What makes Herrera good?

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,710
Location
Salford
Looking back to great United CMs (I include Carrick) in or around their prime, Herrera isn't even close imo.

I like his work rate and attitude, I'd personally want him as more of a squad player looking ahead though
 

Butty19

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
830
Location
Alberts Kit Bag
In term of being complete I think Pogba and Dembele are more complete of package than Herrera.
I did say arguably. I think he is more disciplined than Pogba but that could be down to experience. I'd say he is more effective than Dembele going forward.
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
Well, you can't label a player 'invisible' and expect people not to interpret that as not rating him.
I always figured Kante as Invisible, the same with Mccarthy at Everton for some years. Invisible doesn't mean you're not doing anything, it might mean you're doing the most important part of the team functions, but not getting the major credit. But you interpret it the other way - fine.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
10,006
Pogba and Carrick probably. Hes better in a 3. If we could get a DM like Makelele was for Chelsea, then we could have another AM or Forward.
 

Cassidy

No longer at risk of being mistaken for a Scouser
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
31,667
Pogba and Carrick probably. Hes better in a 3. If we could get a DM like Makelele was for Chelsea, then we could have another AM or Forward.
Hes been excellent in a 2 this season and was playing at a high level before we brought Carrick in. He is just a very good player. Also he was great playing in a 2 with Carrick under LVG.
He brings great energy and tenacity to the midfield along with a decent amount of creativity too.
 

Mike09

New Member
Joined
Dec 20, 2015
Messages
3,035
I did say arguably. I think he is more disciplined than Pogba but that could be down to experience. I'd say he is more effective than Dembele going forward.
But Herrera isn't even a complete midfielder. There are a few stuff that he lacks especially on his physical attribute.
How can you say Herrera is more effective than Dembele going forward? Dembele is better in term of physical attribute, he's quicker than Herrera, he's better dribbler. A lot of people and media even said that when Dembele doesn't play, Kane can't score.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
10,006
Hes been excellent in a 2 this season and was playing at a high level before we brought Carrick in. He is just a very good player. Also he was great playing in a 2 with Carrick under LVG.
He brings great energy and tenacity to the midfield along with a decent amount of creativity too.
Hes a decent player and hes played well, shooting apart, since playing with Pogba and Carrick/Fellaini. There are better options out there, but Mourinho has stated he trusts him so for this season at least hes probably one of the first names on the team sheet. In a two man midfield I'm not so sure.
 

RyRy11

Full Member
Joined
Jan 1, 2014
Messages
1,614
Herrera is criminally underrated by some on the Caf but hes not going to set the world alight either. I guarantee had Herrera signed for a mid to bottom table team and put in the same performances as he does for us we'd be calling him the natural Carrick replacement by now
 

dannyrhinos89

OMG socks and sandals lol!
Joined
Nov 24, 2013
Messages
14,496
I just love him because of his workrate and Passion and emotions he shows for united.

Plus other teams fans actually despise him which makes him even better, mainly because he has a little dirty streak in him. Honestly you ask Liverpool or city fans which united player they hate the most and 90% of the time it'll be Herrera.

Think about it if Herrera played the same way for city or Liverpool, we would hate him wouldn't we?
 

Janson

Full Member
Joined
Oct 29, 2016
Messages
6,028
Location
Sweden
Still people are saying the thread is about rating him, while it isn't. It's trying to get an understanding about what he actually does and what his actual role is within the team with Carrick being the defensive player, Pogba being the offensive, and Herrera came in as an attacking player...
Yes but you've created this thread when we were losing during the Boro match, probably out of frustration, saying he was invisible. It's not difficult to see why people got a negative impression. But you have explained later what your opinion and purpose of the thread is so I don't see why people are still questioning you.
 

