g = window.googletag || {}; googletag.cmd = googletag.cmd || []; window.googletag = googletag; googletag.cmd.push(function() { var interstitialSlot = googletag.defineOutOfPageSlot('/17085479/redcafe_gam_interstitial', googletag.enums.OutOfPageFormat.INTERSTITIAL); if (interstitialSlot) { interstitialSlot.addService(googletag.pubads()); } });

FIFA ban Barcelona from signing any players for next 2 transfer windows for breaches relating

Plugsy

New Member
Joined
Sep 18, 2013
Messages
6,584
Didn't Chelsea have similar once that they appealed against?
 

Mad Winger

New Member
Joined
Apr 14, 2011
Messages
4,138
Location
#ShinjiIsFree
But now they have to hold on to their players as well! I was confident we were gonna get Messi and Iniesta this summer:(
 

Joemo

whistling in the wind
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
8,342
I bet Rossell is happy he's jumped ship already.
 

Joemo

whistling in the wind
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
8,342
Didn't Chelsea have similar once that they appealed against?
BBC 2010:
Chelsea have had their transfer ban lifted after reaching an agreement with Lens over the signing of Gael Kakuta.

The Blues were barred in September from signing new players until 2011 after being found guilty of inducing Kakuta, 18, to break his contract with Lens.

But the two clubs and the teenager have now accepted the player's contract with the French side was not valid.

However, Chelsea will still give Lens £113,000 in compensation towards the costs of developing the player.
I should imagine this is what Barca will do. They'll find a way of deeming that the contracts of the two young players weren't valid, and they might lose a few hundred thousand euro's along the way.
 

Blasphemy

New Member
Joined
Jan 21, 2014
Messages
2,004
So it looks like Barca will get off scot-free... again
Every big club United included are always breaking the rules of transfers (tapping up etc..) and nothing ever happens about it. Get off your high horse.
 

NoLogo

Full Member
Joined
Jun 15, 2009
Messages
19,913
Location
I can't remember why I joined this war.
He's a journalist. Why wait until he types it up on a news site before discussing it?
Well strictly speaking Balague is a sports journalist as well. Not like they never come out with statements that are just rumors or completely made up. I just think Twitter should never be used as a source for anything but that's probably due to my personal hate for the site.
 

Samid

He's no Bilal Ilyas Jhandir
Joined
Dec 12, 2012
Messages
49,727
Location
Oslo, Norway
Does this mean we can let De Gea go to the World Cup without having to worry about some of their players putting a Barca shirt on him?
 

malappapper

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
3,287
Location
London, England
I should imagine this is what Barca will do. They'll find a way of deeming that the contracts of the two young players weren't valid, and they might lose a few hundred thousand euro's along the way.
You are spoiling all the fun for Barca-haters now.

In other news, no way on earth this will stand. FIFA trying to act strict, usual politics.
 

The Man Himself

asked for a tagline change and all I got was this.
Joined
Feb 12, 2013
Messages
22,406
I should imagine this is what Barca will do. They'll find a way of deeming that the contracts of the two young players weren't valid, and they might lose a few hundred thousand euro's along the way.
They are more than a club. A swindling institution. They will surely know how to settle it.
 

NotoriousISSY

$10mil and I fecked it up!
Joined
Mar 20, 2012
Messages
16,302
Location
up north
Didn't Chelsea have a similar sanction overturned a short while ago?

I don't see it being carried through after an appeal. If it is genuine wrongdoing I hope they do get punished but I imagine they'll get out of it.
 

Member 39557

Guest
I assumed this was about Neymar. I imagine they'll find a way out of it, but seeing as this season is almost over, it could harm their transfer dealings this summer if the appeal process drags out.
 

Joemo

whistling in the wind
Joined
Feb 27, 2012
Messages
8,342
You are spoiling all the fun for Barca-haters now.
I'm not a Barca hater, but I'd love to see them handed a transfer ban after their antics during the Fabregas saga when he left Arsenal. But the reality is that any major club will know the repercussions of their actions but also the measures needed to make sure that there aren't any meaningful sanctions against them.
 

