iHicksy
Full Member
- Joined
- Sep 23, 2014
- Messages
- 1,839
I found it very watchable. Unlike city's where I had to turn it off after 20minutes as Kyle walker and Delph were so stupid it made me want to punch myself in the face. Some takeaways:
Levy comes across as very likeable. However, i'm sure the entire point of this documentary was made at his behest precisely to show him in such a light.
Kane seems actually quite level headed and likeable, if he didn't have his lisp i'm sure more people would like him.
Deli Ali is an actual idiot. I'm sure he's surprised that the sun rises everyday and could no doubt be convinced the earth was flat in a hot second.
Now Jose. Well, I was hoping for more tactical insight, the kind of brilliance I saw from him on Skysports that made the other pundits look like slow-witted children. However, what I saw was an ego-maniac who refers to his past teams victories as "his" or "I beat you". His communication is very very poor and he comes across very fake with the players. His use of "fecking hell" and the word mate seems particularly forced and out of place. It's very easy to see from his personality that when things don't go his way he sulks and throws his toys out of the pram. Never a leader and seems disconnected from his entire team. His attempts to joke around with the players always seem poorly received and they don't offer any banter back.
They already seem like they are massively underwhelmed by him from their body language, it's such a shame that the documentary didn't start with Poch's tenure to see the difference in management styles.
Levy comes across as very likeable. However, i'm sure the entire point of this documentary was made at his behest precisely to show him in such a light.
Kane seems actually quite level headed and likeable, if he didn't have his lisp i'm sure more people would like him.
Deli Ali is an actual idiot. I'm sure he's surprised that the sun rises everyday and could no doubt be convinced the earth was flat in a hot second.
Now Jose. Well, I was hoping for more tactical insight, the kind of brilliance I saw from him on Skysports that made the other pundits look like slow-witted children. However, what I saw was an ego-maniac who refers to his past teams victories as "his" or "I beat you". His communication is very very poor and he comes across very fake with the players. His use of "fecking hell" and the word mate seems particularly forced and out of place. It's very easy to see from his personality that when things don't go his way he sulks and throws his toys out of the pram. Never a leader and seems disconnected from his entire team. His attempts to joke around with the players always seem poorly received and they don't offer any banter back.
They already seem like they are massively underwhelmed by him from their body language, it's such a shame that the documentary didn't start with Poch's tenure to see the difference in management styles.