ManUchosenbosslvg

New Member
Joined
Jul 5, 2015
Messages
1,933
Supports
Manchester reds
He's a dirty little fecker this season, we needed that in the team as we were prone to getting counter attacked.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
10,006
Herrera is criminally underrated by some on the Caf but hes not going to set the world alight either. I guarantee had Herrera signed for a mid to bottom table team and put in the same performances as he does for us we'd be calling him the natural Carrick replacement by now
They would of said hes the new Schneiderlin, then we would of bought him, and he probably wouldnt of performed for us lol
 

Oneunited26

New Member
Joined
Mar 19, 2014
Messages
4,635
Its strange to label him invisible and anonymus considering he has 20 percent more touches and 25 % more passes than any other player on the pitch.

He is also our best player of the ball.
Probably because in some eyes he does not score 20 goals lol
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
I just love him because of his workrate and Passion and emotions he shows for united.

Plus other teams fans actually despise him which makes him even better, mainly because he has a little dirty streak in him. Honestly you ask Liverpool or city fans which united player they hate the most and 90% of the time it'll be Herrera.

Think about it if Herrera played the same way for city or Liverpool, we would hate him wouldn't we?
We'd hate any player from those teams tbf
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
Yes but you've created this thread when we were losing during the Boro match, probably out of frustration, saying he was invisible. It's not difficult to see why people got a negative impression. But you have explained later what your opinion and purpose of the thread is so I don't see why people are still questioning you.
Fair point. One I wasn't considering when I made the thread.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,679
Location
The rainbow's end
I always figured Kante as Invisible, the same with Mccarthy at Everton for some years. Invisible doesn't mean you're not doing anything, it might mean you're doing the most important part of the team functions, but not getting the major credit. But you interpret it the other way - fine.
Well, it depends on what you consider to be the most important part of the team's functions. I've always believed that it's somewhat difficult to define what is "important" and what isn't in team sports. Whenever i'm having such discussions with friends, it usually all comes down two things: Individual skills in the action zones (where the ball is played) and/or statistics. In terms of individual skills, my opinion is that quite often personal preferences get in the way of good judgement. For example, after having watched two beastly midfielders like Robson and Keane, it was (and still is) difficult for some of our fans to really appreciate what Carrick brings to the table. It's the same with Ander, people look elsewhere for midfielders who are #8s and they see the likes of Modric, Iniesta/Rakitic or even Vidal, Verratti and Alcantara and they believe that we should have someone better in that role. As for the statistics, they usually do more favors to the players who offer end product than to the ones who do all the heavy lifting.

So, what does Herrera offer to our midfield? Most of our fans praise him for his "workrate" but what does that actually mean? Let's go back to what Mourinho has said about his United side. He has mentioned several times that he wants to create a side that will be able to dominate games. His intention is not to recreate a solely counter attacking side like his last title winning Chelsea team. We also know that Mourinho has never been a fan of high pressing. So, how does he plan to dominate games? There are two options, the first one is by "allowing" players from the second line of attack (midfield) to move further up the pitch and by collecting as many second balls in the attacking half.

Now, back to Herrera. No one in our team has regained possession in the attacking half more than Herrera. Someone posted earlier in this tread a stat showing that he's among the best in the PL in that category. Here's another one, perhaps equally important. No one in our squad has collected more second balls in the final third than the Spaniard. Not in the attacking half... in the final third. That's quite impressive for a player whose starting position is slightly ahead of the holding midfielder (or being the holding midfielder himself). This allows us to keep putting pressure on our opponents by pinning the down in their defensive third and Herrera plays a major role in it.


Secondly, we have the utilization of Pogba. The latter is a freak of nature, strong, tall but also able to get almost 3 dribbles p/g. When he's on the ball he can be a creative force and a difference maker for any big side. But he's only 23 years old so he's not the finished article yet. His off the ball movement needs to be improved. He's not lazy by any means, he will get there by gaining experience. But he's at his best with the ball at his feet in dangerous areas. This is something that Juventus acknowledged too. The more he stays in the attacking half, the more influence he can have in our game. The more times he doesn't interfere with initiating the build up but he focuses on finishing the build up, the more dangerous we become for our opponents.

