Transfer Tweets - Summer 2017 | Keep it on topic

Classical Mechanic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 25, 2014
Messages
35,216
Location
xG Zombie Nation
Tweeted four days ago when there was no news of us being interested in Sancho.
Sancho is supposed to have been AWOL for a few days at least and Gomes is his mate from the England set up living in the same area. I'm pretty sure he would know what is going on. If we are trying to sign him it won't have started today.

I agree though, they are playing in the WC together soon so it could be entirely innocent.
 

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,272
We should be all over Lucas and Matuidi.
Not sure we need Matuidi. Should have enough depth with Matic signing. Lucas could be a good signing even though I have some doubts about his ability to handle the physicality of the Premier League as I did when we first tried to sign him. Still, hugely talented player and excellent dribbler. If available cheap wouldn't be a bad option for the wing. That being said, he'd be a risk if he was the only winger we signed imo.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
Strange time for Glaston to see his manager say what some in the forum have said too which he's vehemently disagreed with.
What I said was that it's a not a race to see who can sign the most new players in the fastest time. And even if some transfer muppets believe that there is such a race, it doesn't seem to have dawned on them that there's no prize for winning it.

Pochettino has not said otherwise.
 

beingshe7don

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2016
Messages
2,735
Not sure we need Matuidi. Should have enough depth with Matic signing. Lucas could be a good signing even though I have some doubts about his ability to handle the physicality of the Premier League as I did when we first tried to sign him. Still, hugely talented player and excellent dribbler. If available cheap wouldn't be a bad option for the wing. That being said, he'd be a risk if he was the only winger we signed imo.
Assuming Matic will be brought in and he would replace Carrick mainly. Matuidi could be Herrera's cover whereas Periera could be Pogba's cover. I rate Lucas Moura pretty high. I just think the guy has a lot of potential and he could be a diamond in the rough if Mourinho can get him under his wings. Talent-wise he's better than Willian and Willian has done really well for Chelsea and not to mention that Lucas is just 24. Even if we get Perisic, I think Lucas should still be bought, he's one of the few orthodox wingers out there who runs to the by line and crosses and offers more direct play rather than passing (which practically all of our attacking players tend to do)
 

freshibal

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2007
Messages
3,686
Location
the ultimate combination is genius and insanity
What I said was that it's a not a race to see who can sign the most new players in the fastest time. And even if some transfer muppets believe that there is such a race, it doesn't seem to have dawned on them that there's no prize for winning it.

Pochettino has not said otherwise.

Which would be fair enough, but spurs have signed nobody as far as I know.
 

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,272
Assuming Matic will be brought in and he would replace Carrick mainly. Matuidi could be Herrera's cover whereas Periera could be Pogba's cover. I rate Lucas Moura pretty high. I just think the guy has a lot of potential and he could be a diamond in the rough if Mourinho can get him under his wings. Talent-wise he's better than Willian and Willian has done really well for Chelsea and not to mention that Lucas is just 24. Even if we get Perisic, I think Lucas should still be bought, he's one of the few orthodox wingers out there who runs to the by line and crosses and offers more direct play rather than passing (which practically all of our attacking players tend to do)
Not disagreeing with anything you've said about Lucas. He's a fantastic talent that I've watched since his time in Brazil. He'd just be a bit of a risk if he was the only attacking option we brought in. You're forgetting we still have Fellaini as backup for Herrera.
 

Alemar

Full Member
Joined
Jul 11, 2017
Messages
7,617
Good stuff, now on to #4.
Always good to have more depth in midfield, although Matic per se wouldn't win us trophies. We need more attacking talent, and if acquired, then matic will help them flourish. Still, at a quoted price (35m + 5m add-on) it is, I would say, a solid signing. Much better than 50m reported a few days ago

The question is, whether it will be a trio with him, pogba and Herrera, or mostly rotation between matic and ander alongside pogba (if, as rumored, mourinho plans to play as a back 3 more often, it is unlikely to see a trio in midfield in this setup).
 
Last edited:

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,272
Always good to have more depth in midfield, although Matic per se wouldn't win us trophies. We need more attacking talent, and if acquired, then matic will help them flourish.

The question is, whether it will be a trio with him, pogba and Herrera, or mostly rotation between matic and ander alongside pogba (if, as rumored, mourinho plans to play as a back 3 more often, it is unlikely to see a trio in midfield in this setup)
The only system we've played with 3 at the back is the 3-5-2 though, so a 3-man midfield. Real question if we're using that setup is whether we use a more attacking cam like Mkhi or a more traditional 3-man midfield with Matic, Herrera, and Pogba
 

seegoblu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 14, 2016
Messages
286
Well, so what? As I've said there is no race and the window still as a month to run.
But to think that the transfer window lends itself to making last minute deals for key players on other teams' squad is a bit naive, no? Where is the selling club going to find a last minute replacement for the key player you are taking from their squad. That's why there IS an urgency to make early moves in the window. Just go ask Arsenal how their Lemar transfer is proceeding, as they waited too long to make their move and Monaco may not sell even if their 80m valuation is met now that they've sold 3 key players from last year.
 

Dazzmondo

Full Member
Joined
Jul 13, 2013
Messages
9,272

Just regarding the fee, seems to be £35m up front with a further £5m in potential addons. About as good a deal as you could get for any 1st XI Chelsea player imo