evil_geko
Full Member
- Joined
- Dec 31, 2005
- Messages
- 5,942
Not even close.He's as good as Costa, Benzema and Sanchez.
Not even close.He's as good as Costa, Benzema and Sanchez.
Well, the guy loves the club and is still only 23. Could he get more cash somewhere else? Yeah but he appears settled at the club and believes we are progressing so he appears in no rush to leave. I'm very pleased about that and I hope he could turn out to be a 'one club man'.
By suggesting he's earning good money I'm trolling?He's trolling.
Top news for us.
He's not as good as Costa, who is pretty much in the same tier as Aguero, neither of whom are at the level of Suarez.He's as good as Costa, Benzema and Sanchez. I probably should have said centre forward as opposed to striker but Messi and Neymar are totally different types of players.
The only out and out, lead the line centre forwards or strikers who are obviously better than him are Suarez, Aguero and Lewandowski.
Sorry but he is not as good as Costa.He's as good as Costa, Benzema and Sanchez. I probably should have said centre forward as opposed to striker but Messi and Neymar are totally different types of players.
The only out and out, lead the line centre forwards or strikers who are obviously better than him are Suarez, Aguero and Lewandowski.
Sorry but no, good player, but this is crazy talk.He's as good as Costa, Benzema and Sanchez.
What's that based on then?Costa is twice the player Kane is. Even Lukaku is better than Kane ffs.
ouch ! lolPerhaps now he can afford that tongue reduction surgery he so desperately needs.
80k? No chanceThose must be some heavy bonuses. 80k a week for a striker of his standing is a great deal. Kane could double that at any of the big clubs.
That's what the press association reported. Basic 80k plus bonuses.80k? No chance
Tournaments are a bit like that though, you often get bonafide world class players looking a little shite. I don't think Kane will ever be world class but I think he is a very, very good premier league striker.I think there are a few questions about just how good he can be. At the Euro's you could make a case for him being the worst player there, it can happen in tournaments but he really was atrocious and looked like a pub team player.
Wow if so. Kane really must be as dumb as he sounds if so.That's what the press association reported. Basic 80k plus bonuses.
He's more well rounded than Lukaku who has an awful first touch.Costa is twice the player Kane is. Even Lukaku is better than Kane ffs.
Guardian saying £125k per week and I'd say thats much more likelyThat's what the press association reported. Basic 80k plus bonuses.
Like how they were lucky that Bale signed a 4 year contract in May 2013 but left in the same summer?A brilliant striker that Spurs are incredibly lucky to have tied down for so long.
What's your point?Like how they were lucky that Bale signed a 4 year contract in May 2013 but left in the same summer?
That long term contracts doesn't guarantee loyal players.What's your point?
An odd post to try and target. I never suggested otherwise.That long term contracts doesn't guarantee loyal players.
Haha! Multi millionaire gets to play for his boyhood club for "only" £5million per year. It's where he grew up and I'd imagine it's where his friends and family are.Wow if so. Kane really must be as dumb as he sounds if so.
It can help ward off potential pursuers/make sure the club gets the best price for their player though.That long term contracts doesn't guarantee loyal players.
Didn't know he had a speech impediment. Just most Southerners sound dull as dishwater and daft as a brush.Haha! Multi millionaire gets to play for his boyhood club for "only" £5million per year. It's where he grew up and I'd imagine it's where his friends and family are.
You probably wouldn't be able to appreciate the importance of this given the amount of time you waste in here trying to wind people up.
Nice touch to mock the guys speech impediment by the way. Stay classy, friend!!
80k per week plus no doubt hefty bonuses is not exactly "poor money" for someone who only turned 23 four months ago, even if he could earn more money elsewhere.By suggesting he's earning good money I'm trolling?
I just can't see why he'd sign a new contract so early into the old one and would imagine he'd seek some parity with other top club players rather than tie himself to poor money for 6 years.
Don't think that's a revolutionary idea.
Bloody hell...He's as good as Costa, Benzema and Sanchez.
If you are a local, young and rich like he is and expecting your first where else in the UK are you going to choose to live over in and around London?80k per week plus no doubt hefty bonuses is not exactly "poor money" for someone who only turned 23 four months ago, even if he could earn more money elsewhere.
I can think of three very good reasons why he's signed a new contract: 1) He immediately starts earning a lot more money than before; 2) he really likes being at Spurs and strongly identifies with the club; and 3) he likes living in London where all friends and family are.
Doubt it.Guardian saying £125k per week and I'd say thats much more likely
But to be fair it's unlikely that Real or Barca are going to come in for H, therefore this contract will carry more weight than Bale's.Like how they were lucky that Bale signed a 4 year contract in May 2013 but left in the same summer?
Yeah, but that deal is what got the 85m or whatever it was for Bale.Like how they were lucky that Bale signed a 4 year contract in May 2013 but left in the same summer?
Levy has never put a buyout clause into a contract, I doubt he's starting now.Yeah, but that deal is what got the 85m or whatever it was for Bale.
If Kane keeps up his goal scoring form over another season or 2, he'll obviously leave for a bigger club (I don't personally think Spurs will be offering him CL football again anytime soon), and that contract will ensure them another big fee.
It's smart business by Levy, and I'm sure with a contract of that length, there'll be buyout clauses/conditions that Kane and his agent would be mad not to put in.