Member 5225
Guest
How are you deciding all this?Indeed, that wasn't good either. As with SAF though, Pep really isn't on Mou's level in terms of toxic behavior.
How are you deciding all this?Indeed, that wasn't good either. As with SAF though, Pep really isn't on Mou's level in terms of toxic behavior.
Who cares? You're not going to marry him! He's a winner! That's all that counts in a manager.Must have missed SAF's years of eye gouging other managers and bullying our own doctors....
SAF wasn't perfect but Mourinho is much, much worse. Something Sir Bobby rightly pointed out.
I certainly don't remember SAF bullying our doctors to the extent that a constructive dismissal case was filed against us, no.What?
Didn't Fergie fall out with the club doctor due to Rooneys injury in 2006?
But we'd forget that. How about the Bayern medical staff leaving last year? Did you forget that too?
my you are slightly weird.I certainly don't remember SAF bullying our doctors to the extent that a constructive dismissal case was filed against us, no.
I hadn't forgotten Pep, nor did I say he was a bastion of virtue. That was one incident though, whereas Mourinho's career is littered with them.
Different really. Guardiola was angry because all of his players kept getting injured and it was all done in the heat of the moment.You mean exactly what Guardiola did at Bayern?
Luis Suarez would help us win plenty too, would you like us to sign him? The principle is the same. If someone's behavior is poor enough to damage the club then the club should certainly think twice before hiring them, no matter how good they are at their job.Who cares? You're not going to marry him! He's a winner! That's all that counts in a manager.
I honestly don't give a shit about toxic behaviour if he gets United back to the top.Indeed, that wasn't good either. As with SAF though, Pep really isn't on Mou's level in terms of toxic behavior.
What?! YES we'd be nuts not to sign Suarez if available.Luis Suarez would help us win plenty too, would you like us to sign him? The principle is the same. If someone's behavior is poor enough to damage the club then the club should certainly think twice before hiring them, no matter how good they are at their job.
You wouldn't want Suarez at United?Luis Suarez would help us win plenty too, would you like us to sign him? The principle is the same. If someone's behavior is poor enough to damage the club then the club should certainly think twice before hiring them, no matter how good they are at their job.
Yeah it would be great to get Suarez. Or any world class player.Luis Suarez would help us win plenty too, would you like us to sign him? The principle is the same. If someone's behavior is poor enough to damage the club then the club should certainly think twice before hiring them, no matter how good they are at their job.
Even after the biting, the cheating, playing for our biggest rivals and (most importantly) racially abusing a United legend, you would still be happy to see Suarez wear a United shirt? You're way, way weirder than I am.What?! YES we'd be nuts not to sign Suarez if available.
Are you like anti-capitalist and work with people that always meditate during their lunch break?!
You seem to like in a parallel universe!
Do you want our club to win? Or are you the type of person that loves to compete and 'it's the taking part that matters'?Even after the biting, the cheating, playing for our biggest rivals and (most importantly) racially abusing a United legend, you would still be happy to see Suarez wear a United shirt? You're way, way weirder than I am.
ps. Where do you stand on Giggs btw? Just curious (you know with his filthy attitute re: his brother etc)?Even after the biting, the cheating, playing for our biggest rivals and (most importantly) racially abusing a United legend, you would still be happy to see Suarez wear a United shirt? You're way, way weirder than I am.
Of course not! Have I wandered into a parallel world where we've forgotten how odious Suarez is? Not only did he racially abuse someone, the guy he abused was a United captain and legend!You wouldn't want Suarez at United?
You're not seriously comparing what Giggs did to racially abusing someone and biting 3 other people? You just forgot the white text, right?ps. Where do you stand on Giggs btw? Just curious (you know with his filthy attitute re: his brother etc)?
err no, Suarez still protests his innocence tbf and says it was lost in translation/culture.You're not seriously comparing what Giggs did to racially abusing someone and biting 3 other people? You just forgot the white text, right?
Obviously I want us to win. I do think some principles are more important than winning at all costs though. Presumably Sir Bobby felt the same way when he made his comments about Mourinho?Do you want our club to win? Or are you the type of person that loves to compete and 'it's the taking part that matters'?
