PL entertaining idea of late weekend kickoff

Theafonis

In love with @Eboue
Joined
Dec 13, 2013
Messages
7,702
Location
British Columbia
Supports
Chelsea
http://www.reuters.com/article/soccer-england-times-idINKBN1940Y0

n" style="transform: translate3d(0px, 0px, 0px);">Premier League matches could kick off as late as 7:45 p.m. from the 2019-20 season as part of plans to broadcast at least half of the 380 games live on television, according to a report in The Times.

The plan was proposed after broadcasters Sky reported that television viewership for league matches fell 14 percent last season while subscriptions to their mobile video service and online live video provider rose by 31 percent.

"As we anticipated, the way customers engage with live sport is changing, with strong growth in newer, digital-first platforms," a Sky spokesman told The Times.

Supporters are likely to oppose the change as travelling to games will become harder compared to the current 3 p.m. kick-offs but the league's growing international popularity is expected to provide incentive to showcase more matches.

"The Premier League is more popular than ever due to the fantastic football put on by clubs and the commitment of fans," a spokesman for the league told The Times.

"In the season 2016-17 stadiums were a record 96.5 percent full, unique broadcasting reach in the UK was up 2 percent on the previous season and matches were available to watch in one billion homes in 188 countries."

Broadcasters can submit their bids for domestic rights by the end of the year and the final decision is expected to be made in February.

Sky and BT Sport acquired domestic broadcasting rights worth 5.14 billion pounds ($6.52 billion) for three years in 2015.
 

NYAS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 25, 2012
Messages
4,323
No thanks. That's when I watch Spanish/Italian/French/Portuguese football.
 

ChaddyP

Full Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2011
Messages
13,852
Location
Jamaica
No. We are no longer in the Europa league. feck off with that Continental shite.
 

DrRodo

Honest worker, never posts
Joined
Jun 14, 2014
Messages
2,022
Location
Chile
No thanks. That's when I watch Spanish/Italian/French/Portuguese football.
This.

Even though i have to wake up sometimes at 7:45 am to watch early games (here in south america) i dont want them to clash with other european league games, or our local leagues games also
 

Red Digger

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
252
Location
Ireland
I like it. It will be a great excuse to go out for a few early pints on a Saturday night. Good news for the pub trade.
 

Rafateria

New Member
Joined
Mar 22, 2009
Messages
6,246
Location
Shanghai
PL & Sky/BT will use any excuse to maximise profits. It will surely come. Won't be good for viewers in Asia but maybe they are targeting the North & South American markets.
 

rcoobc

Not as crap as eferyone thinks
Joined
Jul 28, 2010
Messages
41,702
Location
C-137
Too much football.

Just put the important matches back on Sunday as a double header
 

Successful

Owes the Caf £25 (With interests)
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
7,347
Location
On top of the league
No thanks. That's when I watch Spanish/Italian/French/Portuguese football.
Exactly. And the culture of English football is so centered around the pub in the afternoon and all that goes with the weekend. Sort of a family activity. You play late in warmer countries, not in freezing cold ones. Leave the late nights for European nights or those monday games.
 

mitchmouse

loves to hate United.
Joined
Oct 8, 2014
Messages
17,577
I heard they are more likely to go for 11am kick offs on Sunday
 

Cassady

Supports Liverpool, Not Accrington Stanley
Joined
Jan 15, 2014
Messages
3,682
Location
South Liverpool.
Supports
Accrington Stanley.
Exactly. And the culture of English football is so centered around the pub in the afternoon and all that goes with the weekend. Sort of a family activity. You play late in warmer countries, not in freezing cold ones. Leave the late nights for European nights or those monday games.

I remember when it was centred around the actual football match in the afternoon.
 

Robertd0803

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
6,607
7.45 on a Saturday is a stupid kick off time. If they really need an extra time slot just stagger the Sunday kick off times by half an hour.
 

Successful

Owes the Caf £25 (With interests)
Joined
Dec 15, 2006
Messages
7,347
Location
On top of the league
I remember when it was centred around the actual football match in the afternoon.
I think I forgot to write all the stuff I wanted to put in there :lol: Went a bit too fast. Of course it's centered around the football match. Pub or family event doesn't matter. It's suppose to be a good time out for everyone. Then the weekend continues in the evening.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,168
Location
Manchester
What the PL should do is scrap 3pm Saturday games completely and move the standard PL fixture spot to Sunday, thus avoiding the blackout and leaving Saturday 3pm slots to Championship and below.

