Would you sack or keep Ole? (Poll reopened)

Sack or Keep OLE?

  • Sack Ole & appoint new coach ASAP

  • Keep Ole & back him to finish rebuild


Results are only viewable after voting.
Status
Not open for further replies.

Kajus

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 25, 2012
Messages
795
So by your logic if a team finished with 40 pts and avoided relegation by finishing 17th, then got 40 pts but finished 15th the season after, this would be progress? No its stagnation.
And by your logic Mourinho’s 2nd season was better than Fergie’s treble winning team. It goes both ways.
 

mancave bear

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 22, 2017
Messages
196
I know people like to throw shit at our defenders, but it's pleasing to see another 2 clean sheets on the bounce. That's 22 in 2020 which is significantly more than our rivals. Not bad, good to see us returning back to our defensive form after a sloppy start.

ClubGames (All Comps)Clean SheetsClean Sheet %
Manchester United412254%
Manchester City381539%
Tottenham37822%
Chelsea361336%
Arsenal371541%
Liverpool361542%
I agree that Ole has done a good job in tightening the defence, and those resulsts are great. God point : )

But he have had to arrange the middfield in a defencive way to tighen the defence, and it have have hampered our offencive game.

The centerbacks are to slow, and if we had a world class center back paring (like Rio and Vidic was), our attacking play would become a lot better : )
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,312
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
I agree that Ole has done a good job in tightening the defence, and those resulsts are great. God point : )

But he have had to arrange the middfield in a defencive way to tighen the defence, and it have have hampered our offencive game.

The centerbacks are to slow, and if we had a world class center back paring (like Rio and Vidic was), our attacking play would become a lot better : )
I'm not sure it has. We've got the second highest goals per game in 2020, just slightly behind Manchester City.
Club​
Games (All Comps)​
Goals Scored​
GSpG​
Manchester United​
41​
86​
2.1​
Manchester City​
38​
85​
2.2​
Tottenham​
37​
65​
1.8​
Chelsea​
36​
70​
1.9​
Arsenal​
37​
59​
1.6​
Liverpool​
36​
70​
1.9​

But lets say that the majority of these goals come from games we are more open and don't keep clean sheets. Below is the list of our clean sheets. Only 6 of them are tight results, i.e. 0-0 or 1-0. 12 of these fixtures have us scoring more goals than our current average i.e. 3 or more goals. In these 22 fixtures we've scored 57 goals. I wish I had stats for specific starting midfields but alas I do not. As it would be interesting to see our results when McFred starts together.

ATranmere Rovers0:6
HClub Brugge KV5:0
ALASK0:5
HRB Leipzig5:0
HNorwich City4:0
HWatford FC3:0
ADerby County0:3
HSheffield United3:0
ABrighton & Hove Albion0:3
AAston Villa0:3
ALuton Town0:3
ABrighton & Hove Albion0:3
AChelsea FC0:2
HManchester City2:0
ACrystal Palace0:2
ALeicester City0:2
HWolverhampton Wanderers1:0
AManchester City0:1
HFC Copenhagen1:0
AWolverhampton Wanderers0:0
HWolverhampton Wanderers0:0
HChelsea FC0:0
 

rotherham_red

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2005
Messages
7,411
I'm not sure it has. We've got the second highest goals per game in 2020, just slightly behind Manchester City.
Club​
Games (All Comps)​
Goals Scored​
GSpG​
Manchester United​
41​
86​
2.1​
Manchester City​
38​
85​
2.2​
Tottenham​
37​
65​
1.8​
Chelsea​
36​
70​
1.9​
Arsenal​
37​
59​
1.6​
Liverpool​
36​
70​
1.9​

But lets say that the majority of these goals come from games we are more open and don't keep clean sheets. Below is the list of our clean sheets. Only 6 of them are tight results, i.e. 0-0 or 1-0. 12 of these fixtures have us scoring more goals than our current average i.e. 3 or more goals. In these 22 fixtures we've scored 57 goals. I wish I had stats for specific starting midfields but alas I do not. As it would be interesting to see our results when McFred starts together.

