Odion Ighalo - 6 month loan deal done

Status
Not open for further replies.

Marzo

Full Member
Joined
Mar 11, 2015
Messages
771
Location
South Africa
He may turn out to be shite, maybe he tears it up, BUT IT IS A LOAN ! Why are some freaking out, we need a back up and really have nothing to lose from this deal.....it is better than nothing.
Give the man a chance , a chance of his lifetime, and if he really wants it, he will give his all.
Support the man and who knows, maybe he is the type to break his nose or toe to score!
 
Last edited:

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,217
Location
Hell on Earth
A very good deal. Costs next to nothing, EPL proven. And no obligation to buy if it doesn't work out.
This.

Not sure how everyone cant see the big picture. Instead being hysterical about 'the level we are at now.'
With the original target, Haaland gone, and with Rashford maybe out for the next couple of months, this is the best case scenario.
We have some breathing room and we regroup in the Summer.
 

DBT85

Full Member
Joined
Jul 31, 2017
Messages
638
Solid advice about less outrage, mate, but you are seriously comparing Ighalo to Carrasco? Ighalo has been playing in farmer's league in China, for three years so is completely unfit for EPL and will take months to get in shape, if he can at all. So - how is he going to help us in the rest of the season? And before China he spent 4 years in shite Watford, two out of those in Championship, not PL. So - when exactly was he remotely close to the quality we need?
Have you seen a photo of ighalo recently? He's not gone pot bellied out there. Sure maybe he might not have the same sharpness of someone coming from an EU league, but he's hardly Shaw.
 

Art Vandelay

Full Member
Joined
Jan 29, 2015
Messages
5,729
Location
Northern Ireland
Jamie redknapp says it smacks of desperation.
Jamie redknapp is a gobshite.
Jamie Redknapp has the communication and critical thinking abilities of a watery shit that someone has missed the toilet with. The only time he should ever be listened to is if you intend to laugh at his pathetic word farts. He literally doesn't know what the word literally means.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,750
There has been speculation from Spain and Italy but I've played there and now want to play in England.

I don't think I will be moving but I'm not sure I'd say no if United called. They were my team growing up. I loved watching Andy Cole and Dwight Yorke on TV. They were my idols and playing at Old Trafford has always been a dream.
https://www.bbc.co.uk/sounds/play/p03dttrv

Back in 2016
 

The Purley King

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
4,273
Decent player but a bit streaky in front of goal.
I think he’ll do well for us.
Utd fan too counts for a bit.
Happy with this as a stop gap very good business.
Wonder what price he’ll be be in fantasy footy !!
 

Dante

Average bang
Joined
Oct 22, 2010
Messages
25,280
Location
My wit's end
I’m curious, why?
Why I have doubts? Because I didn't rate him particularly highly when he was last in England.

More to the point, he's another striker on our books whose box-play is far from his biggest strength. As an alternative to Rashford and Martial, all he offers is inferiority. I would have preferred someone with a different toolset to give us a change off the bench. But I guess Ole has a preference and our options were limited.
 

Ranchero

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
5,913
Location
Glasgow
Solid advice about less outrage, mate, but you are seriously comparing Ighalo to Carrasco? Ighalo has been playing in farmer's league in China, for three years so is completely unfit for EPL and will take months to get in shape, if he can at all. So - how is he going to help us in the rest of the season? And before China he spent 4 years in shite Watford, two out of those in Championship, not PL. So - when exactly was he remotely close to the quality we need?
It's to appease the fans, I think until the summer. But for goodness sake, we should have been working on a replacement for Lukaku for months. This should not have been left as a last minute thing. And yes, the Rashford injury has pushed this all forward, but really this was a priority position last summer.
 

NewGlory

United make me feel dirty. And not in a sexy way.
Joined
Jul 13, 2019
Messages
4,357
Did Lukaku want to stay? No.
Was Lukaku a negative influence on the dressing room, which includes some very bright youth prospects? Yes.
Does the signing of Ighalo alleviate the pressure from Martial and especially Greenwood having to perform? Yes.
Is Ighalo going to help prevent the burn out of Martial, Greenwood and James allowing us to rotate? Yes.

It's a no risk signing, he's not going to be expected to bag a serious amount of goals, so if he doesnt theres no harm done. As things stand we're not in top 4 but if our two new signings help us achieve top 4, then it'll be seen as a great bit of business.

Calm the feck down and get behind the team.
You are completing missing the point. Nobody is advocating that Lukaku should have stayed. But when you let Lukaku go, you have to replace him at least with something equal. Ighalo is not even in the ballpark of Lukaku, not just now, but he was never even close to Lukaku's level. This is a fecking embarrassment.
 