They should then completely cut Sky and BT out of the equation and sell their product directly to us the consumers via an online based service - think Netflix for football.

This can be a subscription service with apps for smart TVs, mobile phones, tablets, PS/Xbox etc or via web browser, with every single game available to watch live.

They could sell this subscription for a lower price per month than we are currently made to fork out for Sky and BT Sport and by cutting out the middleman the PL still bring in more money overall, and I'd also wager more people would take up the option to subscribe when they get every game via one source for a more reasonable price.

Netflix has shown that people are willing to pay for content when they're not being ripped off, and the NFL has shown this model to work with their Game Pass system.

PL needs to embrace the technology available in digital media, everybody wins. Except Sky and BT, they lose, which is another bonus.
 

11101

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2014
Messages
21,320
Good to see regulat TV viewer figures drop so much. 14 percent is a big fall. Maybe they'll realise they're pushing it all too far.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,479
What the PL should do is scrap 3pm Saturday games completely and move the standard PL fixture spot to Sunday, thus avoiding the blackout and leaving Saturday 3pm slots to Championship and below.

They should then completely cut Sky and BT out of the equation and sell their product directly to us the consumers via an online based service - think Netflix for football.

This can be a subscription service with apps for smart TVs, mobile phones, tablets, PS/Xbox etc or via web browser, with every single game available to watch live.

They could sell this subscription for a lower price per month than we are currently made to fork out for Sky and BT Sport and by cutting out the middleman the PL still bring in more money overall, and I'd also wager more people would take up the option to subscribe when they get every game via one source for a more reasonable price.

Netflix has shown that people are willing to pay for content when they're not being ripped off, and the NFL has shown this model to work with their Game Pass system.

PL needs to embrace the technology available in digital media, everybody wins. Except Sky and BT, they lose, which is another bonus.
Some good suggestions there, switching to an online sub service would make a lot of sense and make it easier for the average fan to see all the games they want.

It all sounds too sensible though no doubt the Premier League will not even consider it.

I vaguely remember reading a few stories in the 90's that that kept saying eventually the PL would have a PPV service so you could watch any game you wanted, 20 years later and still no sign of it.
 

OnlyTwoDaSilvas

Gullible
Joined
Feb 4, 2013
Messages
21,692
Location
The Mathews Bridge
What the PL should do is scrap 3pm Saturday games completely and move the standard PL fixture spot to Sunday, thus avoiding the blackout and leaving Saturday 3pm slots to Championship and below.

They should then completely cut Sky and BT out of the equation and sell their product directly to us the consumers via an online based service - think Netflix for football.

This can be a subscription service with apps for smart TVs, mobile phones, tablets, PS/Xbox etc or via web browser, with every single game available to watch live.

They could sell this subscription for a lower price per month than we are currently made to fork out for Sky and BT Sport and by cutting out the middleman the PL still bring in more money overall, and I'd also wager more people would take up the option to subscribe when they get every game via one source for a more reasonable price.

Netflix has shown that people are willing to pay for content when they're not being ripped off, and the NFL has shown this model to work with their Game Pass system.

PL needs to embrace the technology available in digital media, everybody wins. Except Sky and BT, they lose, which is another bonus.
Definitely this.

I think they could even charge more than a BT/Sky Sports package and easily justify it. Right now, to get the platform for Sky or BT TV and to then add on the Sports channels to that platform, it can cost around £90-£100 per month. For that money, you are still only getting a fraction of live football. 3pm KO's blacked out, even games that should have been 3pm KOs that have been moved to the Sunday (due to Europa League for example) also carry forward the same blackout. It's a joke that for the money that fans fork out, they still can't watch every Premier League game. As United fans, we are lucky that we are on TV 9 PL matchdays out of 10. For a fan of a midtable club, it's terrible value, and just not worth it unless they want to watch a lot of football as a neutral.

The North American sports all have very good online platforms. Even the WWE does now too. The PL introduced that Premier League Pass for a short time that was only available in New Zealand, Indonesia and some little pacific islands, for some reason. Some other countries have PL games behind the red button for much less ££ than we pay in the UK. Yet in the PL's own country, the accessibility to watch live Premier League football is pretty awful. Expensive, limited, and spread across two different services. It makes no sense.

