Feed Me
I'm hungry
Poor injury record, below par end product - he'll be a good squad player, but nothing to be jealous about.
He didn't really try to hide as he named the exact price that was being quoted for him.this is the type of player roy keane was talking about yesterday in regards to average players going for 36+ million
Carl from TwitterOxlade-Chamberlain proving that once you've played for Southampton you will still end up at Liverpool somehow. There is no escape.
He had decent career and felt that now is the right time to end it. Respect.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Didn't really improve him so much as play him in a position best suited to his skillset and alongside players to maximise his potential. He's made him fitter and more durable for sure but he was always a fantastic player.Do you guys reckon that Klopp can improve him as much as Lallana?
Lallana was always a talented player. Ox has talent as well, should be a good signing. Lallana was going to eventually show his quality though.Do you guys reckon that Klopp can improve him as much as Lallana?
And these cnuts were laughing at us all season last year for spending 89m on Pogba who is 50x the player he is What a bunch of hypocrites.47m for Oxlde Chamberlain? What?!
£35 million plus £5 million in ads ons but it's still a lot based on his career so far.47m for Oxlde Chamberlain? What?!
That's not really true anymore though, is it?. He doesn't have that great a record anymore. And Rob Holding is a stretch. He bought Holding last year, and he is not a finished or even close to finished article. Not sure how that counts as bringing someone through.Wenger has one of the best records at top teams of developing youth in Europe. Even in the past 2 seasons he's brought through Bellerin, Holding and Iwobi.
47£M for Oxlade Chamberlain? Wow that is questionable. Great deals for Salah and Keita but you wonder Klopps thinking for this deal. He's not even as good as Lalana who will be back in a couple months.Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Overpriced signing but I'm not sure where this Lingard comparison is coming from since I don't see Chelsea or Liverpool ever being interested in Lingard or any club making an offer higher than 10M. They're both English players and are same age. These managers and scouts are not idiots.
Last i checked 35+5 is 40, if 47 is true then yous been mugged off. I hope it is.£35 million plus £5 million in ads ons but it's still a lot based on his career so far.
Carl from Twitter
Lingard would fetch atleast 20m in normal circumstances. As you said the managers and scouts are not idiots and therefore our manager plays him in important matches.Overpriced signing but I'm not sure where this Lingard comparison is coming from since I don't see Chelsea or Liverpool ever being interested in Lingard or any club making an offer higher than 10M. They're both English players and are same age. These managers and scouts are not idiots.
Nah I think he wanted Liverpool all along and turned down Chelsea when Liverpool came calling. He was a Pool fan as a kid apparently. Quite refreshing to see someone turn down a bigger offer to go elsewhere.I reckon he wanted to stay in London. How did Chelsea feck this up?