Ranchero

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
5,913
Location
Glasgow
Why I have doubts? Because I didn't rate him particularly highly when he was last in England.

More to the point, he's another striker on our books whose box-play is far from his biggest strength. As an alternative to Rashford and Martial, all he offers is inferiority. I would have preferred someone with a different toolset to give us a change off the bench. But I guess Ole has a preference and our options were limited.
I can't believe Ole, who didn't want a Lukaku kind of player, goes and gets in someone who is just that, and nowhere near as good even when fit.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,710
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Solid advice about less outrage, mate, but you are seriously comparing Ighalo to Carrasco? Ighalo has been playing in farmer's league in China, for three years so is completely unfit for EPL and will take months to get in shape, if he can at all. So - how is he going to help us in the rest of the season? And before China he spent 4 years in shite Watford, two out of those in Championship, not PL. So - when exactly was he remotely close to the quality we need?
Carrasco has been playing in China also.

He won't play this weekend but we don't play again for two weeks, giving him time to acclimatise to the UK again, I reckon he'll play some part against Chelsea. If he scores a few key goals that win us a couple of games then he was 100% worth it and that's it really.

Oh and he's not in bad shape either...

 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,217
Location
Hell on Earth
Okay, anyone who doesn't think this is an act of desperation isn't living in the real world. It has taken us till deadline day to replace Lukaku who left in the last transfer window. We have had the best part of six months to sort a replacement...and we really should have forward planned before the Belgian actually left in any case. Now we are scrambling around unceremoniously to find anyone to fill that huge hole up front.

We have ended up with a 30-year-old striker whose best season for Watford is well behind him, and who at his best still basically a B-Division Lukaku ( to be painfully honest). It all makes our sidelining of Lukaku in favour of Rashford (who doesn't see himself as a striker anyway) all the more baffling. Because there is no question Lukaku would have stayed had he had the confidence of Ole.

Now Ole has to ask himself if he honestly thinks Ighalo is a better bet than Lukaku.

Now having said all that, I went the guy to tear it up. I will be 100% behind him and hope he shows his best form for us. Nobody really loses. He has six months to impress. For us it is a stop gap till the summer, or I hope it is.

But really how we got to the position where we had to go for Ighalo, shows how poor we are at recruitment planning. It really is all over the place. Even the Bruno signing which we are all excited by, was such a farce before we finally got it over the line, for more than we would have paid if we had gone for it during the summer.

Anyone it is Ighalo a go go and he will get my vote at the least. It will give Martial the kick up the butt that he so rightly needs. It is a plan B.
Haaland was Plan A. But hey-ho
 

Virror

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 19, 2014
Messages
201
Why is everybody talking about Lukaku, he was both fat and toxic for the dressing room. Ighalo is fit and wants nothing more than to be here.
 

dove

New Member
Joined
May 15, 2013
Messages
7,899
To all crying people here - who did you expect us to sign on 6 month loan in January? Ronaldo? There is pretty much 0 choice. It’s 6 month loan ffs, if he is shite then whatever but he might just score a few goals and help the team. We got nothing to lose really so stop moaning.
 

Tiber

Full Member
Joined
Apr 22, 2014
Messages
10,283
Honestly can't remember a thing about him, but hopefully he can make a positive contribution
 

holdsteady

Hates Sir Alex Ferguson
Joined
Jul 15, 2009
Messages
5,430
You are completing missing the point. Nobody is advocating that Lukaku should have stayed. But when you let Lukaku go, you have to replace him at least with something equal. Ighalo is not even in the ballpark of Lukaku, not just now, but he was never even close to Lukaku's level. This is a fecking embarrassment.
By all accounts it seems that Ole thought he had that replacement in Haaland but the club screwed him over. This is a short term fix. We'll likely sign the long term solution in the summer.
 

Ranchero

New Member
Joined
Mar 4, 2017
Messages
5,913
Location
Glasgow
Let's be clear, Lukaku only downed tools, when he was told Rashford (who doesn't see himself as a striker) was the first choice striker. Cause and effect. He wanted out because he was not wanted. A bit like Angel Di Maria.
 

Dve

Full Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,917
You are completing missing the point. Nobody is advocating that Lukaku should have stayed. But when you let Lukaku go, you have to replace him at least with something equal. Ighalo is not even in the ballpark of Lukaku, not just now, but he was never even close to Lukaku's level. This is a fecking embarrassment.
As others have pointed out, it´s not a replacement for Lukaku, it´s a 6 months loan deal while we´re searching for a replacement for Lukaku.
 

MileHighRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
276
Location
San Francisco
He may turn out to be shite, maybe he tears it up, BUT IT IS A LOAN ! Why are some freaking out, we need a back up and really have nothing to loose from this deal.....it is better than nothing.
Give the man a chance , a chance of his lifetime, and if he really wants it, he will give his all.
Support the man and who knows, maybe he is the type to break his nose or toe to score!
This 100% we can't lose!
 

Okey

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
2,436
But seriously, some amzingly OTT reactions to this. I mean...how does anyone think this is replacing Lukaku??? If Rashford didn't get injured, we wouldn't even be looking for a striker. It's a 6 month loan deal for a Prem proven striker. We're not signing a player to take us to the next level. We're a Martial injury away from throwing in the towel upfront. This looks like a sensible deal, at a time when it was almost impossible to get anyone you'd really want in.
 

charlenefan

Far less insightful than the other Charley
Joined
Aug 17, 2005
Messages
33,052
But seriously, some amzingly OTT reactions to this. I mean...how does anyone think this is replacing Lukaku??? If Rashford didn't get injured, we wouldn't even be looking for a striker. It's a 6 month loan deal for a Prem proven striker. We're not signing a player to take us to the next level. We're a Martial injury away from throwing in the towel upfront. This looks like a sensible deal, at a time when it was almost impossible to get anyone you'd really want in.
Because people are stupid

Yes anyone reading this who thinks Ighalo is Lukaku's replacement you are stupid
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,253
Location
Lucilinburhuc
Think it is an ok deal. People expected Lewandowski by the looks of it.

The only striker i would have preferred that moved this window was Piatek, but he would have been around 30m expensive and i dont think we wanted him for that money. Bakambu was available as well, but they look on a similar level going by their scoring records.

He is definitely better than Rondon or Slimani. And he chose United over Spurs or Inter, so that is nice. PL proven as well. I dont see any downsides. If he is motivated and stays fit, he could surprise quite a few people on here. Thought he was good at Watford most of the time.
 

Svartzonker

Last Man Standing 2 champion 2022/23
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
687
I can't believe Ole, who didn't want a Lukaku kind of player, goes and gets in someone who is just that, and nowhere near as good even when fit.
Lukaku wanted to leave and we are not keeping a 70 mil player on the bench as a backup.

Such a stupid post.
 

The Purley King

Full Member
Joined
Mar 26, 2014
Messages
4,273
But seriously, some amzingly OTT reactions to this. I mean...how does anyone think this is replacing Lukaku??? If Rashford didn't get injured, we wouldn't even be looking for a striker. It's a 6 month loan deal for a Prem proven striker. We're not signing a player to take us to the next level. We're a Martial injury away from throwing in the towel upfront. This looks like a sensible deal, at a time when it was almost impossible to get anyone you'd really want in.
Amen
 

ColvaleGoa

Full Member
Joined
Jan 28, 2010
Messages
4,613
Location
Susegaad!
Like Many said above , Ighalo is a fan of the club. He will be over the moon at signing with us. He definitely won't be a mercenary who is here for the money..if anything he will be here to prove himself and see if he can get a permanent contract.

I don't know he will be a prime RvN , but I don't think we will moan about his workrate. I think he will work his socks off. Let's just hope he gets the rub of the green and he can score a few. Let everyone laugh at him, We need to get behind this lad. If it doesn't work out, hey ho.
 

SCJY

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 24, 2017
Messages
333
Lukaku wanted to leave and we are not keeping a 70 mil player on the bench as a backup.

Such a stupid post.
It's not the only one from that poster you replied to. It's been a whole shower of shite for a while now.
 

Macca7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 1, 2015
Messages
126
Location
Walney Island
If he's half as good as he was for me on FIFA 17 ultimate team we're onto a winner. Bossed it for me until i got a few coins
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,336
He scored 40 in 100 for Watford and so far in China he's scored 46 in 74 appearances. Obviously it is China so that means almost nothing.

People are being dim if they think this is a Lukaku replacement. This is emergency cover for Rashford and nothing more, not our next no.9 for feck sake. :lol:

I'm as critical of Ole as the next guy. And it certainly hasn't escaped my attention that two of the three strikers we've shown interest in were Norweigan, and Ighalo played for Lyn. Shows Ole has absolutely no breadth when it comes to player scouting. Signing King on a permanent deal would have been irretrievably shit management really, and the fact he even tried is unforgivable. But we had to get a body in on loan and at least we got someone with presence, who's a poacher, who has good form for scoring goals even if it's been in a shit league for the last couple of years.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.