Saudi Takeover - Claim deal done

Status
Not open for further replies.

TrustInOle

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
2,468
Location
Manchester
I know you are a better man than to just look the other way for better football results here, Sults.
I think his point, like my own, would be his love running deeper than ownership? Not like we can choose owners, or we, United as a whole, is wanting this. If it happens it's because the Saudis wanted it to, and them owning the club wouldnt stop me loving the club for the reasons I hold. Though obviously there would always be a taint, but I have no interest in what they do outside of my club that I, myself, can not change.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
In the modern world I don’t think there is any argument about the biggest religious threat to liberty. It’s Islam surely?

Western governments aren’t perfect but their values are based on democracy and liberty. Islamic values are not.
So finally one poster admits their objection is Islamaphobic. At least you are honest.
 
Last edited:

Greck

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
7,099
I think the Glazers selling the club is closer than we think. If our football continues to decline, and by all accounts at this time it will, then the financial success the Glazers have enjoyed will also decline. That is when they will either restructure the football side of the business to be successful again or they will cash out.
They WILL sell but if it's based on a financial decline we are years away from that. Our finances are so strong that they will take years to stagnate talk less of even declining. Furthermore you could slash a quarter of our profits and we'd still be the most worthwhile and stable investment in all of sports.
 

TrustInOle

Full Member
Joined
Aug 7, 2019
Messages
2,468
Location
Manchester
The Saudis couldn't care less about what's best for the club, cleaning their image and getting one over on the UAE is their only motivation. The stadium falling apart is way down the list of priorities just as it has been for the Glazers.



No.

The reasons I am in opposition to Saudi ownership are on display in this thread already (read up)

The history books can say whatever they like. I do not acknowledge a single trophy City have won since they were brought out. I will feel the exact same way if/when United get brought by the Saudis. Quote me if you like.
But, if the stadium got improved, would you not call that a positive for Manchester United? Regardless who paid for it, would you not prefer to see Old Trafford get the treatment it deserves? Not saying it's a done deal, but if that was an actual consequence from the take over.
 

Kostov

Full Member
Joined
Jul 4, 2017
Messages
9,426
Location
Skopje, Macedonia
Jeez, I can't stand he fecking hypocrisy regarding this issue. I want this so much just to see the meltdown of so many drama queens. I think most of you preaching some morals regarding the saudis are more concerned what fans of Chelsea and City might give you as return rather than what is actually happening with the Saudis and how they run their country.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
How do your posts make any sense given that the poster you quoted was pointing out how ridiculous it is to compare being owned by the Saudi royal family to being owned by the US government?

We're being linked to the Saudi royal family, not the US government. A few posters have tried to equate being owned by American citizens with being owned by the US government and have also been called out for their stupidity.
Who has been called out for their stupidity?
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Jeez, I can't stand he fecking hypocrisy regarding this issue. I want this so much just to see the meltdown of so many drama queens. I think most of you preaching some morals regarding the saudis are more concerned what fans of Chelsea and City might give you as return rather than what is actually happening with the Saudis and how they run their country.
Exactly. This is a football matter, not a political one.
 

UDontMessWith24

Full Member
Joined
Apr 9, 2011
Messages
4,023
In the modern world I don’t think there is any argument about the biggest religious threat to liberty. It’s Islam surely?

Western governments aren’t perfect but their values are based on democracy and liberty. Islamic values are not.
People being hand fed fear and blindly consuming it concerns me more but that’s just me.
 

Red Dreams

Full Member
Joined
Aug 16, 2003
Messages
55,373
Location
Across the Universe....from Old Trafford.
The 'news leak' about the takeover is intentional I believe because the board did not expect things to go south so quickly.
This will give some weight to any spendings that are made in January.
The Saudis will not be wanting to take a club that just went into the Championships.
The board will pay over the price, just to get some players in to plug the holes left by what happened in the summer.
 

Dave Smith

Full Member
Joined
Oct 14, 2019
Messages
2,523
Supports
Anything anti-Dipper
Cannot see the Glazer's selling, Utd is a earning machine that they bought on tick that they service though the clubs own income. It would take absolutely insane money for them to sell, whilst they would also want another asset to buy that gives them similar returns. A club more likely to be sold is Chelsea, Abramovich cannot get in the country anymore and his net wealth hasn't really grown in close to a decade as he had to sell his main asset to Putin when he decided that Russia had been screwed over by the oligarchs and he wanted the energy industries back. Further, unlike most oligarchs he is highly liquid in order to protect his wealth from further demands from the Russian state.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,082
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
I'd ask you to look at the influence and positivity United has spread around the globe in the years it has been established, then get back to me on that. May be laughable for some, but a football club means more than entertainment purposes to some people.
Stop over romanticising stuff. We're just another big football club in the grand scheme of things.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,313
The Saudis couldn't care less about what's best for the club, cleaning their image and getting one over on the UAE is their only motivation. The stadium falling apart is way down the list of priorities just as it has been for the Glazers.
Think they're best buds with UAE, they're genocidal partners in the Yemen debacle. Qatar on the other hand...
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Couldn’t agree more. If it was a political matter opposition to slaughter of innocent people would be taken on a case by case basis, especially in the U.S.
Also, MBS has already denied wanting the club. Until it's proven that MBS wants United, we have to presume it's a Saudi businessman. So if people are going to attribute every Saudi with the crimes of the government, than should we not do the same with an American and its government?!
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester

zenith

Full Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2013
Messages
1,789
So its 39 pages now. Would anyone be kind enough to tell me if there has been anymore development on this apart from a weird LinkedIn post and an arrogant Saudi tweet.
 

