Redlambs
Creator of the Caftards comics
https://coto2.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/1968-macdonald-how-to-wreck-the-planet.pdf
"Professor MacDonald is associate director of the Institute of Geophysics and Planetary Physics at the University of California, Los Angeles. His researches have embraced a remarkable diversity of natural phenomena and his professional interests are further extended by his participation in national science policy-making. He is a member of President Johnson’s Science Advisory Committee.
Among future means of obtaining national objectives by force, one possibility hinges on man’s ability to control and manipulate the environment of his planet. When achieved, this power over his environment will provide man with a new force capable of doing great and indiscriminate damage. Our present primitive understanding of deliberate environmental change makes it difficult to imagine a world in which geophysical warfare is practised. Such a world might be one in which nuclear weapons were effectively banned and the weapons of mass destruction were those of environmental catastrophe. Alternatively, I can envisage a world of nuclear stability resulting from parity in such weapons, rendered unstable by the development by one nation of an advanced technology capable of modifying the Earth’s environment. Or geophysical weapons may be part of each nation’s armoury. As I will argue, these weapons are peculiarly suited for covert or secret wars.
Substantial progress within the environmental sciences is slowly overcoming the gap between fact and fiction regarding manipulations of the Earth’s physical environment. As these manipulations become possible, history shows that attempts may be made to use them in support of national ambitions."
Why don't you all actually read the information presented to you?
@JustAFan considering we know that governments have indeed experimented with weather modification in the past and most likely continue to do so today, perhaps we can look beyond the lack of scientific rigour in these experiments.
@Dwazza I wont shy away from providing evidence, if you wont shy away from reading it.
@Redlambs not being interesting to you cannot invalidate the theory. Can I get this straight though, you are actually claiming categorically that there is no such thing as weather modification by any government or any corporation, ever??
I did read it, and I do understand what he's suggesting may happen.
I also never made any claim. For someone striving to appear as a level head, you miss an awful lot. In fact I'm open to the idea this could be something that happens down the line. I just can't help be amused by the way these ideas are presented, let's just say that.