Mourinho's real task at Utd - An overpaid, over-hyped squad that needs fixing

Loublaze

ATLien
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
16,593
Are you suggesting that Shaw is currently the best full-back at Manchester United...?
Why are you answering a question with a question? Who are they? Valencia has been in much better form i'll say that, but they're on similar wages
 

TheSweeper

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
765
No one overhyped this squad last season; if anyone caused the hype it was Jose's signings. Bit weird to call the whole squad this.

Are we supposed to underhype martial- Rashford - shaw - de gea - bailly - TFM - P0gba - Lingard etc etc

These are young players and this manager of ours simply hasn't had much of a track record of getting the best out of them anywhere.

Relax your self. Jose will do decent but he isn't the second coming of SAF & he is simply not all that 'special'.
 

TheSweeper

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
765
Why are you answering a question with a question? Who are they? Valencia has been in much better form i'll say that
Well Valencia is doing better because he suits the game play directed to the new sergeant at United - Ibrahimovic.

Shaw is a defensive fullback much like TFM would be if he played there. Shaw is the best fullback at United but we do not currently play in a system that requires that.

We want attacking fullbacks that are more advanced than the wingers themselves who also happen to be forwards :nervous: talk about a mind bender.
 

TheSweeper

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
765
I disagree. We used to have a team sheet with some of the best names in the world. Now when I look at the lineups I think it's no wonder we aren't top 4. We have a few like that scattered in amongst mediocrity. It should be closer to the other way around.
De gea WC
Bailly - Future star
Shaw- future star
Smalling - More than good enough ie better than cahill
Blind - again probably the best squad rotation player in the league if used right
POgba- WC
Rashford- future star
Martial- Future star
Lingard - Hard worker & at times the right man for the right job
Valencia - 0nly few RB's better than him in the league
TFM- Future star
Herrera- Hard worker

Mkhitarayan- WC unless Jose efd up
Mata- technically as an AM not much better without spending a lot of money

Then
Carrick, Scweinsteiger, Ibrahimovic, Rooney - all arguably was WC and now here for experience.

That to me is as balanced as we can get WITHOUT winning the Pl which we haven't in so long.

It is not 0verhyped; it is that we have some bloody quality youngsters in the first team and even jn the reserves that can be WC but we are either under utilizing them or completely messing up their development by making them fill roles they are not used to.
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...
Why are you answering a question with a question? Who are they? Valencia has been in much better form i'll say that, but they're on similar wages
Valencia is a better full back than Shaw, full stop.

If they were the same age no-one would even contest it, same with Blind.

I'm fairly sure that at this point, José would agree with me.

If we sold Shaw, how much do you think he'd go for now? And what level of club do you think would be starting him in their first 11?
 

Loublaze

ATLien
Joined
Aug 30, 2009
Messages
16,593
Valencia is a better full back than Shaw, full stop.

If they were the same age no-one would even contest it, same with Blind.

I'm fairly sure that at this point, José would agree with me.

If we sold Shaw, how much do you think he'd go for now? And what level of club do you think would be starting him in their first 11?
I think he'd fetch a decent fee as he's still young and he's an English international. Minimum 20M in my opinion and that would be very cheap. Shaw has time on his side. He's still very young with high ceiling potential. Blind is a utility player and not a full time fullback but yes he does a job when called upon. In any case Shaw is not on higher wages than both. Blind makes more and Valencia gets the same weekly wages according to various sources. Let's not forget Shaw was in a rich vein of form before his leg injury at PSV and he was considered one of our best outfield players. You just need to look at his thread from last season.

Furthermore, Shaw would get into any of the top four teams at the moment. Liverpool have Milner as their main LB these days FFS. Monreal at Arsenal is not a better leftback than Shaw, he'd definitely have a shot there under Wenger. Guardiola would play him too in all honesty. He fits the project that City are working on. Young, high potential plus he's English. I can see Pep relishing the chance to work with him, mould him like he's doing Stones and Sterling, young English talent. His other options are aging, Kolarov and Clichy. You don't see Shaw fitting in there? Then there's Pochettino who highly rates Shaw and made him a regular at Southampton. He'd get games there in support of Rose and would eventually displace him IMO
 

flappyjay

Full Member
Joined
Feb 12, 2016
Messages
5,976
Shaw's name keeps reappearing a lot like he is the root of our problems....I guess now that Rooney is not starting we have to focus all the negativity on to Shaw......but let's not forget where we would be if our attackers were not so terrible at finishing. If they had done their job we wouldn't be witch hunting and pretending to know the players attitude and personalities in their everyday lives
 

CS@SG

New Member
Joined
May 12, 2015
Messages
1,290
Well Valencia is doing better because he suits the game play directed to the new sergeant at United - Ibrahimovic.

Shaw is a defensive fullback much like TFM would be if he played there. Shaw is the best fullback at United but we do not currently play in a system that requires that.

We want attacking fullbacks that are more advanced than the wingers themselves who also happen to be forwards :nervous: talk about a mind bender.
I do not know what a defensive fullback or attacking fullback is, and not to argue with you. I only remember last season, early in the season, until Shaw got that terrible injury, he was very very good offensively. He was 1 of the attacking outlet, attacking at will, which made me feel so gutted when he got that terrible tackle by that a55hole.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,516
I have no issue with overpaid, Utd have paid at least in recent history more for transfers and wages just because of the stature and financial position of the club, I do however think that we have a seriously overhyped squad.

