I think we're nearly on the same page, actually - or at least not that far apart. I don't disagree with any of that - but I haven't said that I expect Law to be a direct threat outside the box, and he will obviously seek to get inside it (the box) to finish, not least with his head (from a Kaltz cross). And Greaves doesn't operate as a sheer box player - as per the description he will move about considerably: What I state is that he's my primary finisher, and that he will focus mainly on the latter - whereas Law to a greater extent will seek to link up (with Charlton and the runners).
For me, though, it would look odd if I were to simply reverse those roles, as you suggest- I don't see that as natural. But point noted - I respect your opinion.
As for the un-dynamic duo, I've pretty much exhausted that topic, I reckon - but, yes, you're quite right: A part of the premise here is that the defence may come under pressure, but that is precisely why I've gone with a three-CB model (and three of the greatest defenders in history to fill those roles).
That said, Motta and Albertini don't become air just because they aren't particularly rapid/dynamic. You can't just run right through them - they're both positionally sound and tactically astute. And they obviously won't be standing around gazing at the sky either - neither of them are lazy.
