Fair enough. Dont think he'll move there at all, but at least you present the case well
More titles at City, better wages and more stardom at United/City who can also spend more than Chelsea, so Dortmund might just hold Chelsea out of it - Just think it's more of a fan's punt than it is realistic. Not sure Chelsea will be spending huge money on one big player anymore.
interesting reasoning
maybe worth a punt if odds are right
Chelsea might move on Willian and/or Pedro too
they did invest heavily in Pulisic though and we are probably talking close too 100m for Sancho
Regarding City, I think Guardiola would be unwilling to have him back. He was openly critical of Sancho's decision to move, and when prompted of a possible Sancho return, he said, anything is possible if City have a new manager. The implication here that it wouldn't happen under his own tenure. From the perspective of Sancho, his main competition would be Bernardo Silva, aged 25, and he's been vociferously praised by Pep on more than one occasion, and widely considered to be City's best player alongside De Bruyne. In contrast, the players with the most appearances on the right for Chelsea are Willian (31 years old, 7 appearances), and Pedro (32 years old, 3 appearances on the right). Lampard has hinted he's prepared to pay big, and I do think he has an affinity to English players. Moreover, Roman Abramovich has wanted both domestic, and academy players featuring for the Chelsea side, for quite a substantial amount of time. I think he would happily back Lampard, if he deems Sancho as someone he wants in his side.
Best I could find was 9/1.
@buckooo1978 You're right, Chelsea did invest heavily in Pulisic. Looking at Chelsea's three biggest signings since 2011:
Kepa aged 23, Morata aged 23, Pulisic aged 20, I believe they're willing to break their transfer record, or come exceedingly close to that, if the player in question is young. Just to clarify, the aforementioned ages are the ages of the respective players when they were signed from their parent clubs.
I'm not saying it will 100% happen, but rather enough potential for me to take a punt on it. Especially, with it being considered to be exceedingly unlikely by the masses, which makes the odds better.