And here comes another important contribution of Herrera to this side. He's the mediator between a 35 yo Carrick and Pogba who, as mentioned, is imperative to be given time and space on the ball in more advanced positions. And he can play that role between Carrick and Pogba without all kinds of spaces opening up in our lines because he can find pockets of space with his movement and he can create extra time on the ball with his first touch. He will always try to create a passing angle for Carrick in order to relieve him of the opponent's pressure or to allow him to move to a better space. And when he's on the ball, his teammates can usually trust him to protect the ball and pass it correctly. The confidence in your teammates' ability to retain possession generates positive thinking and forward movements.

But stats usually don't tell you these little details and, in that sense, you're right to suggest that he can be invisible to some. People will look for key passes/assists/goals to argue that he should be doing more or they will mention his tackles/interceptions in order to praise him. None of these things will tell you the full story. Football is first and foremost a game of spaces and as such its most difficult aspect is the team's transition. When we have the ball Herrera and Carrick/Valencia are the most important players in our attacking transition and when we lose the ball high up the pitch Herrera is probably the most important cog in the wheel of our defensive transition, either by regaining possession or by closing down the first attacker. That's what offers to the side.
 
Last edited:

LuisNaniencia

Sky Sports called my bluff
Joined
May 22, 2010
Messages
10,145
Location
271.5 miles from Old Trafford
He's a good footballer in all areas but not a great footballer. But what makes him so valuable for me is that he turns up like every game is a cup final. That doesn't necessarily mean he plays well every game, but my God he tries.
 

Munkehboi

Full Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2013
Messages
1,131
Location
Luke Shaw's bum
I agree with a lot of the posts here, he just has the right attributes of intensity, passion, work rate, stamina, passing, tackling and creativity to compliment our midfield three of himself, Pogba and Carrick. I dont think he really excels in anything but he's very good at them all.

Actually what I do like most of Herrera is the fact that he is always available and wanting the ball. He always seems to be an outlet for someone on the pitch.
 

Walters_19_MuFc

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2013
Messages
29,801
Location
Birmingham
Energy, pressing, ability to keep the ball ticking over. I must say; however, that I would like to see him being more adventurous. He's very quick to sometimes give it Pogba to create, but to me, he needs to take more responsibility sometimes.
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
Well, it depends on what you consider to be the most important part of the team's functions. I've always believed that it's somewhat difficult to define what is "important" and what isn't in team sports. Whenever i'm having such discussions with friends, it usually all comes down to down to two things: Individual skills in the action zones (where the ball is played) and/or statistics. In terms of individual skills, my opinion is that quite often personal preferences get in the way of good judgement. For example, after having watched two beastly midfielders like Robson and Keane, it was (and still is) difficult for some of our fans to really appreciate what Carrick brings to the table. It's the same with Ander, people look elsewhere for midfielders who are #8s and they see the likes of Modric, Iniesta/Rakitic or even Vidal, Verratti and Alcantara and they believe that we should have someone better in that role. As for the statistics, they usually do more favors to the players who offer end product than to the ones who do all the heavy lifting.

So, what does Herrera offer to our midfield? Most of our fans praise him for his "workrate" but what does that actually mean? Let's go back to what Mourinho has said about his United side. He has mentioned several times that he wants to create a side that will be able to dominate games. His intention is not to recreate a solely counter attacking side like his last title winning Chelsea team. We also know that Mourinho has never been a fan of high pressing. So, how does he plan to dominate games? There are two options, the first one is by "allowing" players from the second line of attack (midfield) to move further up the pitch and by collecting as many second balls in the attacking half.

Now, back to Herrera. No one in our team has regained possession in the attacking half more than Herrera. Someone posted earlier in this tread a stat showing that he's among the best in the PL in that category. Here's another one, perhaps equally important. No one in our squad has collected more second balls in the final third than the Spaniard. Not in the attacking half... in the final third. That's quite impressive for a player whose starting position is slightly ahead of the holding midfielder (or being the holding midfielder himself). This allows us to keep putting pressure on our opponents by pinning the down in their defensive third and Herrera plays a major role in it.