They are getting heavy handed with shutting down streams, but how else can you watch the 3pm KOs? Are you really supposed to sit and wait for Match of the Day, to watch 8 minutes of highlights? To fork out near £100 a month for live football and to still be listening to games on the radio as the only legitimate coverage is pretty shocking in 2017.

I vaguely remember reading a few stories in the 90's that that kept saying eventually the PL would have a PPV service so you could watch any game you wanted, 20 years later and still no sign of it.
They did try to do this, very badly, in the early 00's. "PremPlus" it was called, with specific league games behind a PPV blackout. This was before someone ridiculously decided that Premier League football has to be shared between two channels. They now seem to claim that NowTV offers the same solution, where you can get a Sky Sports day pass for £6.99 or something. It's the massively outdated 3pm blackout that is the issue more than anything. Either ditch the blackout, or don't have PL and FL fixtures at the same time.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,479
They did try to do this, very badly, in the early 00's. "PremPlus" it was called, with specific league games behind a PPV blackout. This was before someone ridiculously decided that Premier League football has to be shared between two channels. They now seem to claim that NowTV offers the same solution, where you can get a Sky Sports day pass for £6.99 or something. It's the massively outdated 3pm blackout that is the issue more than anything. Either ditch the blackout, or don't have PL and FL fixtures at the same time.
Yeah i remember Prem Plus, but i think the talk back in the day was always about a PPV service where you could watch any PL match you wanted to. Not just specific matches, as i said 20 years on still no sign of it, the depressing thing is it wouldn't surprise me if we still don't have it 20 years from now.

And yeah the 3pm blackout is ridiculous and is the root of all this nonsense, it would be a shame to have no saturday matches but moving everything to a sunday might be the easiest solution.
 

El General 1994

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2012
Messages
1,225
Location
West Bromwich and Game Pass
What the PL should do is scrap 3pm Saturday games completely and move the standard PL fixture spot to Sunday, thus avoiding the blackout and leaving Saturday 3pm slots to Championship and below.

They should then completely cut Sky and BT out of the equation and sell their product directly to us the consumers via an online based service - think Netflix for football.

This can be a subscription service with apps for smart TVs, mobile phones, tablets, PS/Xbox etc or via web browser, with every single game available to watch live.

They could sell this subscription for a lower price per month than we are currently made to fork out for Sky and BT Sport and by cutting out the middleman the PL still bring in more money overall, and I'd also wager more people would take up the option to subscribe when they get every game via one source for a more reasonable price.

Netflix has shown that people are willing to pay for content when they're not being ripped off, and the NFL has shown this model to work with their Game Pass system.

PL needs to embrace the technology available in digital media, everybody wins. Except Sky and BT, they lose, which is another bonus.

Excellent suggestions here.
 

starman

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
7,092
Location
Under a tree.
What the PL should do is scrap 3pm Saturday games completely and move the standard PL fixture spot to Sunday, thus avoiding the blackout and leaving Saturday 3pm slots to Championship and below.

They should then completely cut Sky and BT out of the equation and sell their product directly to us the consumers via an online based service - think Netflix for football.

This can be a subscription service with apps for smart TVs, mobile phones, tablets, PS/Xbox etc or via web browser, with every single game available to watch live.

They could sell this subscription for a lower price per month than we are currently made to fork out for Sky and BT Sport and by cutting out the middleman the PL still bring in more money overall, and I'd also wager more people would take up the option to subscribe when they get every game via one source for a more reasonable price.

Netflix has shown that people are willing to pay for content when they're not being ripped off, and the NFL has shown this model to work with their Game Pass system.

PL needs to embrace the technology available in digital media, everybody wins. Except Sky and BT, they lose, which is another bonus.
What happens if the internet goes down or connection speeds are not fast enough?
 

starman

Full Member
Joined
May 14, 2007
Messages
7,092
Location
Under a tree.
Netflix can stream in HD at very low connection speeds, that wouldn't be an issue.
Bit rate is low though. For me Netflix's was down for 2 hours the over day. Having online only streaming for football is not a viable solution right now
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,168
Location
Manchester
Bit rate is low though. For me Netflix's was down for 2 hours the over day. Having online only streaming for football is not a viable solution right now
You could say the same thing about poor weather interfering with Sky dishes. At the end of the day the internet is easily sufficiently stable for this kind of service.

BT TV is already provided entirely by internet, and there's talk of Sky Q becoming the same next year and dishes becoming a thing of the past.

