How Do Utd Beat The High Press?

Freak

Born a freak always a freak.
Joined
May 8, 2004
Messages
23,042
Location
Somewhere in your mind, touching a nerve
Do what we did to Bournemouth. Quick passing from the back and try to get the ball to the front 4 as quickly as possible. Literally just 2 touches per player, be direct and bypass their press with quick short passes and let the front 4 do their thing.
 

The Irish Connection

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
2,346
Pretty simple. You don't pass to what Mourinho calls "the first station pass".

An effective press is like a trap that releases when one presser pushes the player with the ball into a direction or avenue giving them a close or easy pass to a player who is being tee'd up for further pressing.

If you constantly just pass the ball five to ten yards to the nearest player because a) you're terrified of losing the ball b) not confident on the ball or c) haven't thought about a pass before you receive the ball (football intelligence) then you walk into the trap.

Vertical / breaking lines passes / forward and straight work. Going long works. Width in your own half does not work, you're just giving the opposition another defender (the touchline).

An example pattern is; GK to CB, CB to CB (my most hated pass), (pressure comes), CB rushes to LB (LB was marked and didn't want the ball) LB turns back towards goal and gives back to CB, CB is pressed and goes back to other CB or GK, who goes back to CB who then passes to RB and the RB does the same thing, turns backwards under pressure or hoofs up the line or loses the ball out of play conceding possession closer to our goal.

My idea (as a forum dweller not a football coach) is, NO EFFING SHORT BALLS UNLESS YOU GO BETWEEN THE OPPO CMs. That's it. Unless you're able to break the lines a la Roy Keane into the AM feet, don't bother. Go long. High press usually means either high back line (get in behind with pace) or gap between midfield and defence (second balls won in their last third, knock downs etc).

I would ban "width" in your own half when in possession as I personally think it is a waste of time, you don't stretch the play, you just move your possession closer to the edge of the playing area.

Then again, I am not a football coach.
Yeah, agreed. We probably looked most dangerous in the first half when Fernandes chipped one in behind Chelsea for dan James but the pass was over hit. We never tried that again.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,172
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Pretty simple. You don't pass to what Mourinho calls "the first station pass".

An effective press is like a trap that releases when one presser pushes the player with the ball into a direction or avenue giving them a close or easy pass to a player who is being tee'd up for further pressing.

If you constantly just pass the ball five to ten yards to the nearest player because a) you're terrified of losing the ball b) not confident on the ball or c) haven't thought about a pass before you receive the ball (football intelligence) then you walk into the trap.

Vertical / breaking lines passes / forward and straight work. Going long works. Width in your own half does not work, you're just giving the opposition another defender (the touchline).

An example pattern is; GK to CB, CB to CB (my most hated pass), (pressure comes), CB rushes to LB (LB was marked and didn't want the ball) LB turns back towards goal and gives back to CB, CB is pressed and goes back to other CB or GK, who goes back to CB who then passes to RB and the RB does the same thing, turns backwards under pressure or hoofs up the line or loses the ball out of play conceding possession closer to our goal.

My idea (as a forum dweller not a football coach) is, NO EFFING SHORT BALLS UNLESS YOU GO BETWEEN THE OPPO CMs. That's it. Unless you're able to break the lines a la Roy Keane into the AM feet, don't bother. Go long. High press usually means either high back line (get in behind with pace) or gap between midfield and defence (second balls won in their last third, knock downs etc).

I would ban "width" in your own half when in possession as I personally think it is a waste of time, you don't stretch the play, you just move your possession closer to the edge of the playing area.

Then again, I am not a football coach.
I think a lot of this has to do with players taking up positions higher up the pitch to receive the ball properly. If they're playing on the shoulder or up against the CB, it's too easy to defend. They need to be in space for someone to be confident to play it to. I think Bruno is the only one I see that does this.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
Do what we did to Bournemouth. Quick passing from the back and try to get the ball to the front 4 as quickly as possible. Literally just 2 touches per player, be direct and bypass their press with quick short passes and let the front 4 do their thing.
That's how you do it, two touches football.
 