Secondly, we have the utilization of Pogba. The latter is a freak of nature, strong, tall but also able to get almost 3 dribbles p/g. When he's on the ball he can be a creative force and a difference maker for any big side. But he's only 23 years old so he's not the finished article yet. His off the ball movement needs to be improved. He's not lazy by any means, he will get there by gaining experience. But he's at his best with the ball at his feet in dangerous areas. This is something that Juventus acknowledged too. The more he stays in the attacking half, the more influence he can have in our game. The more times he doesn't interfere with initiating the build up but he focuses on finishing the build up, the more dangerous we become for our opponents.

And here comes another important contribution of Herrera to this side. He's the mediator between a 35 yo Carrick and Pogba who, as mentioned, is imperative to be given time and space on the ball in more advanced positions. And he can play that role between Carrick and Pogba without all kinds of spaces opening up in our lines because he can find pockets of space with his movement and he can create extra time on the ball with his first touch. He will always try to create a passing angle for Carrick in order to relieve him of the opponent's pressure or to allow him to move to a better space. And when he's on the ball, his teammates can usually trust him to protect the ball and pass it correctly. The confidence in your teammates' ability to retain possession generates positive thinking and forward movements.

But stats usually don't tell you these little details and, in that sense, you're right to suggest that he can be invisible to some. People will look for key passes/assists/goals to argue that he should be doing more or they will mention his tackles/interceptions in order to praise him. None of these things will tell you the full story. Football is first and foremost a game of spaces and as such its most difficult aspect is the team's transition. When we have the ball Herrera and Carrick/Valencia are the most important players in our attacking transition and when we lose the ball high up the pitch Herrera is probably the most important cog in the wheel of our defensive transition, either by regaining possession or by closing down the first attacker. That's what offers to the side.
Great analysis. I thoroughly enjoyed that. Just a follow up question: Is he in reality a box-box mid, allowing Pogba to roam? Because I remember a thread asking if Pogba actually played as Box-Box. Wouldn't that even out the balance of the spaces played?
Also: Is he best used/most efficient offensively or defensively?
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
A third point I wanna make/ask:
A lot mention Work Rate and Energy as some of his biggest forces. But aren't those attributes to expect from players in a team as highly rated as ours? Surely being lazy and not helping your team won't get u into the first 11.
 

Verbalkint

Full Member
Joined
Jan 7, 2016
Messages
580
Location
India
I don't have an intelligent answer but ill say this - Herrera reminds me of Evra in some ways & that's why i like him.

This apart i think he's a good player to have, works hard and plays dirty at times too. His performance against Liverpool was among the most memorable ones I've seen from any player in a United shirt.
 

DanBorja

New Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2011
Messages
366
He's really not that special or talented but works very well with Carrick and Pogba. His workrate and all-around presence compliments an aging Carrick and provides freedom to Pogba.

So it's definitely his workrate that makes him good for Utd. His shooting from outside the box is abysmal tho.
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,679
Location
The rainbow's end
Great analysis. I thoroughly enjoyed that. Just a follow up question: Is he in reality a box-box mid, allowing Pogba to roam? Because I remember a thread asking if Pogba actually played as Box-Box, wouldn't that even out the balance of the spaces played?
Also: Is he best used offensively or defensively?
He is a b2b midfielder and so is Pogba in our setup. He influences both ends of the pitch, so he "qualifies" for the role whatever way you choose to look at it. But he understands that the team as a whole will benefit more from Pogba being on the ball in the attacking half, so he uses his abilities to ensure that the more creative players will spend more time in advanced positions. It's quite unselfish of him actually and that's one of the reasons the majority of our fans likes him so much. But yeah, he helps with the build up and covers/defends in our half and he always lurks on the edge of the opposition box to regain possession/offer a passing option. That's the epitome of the b2b midfielder. It's just that Pogba becomes one of the main play makers in the attacking phase of our game (end of build up) by sitting at the base of a diamond which also consists of the wingers (tucking in) on its sides and Zlatan on its top that's making people believe that Herrera is playing way behind. But he's always in the whereabouts trying to keep the shape and ready to collect second balls. And Pogba, of course, plays his own part in our defensive game, he doesn't just sit still with his arms around his waist.

