UK General Election - 12th December 2019 | Con 365, Lab 203, LD 11, SNP 48, Other 23 - Tory Majority of 80

How do you intend to vote in the 2019 General Election if eligible?

  • Brexit Party

    Votes: 30 4.3%
  • Conservatives

    Votes: 73 10.6%
  • DUP

    Votes: 5 0.7%
  • Green

    Votes: 23 3.3%
  • Labour

    Votes: 355 51.4%
  • Liberal Democrats

    Votes: 58 8.4%
  • Plaid Cymru

    Votes: 3 0.4%
  • Sinn Fein

    Votes: 9 1.3%
  • SNP

    Votes: 19 2.8%
  • UKIP

    Votes: 6 0.9%
  • Independent

    Votes: 1 0.1%
  • Other (BNP, Change UK, UUP and anyone else that I have forgotten)

    Votes: 10 1.4%
  • Not voting

    Votes: 57 8.3%
  • Undecided

    Votes: 41 5.9%

  • Total voters
    690
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.
There's also the FPTP factor to consider - I'd imagine a lot of younger voters would either be excessively concentrated around student cities or metropolitan hubs which favour Labour anyway.
Bingo.
 
But Antisemitism, Indy ref 2 and bankrupting the country are all reasonable concerns. The whole momentum campaign was if you vote Tory you are killing children and the homeless, and voting for a racist liar. There's a clear difference in intensity and intent.

Oh good lord. Get a grip.
 
This is fine but be honest about how you will pay for it. You won't be able to pay for it and everything else by slightly raising taxes on the top 5% of earners and raising corporation tax, both of which I think would be damaging to the country anyway.

You don’t know what you’re talking about.
 
I think you are wrong. The problem isn't just Corbyn. It's Corbynism. It's leftism.

I know you like it. I know you want left-wing policies to succeed. I know they are very popular amongst your supporters.

Amongst your supporters.

Only one Labour Leader has won a general election in over 40 years. Tony Blair won as a centurist. As someone who rejected old Labour, left Labour.

You won't win 2024 with John McDonnell.

The problem is not 'leftism' it's the perception of 'leftism' that people have because of years and years of relentless propaganda. Take the policies away from the Party and they're very popular

Most of Labour's policies barely scratched left of centre, Nationalisation of a few core public services possibly being furthest Left but hey, we're the country of the NHS, which is almost universally popular amongst the electorate.

A small raise in the top rate of tax and a small raise in corporation tax to bring both broadly in-line with other similar-sized European economies would barely even register.

Fact is, your average Joe Punchclock isn't voting on the viability of Labour's policies, they're usually single issue voters or in the absence of any other influences just blindly following the propaganda
 
The result of the election. You've got huge swathes of the country voting conservative. The very people who are supposedly persecuted and treated like shit by the tories. The reality appears to be quite the opposite. We have record employment and low taxes that directly benefit the working class. I'm not surprised they don't want to risk a 'revolutionary' Labour government. Oh, and they also want Brexit.



More working class people are comfortable now because of the Tory government. The concern for me is what happens to people even further down the chain. What happens to social care, what happens when you drop out of the 'working class' system. The Tory approach does work for the many though. Record employment, low taxes, it's a vote winner.

Do you believe any of what you wrote?

If you do, you need to read a book or two.
 
The problem is not 'leftism' it's the perception of 'leftism' that people have because of years and years of relentless propaganda. Take the policies away from the Party and they're very popular

Most of Labour's policies barely scratched left of centre, Nationalisation of a few core public services possibly being furthest Left but hey, we're the country of the NHS, which is almost universally popular amongst the electorate.

A small raise in the top rate of tax and a small raise in corporation tax to bring both broadly in-line with other similar-sized European economies would barely even register.

Fact is, your average Joe Punchclock isn't voting on the viability of Labour's policies, they're usually single issue voters or in the absence of any other influences just blindly following the propaganda

Again, it's media blame. Well yes, they have fecked Labour. But they always do.

The problem is you lot are willing to use that as the go to excuse, rather than look at the fact Labour damn well knew this and STILL had no plan, no defence. And even if they did, Corbyn has no excuse for his mediocre live performances.


I await the Comrade Corbynistas now bringing up Blair...
 
Had Labor partnered with the LD they could have avoided this desaster easily. The utter arrogance cost Labor a lot.
 
The problem is not 'leftism' it's the perception of 'leftism' that people have because of years and years of relentless propaganda. Take the policies away from the Party and they're very popular

Most of Labour's policies barely scratched left of centre, Nationalisation of a few core public services possibly being furthest Left but hey, we're the country of the NHS, which is almost universally popular amongst the electorate.

A small raise in the top rate of tax and a small raise in corporation tax to bring both broadly in-line with other similar-sized European economies would barely even register.

Fact is, your average Joe Punchclock isn't voting on the viability of Labour's policies, they're usually single issue voters or in the absence of any other influences just blindly following the propaganda
You keep saying the policies were popular as if all labour needs is the same programme with a new face at the top. But popularity isn’t enough by itself. There’s believability. There’s deliverability. There’s the cost. There is prioritisation. There’s the impact of the policies when considered as a whole. None of that is captured in “popularity” of individual policies and yet they are all things that affect how people vote.
 
They had paid their debts off by 1952 and were able to prosper unhindered. They effectively surrendered to the Russians before too much damage was done and they were 'lucky' that the country they sided with and would have owed the most to lost the war.



Are you aware of how compounding works? If you were, you wouldn't need to ask that question.

Nations that emerged relatively unscathed from the war had far more freedom to set themselves up for the future.