El Jefe

Full Member
Joined
Dec 28, 2012
Messages
4,925
By studying teams who can. If our coaches are incapable of getting our team to evade the press they should study videos of Nagelmann's teams. After all he didn't have players as good as ours and still made it work.

Truth is we're an average passing team and until that changes we'll be poor at beating the high press.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,687
I think a lot of this has to do with players taking up positions higher up the pitch to receive the ball properly. If they're playing on the shoulder or up against the CB, it's too easy to defend. They need to be in space for someone to be confident to play it to. I think Bruno is the only one I see that does this.
Yeah but if you keep making their def think that the ball is coming up over their heads, they drop back. They drop back and the midfield and front either drop back to close the distance between the two units OR they don't, leaving big space in the middle.

But ffs don't try and have the human bobble head try to channel his inner Busquets when pressed!
 

ash_86

Full Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2013
Messages
6,339
Chelsea hoofed the ball to Giroud most of the time and took over from there. We should have done the same tactic with ighalo. James and Rashford both cannot hold the ball like a typical center forward. Stuipd decision by the manager yesterday to persist playing out from the back.
 

Dan_F

Full Member
Joined
Dec 17, 2012
Messages
10,412
Pretty simple. You don't pass to what Mourinho calls "the first station pass".

An effective press is like a trap that releases when one presser pushes the player with the ball into a direction or avenue giving them a close or easy pass to a player who is being tee'd up for further pressing.

If you constantly just pass the ball five to ten yards to the nearest player because a) you're terrified of losing the ball b) not confident on the ball or c) haven't thought about a pass before you receive the ball (football intelligence) then you walk into the trap.

Vertical / breaking lines passes / forward and straight work. Going long works. Width in your own half does not work, you're just giving the opposition another defender (the touchline).

An example pattern is; GK to CB, CB to CB (my most hated pass), (pressure comes), CB rushes to LB (LB was marked and didn't want the ball) LB turns back towards goal and gives back to CB, CB is pressed and goes back to other CB or GK, who goes back to CB who then passes to RB and the RB does the same thing, turns backwards under pressure or hoofs up the line or loses the ball out of play conceding possession closer to our goal.

My idea (as a forum dweller not a football coach) is, NO EFFING SHORT BALLS UNLESS YOU GO BETWEEN THE OPPO CMs. That's it. Unless you're able to break the lines a la Roy Keane into the AM feet, don't bother. Go long. High press usually means either high back line (get in behind with pace) or gap between midfield and defence (second balls won in their last third, knock downs etc).

I would ban "width" in your own half when in possession as I personally think it is a waste of time, you don't stretch the play, you just move your possession closer to the edge of the playing area.

Then again, I am not a football coach.
I’d agree with lots of what you’ve said.

Our players only seem to be thinking one pass ahead. There’s no movement apart from one player looking for the ball in midfield. To be effective the other players have to move to create space before the first pass has has even taken place, and it should be something that is practiced a lot because it needs to be instinctive (the same as pressing, which through no coincidence we can’t implement correctly either).

Once you beat the press a few times initially, the other team will naturally drop back a bit.
 

Lash

Full Member
Joined
May 3, 2012
Messages
12,172
Location
Buckinghamshire
Supports
Millwall, Saint-Etienne
Yeah but if you keep making their def think that the ball is coming up over their heads, they drop back. They drop back and the midfield and front either drop back to close the distance between the two units OR they don't, leaving big space in the middle.

But ffs don't try and have the human bobble head try to channel his inner Busquets when pressed!
Oh yeah, it's gotta be a mix. So where you have James running in behind, Martial or Bruno yesterday, drops to be an option to feet and like you say the defence has to make a decision because they should be moving as a unit. I feel like we only seem to do one and not all simultaneously.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
By studying teams who can. If our coaches are incapable of getting our team to evade the press they should study videos of Nagelmann's teams. After all he didn't have players as good as ours and still made it work.

