Sw33t
Full Member
- Joined
- Nov 8, 2009
- Messages
- 10,766
He's not.yeah...about him not being worth ribery money.....
He's worth more
He's not.yeah...about him not being worth ribery money.....
I haven't got a clue what Ribery's on. But for me, as a player, I'd take Nani everyday.He's not.
He's worth more
The only issue with that is Valencia on the right - obviously Tony V's main strength is getting down the wing and whipping in crosses. If you play the 3 of them behind Rooney, there's not a lot of presence around the penalty spot to actually put the ball in the net.He's miles ahead of almost everyone in our team technically, with Scholes being up there and Kagawa now that he's joined as well. He's just such a brilliant player to watch, and I've said it before but his dribbling in tight spaces is one of the best I've ever seen, certainly up there with how good the likes of Ronaldinho and Iniesta were at getting themselves out of tight spots. Hopefully SAF puts more faith in him this season and makes him an automatic choice when fit, because that really is what he should be. Him on the left, Kagawa through the middle and Valencia on the right is a fantastic trio.
It's time to give him a proper contract! At the moment Nani is our most talented offensive player and based on yesterday's performance he was our biggest threat.I haven't got a clue what Ribery's on. But for me, as a player, I'd take Nani everyday.
However, if Rooney's on £190K a week odd or whatever it is, I dont think its out of order for Nani to ask in the region of £120K, as has been reported.
And drop Rooney?It's time to give him a proper contract! At the moment Nani is our most talented offensive player and based on yesterday's performance he was our biggest threat.
And btw it's time for Rooney to step up and starts to deliver, otherwise our refusal to give Nani his improved contract looks short sided. I can easily see our best front three involve RVP ( if he's coming) and Nani, either together with 7 or Young.
Yes! I know his fitness is not the best but until he steps up and plays better he's not undroppable. Rooney needs a challenge and Kagawa and RVP (if we buy him) can give him that.And drop Rooney?
Jesus.
Lucas plays on the right. If anything, it was Valencia he'd be competing with. That said, neither Valencia nor Nani would feel too threatened by a 19yr old from Brazil.No Lucas means Nani will be mightly relief.
Our wingers are still: Valencia, Nani and Young. In that order. Young might well be a "backup" to Kagawa as well. So, Valencia as right winger and Nani as left winger.
Fergie obviously does. What with buying him and picking him. You may have written Young off after his debut season but I'd imagine Fergie will be more patient.He and Val are the only players that can beat players.
Which is a shame. We really cannot afford to lose him.
Would love to know whether Fergie plans to use Val as a RB more often. He looked great there yesterday. Him and Nani on the same side is .
If he does then another winger would suddenly make much more sense, as I just don't see Young as first team material.
You're such an idiot.Nani is talented, we all know that. So why does he blow hot and cold? I would like to see a lot more consistency from him.
I know he wasn't. He's still an idiot. It's a myth at this stage, and anyone else who shares that opinion is an idiot too.I don't think Plan M was especially referring to yesterday's game where he was indeed very good. The fact that he mentions consistency points to an overall appreciation of the player; I agree, I really like Nani and in terms of raw talent he's probably the best player in the squad at the moment, but the fact he hasn't yet achieved that "untouchable" status CR had in his last seasons for us is not a coincidence. He has flashes of brilliance (more often than not, luckily), but he can also be an incredibly frustrating player by being too selfish or by being unable to make the right decision. He's going to be 26 now, has bags of experience at top level and next season could be decisive for him.
In what way decisive?I don't think Plan M was especially referring to yesterday's game where he was indeed very good. The fact that he mentions consistency points to an overall appreciation of the player; I agree, I really like Nani and in terms of raw talent he's probably the best player in the squad at the moment, but the fact he hasn't yet achieved that "untouchable" status CR had in his last seasons for us is not a coincidence. He has flashes of brilliance (more often than not, luckily), but he can also be an incredibly frustrating player by being too selfish or by being unable to make the right decision. He's going to be 26 now, has bags of experience at top level and next season could be decisive for him.
You realize he practically HAD that in 10/11, and he would've had it if it wasn't for the injury.Well his stats (goals and assists) are good, but I really feel that he has the potential to do even better. I believe he has the potential to be as good as CR.
So "decisive" in the sense that he is consistently good for us, and not have incredibly frustrating games like he does. If you believe that, at the moment, he is consistently good, then I think your love for the player is maybe blinding you somewhat.
It's not something that's quantifiable I suppose, I'm not saying "unless he has 20 goals and as many assists by the end of the season he's a failure", it's an overall appreciation. If he has a season where he consistently produces performances like last night, then I'd be more than satisfied, and I think that it would reflect very strongly on the team's overall performances. At the moment, I don't really think he's quite there.
He's already much better than most of our squad. All I'm saying is that he can probably be even better.
EDIT: agree with the point about the Euros, also thought he did very well with Portugal.
I agree actually. I think if he go 4-3-3 with Kagawa behind Rooney and Nani and Valencia either side we can be a match for any team in Europe. I've always thought Nani was at his absolute best in that system, we saw that for Portugal this Summer (albeit with a lack of goals).If we miss out on RVP (fingers crossed) then I think we'll adopt more of a 433. That's when Nani can be Nani IMO.