ATranmere Rovers0:6
HClub Brugge KV5:0
ALASK0:5
HRB Leipzig5:0
HNorwich City4:0
HWatford FC3:0
ADerby County0:3
HSheffield United3:0
ABrighton & Hove Albion0:3
AAston Villa0:3
ALuton Town0:3
ABrighton & Hove Albion0:3
AChelsea FC0:2
HManchester City2:0
ACrystal Palace0:2
ALeicester City0:2
HWolverhampton Wanderers1:0
AManchester City0:1
HFC Copenhagen1:0
AWolverhampton Wanderers0:0
HWolverhampton Wanderers0:0
HChelsea FC0:0
You're doing the lord's work :angel:
 

Flexdegea

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 28, 2013
Messages
2,342
First of all, this is his third season. Lets stop talking about his first season as it was some free time or something.

We have squad who must challenge for title. Is our squad that far behind City or Liverpool? I don't think so. As last game proved, we are well covered on all positions but manager must use players better and find the way to play his best players. It is manager's job. To start James and Mata in first 11 in wrong system while having VDB, Pogba and Cavani on the bench is his decision. The fact that we don't have players for 4231 (while having perfect players for another formation) is not excuse for not challenging.
Again i repeat; challenge not winning. If City or Liverpool go again on 95 points and we finish on 80 then fair play to them and Ole. We tried, they were better and that is it.

This is called Goal post moving, so the only way Ole can be successful is if he matching your standards of 'we arent far off city liverpool'


We know that, we finished 3rd based on your assumptions. If we finish close again or maybe 2nd then we have met what is expected. I expect us to be closer this season.


If some folk want the title and nothing else matters fair enough bit they are setting a bar way too high in my opinion at the moment
 

anant

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Feb 28, 2015
Messages
8,259
To the points brigade, who are attacking Ole because we finished 33 points off the top, I really hope you'd be backing him at the end of the season when the gap would quite definitely reduce. And I hope you won't be bringing arguments like, "Pool and City didn't get 95+ points" and other such BS to attack Ole them
 

Dve

Full Member
Joined
Jan 13, 2019
Messages
2,941
First of all, this is his third season. Lets stop talking about his first season as it was some free time or something.

We have squad who must challenge for title. Is our squad that far behind City or Liverpool? I don't think so. As last game proved, we are well covered on all positions but manager must use players better and find the way to play his best players. It is manager's job. To start James and Mata in first 11 in wrong system while having VDB, Pogba and Cavani on the bench is his decision. The fact that we don't have players for 4231 (while having perfect players for another formation) is not excuse for not challenging.
Again i repeat; challenge not winning. If City or Liverpool go again on 95 points and we finish on 80 then fair play to them and Ole. We tried, they were better and that is it.
In fairness, half of his first season, Mourinho was in charge, and from Ole took over, United were actually the third best team in the league. So what´s your point exactly?

Mata was arguable our best player the first games this season, so I don´t understand why it´s suddenly so obvious that he shouldn´t start any game. And we´ve played the diamond in one game this season - in which we were pretty much dominated for 60 minutes of it - while we took more points than any other team from end of January to the end last season playing 4-2-3-1 with Rashford and Greenwood on the wings. So to say that we don´t have players for 4231 is hardly "the fact". However, I do sympathise with the view that the diamond fits out midfielders better, although I´m not convinced this is the formation best suited to meet any challenge, e.g. in games where we control the position and the opponent pack their defence centrally. To play without any width could then become pretty ineffective.

I do agree though, that we have a squad good enough for challenging for titles - which I also said when so many on here were on the bridge of giving up the whole season because we didn´t sign Sancho.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,792
First of all, this is his third season. Lets stop talking about his first season as it was some free time or something.

We have squad who must challenge for title. Is our squad that far behind City or Liverpool? I don't think so. As last game proved, we are well covered on all positions but manager must use players better and find the way to play his best players. It is manager's job. To start James and Mata in first 11 in wrong system while having VDB, Pogba and Cavani on the bench is his decision. The fact that we don't have players for 4231 (while having perfect players for another formation) is not excuse for not challenging.
Again i repeat; challenge not winning. If City or Liverpool go again on 95 points and we finish on 80 then fair play to them and Ole. We tried, they were better and that is it.
It's actually amazing how points are twisted based on who the manager is.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,381
Location
Dublin
Yeah, that's true.
I don't even see these camps as 'Ole in' or 'Ole out'.

