UEFA considering cap on fees that clubs pay to agents

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,171
Location
Manchester
The agents work for they player, So the player must pay the agent some sort of salary. Why does the club have to pay the agent aswel? The agent is employed by the player and is nothing to do with the club. I don’t get it.
There's a reason the FA has a standard conflict of interest form for intermediaries, agents are generally contracted to act on behalf of both the player and the club.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,171
Location
Manchester
Which is what they do.
Nah, clubs generally pay for the players' share of the agents fees and the player is taxed on the benefit in kind.

Same as when you or I have medical insurance or a company car provided by our employers, basically.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,956
Location
France
There's a reason the FA has a standard conflict of interest form for intermediaries, agents are generally contracted to act on behalf of both the player and the club.
I was going to add that part, that's the real new thing. Clubs are more and more likely to let the agent or an agent deal with the negotiations which obviously has a fee.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,171
Location
Manchester
I was going to add that part, that's the real new thing. Clubs are more and more likely to let the agent or an agent deal with the negotiations which obviously has a fee.
It's not particularly new, been going on for years.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,956
Location
France
Nah, clubs generally pay for the players' share of the agents fees and the player is taxed on the benefit in kind.

Same as when you or I have medical insurance or a company car provided by our employers, basically.
But that's part of his wage, they negotiate it that way. It's like clubs can pay for physios on behalf of the player but that's also part of the remuneration.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,171
Location
Manchester
But that's part of his wage, they negotiate it that way. It's like clubs can pay for physios on behalf of the player but that's also part of the remuneration.
Sort of, yea, the contract stipulates wages over the course of the deal and then goes into details of any other amounts being provided, which is where signing bonuses, loyalty bonuses, win bonuses, insurances, intermediary (agent) fees etc.

There's often clauses relating to adjustments to the basic wage based on appearances but that's only really for younger players when they're breaking into a team.

By new, I mean last 20 something years and it's more and more normal.
Ah yea, definitely.
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,171
Location
Manchester
Wouldn't that mean the money gets taxed twice?
Yes, the player would pay tax on the income he received and would then have to pay his agent from his net income. The agent would then pay tax on his own income.
 

Trizy

New Member
Joined
Apr 16, 2014
Messages
12,009
Great idea that will be backed up by all clubs. However, why is there even fees when they're paid a wage by the players to be their agent and do agent stuff?

Only thing I can think of is the player doesn't pay the agent but the agent+player agrees he's wage will come from future sales as a %.
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
UEFA is a hypocrite dictatorship.

If an agent finds a way to earn a lot of money by playing the role of intermediary, then I don't see the issue...
 

1950

Full Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2017
Messages
533
Well said, its like wanting to buy a car, for instance, then having to pay the fecking salesman because you negotiated with them to get a good deal :houllier:
Or, say, wanting to buy a house and paying the real estate agent's commission.

Oh.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,603
Or, say, wanting to buy a house and paying the real estate agent's commission.

Oh.
:lol: from a working perspective as well. It's like an employer paying for the recruitment firm when they hire a candidate. Happens all the time.
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
If a club wants to attract a player, then the club has to pay transaction costs to reward:

-
the selling club (if the player isn't free): transfer fee
- the player: signing bonus
- player's advisors: fees for the agent...
- club's advisors: legal advisors, fiscal advisors...

Some agents are brilliant because they are directly paid by the acquiring club and not the player they advise.

Smart
 

Ecstatic

Cutie patootie!
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
13,787
Supports
PsG
:lol: from a working perspective as well. It's like an employer paying for the recruitment firm when they hire a candidate. Happens all the time.
These companies that like to underpay the employees but like to waste a crazy amount of money on various consultants...
 

whatwha

Sniffs Erricksson’s diarrhea
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
7,612
Location
Norway
Good. Absolutely ridiculous how much of the pie agents have been taking just for drumming up interest and doing a bit of negotiating.
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,404
Location
Birmingham
Good. Absolutely ridiculous how much of the pie agents have been taking just for drumming up interest and doing a bit of negotiating.
Like any business, middlemen get paid alot.
I don't see the issue with it.
The market decides these things.
FIFA and UEFA officials complaining about middlemen is a bit rich.
 

