I must say, that's impressive reasoning and comprehensive data you have shown there, clearly singling you out as a cut above the rest of those agenda posters.
I have many posts elsewhere - feel free to argue there (or here, upto you). My overall points are:
- Glazer ownership has overall been bad because of debt payments + dividend payments which could've been used to improve the club / squad.
- Transfers have been shit because key execs (Gill and co) + SAF left and took a lot of expertise out of the club.
- Woody and co have stumbled around a bit ("one Neymar a season", Falcao, AdM, DDG contract etc.) and have made some really shit transfers but have gotten a lot better and have learned some tough lessons. Removing them and getting new guys in (either just Woody or Woody + entire top leadership at the club) is not going to solve anything and is only going to set us back. Confusing current club leadership w/ Glazer ownership is, I think a common mistake and anger about these issues needs to be appropriately directed.
- Ole is a decent manager, but we have a sufficiently large sample size to say he can get us ~2 points a game on average with the current squad. If we let him continue to rebuild I think the most we can hope for is a slight improvement on that but we won't contend with Pep / Klopp. However getting us top four reliably while moving the squad in the right direction is an underrated ability and I think Ole is a good coach to have for this season.
And yes, I do believe my opinions are more nuanced than just the people who yell Ole out at every opportunity and run an agenda against the club / manager.