Giggs would be an awful appointment, I'd take Mou over him every time. That doesn't even have anything to do with Giggs' behavior, I'd be against him for football reasons alone.ps. Where do you stand on Giggs btw? Just curious (you know with his filthy attitute re: his brother etc)?
Thanks for putting you other comments into perspective.err no, Suarez still protests his innocence tbf and says it was lost in translation/culture.
Giggs put out some super-injunction thing and basically smirks at it.
Once again, you've decided which crime is greater have you?
I wouldn't want him at United because one of his scummy acts was against us. But Barca had no problem with taking him on. Do Barca lack class? Have they been damaged by taking him on?Even after the biting, the cheating, playing for our biggest rivals and (most importantly) racially abusing a United legend, you would still be happy to see Suarez wear a United shirt? You're way, way weirder than I am.
Not really. I'm just making a point as an example.Thanks for putting you other comments into perspective.
Giggs is a matter between his family while Suarez was racist to one of our players, its differenterr no, Suarez still protests his innocence tbf and says it was lost in translation/culture.
Giggs put out some super-injunction thing and basically smirks at it.
Once again, you've decided which crime is greater have you?
I think this sums it up perfectly to be honest. Far more articulate than I.I wouldn't want him at United because one of his scummy acts was against us. But Barca had no problem with taking him on. Do Barca lack class? Have they been damaged by taking him on?
I don't think Jose antics have damaged any club he has been at because football is a pretty classless sport to be honest.
This. Absolutely 100% this.Of course not! Have I wandered into a parallel world where we've forgotten how odious Suarez is? Not only did he racially abuse someone, the guy he abused was a United captain and legend!
suarez is a cnut but he seems to have matured at barca.Of course not! Have I wandered into a parallel world where we've forgotten how odious Suarez is? Not only did he racially abuse someone, the guy he abused was a United captain and legend!
Like you said, it wasn't a Barca player he racially abused. The notion of any United fan accepting Suarez here makes my head hurt.I wouldn't want him at United because one of his scummy acts was against us. But Barca had no problem with taking him on. Do Barca lack class? Have they been damaged by taking him on?
I don't think Jose antics have damaged any club he has been at because football is a pretty classless sport to be honest.
No, to both questions, but he was on his absolute final warning and Barca offered him a move away from the Premiership and Barca play the style of football he revels playing in. If he had moved to another Premier League club or to an Italian club he would still be getting stick now and I doubt he would have settled well and probably reoffended. Barca was the perfect outlet for him.I wouldn't want him at United because one of his scummy acts was against us. But Barca had no problem with taking him on. Do Barca lack class? Have they been damaged by taking him on?
Our board tooJudging by some comments in this thread, we seem to have some of the most self-righteous fans in the world.
Suarez defiantly no. But Mourinhio is no where near as bad as Suarez. Defiantly would like him here.And now I read people want Suarez for United. feck off.
I don't want any of them here, but at least Mourinho has no bad blood with United from before as he seem to like this club so in that way there's no problem.Suarez defiantly no. But Mourinhio is no where near as bad as Suarez. Defiantly would like him here.
It will be too late then. It is very hard to reverse a downward spiral, as Liverpool has discovered.Our board too
They will all probably change their tune when it becomes 5,6,7 years without a trophy
Because Real and Chelsea are the most stable clubs in the world. If you haven't noticed, they tend to discard their managers rather quickly.Like you said, it wasn't a Barca player he racially abused. The notion of any United fan accepting Suarez here makes my head hurt.
If Suarez bites or racially abuses someone while playing for Barca though then it does damage their reputation. How can it not? Even more so if they defend him in the way Liverpool did.
As for Mourinho's behaviour not damaging the clubs he worked for, Chelsea are being sued by one of their employees because of Mourinho's actions aren't they? Plus his toxic approach is a large part of why he burned through Real and Chelsea. It's had a direct impact on the fortunes of the teams he's worked for.
Hope this is true.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date