The regulator
Judge Wanker.
- Joined
- Feb 7, 2013
- Messages
- 2,326
First of all, I'd like to point out that at Heysel, the authorities had to take the blame for many things:
1) Letting Juventus fans sit right next to the Liverpool fans, who on earth thought this was a good idea
2) Using an old decripted half collapsing stadium
3) Terrible policing.
Why is this not picked up on? Of course, Liverpool fans are to blame for most of it because if they didn't try and climb over to the Juve end there wouldn't have been any problems.
However, I read something that has entirely not been mentioned whatsoever and whenever people mention Heysel nobody says anything:
Which is this:
Why is this acceptable? Why has nobody brought this up against Juventus and why is it hushed up?
1) Letting Juventus fans sit right next to the Liverpool fans, who on earth thought this was a good idea
2) Using an old decripted half collapsing stadium
3) Terrible policing.
Why is this not picked up on? Of course, Liverpool fans are to blame for most of it because if they didn't try and climb over to the Juve end there wouldn't have been any problems.
However, I read something that has entirely not been mentioned whatsoever and whenever people mention Heysel nobody says anything:
Which is this:
In retaliation for the events in section Z, Juventus fans then rioted at their end of the stadium. They advanced down the stadium running track towards the Liverpool supporters, but police intervention stopped the advance. The Juventus fans fought the police with rocks, bottles and missiles for two hours. One Juventus fan was captured on television footage apparently firing a pistol (later verified as being a starting pistol). When the game kicked off, riot police were still fighting a pitched battle with Juventus supporters, and they maintained a presence around the entire pitch for the duration of the game.
Why is this acceptable? Why has nobody brought this up against Juventus and why is it hushed up?