Comapare us to;

City
Arsenal
Chelsea
Spurs
Liverpool

and how many of our players would get into their starting elevens, De Gea maybe but apart for Liverpool it wouldn't be a massive upgrade, more worryingly, compare us to the squads of;

Leicester
West Ham
Everton

and okay they may not be over performing, this season but I still struggle to see that many of our squad waltzing straight into their starting elevens! and therein lies the bind, for the last 6-8 years we have had sub par squads, just SAF got them performing at levels which n o other manager since has been able to come close to!
 

whatagoodname

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2009
Messages
2,236
Supports
Liverpool
I have no issue with overpaid, Utd have paid at least in recent history more for transfers and wages just because of the stature and financial position of the club, I do however think that we have a seriously overhyped squad.

Comapare us to;

City
Arsenal
Chelsea
Spurs
Liverpool

and how many of our players would get into their starting elevens, De Gea maybe but apart for Liverpool it wouldn't be a massive upgrade, more worryingly, compare us to the squads of;

Leicester
West Ham
Everton

and okay they may not be over performing, this season but I still struggle to see that many of our squad waltzing straight into their starting elevens! and therein lies the bind, for the last 6-8 years we have had sub par squads, just SAF got them performing at levels which n o other manager since has been able to come close to!
I'd happily take.

DDG at GK
Shaw at LB medium term
Bailly for Lovren
Pogba for Gini/Can
Martial in the long term for one of the front 3.

You're massively under-rating your squad. You have some excellent players.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
I have no issue with overpaid, Utd have paid at least in recent history more for transfers and wages just because of the stature and financial position of the club, I do however think that we have a seriously overhyped squad.

Comapare us to;

City
Arsenal
Chelsea
Spurs
Liverpool

and how many of our players would get into their starting elevens, De Gea maybe but apart for Liverpool it wouldn't be a massive upgrade, more worryingly, compare us to the squads of;

Leicester
West Ham
Everton

and okay they may not be over performing, this season but I still struggle to see that many of our squad waltzing straight into their starting elevens! and therein lies the bind, for the last 6-8 years we have had sub par squads, just SAF got them performing at levels which n o other manager since has been able to come close to!
De Gea in every team.

Bailly
from what he's shown so far would fit nicely in Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal squad.

Shaw would play for City, Arsenal and Liverpool easy. Maybe even for Chelsea if he'd be a bit more offensive.

Herrera
could play for Arsenal, City and Liverpool due to his work rate, conditioning and technical abilities.

Pogba
even tho he's world class his mobility would pose him problems in teams that are playing high pressing game like City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ttham but i don't doubt their coaches would love having him in team.

Martial would excell in Arsenal, City and arguably Liverpool since his pacey, agile and has great finishing and technique.
 

VeevaVee

The worst "V"
Scout
Joined
Jan 3, 2009
Messages
46,268
Location
Manchester
De gea WC
Bailly - Future star
Shaw- future star
Smalling - More than good enough ie better than cahill
Blind - again probably the best squad rotation player in the league if used right
POgba- WC
Rashford- future star
Martial- Future star
Lingard - Hard worker & at times the right man for the right job
Valencia - 0nly few RB's better than him in the league
TFM- Future star
Herrera- Hard worker

Mkhitarayan- WC unless Jose efd up
Mata- technically as an AM not much better without spending a lot of money

Then
Carrick, Scweinsteiger, Ibrahimovic, Rooney - all arguably was WC and now here for experience.

That to me is as balanced as we can get WITHOUT winning the Pl which we haven't in so long.

It is not 0verhyped; it is that we have some bloody quality youngsters in the first team and even jn the reserves that can be WC but we are either under utilizing them or completely messing up their development by making them fill roles they are not used to.

As a first team we're a way below the quality we should be. At our peak we had 4 or 5 on the pitch that'd fit into the world class category and were at their peak.

I know it'll take a bit of time, but that's what we should be aiming for asap imo.
 

rocks13

New Member
Joined
Feb 7, 2007
Messages
2,472
Location
Belfast
De Gea in every team.

Bailly
from what he's shown so far would fit nicely in Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal squad.

Shaw would play for City, Arsenal and Liverpool easy. Maybe even for Chelsea if he'd be a bit more offensive.

Herrera
could play for Arsenal, City and Liverpool due to his work rate, conditioning and technical abilities.

Pogba
even tho he's world class his mobility would pose him problems in teams that are playing high pressing game like City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ttham but i don't doubt their coaches would love having him in team.