Señor

Humongous twit who can't read
Joined
Jan 5, 2014
Messages
8,721
Every big club United included are always breaking the rules of transfers (tapping up etc..) and nothing ever happens about it. Get off your high horse.
Give me a break. Real and Barca are much worse than your average big club. The Neymar transfer alone deserves punishment but as far as I'm aware, nothing's been done by FIFA.
 

FCBarca

Mes que un Rag
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
14,246
Location
La Côte, Suisse
Supports
Peace
Not an April Fool, FIFA has it on their website as well

As it should. Preposterous decision.
It really is, it's not as if these youth players were poached or put into some juvenile work camps - they joined Barcelona's academy which beyond football included schooling. This initial complaint to FIFA was brought forward by an unnamed club, one guess which one that was.

No idea what the implications are as the wording of the transfer ban isn't clear about whether it relates to U18 transfers into the academy or senior players over the age of 18. Can't imagine the latter being true but we'll see how it ends up as I imagine there is an appeals process

In the shorter term, more concerned about what this means for several gems in the cantera, not the least of which is Lee Seung Woo which most of this centers around. It was announced in the local papers that he had an agreement to stay at the club and wait until he's 18 (Jan 2016) before he can play an official match with any of the youth teams - turning down more lucrative offers to go to Chelsea, Liverpool etc.
 

malappapper

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
3,287
Location
London, England
I'm not a Barca hater, but I'd love to see them handed a transfer ban after their antics during the Fabregas saga when he left Arsenal. But the reality is that any major club will know the repercussions of their actions but also the measures needed to make sure that there aren't any meaningful sanctions against them.
It is one thing to dislike a club and its conduct, and it quite another imposing transfer bans because of the signing of children in the youth teams. Totally different things, and disproportionate reaction from FIFA if it goes through, which I am certain it will not.
 

malappapper

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
3,287
Location
London, England
Not an April Fool, FIFA has it on their website as well



It really is, it's not as if these youth players were poached or put into some juvenile work camps - they joined Barcelona's academy which beyond football included schooling. This initial complaint to FIFA was brought forward by an unnamed club, one guess which one that was.

No idea what the implications are as the wording of the transfer ban isn't clear about whether it relates to U18 transfers into the academy or senior players over the age of 18. Can't imagine the latter being true but we'll see how it ends up as I imagine there is an appeals process

In the shorter term, more concerned about what this means for several gems in the cantera, not the least of which is Lee Seung Woo which most of this centers around. It was announced in the local papers that he had an agreement to stay at the club and wait until he's 18 (Jan 2016) before he can play an official match with any of the youth teams - turning down more lucrative offers to go to Chelsea, Liverpool etc.
The punishment clearly relates to the signing of players under the age of 18. Now, from what I understand, the transfer ban relates to all players, so if it goes through, then we cannot sign a single player this summer or in January. But I am 99% certain that this will be appealed against successfully. But with lots of legal shenanigans along the way.
 

coolredwine

lameredboots
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
17,065
Location
Je m'en fous!
It really is, it's not as if these youth players were poached or put into some juvenile work camps - they joined Barcelona's academy which beyond football included schooling. This initial complaint to FIFA was brought forward by an unnamed club, one guess which one that was.

No idea what the implications are as the wording of the transfer ban isn't clear about whether it relates to U18 transfers into the academy or senior players over the age of 18. Can't imagine the latter being true but we'll see how it ends up as I imagine there is an appeals process

In the shorter term, more concerned about what this means for several gems in the cantera, not the least of which is Lee Seung Woo which most of this centers around. It was announced in the local papers that he had an agreement to stay at the club and wait until he's 18 (Jan 2016) before he can play an official match with any of the youth teams - turning down more lucrative offers to go to Chelsea, Liverpool etc.
:lol:
 

Shamwow

listens to shit music & watches Mrs Brown's Boys
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
13,969
Location
Spiderpig
The punishment clearly relates to the signing of players under the age of 18. Now, from what I understand, the transfer ban relates to all players, so if it goes through, then we cannot sign a single player this summer or in January. But I am 99% certain that this will be appealed against successfully. But with lots of legal shenanigans along the way.
What makes you so certain it will be successfully appealed?
 

