Simply because of this statement:
Roy Keane became the player he was because he was Roy Keane
Which implies that it is only him who created his character, the way he was motivated and he drove the team because of his will to win.
Sorry, but my whole statement was this: "That's a bit naïve to think Brian Clough single handedly carved Roy Keane. Roy Keane became the player he was because he was Roy Keane, someone who responded positively to the "treatment" given by his manager"
You just removed the first and the last parts of the statement!
It does make sense, but you stated earlier in a post that we have players now who are not clearly good enough to join an elite European team, which again implies that at the time when Sir Alex was manager, we did have those type of players. If we did, then why didn't we win more European Champions leagues? It could be a mixture of reasons to be honest, but it was for me, the only black mark against him, however, to dominate the Premier league against other "quality" teams for years on end, suggests that it could have been Premier league quality only. Either way, his overall performance as manager with the players he has had ha been fantastic and his records will stand the test of time.
We did have atleast a few players who could compete against any elite European team but not enough to actually win in Europe. I agree it is a black mark against him and a manager of his pedigree should have had more European Cups. His overall performance is best bar none, nobody is disputing that.
The season before Sir Alex left, we had a good team, but then when we won the league one season after, the rot was already in place. Wayne Rooney was scoring at less than a goal every other game, and we had to rely on Robin Van Persie and Hernandez to win us the league. In fact, we were very lucky to actually have Hernandez in the team because I believe he scored 18 goals from substitute appearances. If it hadn't been for the 10 points we won with Hernandez in the tight matches we played, I am sure that we might not have won the league. For the bolded part, I agree that he is not a mid-table manager, and if his past career is anything to go by, we cannot say that he will still be here after 3 years. Secondly, we have not won anything at all so, to make this statement about "character", and "win things", is too easy. The only person on the pitch who has the character and tries to inspire the players (it certainly isn't Mourinho who spends most of his time chatting and complaining to the 4th official) is Zlatan. Again, if he was captain instead of Wayne Rooney then maybe, just maybe we have a chance of winning some silverware. It is harder than it looks but for a manager of his calibre, he should easily be doing better and he is not imposing his character onto the players one little bit. Here is his record since his time here:
http://prntscr.com/d5he6r
Here is the record of José Mourinho the season after he managed Chelsea to the Premier league title up to the present day combined:
http://prntscr.com/d5hg5d
You see, he is clearly a human being and there maybe some personal problems that we don't know about since his second season with Chelsea when he got the sack.
I agree that I (and every football fan I know) expected him to be doing far, far better than he is doing currently, especially considering Pep has managed to transform City overnight, and to some extent Klopp too. But maybe this would have happened to United if you had brought in any manager. All I am saying is this is the very first time we have a truly quality manager who can stay beyond 3 years. If we don't stick by this manager, there's never going to be any stability at the club, people, from the club management to the academy, have been leaving since Ferguson left and it will only continue.
Indeed he is, against other teams of similar quality at the moment. I recently saw a still image from a Chelsea match and it is clear that apart from his defending skills which are good, but not on the same level as a in-form Luke Shaw; he lacks spatial awareness. He was clearly ball watching (the ball was on the right wing so, not his problem) and Pedro was on his left shoulder. I didn't watch the match because I was with my daughters however, if that had been a Suarez or Messi or even Gareth Bale on that right wing attacking, we would have been torn a new one. Secondly, I am aware that they are performance related statistics, which goes to show how we rate the players performance with regards to certain matches they played. So, it is clear that Shaw has been rated highly on here for his performances (in spite of coming back from a very bad injury) and shouldn't even be in your list of those who should be turfed out. As for Di Maria, he was given a poor rating and he is doing well for Paris Saint Germain. Again, different league and different quality. Zlatan was having fun over there last season, this season, he has been on a lean spell (up to the Swansea match) not seen since his seasons with Juventus nearly 10 years ago.
You simply have to give players who have had bad injuries in their careers. Players have character and this is why Bryan Robson will always be held in high-esteem at Manchester United. As a left-back earlier on in his career he suffered a broken left leg and then two months later, it was refractured again in a match. A couple of seasons later he broke his right ankle. Perhaps Shaw can adapt to another role and I certainly hope so and as he is young, he surely has to have the benefit of the doubt, since Rooney has been given that ever for his bleak record over the last 4 seasons.
Shaw shouldn't have been on the list, agreed. Really want him to set the stage alight and make that place his own. He has tremendous potential.