Martial would excell in Arsenal, City and arguably Liverpool since his pacey, agile and has great finishing and technique.
I'd add in Rashford as a rotation striker in any of those squads.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,921
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
1) That's a bit naïve to think Brian Clough single handedly carved Roy Keane. Roy Keane became the player he was because he was Roy Keane, someone who responded positively to the "treatment" given by his manager. There is no one-size-fits-all formula that a Brian Clough could use on anyone and everyone. Why didn't Clough come up with more Keanes? The truth is not everyone can rise up to the occasion and respond to the manager and those how don't, need to be moved on instead of replacing the manager. Do you cut your foot off if the shoe doesn't fit? Agreed, Ferguson was a master at getting most out of the players. Maybe he would have succeeded but whenever he realized he couldn't, he would get new players in to replace the existing ones. His league win in 2013 was the greatest example of this. Sure, better than most teams in the country but you will definitely get found out in Europe, which brings me to say -

2) Maybe you are right, the rot set in earlier than Moyes's appointment. Once Ferguson left, the players just stopped responding because it was David Moyes, Everton manager FFS! And then LVG just changed a lot of things too much. Again, if you think Smalling (regardless of his recent performances), Jones, Young, Darmian, Fellaini, Lingard (as much as I want him because Academy!), Shaw (after the recent performances), Depay, Schneiderlein would walk into an elite European team, you're having a laugh. These players aren't good enough and/or don't know what it means to play for United. Yeah it is all down to the manager, sure, but this is football, you can't say a bad workman blames his tools, especially when you know the workman has proven to be good before.

3) Yes we expect a lot from Mourinho and yes, we cannot compare Moyes and Mourinho. But with Moyes, we fell from the top. With Mourinho, we need to start from the bottom, unlike most clubs you are comparing United with, except Liverpool. Klopp has done so well that no one expected to see Liverpool top of the table. Why getting Mourinho and splashing a lot of cash should see us automatically go on top right away is beyond me. Mourinho needs to build some character, re-build the club in one sense. That's going to take time and it will be worth it.
I don't like the 2nd Argument. Most of the players you named are our back up/ carling cup / Europa players. People give too much grief to the players who aren't even the ones who are going to be playing. None of those guys are 1st teamers except Fellaini and he is a Jose favourite. Its like saying, would Navas, Nasri, Fernando, Gnabry, (what ever shite player is on Liverpool bench), would they get into an elite team? course not! so its a moot point.
Also If you look at the sides at the top of the low standard EPL, how many players in each side could get into an elite team? Very Few. De Bruyne could. Aguero may squeeze into Real or Bayern. Sanchez was discarded by an elite team and promptly replaced. So was Ozil. everyone else wouldn't make it. People say Hazard? He could possibly play at Bayern. Costa too. All the others wouldn't get into an elite European Team so it isn't an excuse to be how we are in the Europa Cup and Premier league
 

woodhouseparkred

New Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
353
Location
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit
Where did I say it was Roy Keane alone who made himself? It takes a perfect marriage between a manager and a player (and sometimes the club) to get the best out of any of them - all things need to come together. The Class of 92 is a perfect example. The Barcelona squad is another. You don't see a Class of 92 often and you don't see that Barcelona squad often.
Simply because of this statement:

Roy Keane became the player he was because he was Roy Keane
Which implies that it is only him who created his character, the way he was motivated and he drove the team because of his will to win.

Yes, Ferguson worked with some great players and managed to bring out the best out of them, who's denying that? I don't quite understand your question underlined above. But I will make it clearer of what I was trying to say earlier: even after Ferguson getting the best out of his players, they were good enough only to win the league, not in Europe. Does that make sense? I am, infact, agreeing with you when you said the rot probably set in much before Moyes was appointed.
It does make sense, but you stated earlier in a post that we have players now who are not clearly good enough to join an elite European team, which again implies that at the time when Sir Alex was manager, we did have those type of players. If we did, then why didn't we win more European Champions leagues? It could be a mixture of reasons to be honest, but it was for me, the only black mark against him, however, to dominate the Premier league against other "quality" teams for years on end, suggests that it could have been Premier league quality only. Either way, his overall performance as manager with the players he has had ha been fantastic and his records will stand the test of time.

What are you on about? All I said in my first post was that some players don't get it what it means to play for United. The only reason I brought Moyes and LVG into the discussion was to illustrate how they didn't inspire the players enough and/or changed too many things. We finally have a manager who is NOT a mid table level manager, NOT retiring in 3 years, and NOT playing dull football. We finally have a manager who we know can build some character around the team and win things and therefore he needs to be given time. You don't have to agree with this opinion but your post was just basically saying how we cannot compare Moyes and Mourinho but then you went on to do the same when in fact I never even compared them in the first post. All I am saying is Mourinho's job is harder than it looks, even for a manager of his caliber and for a manager who has spent as much as he has.[/quiote]

The season before Sir Alex left, we had a good team, but then when we won the league one season after, the rot was already in place. Wayne Rooney was scoring at less than a goal every other game, and we had to rely on Robin Van Persie and Hernandez to win us the league. In fact, we were very lucky to actually have Hernandez in the team because I believe he scored 18 goals from substitute appearances. If it hadn't been for the 10 points we won with Hernandez in the tight matches we played, I am sure that we might not have won the league. For the bolded part, I agree that he is not a mid-table manager, and if his past career is anything to go by, we cannot say that he will still be here after 3 years. Secondly, we have not won anything at all so, to make this statement about "character", and "win things", is too easy. The only person on the pitch who has the character and tries to inspire the players (it certainly isn't Mourinho who spends most of his time chatting and complaining to the 4th official) is Zlatan. Again, if he was captain instead of Wayne Rooney then maybe, just maybe we have a chance of winning some silverware. It is harder than it looks but for a manager of his calibre, he should easily be doing better and he is not imposing his character onto the players one little bit. Here is his record since his time here:

http://prntscr.com/d5he6r

Here is the record of José Mourinho the season after he managed Chelsea to the Premier league title up to the present day combined:

http://prntscr.com/d5hg5d

You see, he is clearly a human being and there maybe some personal problems that we don't know about since his second season with Chelsea when he got the sack.


