And likewise I can understand why people believe her, and wish to publicly acknowledge that fact.
@Oscie touched on it earlier in the thread, but it seems to me to be an entirely sensible position to think that she probably was raped. The difficulty arrises in going from that 'probably' to a degree of certainty that would make me satisfied that they should be criminally convicted. I'm sure there were members of that jury who think that she was raped but couldn't be certain enough to convict. Had I been on the jury I'm not certain I would not have been one of them
That's not a bug, but the justice system working as intended, but I have no idea how you can square the circle here and ensure more convictions without causing more problems (such as the cases being dropped recently because CPS were withholding evidence).