MDFC Manager

Full Member
Joined
Dec 26, 2005
Messages
24,313
There is a fierce rivalry between SA and the UAE over Yemen. There will always be something between them since they share a border.

I'm no expert on the subject, admittedly, it's just stuff you hear on the news.
I think you're confusing UAE with Iran.

Saudi Arabia and UAE are the main coalition partners in the Yemen 'war', whereas Iran are being accused of assisting the Yemeni rebels that the Saudi-UAE coalition is fighting.
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
I think you're confusing UAE with Iran.

Saudi Arabia and UAE are the main coalition partners in the Yemen 'war', whereas Iran are being accused of assisting the Yemeni rebels that the Saudi-UAE coalition is fighting.
Follow the link in my first reply as it will give a far more descriptive account of the situation than I ever could.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
So its 39 pages now. Would anyone be kind enough to tell me if there has been anymore development on this apart from a weird LinkedIn post and an arrogant Saudi tweet.
No not really. However I don't think there's any doubt any longer that they'd quite like to buy the club. Supposedly already made a few bids, latest coming in 2018.

Glazers been here 15 years. I think they see their end game and big profit sell price coming.
 

fallengt

Full Member
Joined
Jul 27, 2011
Messages
5,602
So its 39 pages now. Would anyone be kind enough to tell me if there has been anymore development on this apart from a weird LinkedIn post and an arrogant Saudi tweet.
Twitter post is like one page. Fill the rest with virtue signaling, moral high ground & whaboutism

There you go
 

Random Task

WW Lynchpin
Joined
Feb 7, 2010
Messages
34,503
Location
Chester
But, if the stadium got improved, would you not call that a positive for Manchester United? Regardless who paid for it, would you not prefer to see Old Trafford get the treatment it deserves? Not saying it's a done deal, but if that was an actual consequence from the take over.
[selfish]I've not been to a home game for years so it wouldn't affect me either way[/selfish]

:devil:
 

AneRu

Full Member
Joined
Jul 28, 2019
Messages
3,174
I think the Glazers selling the club is closer than we think. If our football continues to decline, and by all accounts at this time it will, then the financial success the Glazers have enjoyed will also decline. That is when they will either restructure the football side of the business to be successful again or they will cash out.
The issue is do they have the appetite for another rebuild or the skill to bring in the correct people that ensure it succeeds? At the moment they look like they are interested in letting Woodward and Judge have their way and ruin us further. Every season this happens the deeper we are in the rut and the more difficult it becomes to claw our way out.
 

red thru&thru

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2004
Messages
7,657
Man, watching the advert on Sky, Kings of England V Champions of Europe...depressing. So much negligence in our fall from grace. I'm quite sure the Saudi owners will bring us back to the pinnacle of the game.
 

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
3,747
Talk about hand feeding people fear



Who would want to be owned by a state that kills people for converting from Islam?
How did Nigeria make it to that list?
One thing that is sure in Nigeria is freedom of religion. It is a secular nation in all sense of it.
 

Scotty McT

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 22, 2019
Messages
274
How did Nigeria make it to that list?
One thing that is sure in Nigeria is freedom of religion. It is a secular nation in all sense of it.
In cases such as Nigeria and Malaysia, those laws are on a state/region level:

Twelve out of Nigeria's thirty-six states have Sunni Islam as the dominant religion. In 1999, those states chose to have Sharia courts as well as Customary courts.[2] A Sharia court may treat blasphemy as deserving of several punishments up to, and including, execution.[3][4]
In many predominantly Muslim states, conversion from Islam to another religion is illegal and often a capital offence.[5]
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia_in_Nigeria#Blasphemy_and_apostasy
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
Hold on, are you suggesting the only reason people would be against Saudi ownership is Islamaphobia?
No. I'm suggesting that some people are against Saudi ownership because of their Islamaphobia. The poster whom I wrote this message for stated that:

Islamic states are undesirable in my opinion.
I’m just not a fan of Islam, it’s regressive, oppressive and damn right nasty at times when it’s mixed with government. No separation between religion and state is a bad idea.
Yes, what’s your point? Islamic states that have brutal laws based on Islam are ok because others have done it? It’s just in the current period Islam is a problem globally. Doesn’t mean other religions haven’t done shit in the past.
In the modern world I don’t think there is any argument about the biggest religious threat to liberty. It’s Islam surely?

Western governments aren’t perfect but their values are based on democracy and liberty. Islamic values are not.
Pretty clear he is against any Muslim organisation or nation owning our club. Or make of it what you will. And I've nothing against him having his opinion. That's his right.

I am suggesting he speaks for a few more, though they may express their views less directly. And it's my right to believe that these types of opinion are driven by Islamaphobia.
 
Last edited:

E-mal

Full Member
Joined
Jan 14, 2017
Messages
3,747
In cases such as Nigeria and Malaysia, those laws are on a state/region level:





https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharia_in_Nigeria#Blasphemy_and_apostasy
I am from Nigeria and live in one of those states, those where political propaganda back in early 2000s, currently it is really not practiced by law. Nobody has been killed for renouncing any religion, though persecution from family and society is an issue.
Don't believe everything's you read on the internet.
 

sammsky1

Pochettino's #1 fan
Joined
Feb 10, 2008
Messages
32,841
Location
London
I don’t like the term Islamaphobic. A lot of phobias have no basis in reality. Being skeptical about aspects of Islam and the dangers it poses to the freedom of both its followers and the global population is not a phobia.
Well you don't really get to decide that. How others interpret what you say is the only thing that matters.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.