Class of 63
Sourness
He stays 26 or the Cat gets it!
Personally I'd rather put the #7 on our most gifted academy product since the class of 92.the other way around
Best and Giggs wore 11 though - who are usually the standard our academy players held up against.Personally I'd rather put the #7 on our most gifted academy product since the class of 92.
Hasn't worked with ready-made players. Both Beckham and Ronaldo got it fairly young, who are the best players to wear it in my lifetime.11 is a cool number for a left footed academy product. I think 7 would be a lot of pressure though that perhaps he doesn't need just yet. Personally I'd leave him as 26 for now and let him develop. He'll have tough times for sure along the way.
We've had a string of import failures in the #7 since Ronaldo though so I'd look to go homegrown this time, not that I'd mind either way if we have both players.Best and Giggs wore 11 though - who are usually the standard our academy players held up against.
7 is usually the best of our imported talent (Beckham being the exception) - Cantona and Ronaldo.
The wonderkid from London who grew up in Manchester. Wonder where we can find another one of them?Best and Giggs wore 11 though - who are usually the standard our academy players held up against.
7 is usually the best of our imported talent (Beckham being the exception) - Cantona and Ronaldo.
Who's Will Mason?
Unlike most clubs the number 10 at United has often been given to goal scorers rather than playmakers.Me too, for now. Rashford is quickly developing his passing ability and vision though so maybe in the future he will fit #10 more.
But then Bruno already fit wearing Scholes's #18 and we don't have any other playmaker or other player suitable for the number #10.
Best wore 11 a couple of times but he's known for 7 shirt i'm sure.I like the idea of him keeping the #26 shirt and popularizing it, as there something endearing about a youth system player holding on to his first First Team number — like Bayern's lot of Schweinsteiger with 31, Lahm with 21, Alaba with 27 or Müller with 25 — when they could have easily changed to more conventionally important numbers. Though if he wants to change it to something else, a number that's slightly off the beaten track would be ace. #7 already has a great tradition at United and comes with a heavy burden of expectations, #11 is associated with Best and Giggs — neither jersey number is likely to be truly his in terms of imprint, at the most he can inherit them — but #14 is wide open to become his trademark number as he can easily displace Kanchelskis/Chicharito, and was worn by a few wonderful attackers (most prominently Cruyff and Henry) so it's not too out there!
Best wore 11 a couple of times but he's known for 7 shirt i'm sure.
WorldSoccer link.George Best played 470 games for Manchester United. Never did he have to carry the substitute’s number 12. Once – against Sheffield Wednesday in March 1969 – he donned the number 9 shirt. He wore number 10 on 39 occasions and had 8 on his back 43 times. In a total of 141 games, he was number 7, including the 1968 European Cup final win against Benfica, which has served to solidify the perception that it was ‘his’ number. It’s a perception which endures – look at the t-shirt worn by Zinedine Zidane’s son Enzo at his father’s unveiling as Real Madrid manager.
Popular history tells us that it was Best who started the tradition of superstars wearing 7 at United, a lineage taking in Bryan Robson, Eric Cantona, David Beckham, Cristiano Ronaldo and, now, they hope, Memphis Depay. And yet, in 246 of Best’s Manchester United games – more than half – he wore number 11. In his final six seasons with the club, he appeared as number 7 only 32 times and also wore 11 in his time in the NASL. We stand to be corrected, but we remember that, when Ryan Giggs emerged in the early 90s, one of the reasons he was called ‘the new Best’ was because he wore 11 too (but not always).
Would have an argument for the scariest front line in Europe if that happens6 Pogba
7 Sancho
8 Bruno
9 Martial
10 Rashford
11 Mason
Yes, in line with United's tradition, Rashford actually fits it.Unlike most clubs the number 10 at United has often been given to goal scorers rather than playmakers.
Van Nistelrooy, Mark Hughes, Rooney, Denis Law comes to mind.
I remember reading how Beckham felt he suddenly seemed to score a few extra goals wearing the number 10 in his biography.
New player.Who's Will Mason?
I pretty much agree with this. Let him have a full season with the first team before he switches26.
Do not add more pressure. I know it's just a number but let's just go for the safest option, he's still pretty young anyway.
There's no legends to compare to by wearing the number 26.
6 Pogba
7 Sancho
8 Bruno
9 Martial
10 Rashford
11 Mason
I think many kids dream of playing for United without worrying for the shirt number mate Anyway, I also think 26 suits him. It’s not like 43 or anyone of those high numbers.No one dreams of being Manchester United's number 26. That just happens to be the number he was allocated as a young player breaking through. He should be aiming for the no.9
Wasn't he given the 26 at the start of this season? Pretty sure he wore a number in the 50's before that.No one dreams of being Manchester United's number 26. That just happens to be the number he was allocated as a young player breaking through. He should be aiming for the no.9
He’s not a winger though. His destiny is the no 9Made for the 11 shirt.
It sort of plays into the playstyle of the team for years under the 4-4-2 we ran for our era of dominance in the 90's. RVN was truly a #9 and a poacher. Rooney would drop deep and play in the attacking wingers for years and definitely had the playstyle that suited a #10 for us, and with England when he was paired with Owen early on. Only later on was he asked to be our primary goal-scoring threat after RVN left, and even more so after we lost Tevez and Ronaldo, and even then he was paired a lot with Berbatov (who had nowhere near the work-rate to play back) and Chicharito who was a pure-poacher.Yes, in line with United's tradition, Rashford actually fits it.
Other than Law, personally I don't feel it's fitting that strikers wearing it. For me, it's associated with the CAM role, the playmaker. Law is more like a playmaker for me but at that time, Busby decided to stick him rightly at CF for the team to keep things balanced so I'm fine with that.
Yeah, was thrill when that happen, finally a midfielder is getting it but ended up #7 fits Becks better.