Missed Rojo entirely, he's not good enough at all. You're being tedious.
Like a dog with a bone chap. Nothing personal, I just thought that it was odd that his name wasn't mentioned.



Blind is class, I'm truly sorry if this forum and/or you cannot see that. Besides using the ratings on the Cafe to judge who is a better player? Really? The underlined part in your post is enough to tell you what the ratings really stand for - their performances, not their quality. I don't have the data right now but I'm pretty sure di Maria was given a poor rating throughout his time with us. That doesn't make him a bad player similarly how high ratings don't make a player world class.
Indeed he is, against other teams of similar quality at the moment. I recently saw a still image from a Chelsea match and it is clear that apart from his defending skills which are good, but not on the same level as a in-form Luke Shaw; he lacks spatial awareness. He was clearly ball watching (the ball was on the right wing so, not his problem) and Pedro was on his left shoulder. I didn't watch the match because I was with my daughters however, if that had been a Suarez or Messi or even Gareth Bale on that right wing attacking, we would have been torn a new one. Secondly, I am aware that they are performance related statistics, which goes to show how we rate the players performance with regards to certain matches they played. So, it is clear that Shaw has been rated highly on here for his performances (in spite of coming back from a very bad injury) and shouldn't even be in your list of those who should be turfed out. As for Di Maria, he was given a poor rating and he is doing well for Paris Saint Germain. Again, different league and different quality. Zlatan was having fun over there last season, this season, he has been on a lean spell (up to the Swansea match) not seen since his seasons with Juventus nearly 10 years ago.


Shaw didn't play well enough against City (in the league), against Fenerbahce away, did he? Even at his best, I honestly didn't think he was the best full back in the league by a mile. Even then, I admit, he needs to be given a chance because he's young, just coming from an injury and, we don't have a proper left back.
You simply have to give players who have had bad injuries in their careers. Players have character and this is why Bryan Robson will always be held in high-esteem at Manchester United. As a left-back earlier on in his career he suffered a broken left leg and then two months later, it was refractured again in a match. A couple of seasons later he broke his right ankle. Perhaps Shaw can adapt to another role and I certainly hope so and as he is young, he surely has to have the benefit of the doubt, since Rooney has been given that ever for his bleak record over the last 4 seasons.
 

woodhouseparkred

New Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
353
Location
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit
I don't like the 2nd Argument. Most of the players you named are our back up/ carling cup / Europa players. People give too much grief to the players who aren't even the ones who are going to be playing. None of those guys are 1st teamers except Fellaini and he is a Jose favourite. Its like saying, would Navas, Nasri, Fernando, Gnabry, (what ever shite player is on Liverpool bench), would they get into an elite team? course not! so its a moot point.
Also If you look at the sides at the top of the low standard EPL, how many players in each side could get into an elite team? Very Few. De Bruyne could. Aguero may squeeze into Real or Bayern. Sanchez was discarded by an elite team and promptly replaced. So was Ozil. everyone else wouldn't make it. People say Hazard? He could possibly play at Bayern. Costa too. All the others wouldn't get into an elite European Team so it isn't an excuse to be how we are in the Europa Cup and Premier league

Great post!!

De Bruyne would get into quite a few teams, Aguero, no matter how good he is would simply be a substitute on the bench for either Real Madrid or Barcelona, simply because Real have Ronaldo, Benzema and Bale, and Barcelona have Neymar, Suarez and Messi and not one of those players would be displaced. Alexis Sanchez and Pedro are pretty good players, but as far as Barcelona was concerned, only really good enough to either replace an injured player or simply to be used as substitutes. Hazard is a great little player and he might be able to get into a few top teams, and Costa, the fact he is doing well is an enigma. He wasn't the best striker in la Liga, yet he is the best this season. The mind boggles. To put it bluntly, with respect to Wayne Rooney, if he had been Spanish, he would have been a substitute for a majority of his career if he had been at Real or Barcelona. They demand high standards.
 

TheSweeper

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 31, 2015
Messages
765
I do not know what a defensive fullback or attacking fullback is, and not to argue with you. I only remember last season, early in the season, until Shaw got that terrible injury, he was very very good offensively. He was 1 of the attacking outlet, attacking at will, which made me feel so gutted when he got that terrible tackle by that a55hole.
I have this conversation with my brother who says he is attacking fullback.
I however think his defensive game is better than his attacking.

He isn't the best at cross service & this is shown by Jose playing blind at LB to get the best out of Ibrahimovic.

Other defensive fullbacks include - zabaleta, Fabinh0 and TFM. In my opinion the person shaw should emulate is carjaval who is a well rounded defensive fullback who has the ability to have a decent input as an offensive fullback but primarily has a WC ability to hold on to his position -I.E few can actually beat him at his primary position.

On the attacking full back list - Valencia, Alba and Rodriguez sprint to mind. They can be beaten and taken out of position but have more stability afforded by the rest of their defenders to allow them to attack. Their input as fullbacks to the whole team is considerably greater than someone like Shaw.
 

