Because it’s negative.That guy Wheeler seems to be a bit of an opportunist, I don't why people has started to take his words so seriously.
Don't you think he deserves a new and improved contract considering all the good he's done off the pitch?Doesn't need a new contract nor deserve one. He's got 2.5 years left.
I think he had one or two things that proved to be ahead of the curve, so he got a bit of spotlight.That guy Wheeler seems to be a bit of an opportunist, I don't know why people have started to take his words so seriously.
This is the important part for me....for any player at the club.Also, if United are serious then with 3 years on his deal they should be thinking about what happens next with Marcus. They can't keep letting players drift into the last two years of their deals, thinking that things will just resolve themselves.
If he wants to change careers and be a club ambassador I fully support him. He won't get a 250k a week contract though.Don't you think he deserves a new and improved contract considering all the good he's done off the pitch?
The feck is category 2 or 3??This is the important part for me....for any player at the club.
We need to stop 'value retention' contracts (Axel and Bailly recently, countless in the past), need to either commit to a player or sell them - not our current method of running down contracts to their last 2 years before starting negotiations (Pogba and Lingard) and we really need to start suckering other teams into buying our players in the hype instead of being the suckers (Henderson, Axel, Lingard after the loan spell, throw a new contract at Martial after a good 2 months.)
I think Rashford's going to end up in category 2 or 3.
Doesn't need a new contract nor deserve one. He's got 2.5 years left.
Where are you getting this from? Both the article and transfermarkt says he has 18 months left. Transfermarkt says it expires in June 2023.Just the nearly 3 years on his contract then… terrible article
Only if it's for a career shift to working for the United Foundation.Don't you think he deserves a new and improved contract considering all the good he's done off the pitch?
So in other words 2.5 years.Where are you getting this from? Both the article and transfermarkt says he has 18 months left. Transfermarkt says it expires in June 2023.
edit: Man Utd website says the same, but there’s the option to extend for a year.
Regardless, 2.5 years is an appropriate time to start the conversation.Where are you getting this from? Both the article and transfermarkt says he has 18 months left. Transfermarkt says it expires in June 2023.
edit: Man Utd website says the same, but there’s the option to extend for a year.
100%.This is the important part for me....for any player at the club.
We need to stop 'value retention' contracts (Axel and Bailly recently, countless in the past), need to either commit to a player or sell them - not our current method of running down contracts to their last 2 years before starting negotiations (Pogba and Lingard) and we really need to start suckering other teams into buying our players in the hype instead of being the suckers (Henderson, Axel, Lingard after the loan spell, throw a new contract at Martial after a good 2 months.)
I think Rashford's going to end up in category 2 or 3.