I agree with your main point but that isn't true. I think he's delivery can be wildly inconsistant and he can be an incredibly frustrating player when he has one of those runs where he seems to always pick the wrong option. I think it's the frustrating things he does which points people towards the "inconsistant" tag.You realize he practically HAD that in 10/11, and he would've had it if it wasn't for the injury.
There's nothing inconsistent about him, and yes, he can become even more consistent, but that doesn't mean he isn't already a consistently top player.
He's only seen as inconsistent because he tries things no other player will do. It's sort of the opposite to Valencia, who will always look to just find a yard of space and ping a good cross in. Nani on the other hand will look for a perfect cross, or take a shot, or try beat 2 or 3 defenders at once, and that's never going to come off as often.I agree with your main point but that isn't true. I think he's delivery can be wildly inconsistant and he can be an incredibly frustrating player when he has one of those runs where he seems to always pick the wrong option. I think it's the frustrating things he does which points people towards the "inconsistant" tag.
That said, you always feel that even if he's not having a great game he can win the game for you with a goal/assist. Which is a special quality in a player. In fact, there's only Rooney and Nani in our squad I would say that about.
EDIT: It's probably because he's not afraid. When he's having a poor game he still always shows for the ball and still tries to beat his man etc. Unlike other players (Young being a good example) whereby when they have poor games they shy away and keep it simple.
Whether or not we sign Van Persie, Fergie will still play two strikers in a lot of games. Welbeck was excellent last season, had a strong Euros and has been one of our best players in pre-season. He's only going to get better. He'll be playing a lot of football for us next season.I can see a fecking massive season from Nani..... if we don't sign Van Persie.
Van Persie will mean more of a 4411 with Nani in a more traditional wing role which requires more work going backwards. Even though Nani doesn't shirk his defensive responsibilities he's not as reliable going backwards as Valencia and Young which is why I think he was overlooked a lot last season.
If we miss out on RVP (fingers crossed) then I think we'll adopt more of a 433. That's when Nani can be Nani IMO.
If Kagawa wasn't bought I would've though the same thing, but with him here I don't see Welbeck playing as many games. I assume he's rotate between the 3 more with Hernandez being a bit of a 'super sub'.Whether or not we sign Van Persie, Fergie will still play two strikers in a lot of games. Welbeck was excellent last season, had a strong Euros and has been one of our best players in pre-season. He's only going to get better. He'll be playing a lot of football for us next season.
Like I said, I don't disagree with you. Just trying to explain where this inconsistant tag comes from.He's only seen as inconsistent because he tries things no other player will do. It's sort of the opposite to Valencia, who will always look to just find a yard of space and ping a good cross in. Nani on the other hand will look for a perfect cross, or take a shot, or try beat 2 or 3 defenders at once, and that's never going to come off as often.
Put it this way, if we took that 'frustrating' aspect in his game, i.e. not taking shots, not trying to beat players, would he still be the player he is?
His overall goals/assists stats are brilliant for the last 2 seasons. Going by your reasoning, Ronaldo would be an inconsistent player too, wouldn't he?
I know he will. But last season he seemed to start almost every game. He won't have that kind of role for us this season.Whether or not we sign Van Persie, Fergie will still play two strikers in a lot of games. Welbeck was excellent last season, had a strong Euros and has been one of our best players in pre-season. He's only going to get better. He'll be playing a lot of football for us next season.
I agree with that, overall. Maybe I'm a bit too harsh, but impossible to deny that he does have an incredibly frustrating side to him.I agree with your main point but that isn't true. I think he's delivery can be wildly inconsistant and he can be an incredibly frustrating player when he has one of those runs where he seems to always pick the wrong option. I think it's the frustrating things he does which points people towards the "inconsistant" tag.
That said, you always feel that even if he's not having a great game he can win the game for you with a goal/assist. Which is a special quality in a player. In fact, there's only Rooney and Nani in our squad I would say that about.
EDIT: It's probably because he's not afraid. When he's having a poor game he still always shows for the ball and still tries to beat his man etc. Unlike other players (Young being a good example) whereby when they have poor games they shy away and keep it simple.
He could still have that aspect to him and just be better at shots and crosses. There are games where he can, for 90 minutes, just miss anything complicated he tries. If it comes off, it's spectacular, if he misses, then it's frustrating because there might have been a more evident option to choose.He's only seen as inconsistent because he tries things no other player will do. It's sort of the opposite to Valencia, who will always look to just find a yard of space and ping a good cross in. Nani on the other hand will look for a perfect cross, or take a shot, or try beat 2 or 3 defenders at once, and that's never going to come off as often.
Put it this way, if we took that 'frustrating' aspect in his game, i.e. not taking shots, not trying to beat players, would he still be the player he is?
Surely his goals/assists stats are nowhere near as good as those Ronaldo had during his last two seasons with us, are they?His overall goals/assists stats are brilliant for the last 2 seasons. Going by your reasoning, Ronaldo would be an inconsistent player too, wouldn't he?