CA_vampire

New Member
Joined
Aug 12, 2017
Messages
977
Location
California
As a newbie I cannot start a new thread, and I don't know where else to put this, but I think it is worthwhile to discuss it:

Arsene Wenger: Arsenal boss says Europe's 'big five' leagues 'being destroyed'

http://www.bbc.com/sport/football/42916936

I may disagree with Wenger on other issues, but I agree with him on this. Big money in football is getting ridiculous, and yes, for four of the five greatest European leagues their champion has already been decided in January. And things will only get worse, if nothing is done by UEFA. However, I am not holding my breath because UEFA is also controlled by big money...
 

whatwha

Sniffs Erricksson’s diarrhea
Joined
Oct 18, 2007
Messages
7,612
Location
Norway
Like any business, middlemen get paid alot.
I don't see the issue with it.
The market decides these things.
FIFA and UEFA officials complaining about middlemen is a bit rich.
You don't see an issue with an agent taking many millions of pounds away from players and clubs for hardly doing any work?
 

Adisa

likes to take afvanadva wothowi doubt
Joined
Nov 28, 2014
Messages
50,404
Location
Birmingham
You don't see an issue with an agent taking many millions of pounds away from players and clubs for hardly doing any work?
Well we don't have any idea what they do, likewise other businesses where agents are paid loads of money.
What we do know as a fact, they facilitate movement of assets worth millions of pounds.
I don't know any industry where agents doing that don't get paid huge amounts.
We can debate if they are necessary but that's a different argument.
The same can be said for any other industry.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,956
Location
France
If you look at the money generated by the PL and compare it to agent fees you are at less than 2%, if I'm not mistaken.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
Yeah, agreed. Making the players pay it makes sense, would mean the agents have to be competitive (not that anyone would care then other than the players) and a transfer would be slightly less ridiculous.
It's not tax efficient.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,956
Location
France
That was a completely separate thing. A specific arrangement with Juve whereby he effectively part-owned Pogba.
He didn't part owned him, Juventus didn't pay him and Pogba when they initial signed him from United. The deal was that they would get paid on the next transfer.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
Citing the risk of "economic exploitation of young players, fraud, corruption, and money laundering," UEFA said European lawmakers can help address illegal practices.
They really think that? All they will do is promote money laundering. Agents will still get their cut, just off the books.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
He didn't part owned him, Juventus didn't pay him and Pogba when they initial signed him from United. The deal was that they would get paid on the next transfer.
It wasn't technically that (not sure if still allowed in Italy), but the outcome is the same. If I have an agreement with you that when you sell your car I get 40%. I don't have an asset, own nothing, but participate in the proceeds.

Make the rule and it will be dodged one way or the other.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,956
Location
France
It wasn't technically that (not sure if still allowed in Italy), but the outcome is the same. If I have an agreement with you that when you sell your car I get 40%. I don't have an asset, own nothing, but participate in the proceeds.

Make the rule and it will be dodged one way or the other.
It's not an ownership because he didn't own Pogba's rights that's a crucial point. Juventus owed them money on a previous move and the date to pay it was the next transfer. And it's illegal everywhere.
 

Jerzol78

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 8, 2012
Messages
375
Location
PL
You don't see an issue with an agent taking many millions of pounds away from players and clubs for hardly doing any work?

I think the main issue here is not the amount earned, but the completely wrong rules. There is such a thing as conflict of interest. An agent is hired by a player and is responsible for finding him the best possible deal. He should never be paid (and contacted) by the other side of contract (a club), because the club has different target than the player.

It’s as if either a club tries to “bribe” an agent who will act, because of the money, with different aim than just finding the best deal for his client, or an agent forces a club to pay, saying there will be no deal without such payment.
 

Swift Football

New Member
Joined
Nov 13, 2017
Messages
882
This would be a welcome move.
UEFA should act in bringing policies that make it difficult to take money 'away' from football. I will rather see the large chuck of 'the agent fees' paid to selling club or to the player himself rather than some agent taking money away. And some of the recent agent fees cited , its getting ridiculous.
Agent fees in Pogba - 23M ( some reports mention we have to pay agent every year meaking the total of 41M!)
Pogba's wages - 290,000 . So it takes Pogba one and half year to earn the same amount! Thats just ridiculous.