Stacks

Full Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2015
Messages
10,921
Location
Between a rock and Gibraltar
I have this conversation with my brother who says he is attacking fullback.
I however think his defensive game is better than his attacking.

He isn't the best at cross service & this is shown by Jose playing blind at LB to get the best out of Ibrahimovic.

Other defensive fullbacks include - zabaleta, Fabinh0 and TFM. In my opinion the person shaw should emulate is carjaval who is a well rounded defensive fullback who has the ability to have a decent input as an offensive fullback but primarily has a WC ability to hold on to his position -I.E few can actually beat him at his primary position.

On the attacking full back list - Valencia, Alba and Rodriguez sprint to mind. They can be beaten and taken out of position but have more stability afforded by the rest of their defenders to allow them to attack. Their input as fullbacks to the whole team is considerably greater than someone like Shaw.
Some good points. When all is said and done, Shaw's best season was years ago when he was a fearless teenager with no expectation.
 

SteveJ

all-round nice guy, aka Uncle Joe Kardashian
Scout
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
62,851
Jose Mourinho has reportedly ‘scared off’ a mole that was hindering his pre-match plans by giving away Man United starting line-ups early.

Opponents have been given extra time to perfect their game plans against the Red Devils but Jose Mourinho has successfully stopped the leak after launching his own investigation into the matter.

The report claims that team line-ups were being sent to a Manchester United fan via text message, one of which was seen three hours before the official announcement. However, the issue now looks to have been resolved.

A United insider said last month: “Mourinho is spitting feathers after discovering he’s being betrayed by someone within the club.”

(Teamtalk)
 

Rhyme Animal

Thinks Di Zerbi is better than Pep.
Joined
Sep 3, 2015
Messages
11,193
Location
Nonchalantly scoring the winner...
Jose Mourinho has reportedly ‘scared off’ a mole that was hindering his pre-match plans by giving away Man United starting line-ups early.

Opponents have been given extra time to perfect their game plans against the Red Devils but Jose Mourinho has successfully stopped the leak after launching his own investigation into the matter.

The report claims that team line-ups were being sent to a Manchester United fan via text message, one of which was seen three hours before the official announcement. However, the issue now looks to have been resolved.

A United insider said last month: “Mourinho is spitting feathers after discovering he’s being betrayed by someone within the club.”

(Teamtalk)
Deserves it's own thread, unless it's a joke that I'm not getting or a daft rumour.
 

Client6

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
180
Location
Virtual Stretford End
Simply because of this statement:

Roy Keane became the player he was because he was Roy Keane

Which implies that it is only him who created his character, the way he was motivated and he drove the team because of his will to win.

Sorry, but my whole statement was this: "That's a bit naïve to think Brian Clough single handedly carved Roy Keane. Roy Keane became the player he was because he was Roy Keane, someone who responded positively to the "treatment" given by his manager"

You just removed the first and the last parts of the statement!



It does make sense, but you stated earlier in a post that we have players now who are not clearly good enough to join an elite European team, which again implies that at the time when Sir Alex was manager, we did have those type of players. If we did, then why didn't we win more European Champions leagues? It could be a mixture of reasons to be honest, but it was for me, the only black mark against him, however, to dominate the Premier league against other "quality" teams for years on end, suggests that it could have been Premier league quality only. Either way, his overall performance as manager with the players he has had ha been fantastic and his records will stand the test of time.

We did have atleast a few players who could compete against any elite European team but not enough to actually win in Europe. I agree it is a black mark against him and a manager of his pedigree should have had more European Cups. His overall performance is best bar none, nobody is disputing that.


The season before Sir Alex left, we had a good team, but then when we won the league one season after, the rot was already in place. Wayne Rooney was scoring at less than a goal every other game, and we had to rely on Robin Van Persie and Hernandez to win us the league. In fact, we were very lucky to actually have Hernandez in the team because I believe he scored 18 goals from substitute appearances. If it hadn't been for the 10 points we won with Hernandez in the tight matches we played, I am sure that we might not have won the league. For the bolded part, I agree that he is not a mid-table manager, and if his past career is anything to go by, we cannot say that he will still be here after 3 years. Secondly, we have not won anything at all so, to make this statement about "character", and "win things", is too easy. The only person on the pitch who has the character and tries to inspire the players (it certainly isn't Mourinho who spends most of his time chatting and complaining to the 4th official) is Zlatan. Again, if he was captain instead of Wayne Rooney then maybe, just maybe we have a chance of winning some silverware. It is harder than it looks but for a manager of his calibre, he should easily be doing better and he is not imposing his character onto the players one little bit. Here is his record since his time here:

http://prntscr.com/d5he6r

Here is the record of José Mourinho the season after he managed Chelsea to the Premier league title up to the present day combined:

http://prntscr.com/d5hg5d

You see, he is clearly a human being and there maybe some personal problems that we don't know about since his second season with Chelsea when he got the sack.

I agree that I (and every football fan I know) expected him to be doing far, far better than he is doing currently, especially considering Pep has managed to transform City overnight, and to some extent Klopp too. But maybe this would have happened to United if you had brought in any manager. All I am saying is this is the very first time we have a truly quality manager who can stay beyond 3 years. If we don't stick by this manager, there's never going to be any stability at the club, people, from the club management to the academy, have been leaving since Ferguson left and it will only continue.


