And as I've said, you are woefully out of touch with the reality.
You're of course entitled to your belief that "Trans women are literally women", but of course they aren't literally women. Instead they self-identify as female and pursue that desire/belief to varying degrees, none of which can erase their male genetics or (for the most part) their male physiology, or their lived experience - from birth to transition-date - as being seen as the male gender as recorded at their birth.
It is just ideological magical thinking to believe that trans women are literally women, and it's just perceived political correctness to go around saying it. The vast, vast majority of people do not believe that trans women are literally women and no amount of word-twisting will convince them otherwise, though most will not venture public opinions on the subject - especially if they work in the public sector - for fear of being potentially persecuted by ideological fanatics.
Actually, I'm very in touch with reality, what with being LGBQTIA+ and all. I think I have a pretty good handle on what the general mood is within the community.
You, on the other hand, continue with the willful conflation of sex and gender and the misrepresentation of arguments that is so common among your ilk. Instead of actually addressing the other sides arguments, you make up new, ridiculous ones and ascribe them to your opponents, then proceed to attack those instead.
It's come to quite a pass when lesbians, gays and bisexuals - many of whom will have experienced hostility and hatred because of their sexual preferences - are now being branded as a "hate group" because they dare to express concerns or criticism about any aspect of trans-ideology.
It's a symptom of just how absolutist trans-ideology has become.
If this is your preferred direction for society's evolution then count me out.
Yes, my preferred direction for society is one were bigots are branded as such. The LGB Alliance does in no way have the interests of any of those groups at heart, and have more often spoken out against them than they have in favour of them. Their raison d'etre is to deny trans people rights, and if they have to sacrifice the rights of LGB people and women to do so, they're more than happy to.
Anyway, you continue to be the clearest example of Dunning-Kruger on these forums, and any attempt at debating you is pointless, because you have neither the will nor the capability to re-evaluate your views.