- Joined
- May 10, 2009
- Messages
- 36,723
He's scored 5 career goals against us in I'm guessing about 15 games, two of which was against our B team.
I mean, it's a good record but we're not exactly talking Drogba and Rooney Vs Arsenal are we?
He's scored 5 career goals against us in I'm guessing about 15 games, two of which was against our B team.
I mean, it's a good record but we're not exactly talking Drogba and Rooney Vs Arsenal are we?
5 goals in 10 games.He's scored 5 career goals against us in I'm guessing about 15 games, two of which was against our B team.
I mean, it's a good record but we're not exactly talking Drogba and Rooney Vs Arsenal are we?
Well thought out counter argument as usual.
Reece James, Zouma, Jorginho, Kovacic, CHO, Pulisic. Apart from James everyone played regularly.Well thought out counter argument as usual.
Name me the players that started for us that night that start with everyone fit.
James, Jorginho, one of CHO/Pulisic yes.Reece James, Zouma, Jorginho, Kovacic, CHO, Pulisic. Apart from James everyone played regularly.
Then Tammy and Mount came on after which second goal was scored.
Don’t think that deserved any thought out reply, just laughing emoji is enough for usual nonsense.
Goldbridge acknowledged? What a fecked up argumentJames, Jorginho, one of CHO/Pulisic yes.
Zouma will be behind Rudi in a fully fit side, likewise Kova with Kante.
Even Goldbridge acknowledged it was a scratch side from us.
Ever since Tomori won his place against Sheffield United he's played every match. Zouma was dropped when Christensen was available (Vs Wolves, Liverpool and Brighton).Why would Zouma be behind Rudiger and not Tamori? Oh because it doesn’t the point to make here.
.
At least currently he is first choice CB for Chelsea. So much for B team.Ever since Tomori won his place against Sheffield United he's played every match. Zouma was dropped when Christensen was available (Vs Wolves, Liverpool and Brighton).
Think it's safe to say he's higher in the pecking order, atleast currently.
A (currently) excellent striker or a decent winger/average striker.Tammy is a better striker than Rashford but the latter is simply the better player/footballer. Then again Rashford himself isn't a striker so I don't even get the comparison.
Most teams would take Rashford over Tammy
Funny how you're quick to point out that Tammy is currently an exellent striker probably of his current goal output yet you call Rashford an average winger yet his also has currently big numbers playing on the wing.A (currently) excellent striker or a decent winger/average striker.
I don’t think it’s so clear cut.
Hudson-Odoi will probably end up being better than a lot of players, in fairness.Yeah it isn't a like for like comparison.
I'll create a different flavoured uproar saying CHO will turn out to be better player than Rashford.
Why do I need to compare them in a broad sense? If you’re suggesting Rashford is better due to being able to play in multiple positions then I disagree strongly, give me a player that excels in his designated roll over one that can multitask any day.Funny how you're quick to point out that Tammy is currently an exellent striker probably of his current goal output yet you call Rashford an average winger yet his also has currently big numbers playing on the wing.
In case you've forgotten, Rashford is on 8 goals this season already and isn't our CF.
Rashford is simply the better footballer. Tammy being a better striker is actually irrelevant to anything since his comparison with Rashford isn't CF to CF. You've got to compared them in a broad and general sense as footballer and Rashford is the better one.
Shit hair and will be playing League 1 football in a few years.
I stand by what I said. We’ll see if he’s ultimately good enough to be the main man for them competing for major trophies.
One game does not make a striker
Nope, in order to score that tap in you have to evade the defender.Exactly. It's harder to score a penalty than it is to socre a tap-in at the back post. Yet one gets singled out almost as if it's some kind of worthless, 'friendly' goal.
Are you kidding, he's part of the reason we are in the state we are in. Too many people think he's the dogs bo@@*x, including Ole, and he's pretty bang average! Tammy has already scored as many goals in 12 games as Rashford has scored in his best ever season. In the league Rashford has only 5 goals (2 of which are penalties). So comparing goals from play Tammy has 10 in 12 games to Rashford's 3 in 11, it's pretty clear who is the better CF. Even Mason Mount has 4 goals from and Christian Pulisic has 5.Funny how you're quick to point out that Tammy is currently an exellent striker probably of his current goal output yet you call Rashford an average winger yet his also has currently big numbers playing on the wing.
In case you've forgotten, Rashford is on 8 goals this season already and isn't our CF.