You don’t know what you’re talking about
 
You keep saying the policies were popular as if all labour needs is the same programme with a new face at the top. But popularity isn’t enough by itself. There’s believability. There’s deliverability. There’s the cost. There is prioritisation. There’s the impact of the policies when considered as a whole. None of that is captured in “popularity” of individual policies and yet they are all things that affect how people vote.

I feel like they already faced an uphill struggle to convince people their policies were deliverable and achievable, but the sudden promise of free broadband and of £60bn to the WASPI women were mistakes which I think pushed a lot more people away from believing Labours policies were achievable
 
You keep saying the policies were popular as if all labour needs is the same programme with a new face at the top. But popularity isn’t enough by itself. There’s believability. There’s deliverability. There’s the cost. There is prioritisation. There’s the impact of the policies when considered as a whole. None of that is captured in “popularity” of individual policies and yet they are all things that affect how people vote.

I don't 'keep saying' this is my first post for ages!

Believability - isn't it amazing that despite presenting a fully costed manifesto, UK citizens were openly raging about Labour's plans to invest in public services? Does this happen in any other Country? What a bunch of w**kers this lot are presenting plans to spend more money on US!

Cost - see above

Prioritisation - granted there wasn't much of this, however, I believe the point was to sell a vision. Obviously the electorate didn't buy the vision for reasons I outlined in my 1st post,...but which of the individual components do people have an issue with? They can't usually tell you.

What's the Conservative vision? Zero-sum Economics? Mercantalism? Trickle-down Economics? Natural hierarchy? Rampant laissez-faire profiteering?
 
I don't 'keep saying' this is my first post for ages!

Believability - isn't it amazing that despite presenting a fully costed manifesto, UK citizens were openly raging about Labour's plans to invest in public services? Does this happen in any other Country? What a bunch of w**kers this lot are presenting plans to spend more money on US!

Cost - see above

Prioritisation - granted there wasn't much of this, however, I believe the point was to sell a vision. Obviously the electorate didn't buy the vision for reasons I outlined in my 1st post,...but which of the individual components do people have an issue with? They can't usually tell you.

What's the Conservative vision? Zero-sum Economics? Mercantalism? Trickle-down Economics? Natural hierarchy? Rampant laissez-faire profiteering?

where was the £60bn for the WASPI women costed?
 
I feel like they already faced an uphill struggle to convince people their policies were deliverable and achievable, but the sudden promise of free broadband and of £60bn to the WASPI women were mistakes which I think pushed a lot more people away from believing Labours policies were achievable

The promise wasn't really about 'free Broadband' as was commonly reported, it was about investing in the core infrastructure to ensure all residents and businesses had access to fibre internet to the premise. I believe currently only 10% of the Country has this....compared to 90%+ in some Asian countries
 
The promise wasn't really about 'free Broadband' as was commonly reported, it was about investing in the core infrastructure to ensure all residents and businesses had access to fibre internet to the premise. I believe currently only 10% of the Country has this....compared to 90%+ in some Asian countries

I agree, but they pitched it as free broadband for all and it was largely seen as a joke policy.
 
I agree, but they pitched it as free broadband for all and it was largely seen as a joke policy.

Was it 'pitched' that way or was it spun that way? Another progressive policy just shot down in flames and ridiculed (like your WASPI example) by a Party offering cock all but scorn and negativity. Sad really when something positive is proposed and we're conditioned to knock it down
 
Was it 'pitched' that way or was it spun that way? Another progressive policy just shot down in flames and ridiculed (like your WASPI example) by a Party offering cock all but scorn and negativity. Sad really when something positive is proposed and we're conditioned to knock it down

 
I just checked out the profile of some guy taking the high ground on a Piers Morgan tweet and his last two tweets were about Abbot’s shoes and that ‘My friend is a nurse at Leeds Hospital’ shit. The frightening bit is 500+ comments on each where it’s not even contested, by anyone. I’m not excuse making here, it’s genuinely concerning. But I’m being lectured (indirectly, as a Labour voter) by people from all over the place about how it’s time for reflection. The amount of misinformation floating around in their favour is staggering.

Say what you want about Abbot on merit but this shit with the shoes has wound me up. It’s like I’m witnessing a collective sigh of relief that in observing this picture their views are vindicated and when you try and say otherwise, posts get deleted or you get blocked.
 


I'm not in a position to listen to that now but if it's Corbyn using the term 'free Broadband for all' - I don't dispute they promised this I just don't understand why half the population are desperate to shoot down any progressive ideas

How much money have we wasted on Brexit, bribing the DUP and giving tax breaks to the rich? That's all sound. Invest in something for the public? What a clown!
 
How many times do people like Burgon need to be reminded Labour lost in 2017?

 
I'm not in a position to listen to that now but if it's Corbyn using the term 'free Broadband for all' - I don't dispute they promised this I just don't understand why half the population are desperate to shoot down any progressive ideas

How much money have we wasted on Brexit, bribing the DUP and giving tax breaks to the rich? That's all sound. Invest in something for the public? What a clown!

I'm sure the last Brexit petty cash check came out as £6.5bn down.
 
How many times do people like Burgon need to be reminded Labour lost in 2017?



It's madness. They shouldn't let him out. McDonnell is the only one of the current Labour front bench I think is a competent politician.
 
Last edited:
Even Burgos’s bio tickled me, it’s kind of Partidge-eque

Labour Party Candidate for Leeds East. I am not currently an MP, as Parliament has been dissolved until after the General Election.

Unnecessary pedantry
 
Status
Not open for further replies.