Indeed he is, against other teams of similar quality at the moment. I recently saw a still image from a Chelsea match and it is clear that apart from his defending skills which are good, but not on the same level as a in-form Luke Shaw; he lacks spatial awareness. He was clearly ball watching (the ball was on the right wing so, not his problem) and Pedro was on his left shoulder. I didn't watch the match because I was with my daughters however, if that had been a Suarez or Messi or even Gareth Bale on that right wing attacking, we would have been torn a new one. Secondly, I am aware that they are performance related statistics, which goes to show how we rate the players performance with regards to certain matches they played. So, it is clear that Shaw has been rated highly on here for his performances (in spite of coming back from a very bad injury) and shouldn't even be in your list of those who should be turfed out. As for Di Maria, he was given a poor rating and he is doing well for Paris Saint Germain. Again, different league and different quality. Zlatan was having fun over there last season, this season, he has been on a lean spell (up to the Swansea match) not seen since his seasons with Juventus nearly 10 years ago.

You simply have to give players who have had bad injuries in their careers. Players have character and this is why Bryan Robson will always be held in high-esteem at Manchester United. As a left-back earlier on in his career he suffered a broken left leg and then two months later, it was refractured again in a match. A couple of seasons later he broke his right ankle. Perhaps Shaw can adapt to another role and I certainly hope so and as he is young, he surely has to have the benefit of the doubt, since Rooney has been given that ever for his bleak record over the last 4 seasons.

Shaw shouldn't have been on the list, agreed. Really want him to set the stage alight and make that place his own. He has tremendous potential.
 

Client6

Full Member
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
180
Location
Virtual Stretford End
I don't like the 2nd Argument. Most of the players you named are our back up/ carling cup / Europa players. People give too much grief to the players who aren't even the ones who are going to be playing. None of those guys are 1st teamers except Fellaini and he is a Jose favourite. Its like saying, would Navas, Nasri, Fernando, Gnabry, (what ever shite player is on Liverpool bench), would they get into an elite team? course not! so its a moot point.
Also If you look at the sides at the top of the low standard EPL, how many players in each side could get into an elite team? Very Few. De Bruyne could. Aguero may squeeze into Real or Bayern. Sanchez was discarded by an elite team and promptly replaced. So was Ozil. everyone else wouldn't make it. People say Hazard? He could possibly play at Bayern. Costa too. All the others wouldn't get into an elite European Team so it isn't an excuse to be how we are in the Europa Cup and Premier league
Great post!!

De Bruyne would get into quite a few teams, Aguero, no matter how good he is would simply be a substitute on the bench for either Real Madrid or Barcelona, simply because Real have Ronaldo, Benzema and Bale, and Barcelona have Neymar, Suarez and Messi and not one of those players would be displaced. Alexis Sanchez and Pedro are pretty good players, but as far as Barcelona was concerned, only really good enough to either replace an injured player or simply to be used as substitutes. Hazard is a great little player and he might be able to get into a few top teams, and Costa, the fact he is doing well is an enigma. He wasn't the best striker in la Liga, yet he is the best this season. The mind boggles. To put it bluntly, with respect to Wayne Rooney, if he had been Spanish, he would have been a substitute for a majority of his career if he had been at Real or Barcelona. They demand high standards.
Those players I named that I think should be moved on complete our squad. Sure, we'd have a starting 11 if we remove those but what about any depth? A few injuries to our "starting 11" and these players will be called up. Our squad in 2008 and 2009 had brilliant quality even on the bench.

You are rightly saying fringe players from City, Liverpool etc won't get into an elite team. That's why nobody is saying they are elite teams, they will struggle in Europe. To have someone like Aguero on your bench says a lot about the quality of the team don't you think? That's what United should be aiming for.

Remove De Bruyne and Aguero from City, Sanchez and Ozil from Arsenal, Hazard and Costa from Chelsea and tell me they won't struggle in the Premier League. Our squad is realistically worthy of competing for top 4 this season. To say this United squad will walk the league or easily manage top 4 is an overestimation.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Penna

goin4glory

New Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2011
Messages
5,033
Location
Crushing Souls.
We overpaid for players because we were desperate. I don't like bringing it up regularly but the serious lack of investment throughout the Glazers ownership left a squad in dire need of changes, it wasn't an easy transition because results went to shit and the manager's put under massive pressure.

I fully support Mourinho and would sell half the squad before I got rid of him, he knows what it takes to win the premier league and champions league whereas these players have seen us finish 7th/4th and 5th in the last 3 seasons, simply not good enough. Mourinho must be backed to make the necessary changes.
 

Mike09

New Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
3,035
He bought the likes of mkhitaryan, Pogba and Ibra with wages of 140k and 290k and 220k per week respectively. But the likes of Shaw and (70k per week) and Smalling (80k per week) were being labeled as overpaid with ridiculous wages. I remember in Fergie era, Jones got wages of 50k per week and Smalling was about the same as well. This time we all know the market is increased significantly compared to a few years back then. To me Shaw wages isn't considered to be ridiculously overpaid, wages between 50 to 90k per week for first team squad in a big club like Manchester United is normal value. overpaid is what we paid on Pogba, Ibra, Rooney, Schweinsteiger, Schneiderlin. At least Ibra's shirt selling is massive so 220k per week can still be covered.
If Jose first task is to fix the overpaid and overhyped squad then people who thinks that way have failed because Jose's first summer signings are overpaid.
 