Truth is we're an average passing team and until that changes we'll be poor at beating the high press.
Agree to an extent. Our forward passing has improved to break lines but the intricate triangles need work.

Also think there is a disconnect at times with Bruno pushing up and big gaps between him and Pogba for example, which doesn’t allow for triangles to be played around the press itself.

There were examples against Southampton where we got behind the press by playing more quickly out to the wings and back through midfield, it just needs work and more cohesion between our three midfielders.
 

eire-red

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2018
Messages
2,657
Stop trying to play through the middle from so deep, play it out to the flanks quickly and then push the ball back into midfield. We need to get Pogba and Matic on the ball facing play, not on the half turn where they can get pinched.

Also, sometimes it's just better to knock it up the touchline and play for territory. Our game management is naive at times. It was obvious against Southampton we were eventually going to get robbed and concede, you could see it coming from a mile off.

On one hand, you commend Ole for having belief in a certain way, on the other hand you need to recognise when you are being put under pressure. Over the top to Rashford and Martial isn't the worst option either. We need a bit of variation in our play.

We also play to passively at times to play quick football from the back. Moving the ball quicker has to be something we work on, and is not dependent on personnel, but a change in mindset and intent. So many of our passes are sideways and underhit, putting the receiver on the back foot instantly. We need to play with more belief and conviction in what we are doing.
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
Ok, last 3 games we’ve looked a little vulnerable against the system relying on individual brilliance to get us out of trouble. That’s a positive but moving forward against quality players we can’t rely on that all the time.
What tactics should we employ to counter that? What players should we go for?
I’m no transfer or player expert so don’t really know who’s out there that will give us the quality...oh I do know all about Sancho but that’s just one. I’ve felt we need 3 at least.
It's a weird one, because if you'd ask me before lockdown and even 3 or 4 weeks ago, I'd have told you that we were infinitely better at playing out from the back and that we were really dealing better with the press than from before - we easily handled City's press, for example.

But the last week or so has seen us regress in this aspect, which seems to tell me that it might be a fitness and tiredness issue rather than a technical one. The best we can do right now is to continue working hard in training and get it right - be it spacing, being proactive, identifying the passing lanes, etc etc.

Alternatively, it might also be that our personnel in crucial positions are not sufficiently press-resistant, and it's something that can only be fixed through the transfer market.
 

Smithy89

Full Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
3,237
We just brought AWB and Maguire. So who are you referring to?

You think AWB is good on the ball? He's a great defender but trying to pass through the press or pick out a ball down the channel is a different story and i am referring to Maguire, suspect as hell since the restart, especially when pressed.
 

NFM

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
339
I have watched United teams since the early 60s. Not once have I seen a United team that can play well against a concerted energetic, agressive press. And United have had some great teams with some great players. I think the problem is that United don't develop , train or even buy players who are naturally suited to play a press. So in training its never practiced 'against' by players good at it. Probably over all that period the nearest team that had some midfielders suited to play against a press was the Keane/Ince era. There was a lot of bite in that midfield.
Chelsea's front 3 won the game, never stopped working. United's front 3 were absent without leave. No-one for the rest to aim a pass at.
 

Rash Decision

not to use the cream
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
1,525
Location
In your closet, in your head!
Most people seem to think it's a question of ability on the ball, which to be fair isn't a stupid suggestion as it always helps, but I think the movement of the team is even more important. When you see really well drilled teams they are able to almost always create a spare man with their movement. Their players don't need acrobatic skills to avoid the pressure, they receive passes at favorable angles that allow them to put their body between the ball and the pressuring player and then they can just pass it to a free team mate.
I mean look at what Norwich did to City at the beginning of the season and they didnt exactly have world beaters playing out from the back.
Glad you posted this. I have been thinking along these lines as well. I have watched a few analyses of Man City's games and they are nearly always able to overcome the opponents' press by moving their players around to create space and/or a numerical advantage. I think United under Ole play with a fairly basic, loose structure, and too much is left to the players' own imagination and abilities as compared to other teams whose managers impose a more defined structure on the way they play. The natural ball-playing abilities of our players are certainly a limiting factor, but I believe a better structure to our play can compensate to a greater degree than we see now. Would also help improve the speed of passing by reducing the players' need to think on the pitch.
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
We’d need a new goalkeeper, centre back & right back. Only Lindelof & Shaw right now are semi capable of dealing with it.
 