As for your second question, i believe he's being used correctly by Mourinho. I don't think he could be better than Pogba in a more attacking role and i still don't trust him with the holding role which needs more calmness and better reading of the game. Right now, he creates little pockets of space and provides time on the ball for both Pogba and Carrick to do their thing off and on the ball. That's invaluable contribution to us and it does it injustice when it's credited simply as energy/workrate. These are things Fellaini and Morgan can offer too but, according to Mourinho's starting lineups, Herrera seems to be as irreplaceable as Pogba, Carrick and Zlatan. Why? Because, as i mentioned in my previous post, it's work rate alongside the ability to protect the ball in tight spaces and the ability to regain possession in the attacking half. Especially the latter is something most managers are more than happy to have in their midfield.
 

m1y2

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
5,226
Location
Prague
Ridiculous threads like this are a great way of figuring out whose opinions are actually worth listening to on here. Honestly, you're above the age of 20 and struggling to figure out the value of players like Herrera then you should consider investing your time in another sport because football just isn't for you.
my thoughts

but but... he's average
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
He is a b2b midfielder and so is Pogba in our setup. He influences both ends of the pitch, so he "qualifies" for the role whatever way you choose to look at it. But he understands that the team as a whole will benefit more from Pogba being on the ball in the attacking half, so he uses his abilities to ensure that the more creative players will spend more time in advanced positions. It's quite unselfish of him actually and that's one of the reasons the majority of our fans likes him so much. But yeah, he helps with the build up and covers/defends in our half and he always lurks on the edge of the opposition box to regain possession/offer a passing option. That's the epitome of the b2b midfielder. It's just that Pogba becomes one of the main play makers in the attacking phase of our game (end of build up) by sitting at the base of a diamond which also consists of the wingers (tucking in) on its sides and Zlatan on its top that's making people believe that Herrera is playing way behind. But he's always in the whereabouts trying to keep the shape and ready to collect second balls. And Pogba, of course, plays his own part in our defensive game, he doesn't just sit still with his arms around his waist.

As for your second question, i believe he's being used correctly by Mourinho. I don't think he could be better than Pogba in a more attacking role and i still don't trust him with the holding role which needs more calmness and better reading of the game. Right now, he creates little pockets of space and provides time on the ball for both Pogba and Carrick to do their thing off and on the ball. That's invaluable contribution to us and it does it injustice when it's credited simply as energy/workrate. These are things Fellaini and Morgan can offer too but, according to Mourinho's starting lineups, Herrera seems to be as irreplaceable as Pogba, Carrick and Zlatan. Why? Because, as i mentioned in my previous post, it's work rate alongside the ability to protect the ball in tight spaces and the ability to regain possession in the attacking half. Especially the latter is something most managers are more than happy to have in their midfield.
So he's an aggressive ball winner when we're defending, and a roaming playmaker when we're attacking?
Also: his work rate ... I often consider this concept. High work rate - you must mean as in aggression (wanting the ball, not dirty) right? Because if you tell a player he'll be in the team, if he just runs a lot, then most of the players would just run more and be more unintelligent in their positioning I assume.
 

TsuWave

Full Member
Joined
Oct 12, 2013
Messages
14,525
Looking back to great United CMs (I include Carrick) in or around their prime, Herrera isn't even close imo
wow, carrick is grossly overrated around these parts. Especially in the past few years or so, I've been reading more and more about this mythical "prime carrick" and to me it just doesn't add up with the player i've watched all these years. Don't get me wrong though, good player and servant to the club but somehow his legend just took an amazing uptake to levels that just aren't true in my opinion.
 