Zed 101

Full Member
Joined
Jun 27, 2014
Messages
1,516
De Gea in every team.

Bailly
from what he's shown so far would fit nicely in Liverpool, Chelsea and Arsenal squad.

Shaw would play for City, Arsenal and Liverpool easy. Maybe even for Chelsea if he'd be a bit more offensive.

Herrera
could play for Arsenal, City and Liverpool due to his work rate, conditioning and technical abilities.

Pogba
even tho he's world class his mobility would pose him problems in teams that are playing high pressing game like City, Liverpool, Arsenal, Ttham but i don't doubt their coaches would love having him in team.

Martial would excell in Arsenal, City and arguably Liverpool since his pacey, agile and has great finishing and technique.
I agree that Bailly looks the real deal, Shaw, Pogba, Martial and Rashford have massive potential, and I love Herrera, but I am not talking about squads, or potential, I am talking about guaranteed 1st eleven.....

Pogba on reputation maybe, not form, but the others sure they would be in the squads, but improving their first teams? don't think so. Even still you have quoted 5 players that would maybe be fringe for the other teams.... how is that not overhyped when we are looking for players good enough to win us the league?

On Herrera, love what he does and he would defo be in most fans and managers squads.... but he is hardly the midfield maestro that dominates and controls games, he is a great player to have as a midfielder alongside Pogba.... past successful squads have shown you need a blend of world class and good players, but world class he aint and starting 11 for most teams in the top 7 or 8 he aint, not if we are looking at replacing Carrick with him!

BTW not trying to hate on lots, just think we are unrealistic, I love the players you have listed and would not want them to be anywherw but Utd, however when they are the best supporting by the likes of Felani, when our strike force is admittedly talented but way over the hill for a league of this energy. We have too many weak and under performing players in and around these players, we are therefore relying on Martial, Rashford ect... to carry the team, it is no wonder we are so often disapointing.

BTW 2, also would not want Mata, Blind, Carrick, Valencia moving on, but yet again guaranteed 1st teamers to win the league... we need more quality.
 

Swearing Budgie

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 1, 2016
Messages
1,055
If I were proper ace at football you would have to pay me loads to live and work in Manchester.

Maybe the solution is to move the club to London, or somewhere just outside like Reading or Swindon. That would be ace because then I would get a season ticket.

Or China...
 

MrBest

Full Member
Joined
Feb 18, 2016
Messages
2,868
Agree with most of the posts. the players are over paid, the club became toxic after Moyes and Gaal and we have lost our values of playing for the badge but also enjoying the game.

The other issue is we don't have a game winner. my issue with buying pogba was simple, he don't win games and u cannot expect to break the record with a player who don't change games
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,744
Location
London
De gea WC
Bailly - Future star
Shaw- future star
Smalling - More than good enough ie better than cahill
Blind - again probably the best squad rotation player in the league if used right
POgba- WC
Rashford- future star
Martial- Future star
Lingard - Hard worker & at times the right man for the right job
Valencia - 0nly few RB's better than him in the league
TFM- Future star
Herrera- Hard worker

Mkhitarayan- WC unless Jose efd up
Mata- technically as an AM not much better without spending a lot of money

Then
Carrick, Scweinsteiger, Ibrahimovic, Rooney - all arguably was WC and now here for experience.

That to me is as balanced as we can get WITHOUT winning the Pl which we haven't in so long.

It is not 0verhyped; it is that we have some bloody quality youngsters in the first team and even jn the reserves that can be WC but we are either under utilizing them or completely messing up their development by making them fill roles they are not used to.
Only two WC players from your list, and a lot of future stars. That implies we're a team in transition, which we are.

When we were winning titles our entire starting 11 was practically WC (ignoring the last title).
 

woodhouseparkred

New Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
353
Location
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit
Those players I named that I think should be moved on complete our squad. Sure, we'd have a starting 11 if we remove those but what about any depth? A few injuries to our "starting 11" and these players will be called up. Our squad in 2008 and 2009 had brilliant quality even on the bench.

You are rightly saying fringe players from City, Liverpool etc won't get into an elite team. That's why nobody is saying they are elite teams, they will struggle in Europe. To have someone like Aguero on your bench says a lot about the quality of the team don't you think? That's what United should be aiming for.

Remove De Bruyne and Aguero from City, Sanchez and Ozil from Arsenal, Hazard and Costa from Chelsea and tell me they won't struggle in the Premier League. Our squad is realistically worthy of competing for top 4 this season. To say this United squad will walk the league or easily manage top 4 is an overestimation.
It is interesting that you have only pointed out City, Arsenal and Chelsea as possible strugglers without said players. In fact, it goes to show how bad we really are under Mourinho and that is with players like Wayne Rooney, Herrera, Zlatan and Paul Pogba who start virtually every single match. I think it is safe to say that if we hadn't had the aforementioned players, with a possibly exception to Wayne Rooney; then we would clearly be even further behind. Further to that point, you failed to mention Liverpool, who have some ok players with only Coutinho as the exception. How is it possible for Klopp to get the best out of the others? It is too early, but his man management is similar to Sir Alex Fergusons and it seems that he is capable making his ok players go beyond their maximum potential. Herein, lies the difference between Klopp this season and Mourinho this season. With respect, what Klopp is doing at the moment defines the expression "making a silk purse out of a sow's ear." Whereas Mourinho is doing nothing different to either LVG or David Moyes.
 