kidbob

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2012
Messages
8,082
Location
Ireland
I think we are overblowing this to be honest. We've dealt with City, Chelsea and even Liverpool to an extent this season. The last thing we were questioning was 'how do we beat the low block' and in the end we have overcome this. That doesn't mean that we'll overcome it every time we face it but we have clearly progressed. So what we really need to do is be patient and trust in the progress we are making. Pep and Klopp both took time to get to where they are right now and all signs point to the fact that we are finally going in the right direction but its a marathon and not a sprint. We're always going to have games where we struggle with certain things.

The one thing I'll take from the Chelsea and Southampton games is that our squad depth isn't good enough. We need at least three more first team players but we also need a giant clear out of players who shouldn't be here and replace them with players who can be trusted to do a job. This is where the importance of an O'Shea or a Park is vital.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
You think AWB is good on the ball? He's a great defender but trying to pass through the press or pick out a ball down the channel is a different story and i am referring to Maguire, suspect as hell since the restart, especially when pressed.
He’s not. Which is why I’m always confused. We keep asking players to do things they can’t do. Fair enough he wanted a ball playing team from out the back. So why buy AWB? Was his plan to always get rid of DDG as he can’t play from the back and Shaw as very sound as he is. Is he also looking to be replaced? He passing isn’t amazing either.
 

NFM

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2015
Messages
339
Glad you posted this. I have been thinking along these lines as well. I have watched a few analyses of Man City's games and they are nearly always able to overcome the opponents' press by moving their players around to create space and/or a numerical advantage. I think United under Ole play with a fairly basic, loose structure, and too much is left to the players' own imagination and abilities as compared to other teams whose managers impose a more defined structure on the way they play. The natural ball-playing abilities of our players are certainly a limiting factor, but I believe a better structure to our play can compensate to a greater degree than we see now. Would also help improve the speed of passing by reducing the players' need to think on the pitch.
Yes, but United develop, train and try to buy players who can play with their own imagination. Its been the case since Busby, which is why United had so much trouble with Leeds under Revie. If you get a more 'method' manager, and we've tried some of those recently, they lose half the players who just aren't able to play that way. The way United have tried to deal with this is to get such good players that they will improvise their way through a method team. This team is short of such players who need character as well as skill, which is one reason Ole openly says it will take time. But patience is not an attribute most have these days.
 

Superunknown

Full Member
Joined
Aug 4, 2019
Messages
8,361
To beat the high press, the passing has to be a lot quicker, slicker and needs to be played out of the back a lot better than it currently has been. We definitely spend too much time touching unnecessary touches. Fine if the resulting ball ends up going somewhere productive, but more often than not it doesn't.

By the time we've taken an extra 3 or 4 or even 5 touches, the opposition has closed us down, our players have stopped moving and the passing channels have been blocked. So, it creates that loop.

Player receives ball > player takes a touch and dwells on ball > opposition closes us down, blocking passing angles > player takes an extra touch > opposition block further channels > player takes an extra touch > our own players struggle to find space > player either loses the ball or it goes backwards

If it's happening too often, then it has to be something that needs addressing on our end, and not just expecting teams to turn up and not press us. Of course they're going to attempt to press us if they think that it's going to result in a more favourable result for them. If it's worked for one team, it may work for another. So, it absolutely needs to be addressed by our coaching staff. Quicker passing, better movement, better and quicker decision making, and moving the ball on to the more dangerous attacking players as best we can. I bet if we look back at our better performances, we probably had quicker passing in those games. It also tires the opposition out if they have to keep doing constant pressing and are getting no luck, which is also quite demoralising for them.
 

