And inflation because of the new TV deal
Jadon Sancho| Staying at Dortmund for now
- Thread starter Adnan
- Start date
- Status
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
It's on!
So what's the date?
Between now and soon.
I also use it to post on RedCave too also
Can tell Fab's sick of the Sancho questions
To be fair he could ignore them as well if he wanted. He's happy to interact. Since the saga started his followers have gone from 800k to over 1 million.
Chelsea themselves have just posted this on their website:
Those small sums reported in the last few days were false. The transfer will cost Chelsea 100m € almost certainly.
Standard Transfer Demographic
Is Fab right or are we briefing the wrong information? I really don't know what to believe anymore 
Pogba was never worth or proved his fee, even Real was put off by it at the time. United and alot of fans were hypnotized by the romance and fandom of him coming back when there were so many better investments available that summer to spend the money on (Kante to name one). Pogba played for a unchallenged Juv team and French team with the best sqaud of players. I never get the whole idea of "he won the world cup" so means he must be world class. Hes hardly Maradona and was the key to it all.
I am much more inclined to spend big on Sancho than I ever was on Pogba
He's gained 600,000+ followers on Twitter since early August, I doubt he's sick of it
So what, their previous record was 71m for Arrizabalaga. Harvertz might be 71.1.....
Theres no major outlet reporting the fee currently at what you say is "almost certainly" 100m
That would maaaaybe make sense if the transfer market hadnt progressed since then. Players cost more money now. Also Pogba wasn't the world champion for france back then, he was a regular and big player for Juve. Sancho is a regular and big player for Dortmund, is English and is 20. Sancho arguably has the same stature in world footbal as Pogba did then. Account for the rise in transfer fees and £108 million seems about right.
In fairness, providing it goes through, this will be the biggest transfer this summer.
Who to believe ? Romano/falk’s side saying it’s the fee with Dortmund that appears to be the problem, or the English press - Agent fees?
If it was me I'd love the followers increase but still get fed up of answering the same question over and overHe's gained 600,000+ followers on Twitter since early August, I doubt he's sick of it
We don’t have the funds and we also have academy players who are fine filling in.
I’m not sure what planet you live on.
We are clearly far from being fine if Shaw is out.
The semi final game should surely tell you that.
Also re funds : IMO we have more than enough funds to sign a LB AND Sancho.
If kai is worth 100m then Sancho is worth 120m.
The only issue is how much of that is in bonus and how will the payments be structured?
The only issue is how much of that is in bonus and how will the payments be structured?
Well Transfermarkt, a German based website have him down at 72m, not sure where this conspiracy comes from over British media or what interest it is to under report the fee, surely the higher the better for more attention...
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
The cold war between foreign journo's like Fab and the UK press has been arguably the most entertaining aspect of this saga
when is Sancho day?
I think it's more a case of Man United's fee being over-reported; we apparently ended up saving £10m on Maguire by delaying (not that I'm a fan of the transfer), but that won't ever be reported in the mainstream media. Same with AWB, and hopefully with Sancho
Monday (the seventh)
It’s gonna take off tomorrow evening, just like the van de Beek transfer, and the real Sancho day will be tuesday or wednesday.
I feel it in my bone!
He said something like 70m pounds before 30th August was the initial fees. Bayer & Chelsea had agreement with the 70m pounds initial fees for weeks already. The reason why the deal of Havertz took long because they tried to find agreement in the adds on fees that reached 100m euro. Bayer wanted him for 100m euro with initial fees of 80m euro.
We weren’t in the middle of a global pandemic, no supporters at OT for an unknown time and big TV deals being cancelled.
Being cautious is perfectly understandable.
There are fans who want to see the club play good football and win trophies, and there are fans that are more worried about the Glazer's finances.
Next summer, to Liverpool.
This. I put those fans alongside Nazi sympathisers.
The most fleeced deal ever has to be a world record transfer of Denilson to Sevilla for £24m. That was outrageous at the time! Especially as he turned out to be pretty shit!
Not true. The kicker reported it and that's the most reliable source in Germany you can find. In detail, they reported that the fee including add ons will "as far as it is humanly possible to judge reach 100m with a probability bordering certainty". They further more reported that the add ons are not reliant on titles by Chelsea. Also, The Athletic and co. reported that Havertz was NOT the most expensive transfer in Chelsea's history. Not regarding the initial fee and not after bonuses. This is false, plain and simple, as the statement by Chelsea itself proved.
So we have a very specific and detailed report by the most reliable German news paper that is in line with the reported sums since the beginning of the saga and then there are the sources that speak of a smaller fee which are also detailed but at least partially contain definitely false information. I don't even have a remainder of a doubt that the kicker article is correct
Looking very good. Insane close control. Set up Rice nicely but he fluffed his lines.
Reminds me of Sterling but with a better touch and more composure etc.
Reminds me of Sterling but with a better touch and more composure etc.
We let that happen we will never live it down
- Status