Fracture90

Full Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2016
Messages
10,360
Location
Serbia
The fact that Moyes and LVG (been infamous throughout his career for being stubborn and hard to work with) aren't exactly player magnets like other managers so in order to get some players to join us we had to reach much deeper in our pocket.
 

Silverman

Full Member
Joined
Oct 8, 2013
Messages
6,499
This is exactly what I think too. We didn't buy him at the start simply to make up the numbers. I think it is clearly a mental thing and perhaps he doesn't have the character to get over that particular nasty incident yet, however, just as those who think he is rubbish and should be sold (yet by the same token want Mourinho to stay in spite of the results) he should be given a fair shot because I think he has a great deal to offer.
I dont get why anyone would want him sold. He was fantastic before the injury. He deserves plenty of time to prove himself.
 

Lawman

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
10,639
Location
Scotland
When SAF left he left an ageing squad that needed surgery no doubt. Vidic Rio Evra RVP etc etc the problem is what we have bought has not been good enough under both Moyes and LVG. With the exception of Mata and Martial we got rid of better players and the standard dropped (Nani, Evans, Hernandez, Rafael, Fletcher) as opposed (Depay, Fellaini, Rojo, Blind, Morgan, Darmain even Herrera although I'm still hopeful with him has failed to be a regular). With Jose he signed 4 players and 3 of them in my opinion have improved the team 2 (Pogba and Bailley) could be here for next 5-6 years and look very good signings (regardless fees) Zlatan is a good stop gap and Myktarin is still an unknown quantity in this league. Hopefully Jose keeps buying good players and we will soon be back as opposed to the scatter gun and strange signings of our previous two managers.
 

Lawman

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
10,639
Location
Scotland
If my memory served me right, Shaw is just good for his pace and 1 dribble every 2-3 games. Even Rojo can cross and assist from the left.
Please don't compare Shaw to Rojo. Shaw is one of the best/talented players in the world in his position (for his age). Rojo is Rojo and will be moved on when we have our players fit or buy new ones.
 

woodhouseparkred

New Member
Joined
Oct 30, 2016
Messages
353
Location
Onus probandi incumbit ei qui dicit
When SAF left he left an ageing squad that needed surgery no doubt. Vidic Rio Evra RVP etc etc the problem is what we have bought has not been good enough under both Moyes and LVG. With the exception of Mata and Martial we got rid of better players and the standard dropped (Nani, Evans, Hernandez, Rafael, Fletcher) as opposed (Depay, Fellaini, Rojo, Blind, Morgan, Darmain even Herrera although I'm still hopeful with him has failed to be a regular). With Jose he signed 4 players and 3 of them in my opinion have improved the team 2 (Pogba and Bailley) could be here for next 5-6 years and look very good signings (regardless fees) Zlatan is a good stop gap and Myktarin is still an unknown quantity in this league. Hopefully Jose keeps buying good players and we will soon be back as opposed to the scatter gun and strange signings of our previous two managers.
As far as I'm concerned, Herrera should be in the team every game. He has performed his job to the best of his abilities and has done really well. His performances against Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester City attest to this. He cost how much by the way compared to Pogba? As far as the signings are concerned, I would have to say that only Bailly has done his job as regular as clockwork up until his injury. Zlatan nearly broke his own record of going 7 matches without scoring a goal (going back to his Juventus days) until the Swansea match, and Pogba has failed to impress against the big boys so far, by the same token, I don't class Liverpool either as the big boys considering they only really have one good player plus the rest. It is just that Klopp has them functioning like a unit. As for Micky, when he came on against Fenerbaçe, he did quite well, contrary to what Mourinho said in the press. He passed the ball as many times as Zlatan and Mata and his passing accuracy was ok. My opinion on him is that I don't have one. He has not played enough minutes or games to suggest that I have one.
 

Lawman

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Dec 21, 2006
Messages
10,639
Location
Scotland
As far as I'm concerned, Herrera should be in the team every game. He has performed his job to the best of his abilities and has done really well. His performances against Liverpool, Chelsea and Manchester City attest to this. He cost how much by the way compared to Pogba? As far as the signings are concerned, I would have to say that only Bailly has done his job as regular as clockwork up until his injury. Zlatan nearly broke his own record of going 7 matches without scoring a goal (going back to his Juventus days) until the Swansea match, and Pogba has failed to impress against the big boys so far, by the same token, I don't class Liverpool either as the big boys considering they only really have one good player plus the rest. It is just that Klopp has them functioning like a unit. As for Micky, when he came on against Fenerbaçe, he did quite well, contrary to what Mourinho said in the press. He passed the ball as many times as Zlatan and Mata and his passing accuracy was ok. My opinion on him is that I don't have one. He has not played enough minutes or games to suggest that I have one.
I think Bailey has done well I also think contrary to press Pogba looks a class above what we had. I really don't care he cost 90 million as that will work itself out as I think a bit like Ronaldo the fee will look small in a couple of years.