LawCharltonBest

Enjoys watching fox porn
Joined
May 17, 2012
Messages
15,710
Location
Salford
wow, carrick is grossly overrated around these parts. Especially in the past few years or so, I've been reading more and more about this mythical "prime carrick" and to me it just doesn't add up with the player i've watched all these years. Don't get me wrong though, good player and servant to the club but somehow his legend just took an amazing uptake to levels that just aren't true in my opinion.
He's the one that makes it all tick. I'll never be able to find it, but Neville did analysis on him on MNF a while back about the difference he makes when he plays. The amount of brilliant interceptions and forward passes he makes that go unnoticed is surreal
 

TheRedDevil'sAdvocate

Full Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2013
Messages
3,679
Location
The rainbow's end
So he's an aggressive ball winner when we're defending, and a roaming playmaker when we're attacking?
Also: his work rate ... I often consider this concept. High work rate - you must mean as in aggression (wanting the ball, not dirty) right? Because if you tell a player he'll be in the team, if he just runs a lot, then most of the players would just run more and be more unintelligent in their positioning I assume.
I believe that most people would agree with this description.

I'm talking about workrate as purposeful coverage of space on the pitch. There are many players who run a lot on the pitch but there only a few who can apply quality pressing very high on the pitch or have the anticipation to predict where the ball will end up. The latter is a quality that usually goes unnoticed by many football fans. In the stats i posted in my first post, Hazard and Ozil are the players who have regained possession in the attacking third more times than anyone else. If you asked ten fans to give you the first two names in that category, none of them would get them right, especially Ozil who's not an athletic footballer. It's about being clever too (Herrera obviously has more tackles). It's one of the qualities that made SAF turn Rooney into a SS/#10 instead of making him the main attacking force in the team.

It's also a practical matter for us. Carrick isn't as mobile as he used to be in his glory days when he could hold the midfield (of two) on his own.He needs some protection and Herrera offers it. Not just by running back to our half and then up again but by being able to both play a part in the build up and close down the first attacker until Carrick and the back four have reorganized our defensive shape. It's a quite nice partnership, Carrick holds and dictates play by providing Herrera the opportunity to play a bit further and Herrera provides cover for him so he doesn't have to deal with attackers running straight at him. In a similar manner, Pogba wants to play closer to Zlatan and the other creative players, so it's important that Herrera covers the space in the midfield when the Frenchman moves further up the pitch. Not just by running again but by circulating the ball in the most congested areas of the pitch.

The energy levels and the work rate give Herrera the nod ahead of Bastian for that role (who has the footballing brain) and in the same time his cleverness gives him the nod ahead of Morgan/Fellaini (who aren't as good on the ball).
 

m1y2

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
5,226
Location
Prague
Show a YouTube highlight of anything and they'd look like godsend. Bet I could find you one of Tom Cleverly and just quote you below.
of course but some ppl call him invisible which is annoying and the lack of knowledge here, so just a little reminder here for some ppl
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,408
Quick comparison from whoscored is interesting for similar players. For defensive stats Coquelin outperforms Kante which surprised me but Herrera looks decent - as an all rounder he is involved in more attacking play but still has strong stats from a defensive point of view.

Green: best score
Red: worst score


Ander Herrera:

Average tackles per game 2.8
Average interceptions 2.7
Goals 1

Assists 3
Pass Success 88.5
Key Passes 1.1

Kante:
Average tackles per game 3.1
Average interceptions 2.8

Goals 2
Assists 1
Pass Success 89.7
Key Passes 0.7

Coquelin:
Average tackles per game 3.3
Average interceptions 2.9

Goals 0
Assists 0

Pass Success 88.5
Key Passes 0.6

Fernandinho:
Average tackles per game 2.4
Average interceptions 2.1

Goals 2
Assists 1
Pass Success 85.4
Key Passes 0.9
 

poleglass red

Full Member
Joined
Aug 5, 2015
Messages
3,720
good thing about him is his versatility. Against a top team he can sit back alongwith Carrick and protect the back line. against weaker teams he can be more box to box and actually play a more attacking role. his shooting has been off recently, is about the only bad thing I can say about him.
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
of course but some ppl call him invisible which is annoying and the lack of knowledge here, so just a little reminder here for some ppl
If you point a camera at a guy for 8 minutes and tell people to look at it, they won't see anything else. People should remind you to think before posting. YouTube highlights really doesn't help anything in this debate.
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
Quick comparison from whoscored is interesting for similar players. For defensive stats Coquelin outperforms Kante which surprised me but Herrera looks decent - as an all rounder he is involved in more attacking play but still has strong stats from a defensive point of view.