Smithy89

Full Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2014
Messages
3,237
He’s not. Which is why I’m always confused. We keep asking players to do things they can’t do. Fair enough he wanted a ball playing team from out the back. So why buy AWB? Was his plan to always get rid of DDG as he can’t play from the back and Shaw as very sound as he is. Is he also looking to be replaced? He passing isn’t amazing either.

Which might lead you to believe Ole didn't know how he wanted his team to play while signing these players or it was all Ed's signings and Ole didn't have much of a say. I still couldn't really tell you what the style of play of this United side is tbh. Are we counter attacking, but at the same time it feels like Ole wants us/a team to dominate possession. What are we?
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
Maguire, AWB, Matic & Pogba are specifically targeted by pressing teams because they take 10 touches to do what they could do in 2 or 3. Wan-Bissaka & Maguire in particular. Watch the intensity Southampton pressed Shaw & Lindelof compared with AWB & Maguire, it was noticeable.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
Most people seem to think it's a question of ability on the ball, which to be fair isn't a stupid suggestion as it always helps, but I think the movement of the team is even more important. When you see really well drilled teams they are able to almost always create a spare man with their movement. Their players don't need acrobatic skills to avoid the pressure, they receive passes at favorable angles that allow them to put their body between the ball and the pressuring player and then they can just pass it to a free team mate.
I mean look at what Norwich did to City at the beginning of the season and they didnt exactly have world beaters playing out from the back.
It's a mix of several things that we have all trained for since we were 5-6 years old, if you played organized football. The list would be the following:

- Two touches football(Control-Pass-Move).
- Always try to create triangles, it essentially means that three players can't be on a straight line, their is a need for depth, for United it's particularly true for our CBs and fullbacks who for some unknown reason tend to put themselves on a line when they are on the ball.

Then there are things that are purely technical:

- The passer needs to put the ball in a place that is the easier to control and faster to release, too often our players just lump the ball toward a teammate with no care for his stronger foot or where the opposition is.
- Oriented first touches, this applies to Maguire and AWB in particular, the reason they need that many touches is because they don't orient their first touches in a way that allows the next touch to be a pass, the ball is too often to close to their feet, too close to the opponent or on their wrong foot.
 

Josh 76

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
5,594
Maguire, AWB, Matic & Pogba are specifically targeted by pressing teams because they take 10 touches to do what they could do in 2 or 3. Wan-Bissaka & Maguire in particular. Watch the intensity Southampton pressed Shaw & Lindelof compared with AWB & Maguire, it was noticeable.
You can add Fred and Mctomminy to that list.
The only player I feel comfortable with when under a press is Bruno.
The rest give me anxiety.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
Time and patience for a start. Accepting we'll mess up a few times whilst we get good at it.

I think the role of the keeper in this situation is understated too.

The keeper has to be an 'out'. The ability to roll it back to the keeper to play a good long pass is very important.

Its early days for this team and to add to that they are all bloody tired at the moment doesnt help.

We've demonstrated we can do it well plenty of times over the season, I'm not convinced its the big drama people are making out.
 

Rash Decision

not to use the cream
Joined
Mar 15, 2018
Messages
1,525
Location
In your closet, in your head!
Yes, but United develop, train and try to buy players who can play with their own imagination. Its been the case since Busby, which is why United had so much trouble with Leeds under Revie. If you get a more 'method' manager, and we've tried some of those recently, they lose half the players who just aren't able to play that way. The way United have tried to deal with this is to get such good players that they will improvise their way through a method team. This team is short of such players who need character as well as skill, which is one reason Ole openly says it will take time. But patience is not an attribute most have these days.
But does that imply that to beat "method" teams, we generally need to have better players than them? It does not seem a viable way forward for us when we're up against teams like Pep's City who are both "method" and super talented.