It's definitely a viable solution.
 

Drifter

American
Joined
Jan 27, 2004
Messages
68,365
Think we're getting over saturated with football now. I only tend to watch the odd game outside of watching United nowadays and the major cup competitions.
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,479
Well then, that makes the idea of moving football over to online only silly, until more reliable tech comes out
I've had sky and virgin tv services go out in the past and missed games how is that any different from an internet service going down?

Most parts of the UK have pretty reliable internet.
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,681
Location
London
What the PL should do is scrap 3pm Saturday games completely and move the standard PL fixture spot to Sunday, thus avoiding the blackout and leaving Saturday 3pm slots to Championship and below.

They should then completely cut Sky and BT out of the equation and sell their product directly to us the consumers via an online based service - think Netflix for football.

This can be a subscription service with apps for smart TVs, mobile phones, tablets, PS/Xbox etc or via web browser, with every single game available to watch live.

They could sell this subscription for a lower price per month than we are currently made to fork out for Sky and BT Sport and by cutting out the middleman the PL still bring in more money overall, and I'd also wager more people would take up the option to subscribe when they get every game via one source for a more reasonable price.

Netflix has shown that people are willing to pay for content when they're not being ripped off, and the NFL has shown this model to work with their Game Pass system.

PL needs to embrace the technology available in digital media, everybody wins. Except Sky and BT, they lose, which is another bonus.
Sky and BT between them pay something like £1.7b per year for the TV rights. Would the premier league get that much revenue selling straight to the consumer? I doubt it. Sky and BT pay over the odds to entice people to join their service, hence the ridiculous fees.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,168
Location
Manchester
Sky and BT between them pay something like £1.7b per year for the TV rights. Would the premier league get that much revenue selling straight to the consumer? I doubt it. Sky and BT pay over the odds to entice people to join their service, hence the ridiculous fees.
You think Sky and BT provide football at a loss?
 

stevoc

Full Member
Joined
Jun 11, 2011
Messages
20,479
Sky and BT between them pay something like £1.7b per year for the TV rights. Would the premier league get that much revenue selling straight to the consumer? I doubt it. Sky and BT pay over the odds to entice people to join their service, hence the ridiculous fees.
Possibly it depends on how many subscribers they can get i suppose. I'm currently paying over £40 a month for Sky and Bt sports. Even if they charged £30 a month for a subscription service and managed to attract 5m subscribers thats around 1.8 billion per year.
 

Mr Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 4, 2015
Messages
4,026
Location
Australia
Obviously this benefits me as an overseas viewer (I could watch matches over breakfast) but I do think local, and especially match-going fans should be put first with regard to playing times.
 

whatwha

Sniffs Erricksson’s diarrhea
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
7,612
Location
Norway
What's the deal with the "Saturday 3 pm blackout" in England? What's the point? Who decided on it?
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,681
Location
London
Possibly it depends on how many subscribers they can get i suppose. I'm currently paying over £40 a month for Sky and Bt sports. Even if they charged £30 a month for a subscription service and managed to attract 5m subscribers thats around 1.8 billion per year.
I'm not sure how much it would cost for the PL to run their own digital media platform, including presenters, filming, production, marketing, design, and all the rest of the on-going IT and service delivery costs, but I imagine it would cost quite a bit. they would have to earn a lot more than £1.7b per year, then, just to match what Sky and BT are offering (an amount that seems to go up every 3 years). I just see no reason for them to do this on their own.
 

stepic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2006
Messages
8,681
Location
London
You think Sky and BT provide football at a loss?
it's not as easy as that. Sky and BT aren't just offering football. They know by not paying over the odds for the premier league rights, they wouldn't just lose football fans but users of their TV, movie and broadband services, too.
 

Mindhunter

Full Member
Joined
Jul 26, 2013
Messages
3,633
Possibly it depends on how many subscribers they can get i suppose. I'm currently paying over £40 a month for Sky and Bt sports. Even if they charged £30 a month for a subscription service and managed to attract 5m subscribers thats around 1.8 billion per year.
I don't think they want to take on the hassle of managing a data center and getting into businesses they know nothing about. Selling the rights is the easiest way to make money.

Also, this solution won't work in all geographies. In India, Tata Sky is pretty cheap (compared to UK) and we get to watch most EPL matches through the Star Sports channels. Also, internet connectivity and penetration has much to be desired so I don't think there will be takers for a more premium streaming service here.