dsch
Full Member
- Joined
- May 24, 2009
- Messages
- 1,770
Changed vote to yes, because it can't get worse.
I wanted him and still do but in a way it'll piss me off a bit if we do hire him now. We'd have thrown away the Stoke, Chelsea, Newcastle, Southampton games and the January window delaying.If we had gotten him in a month ago we could still be in the title hunt.
There's still time to make top 4 and challenge for the other two trophies if we appoint him now.
Basically this seems destined to happenE.Woodward should be on the phone to Jose telling him that we want him to commit right now and come in on Monday.
My fear is that we will miss out on Mourinho and then end up with a sub standard manager who will waste another season.
And with ever season we fail to win anything, the more difficult it is to get back to winning ways.
I agree, but at the same time, better late than never.I wanted him and still do but in a way it'll piss me off a bit if we do hire him now. We'd have thrown away the Stoke, Chelsea, Newcastle, Southampton games and the January window delaying.
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-under-david-moyes-cost-club-50m-9381431.htmlManchester United have revealed that the full cost of the brief David Moyes term was £50million, as they prepare to hand Louis van Gaal a three-year deal to resurrect the team.
This. Especially the part about assessing the swuad ready for the summer window.Honestly, I just can't figure out what exactly we're waiting for. At this rate, we might miss out on the Champions League. Last time that happened, the club lost about £50 million+ in revenues, so why not make a change now when terminating his contract will mean £10 million residual wages tops? Doesn't that make a bit of business sense, apart from the obvious sporting benefit:
http://www.independent.co.uk/sport/...-under-david-moyes-cost-club-50m-9381431.html
That lost revenue bit is just the tip of the iceberg. Delve a little deeper, and will an elite manager/ replacement want to take charge of a team that isn't playing in the Champions League? Plus, will the top, top players want to join the club when we might be missing out on the Premier European club competition for the second time in three seasons? To be fair, Di María transferred to a United team that was out of Europe altogether, but that season under Moyes was perceived to be a blip and he was essentially being forced out of Madrid. Not qualifying for the Champions League will hurt us a lot, on multiple fronts. Appoint José now, he might create a siege mentality, and that change in mood might uplift the players. Even if we fail to qualify for the Champions League, at the very least he'll have sufficient time to assess the squad first hand, and maybe we will end the season on a positive note - building momentum for 2016/ 2017. Because as things stand we might regress further and end the season with a whimper, which is what happened last season too. It's pretty evident that there won't be progression under the current manager. A couple decent results (point wise) amid an abject couple of months doesn't half fill you with confidence.
Which one of the two are you talking about here?Un-fecking-believable how we've not gotten him yet.
From a footballing perspective, business perspective, brand, players, etc....LVG is utterly destroying our club.
And arrogant, stubborn and basically an idiot, on top!
the serial-loser.Which one of the two are you talking about here?
You'll have to narrow that down a bit more.the serial-loser.
er not really!You'll have to narrow that down a bit more.
So did Real and Chelsea both sack him for being too good?er not really!
don't let your opinions blind the facts mate.
Maybe same reason Bayern and Barca sacked LVG?So did Real and Chelsea both sack him for being too good?
Probably. I'm not the one arguing one is better than the other though.Maybe same reason Bayern and Barca sacked LVG?
Well tbh I don't hold the goings-on at the likes of R.Madrid and Chelski a 'normal' football club (players have more power than the manager in most cases, some crazy dictatorship, etc) as a serious indicator. If anything he's worked in the most testing of footballing environments tbh.Probably. I'm not the one arguing one is better than the other though.
The idea that the answer to a dressing room that has seemingly given up due to a run of bad defeats and negative performances, is one of the most negative managers in world football who just lost a dressing room (and staff) and turned the safest job in world football into a P45 in the space of 3 months is baffling to me.
And he's said it time and time again (even this season) how he wants his next job to be his 'long term' job. He's literally said he wants to 'settle at a club'.This is the job he wanted, no matter what has been recorded before. Let him have it, he's young enough and arrogant enough to want to prove to Ferguson that someone else can have success at this club. And to be honest, Ferguson would be the first to run to him and hug him. Because?...Fergie has already said he's a brilliant manger.
Woody...give him the bloody job for goodness sake. No matter the fans are divided..they were with LVG to be honest..and certainly with Moyes. Even Pep has his detractors...but this guy really really wanted this job and I say give it to him and lets see.And he's said it time and time again (even this season) how he wants his next job to be his 'long term' job. He's literally said he wants to 'settle at a club'.
Getting replaced at Madrid is no big deal. Didn't Del Bosque get sacked after winning the CL ? Perez and his posse are completely mentalists.Ancelotti got sacked by Real Madrid and Chelsea. Lots of good managers have. So what's your point?
And again with this Mourinho is negative nonsense.
yep agreed, you know, like:Would you all really be happy to put up with his awful behavior if he was our manager? We hear so much about the "United way" that's largely bullshit but surely expecting a basic level of dignity from our manager is a reasonable principle for the club to stick by? Or are results simply more important?
er the stats mainlyHow is that myth debunking?
Must have missed SAF's years of eye gouging other managers and bullying our own doctors....yep agreed, you know, like:
This seige mentality was lapped up wasn't it?
Ah all hail to the judge of all crimes. You know which one is worse then do you?Must have missed SAF's years of eye gouging other managers and bullying our own doctors....
SAF wasn't perfect but Mourinho is much, much worse. Something Sir Bobby rightly pointed out.
You mean exactly what Guardiola did at Bayern?Must have missed SAF's years of eye gouging other managers and bullying our own doctors....
SAF wasn't perfect but Mourinho is much, much worse. Something Sir Bobby rightly pointed out.
What?Must have missed SAF's years of eye gouging other managers and bullying our own doctors....
SAF wasn't perfect but Mourinho is much, much worse. Something Sir Bobby rightly pointed out.
Indeed, that wasn't good either. As with SAF though, Pep really isn't on Mou's level in terms of toxic behavior.You mean exactly what Guardiola did at Bayern?
yep agreed, you know, like:
This seige mentality was lapped up wasn't it?