malappapper

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
3,287
Location
London, England
They'll appeal & while it's a legal wrangle - they'll still go ahead and sign players. Or doesn't an appeal work that way?
I am sorry to break several bubbles on these thread, but when was the last time such a decision stood against a major and prestigious European club such as FC Barcelona? No chance it will stand, it's just the usual politics surrounding football. Some teams will have to receive some sort of compensation and it will quickly revert to normality.
 

thegregster

Harbinger of new information
Joined
Nov 4, 2009
Messages
13,616
They should be banned from transfers after the Neymar affair anyway.
 

malappapper

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
3,287
Location
London, England
Even if it isn't, it's extremely wild to just pass off the judgement as "preposterous decision" and be convinced by that.
When was the last time a major club received such a punishment for such a type of offence, of which I am sure there are myriads throughout the world of football.
 

FCBarca

Mes que un Rag
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
14,246
Location
La Côte, Suisse
Supports
Peace
What makes you so certain it will be successfully appealed?
It's such an unusual case to begin with as Article 19 is rarely imposed unless there has been a complaint by a specific body/club. The exception to the rule of signing U18 players is the following:

  1. The player’s parents move to the club’s country for non-football related purposes.
  2. The transfer occurs within the territory of the European Union or the European Economic Area and the player being within 16 to 18 years of age.
  3. The players lives 50km from a border shared by the club’s country, with the club being within 50km of that same border.
In LSW's case, it was the Korean FA that actually approached the club to consider him for their academy and was the argument made by the club in terms of an exception...to no avail apparently

Club is already preparing an appeal and will make a statement this afternoon concerning the FIFA ban. Chelsea's ban was actually shady yet they successfully appealed it, I expect no less
 

coolredwine

lameredboots
Joined
Aug 11, 2011
Messages
17,065
Location
Je m'en fous!
When was the last time a major club received such a punishment for such a type of offence, of which I am sure there are myriads throughout the world of football.
Chelsea. However, the complainants received a compensation and withdrew the case, which is not the case with Barcelona as stated by FCBarca.
 

Shamwow

listens to shit music & watches Mrs Brown's Boys
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
13,969
Location
Spiderpig
When was the last time a major club received such a punishment for such a type of offence, of which I am sure there are myriads throughout the world of football.
The fact they've sanctioned the Spanish FA as well suggests it might be more serious than you assume.

It's also different from the Chelsea case, which was in relation to a transfer within the EU. This sounds like it's regarding players from outside the EU, in addition it's in relation to ten transfers not just one.

On the other hand FIFA's instruction to Barca to “to regularize the situation of all minor players concerned.” suggests that this is their way out of the situation. Regularise probably means "pay off the effected clubs".

I won't be at all surprised if it's overturned but FIFA will be even more of a laughing stock if it is so I'll be interested to see how this plays out.
 

rimaldo

All about the essence
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
41,129
Supports
arse
i wonder how many times we'll go in for fabregas this summer knowing they aren't allowed to sell any players.
 

malappapper

New Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2012
Messages
3,287
Location
London, England
It's such an unusual case to begin with as Article 19 is rarely imposed unless there has been a complaint by a specific body/club. The exception to the rule of signing U18 players is the following:

  1. The player’s parents move to the club’s country for non-football related purposes.
  2. The transfer occurs within the territory of the European Union or the European Economic Area and the player being within 16 to 18 years of age.
  3. The players lives 50km from a border shared by the club’s country, with the club being within 50km of that same border.
In LSW's case, it was the Korean FA that actually approached the club to consider him for their academy and was the argument made by the club in terms of an exception...to no avail apparently

Club is already preparing an appeal and will make a statement this afternoon concerning the FIFA ban. Chelsea's ban was actually shady yet they successfully appealed it, I expect no less
It is such a minor issue, and the punishment of such gravity that it really smacks of some very low-level politics. The possibility that a major club will receive such a penalty for something so minor is virtually zero. It's ridiculous they even went on with this.
 

FCBarca

Mes que un Rag
Joined
Oct 19, 2010
Messages
14,246
Location
La Côte, Suisse
Supports
Peace
Sounds like the protection of European kids listed as an exception to art. 19 was really an opportunity for English clubs to poach as they please. Its a preposterous ban