Logically, given two equally talented teams, the more organised team will be superior to the other as the former is less dependent on individual performance and form. I don't think we can afford to turn away from "method" just because two of our previous "method" managers failed. LVG was out-of-date, dogmatic, and bought the wrong players. Mourinho was out-of-date, dogmatic, bought the wrong players, and toxic on top of that. We just have to choose more wisely if we ever move on from Ole.
 

Inigo Montoya

Leave Wayne Rooney alone!!
Joined
Oct 1, 2008
Messages
38,543
It's a weird one, because if you'd ask me before lockdown and even 3 or 4 weeks ago, I'd have told you that we were infinitely better at playing out from the back and that we were really dealing better with the press than from before - we easily handled City's press, for example.

But the last week or so has seen us regress in this aspect, which seems to tell me that it might be a fitness and tiredness issue rather than a technical one. The best we can do right now is to continue working hard in training and get it right - be it spacing, being proactive, identifying the passing lanes, etc etc.

Alternatively, it might also be that our personnel in crucial positions are not sufficiently press-resistant, and it's something that can only be fixed through the transfer market.
Two very valid points which I feel are the main issues atm.
 

Nikelesh Reddy

Full Member
Joined
Sep 10, 2017
Messages
1,912
Ok, last 3 games we’ve looked a little vulnerable against the system relying on individual brilliance to get us out of trouble. That’s a positive but moving forward against quality players we can’t rely on that all the time.
What tactics should we employ to counter that? What players should we go for?
I’m no transfer or player expert so don’t really know who’s out there that will give us the quality...oh I do know all about Sancho but that’s just one. I’ve felt we need 3 at least.
By finding Centre backs who are good enough to pass forward under high pressure.I”ve honestly been dissapointed by the ball playing ability of Maguire and Lindelof....If they arenot good enough to pass out from the back then we should sign new CB’s...
 

Pav1878

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
1,152
But does that imply that to beat "method" teams, we generally need to have better players than them? It does not seem a viable way forward for us when we're up against teams like Pep's City who are both "method" and super talented.

Logically, given two equally talented teams, the more organised team will be superior to the other as the former is less dependent on individual performance and form. I don't think we can afford to turn away from "method" just because two of our previous "method" managers failed. LVG was out-of-date, dogmatic, and bought the wrong players. Mourinho was out-of-date, dogmatic, bought the wrong players, and toxic on top of that. We just have to choose more wisely if we ever move on from Ole.
Totally agree. Nagelsmann is the best one out there who we could possibly get.
 

shabz

Full Member
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
2,595
Location
Manchester
We need more players to come to the ball rather than running away from it. We need to draw pressing players to spaces on the pitch we aren't going to pass the ball. If all we do is try to run away and get in behind when the press is on, it's forcing our players on the ball to make long ball passes which don't have a high success rate. This leads to the opposition getting the ball back unnecessarily and having us without the ball and on the backfoot regularly.

Bruno's possibly the best passer in the team and the last two games he's had to attempt too many long balls in behind or through the lines which have been cut out due to the difficulty of the pass. If he's struggling to make the passesn it's no surprise that no one else can, seems like an obvious coaching point for our backroom staff but we havent seen anything implemented yet.
 

Pav1878

Full Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2014
Messages
1,152
By finding Centre backs who are good enough to pass forward under high pressure.I”ve honestly been dissapointed by the ball playing ability of Maguire and Lindelof....If they arenot good enough to pass out from the back then we should sign new CB’s...
This has been my point on maguire. If he isn't fast enough, and isn't good enough on the ball, then why on earth did we pay a record fee for him? And the fact most people think we need a new CB is damning.

Having said that, we look best at playing out from the back when the CBs split and allow Matic to have the ball from there ie when the CBs aren't actually involved in playing out from the back :lol:
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,364
Location
UK
We need players more suited to it, it’s that simple. If you could coach it then Pep wouldn’t have had to spend half a billion buying players for City that could do it. And even then it’s not easy and a team with a good high press can cause problems.
 