Rashford is simply the better footballer. Tammy being a better striker is actually irrelevant to anything since his comparison with Rashford isn't CF to CF. You've got to compared them in a broad and general sense as footballer and Rashford is the better one.
Really?Nope, in order to score that tap in you have to evade the defender.
Rashford's role at Man United seems a lot like Anekla's was for Chelsea. Plenty of games as a centre forward, plenty wide as part of a front 3.People calling Rashford a winger? His an inside forward and they generally score more goals in the modern game than the CF. How often do we see Rashford bomb it down the wing and deliver a ball inside like a “winger”
Dan James is a winger, Rashford is not.
That tends to just be football fans in general.I always forget how obnoxious Chelsea fans can be when they're doing well.
This is exactly correct; at times Anelka and Drogba would play close to each other to form a genuine partnership, at times he'd move wide to get on the ball and make outside to in runs towards goal. Rashford and Martial do much the same even when playing together. At the same time though Anelka did win a golden boot when half playing that role, so arguing that an inside forward is at a huge disadvantage in terms of goalscoring is dubious. More recently, Salah has had huge success in this same type of position.Rashford's role at Man United seems a lot like Anekla's was for Chelsea. Plenty of games as a centre forward, plenty wide as part of a front 3.
He's not a winger insofar as how I understand the term.
Not all team plays the player with same roles. Just watch yesterday's game, Rashford was next to De Gea when Brighton attacked, wingers at ManUtd are not just to attack, under Jose there was many times when it was back 6, even Zabaleta commented on that.This is exactly correct; at times Anelka and Drogba would play close to each other to form a genuine partnership, at times he'd move wide to get on the ball and make outside to in runs towards goal. Rashford and Martial do much the same even when playing together. At the same time though Anelka did win a golden boot when half playing that role, so arguing that an inside forward is at a huge disadvantage in terms of goalscoring is dubious. More recently, Salah has had huge success in this same type of position.
Thought the time was right revive this creative gem.Tammy Abraham, aka, Tammy Shitbraham. Am I right fellas?!
Hahahahahaha.
Feel free to use that one.
Yeah mate I know what you mean. Championship at best.I don't think he's PL material. He's gonna have a rough season.
Rashford’s game is a lot more than goals. His skill set and speed is brilliant at times. I agree his finishing needs work but Ronaldo was hardly profilic around the age of 20/22 either. He started scoring goals at the age of 23 often.Are you kidding, he's part of the reason we are in the state we are in. Too many people think he's the dogs bo@@*x, including Ole, and he's pretty bang average! Tammy has already scored as many goals in 12 games as Rashford has scored in his best ever season. In the league Rashford has only 5 goals (2 of which are penalties). So comparing goals from play Tammy has 10 in 12 games to Rashford's 3 in 11, it's pretty clear who is the better CF. Even Mason Mount has 4 goals from and Christian Pulisic has 5.
People seem so blinkered as to how average Rashford is, just because he came from our academy. We have too many mediocre players who people seem to put on a pedestal and think they are amazing even though when you look closely and check the stats they are nowhere near as good as people think. Rashford is neither a top class CF nor a top class winger.
He’s piss poor isn’t he? Lacks any spark and lacks any real ball control as a back up either
This bloke is horrific, Chelsea should just start with experience up top instead of pandering to academy players. They should play Giroud and Batshuayi
Glad Tammy has shut up his detractors.Plus a season at Swansea and some sporadic England caps.
It's pretty obvious he's not good enough for the Prem but he's a good Championship level striker.
No shame in it, can have a very good career banging goals in for fun and winning promotion.
You can quote them all in one post.Glad Tammy has shut up his detractors.
Yeah you're not wrong.That tends to just be football fans in general.
I was joking. Surely the "Am I right fellas" and "feel free to use that one" was enough to convey that?Thought the time was right revive this creative gem.
It appears you were wrong mate.
He can? Maybe the absolute elite but whos the last out and out winger to score 20-25 goals a season?The modern day winger can score just as many goals as a striker.
Also the only inside forward in that comparison.Don't see the need for comparison Abraham's plays in a much more expansive team and to me is a better striker. Rashford is the better inside forward, as Marcus has proved on the field time and time again he's a dreadful number 9. Southgate / Mourinho even highlighted themselves. I'm fairly confident in Lampard's accreditation as a coach that even Lingard if given game time in that Chelsea team would have a good influence. Look at Jorginho last season compared to now, it's almost as if we are talking about two different individuals.