Yes. Obviously Maradona is in the GOAT discussion but other GOAT's have achieved much more at club level and others have achieved much more at International level. So for me he isn't the GOAT, he also had some negative aspects that shouldn't go unnoticed.
The Maradona and Argentina/Napoli is great yes but football is a team sport, which is why we have also seen other fairly average teams compared to opposition in the tournament/league achieve similar without even having a player of his calibre.
Leicester City 2016 PL, Blackburn 1995 PL, Lazio SA 2000, Roma SA 01, Boavista PL 01, Montpellier L1 12, Bursaspor SL 12, AZ Alkmaar Eredivisie 09, Kaiserslautern 98, Twente Eredivisie 10. Aberdeen SPL 80, 84, 85, Dundee SPL 83.
Chelsea 2012 CL, Liverpool 2005 CL, Steaua Bucharest 1986 CL/EC, Red Star Belgrade 1991 CL/EC, Marseille 1993 CL, Porto 2004 CL, Nottingham Forest 79, 80 CL/EC's.
Denmark 1994 Euro's, Greece 2004 Euro's, Portugal 2016 Euro's (Yes they had Ronaldo, but they were not a great team and France, Spain, Germany, Belgium all had much better teams that year and Ronaldo missed most of the Final).
I could mention so many more teams that won against far better competitors than themselves over the years, just because Maradona did it with Argentina and Napoli doesn't make him the greatest. They are not the only upsets that have happened and seem to be the only two reasons people use to call him the GOAT.
I could list countless other players that have achieved similar to Maradona and arguably more but I think I can get my point across without doing so.