AFC NimbleThumb

New Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2019
Messages
8,363
Pretty simple. You don't pass to what Mourinho calls "the first station pass".

An effective press is like a trap that releases when one presser pushes the player with the ball into a direction or avenue giving them a close or easy pass to a player who is being tee'd up for further pressing.

If you constantly just pass the ball five to ten yards to the nearest player because a) you're terrified of losing the ball b) not confident on the ball or c) haven't thought about a pass before you receive the ball (football intelligence) then you walk into the trap.

Vertical / breaking lines passes / forward and straight work. Going long works. Width in your own half does not work, you're just giving the opposition another defender (the touchline).

An example pattern is; GK to CB, CB to CB (my most hated pass), (pressure comes), CB rushes to LB (LB was marked and didn't want the ball) LB turns back towards goal and gives back to CB, CB is pressed and goes back to other CB or GK, who goes back to CB who then passes to RB and the RB does the same thing, turns backwards under pressure or hoofs up the line or loses the ball out of play conceding possession closer to our goal.

My idea (as a forum dweller not a football coach) is, NO EFFING SHORT BALLS UNLESS YOU GO BETWEEN THE OPPO CMs. That's it. Unless you're able to break the lines a la Roy Keane into the AM feet, don't bother. Go long. High press usually means either high back line (get in behind with pace) or gap between midfield and defence (second balls won in their last third, knock downs etc).

I would ban "width" in your own half when in possession as I personally think it is a waste of time, you don't stretch the play, you just move your possession closer to the edge of the playing area.

Then again, I am not a football coach.
Good post. Informative. Thank you. I’ll be looking at things differently.
 

Skills

Snitch
Joined
Jan 17, 2012
Messages
42,100
Most people seem to think it's a question of ability on the ball, which to be fair isn't a stupid suggestion as it always helps, but I think the movement of the team is even more important. When you see really well drilled teams they are able to almost always create a spare man with their movement. Their players don't need acrobatic skills to avoid the pressure, they receive passes at favorable angles that allow them to put their body between the ball and the pressuring player and then they can just pass it to a free team mate.
I mean look at what Norwich did to City at the beginning of the season and they didnt exactly have world beaters playing out from the back.
I mean this is all obvious stuff to everyone but man utd fans. For who'm the solution is always BUY MORE PLAYERS.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Which might lead you to believe Ole didn't know how he wanted his team to play while signing these players or it was all Ed's signings and Ole didn't have much of a say. I still couldn't really tell you what the style of play of this United side is tbh. Are we counter attacking, but at the same time it feels like Ole wants us/a team to dominate possession. What are we?
You called it right. We are a counter attacking team who also wants to control possession, whilst being an exciting attacking team (United way). Probably explains why we are both confused.

Someone at the club needs to decide what they want to do.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,619
Location
London
Playing it long means that you are going to lose the ball even more. Have you guys checked the aerial duel percentages? There is a reason why dominant teams play from the back.
Yes but you lose it at the other end of the pitch and not at the edge of your box so you're not immediately in danger. And if you kick it down the pitch and lose it, you can now do your own press and watch them try to get out of it.

Also dominant teams have players that are press resistant agile and really good with ball at feet in all positions of the back 4 and DM. We don't have that at the moment. You can target certain players (Matic, AWB) and possession will be turned over.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,949
Location
France
Yes but you lose it at the other end of the pitch and not at the edge of your box so you're not immediately in danger. And if you kick it down the pitch and lose it, you can now do your own press and watch them try to get out of it.

Also dominant teams have players that are press resistant agile and really good with ball at feet in all positions of the back 4 and DM. We don't have that at the moment. You can target certain players (Matic, AWB) and possession will be turned over.
You rarely lose possession at the edge of your box but you will lose the ball around 50 percent of the time if you lump it forward. It's a terrible idea, particularly when you play against a team that is good at retaining possession.