Green: best score
Red: worst score


Ander Herrera:

Average tackles per game 2.8
Average interceptions 2.7
Goals 1

Assists 3
Pass Success 88.5
Key Passes 1.1

Kante:
Average tackles per game 3.1
Average interceptions 2.8

Goals 2
Assists 1
Pass Success 89.7
Key Passes 0.7

Coquelin:
Average tackles per game 3.3
Average interceptions 2.9

Goals 0
Assists 0

Pass Success 88.5
Key Passes 0.6

Fernandinho:
Average tackles per game 2.4
Average interceptions 2.1

Goals 2
Assists 1
Pass Success 85.4
Key Passes 0.9
All of those I would categorise as defensive midfielders. That's my point really - we bought him because he was a great prospect offensively, but from what I've been seeing, he's not. He's providing defensive backup, but then everybody was crying for Carrick to bind defence and mid. So then what did Herrera actually provide. But I think I've gotten my answer now
 

Scholesy

New Member
Joined
Oct 17, 2006
Messages
11,118
Location
'And Solskjær has won it'
All of those I would categorise as defensive midfielders. That's my point really - we bought him because he was a great prospect offensively, but from what I've been seeing, he's not. He's providing defensive backup, but then everybody was crying for Carrick to bind defence and mid. So then what did Herrera actually provide. But I think I've gotten my answer now
Agree, imo Herrera is outstanding as the holding midfielder. Anywhere else, just ok.
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Ander has a good personality. He gets stuck in and knits play together. He's got good technique that he can get himself out of trouble and he has a picture of the game. You don't need 11+ superstars. When he first came, he chipped in with goals. Obviously playing under Moyes wasn't good for anyone and LVG was a nightmare. Herreras job isn't so much offensive anymore and the balance looks ok baring the odd brain fart.
 

caid

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
8,418
Location
Dublin
But Herrera isn't even a complete midfielder. There are a few stuff that he lacks especially on his physical attribute.
How can you say Herrera is more effective than Dembele going forward? Dembele is better in term of physical attribute, he's quicker than Herrera, he's better dribbler. A lot of people and media even said that when Dembele doesn't play, Kane can't score.
Dembele has scored about 6 goals for tottenham in 4+ seasons, his assists are similarly low.
Hes a water carrier, hes not beating guys on the edge of the box. Hes good at carrying the ball out of defence and getting it forward quickly.

Herrera is a better passer by a distance imo, his positioning and movement are better.
He has more of an eye for a pass and he scored 5 goals last season despite most people agreeing he had a pretty poor season (so hes a better goalscorer)
Physically hes not a monster but hes not a pushover either.
Its debatable but i rate herrera more and think he has more to his game
 

m1y2

New Member
Joined
Jan 26, 2014
Messages
5,226
Location
Prague
If you point a camera at a guy for 8 minutes and tell people to look at it, they won't see anything else. People should remind you to think before posting. YouTube highlights really doesn't help anything in this debate.
just realized you are the one who started this thread:lol:

just go watch some other sport, maybe you understand something better than footy, tennis might be fine for you - less players on the pitch so you won't miss of much what makes this or that player good, cheers
 

ThomasEmil

Invisible Herrera Watcher
Joined
Dec 4, 2013
Messages
5,435
Location
Denmark
just realized you are the one who started this thread:lol:

just go watch some other sport, maybe you understand something better than footy, tennis might be fine for you - less players on the pitch so you won't miss of much what makes this or that player good, cheers
Lol. Go watch something other than YouTube - you might be surprised at the quality definition.