dichinero
New Member
- Joined
- Mar 19, 2013
- Messages
- 7,153
Picking up from the Wayne Rooney threads especially, I am interested in knowing what most people consider to be a 10/10 performance.
I've seen many people/ outlets regard Wayne Rooney's performance against Russia or Wales to be an 8/10. That is fair if we are not considering the highest level of performances that top players currently put in regularly.
Personally, I would usually use the best performances of the top players as a gauge to compare players of a similar experience range. For example. If Modric has put in the best individual midfield performance within the last 2 seasons, that serves as a basis for other midfielders plying their trade in the top leagues with the similar experience levels. I will use Modric to judge Rooney as a midfielder but would hardly be fair to use it on Will Hughes in the Championship even though he has enough experience to be considered a regular player, neither will I use a 10/10 Di Maria performance to judge Lingard, given his relative inexperience despite his age but rather use a 10/10 Dembele performance to judge him.
I just want to know how people view performances because ratings like awesome, great, magnificent etc does not make sense when other players at the top of their game put on performances like this often on a slow day.
Thoughts?
I've seen many people/ outlets regard Wayne Rooney's performance against Russia or Wales to be an 8/10. That is fair if we are not considering the highest level of performances that top players currently put in regularly.
Personally, I would usually use the best performances of the top players as a gauge to compare players of a similar experience range. For example. If Modric has put in the best individual midfield performance within the last 2 seasons, that serves as a basis for other midfielders plying their trade in the top leagues with the similar experience levels. I will use Modric to judge Rooney as a midfielder but would hardly be fair to use it on Will Hughes in the Championship even though he has enough experience to be considered a regular player, neither will I use a 10/10 Di Maria performance to judge Lingard, given his relative inexperience despite his age but rather use a 10/10 Dembele performance to judge him.
I just want to know how people view performances because ratings like awesome, great, magnificent etc does not make sense when other players at the top of their game put on performances like this often on a slow day.
Thoughts?