g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });
Exactly yeah, massive error on protocol.Apparently from then comments they've retrospectively Hawkeyed it and the decision was correct. However, if they truly can't tell and are 'guessing', as per the tweet, they should be sticking with the on-field decision.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The most egregious part to this is the following week City earned a penalty for this similar incident with the defender even closer to the attacking player. And I recall there was another similar incident within a week or two that also earned the attacking side a penalty with the defender closer to the attacker than Romero was in his incident.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
One of the worse refereeing decisions in football this year.
Arsenal?The most egregious part to this is the following week City earned a penalty for this similar incident with the defender even closer to the attacking player. And I recall there was another similar incident within a week or two that also earned the attacking side a penalty with the defender closer to the attacker than Romero was in his incident.
Think Arsenal got a pen against Spurs?The most egregious part to this is the following week City earned a penalty for this similar incident with the defender even closer to the attacking player. And I recall there was another similar incident within a week or two that also earned the attacking side a penalty with the defender closer to the attacker than Romero was in his incident.
Most surprising part of that video was seeing that Jean Michael Seri scored for Hull.West Brom somehow got awarded a penalty for the ball hitting a Rotherham player in the head outside of the box
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
How???
Wtf?
The worst part is that the only reason he is somewhat close to the ball is becauae he threw himself with arms raised into that position. So the fault is 100% on the defender.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
One of the worse refereeing decisions in football this year.
It's not intentional hand ball and it doesn't meet the guidance for making your body bigger , exactly.The worst part is that the only reason he is somewhat close to the ball is becauae he threw himself with arms raised into that position. So the fault is 100% on the defender.
Nothing can defend that decision.
He goes into the challwnge with his arma raised like a handball keeper. Either intentional or he’s an idiot.It's not intentional hand ball and it doesn't meet the guidance for making your body bigger , exactly.
I really think they should empathise hand ball has to be deliberate and all the rest is just bullshit about on if a movement is "on purpose" gaining an advantage.
It doesnt need to be intentional the arm just needs to be in an un-natural position which it was, clear penalty for any club except us.It's not intentional hand ball and it doesn't meet the guidance for making your body bigger , exactly.
I really think they should empathise hand ball has to be deliberate and all the rest is just bullshit about on if a movement is "on purpose" gaining an advantage.
Clear penalty. Put his arm wide. Didn’t have time to put them back. He knew that.Dermot Gallagher will 100% be declaring that hand ball incorrect.
There’s going to be apologies at the final whistle and a weeks worth of scousers crying in the media talking about it in the build up to matches United aren’t involved in.
That freekick they got from our corner was pure imagination.Where do they get these refs from? He is guessing most of his decisions.
It is Dalot rule. Only for Dalot.Bournemouth goalie carried on at the referee AFTER his yellow.
Where was his second yellow?
It will never again be seen. Unless it’s a United playerIt is Dalot rule. Only for Dalot.
To be honest on replay i'm not even sure it's a foul, but yeah, outside the box and good use of VAR for onceNo way that’s a pen. It’s a free kick outside the area
Christie just ran into him.To be honest on replay i'm not even sure it's a foul, but yeah, outside the box and good use of VAR for once
Agree, he just runs in to him.To be honest on replay i'm not even sure it's a foul, but yeah, outside the box and good use of VAR for once
The referee made three very suspect decisions. The Dalot free kick for having his shirt pulled. AWB for winning the ball. Maguire for existing at a corner.That freekick they got from our corner was pure imagination.
Ita not new, it’s been around for years.What's the rule on the foul continuing into the box? I genuinley have no idea.
Yep. Tbf live it looked like an obvious foul anf VAR can't change the decision once it's established it's outside the box. Because the drunken bozos on trycicles said soChristie just ran into him.
Ehh … not sure we should be the ones complaining today.The referee made three very suspect decisions. The Dalot free kick for having his shirt pulled. AWB for winning the ball. Maguire for existing at a corner.
You can't rule out match fixing / fixed betting when you see decisions that unusual.
I didn't say it was new. I said I didn't understand it!Ita not new, it’s been around for years.
Why?Ehh … not sure we should be the ones complaining today.