The small minority that camp out with these extreme opinions are far more 'Ole can do no wrong' and 'Ole can do no right'. Both are so entrenched in their beliefs, that reasoned nuanced conversations, pointing out even his obvious flaws or qualities are impossible to have in a civilised manner.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,792
I don't even see these camps as 'Ole in' or 'Ole out'.

The small minority that camp out with these extreme opinions are far more 'Ole can do no wrong' and 'Ole can do no right'. Both are so entrenched in their beliefs, that reasoned nuanced conversations, pointing out even his obvious flaws or qualities are impossible to have in a civilised manner.
They have already decided on Ole's position, so what happens on the pitch has 0 relevance.

I believe Ole might not be good enough to win us titles but he is also doing decent job, finishing 3rd and then winning 2/2 games in CL against tough opposition. We have to improve our league form though.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,381
Location
Dublin
They have already decided on Ole's position, so what happens on the pitch has 0 relevance.

I believe Ole might not be good enough to win us titles but he is also doing decent job, finishing 3rd and then winning 2/2 games in CL against tough opposition. We have to improve our league form though.
My view on it too. He's changed my opinions on him before, so he may well make me believe he can win the league but not right now.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,792
My view on it too. He's changed my opinions on him before, so he may well make me believe he can win the league but not right now.
Yeah, our form in 2020 is very good. Scored many goals, defensively good and also did well in the league. Shame somehow signing Bruno is used against Ole (not surprised though).

We have very good team, if can perform consistently then at least we should finish top 4 comfortably.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,381
Location
Dublin
Yeah, our form in 2020 is very good. Scored many goals, defensively good and also did well in the league. Shame somehow signing Bruno is used against Ole (not surprised though).

We have very good team, if can perform consistently then at least we should finish top 4 comfortably.
Our team is good and we finally have some really nice squad depth. Add to that Ole's improvements in a coaching and tactical sense and I fully fancy a comfortable top four finish. I would be happy with that outcome, and with a good summer window next year, I would expect more improvements and a title fight.
 

R77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2017
Messages
530
Both sides of this points argument reek of bias.
That's people for you. Little to do with football.

My personal slant is that he's more than earned his right to see out the tetchy bits. By the end of his tenure (whenever that may be), we'll almost certainly be in a far better position moving forward than at any point since Moyes turned up. When folks say we have the squad to challenge, that's mainly down to Solskjaer as far as I can see.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,381
Location
Dublin
That's people for you. Little to do with football.

My personal slant is that he's more than earned his right to see out the tetchy bits. By the end of his tenure (whenever that may be), we'll almost certainly be in a far better position moving forward than at any point since Moyes turned up. When folks say we have the squad to challenge, that's mainly down to Solskjaer as far as I can see.
Aye, there's plenty of reasoned posters to converse with so the small minority can be ignored.

He'll certainly leave us in a far better place than the mess left behind by Jose. He's built a good solid squad with some very exciting youngsters and gotten rid of players that needed binning. He's also improved the likes of Rashford, Fred and McTominay while managing Greenwoods development in top notch fashion.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,792
Our team is good and we finally have some really nice squad depth. Add to that Ole's improvements in a coaching and tactical sense and I fully fancy a comfortable top four finish. I would be happy with that outcome, and with a good summer window next year, I would expect more improvements and a title fight.
We should be consistent, right now that's our biggest issue.

Yeah we have to build on what we have achieved to mount title challenge, we should have been aggressive this window.
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,792
Aye, there's plenty of reasoned posters to converse with so the small minority can be ignored.

He'll certainly leave us in a far better place than the mess left behind by Jose. He's built a good solid squad with some very exciting youngsters and gotten rid of players that needed binning. He's also improved the likes of Rashford, Fred and McTominay while managing Greenwoods development in top notch fashion.
Yeah, attack with players Rashford, Martial, Greenwood, Bruno is too much to handle for most of the league, first 3 are young and still improving.
 

Robbie Boy

Full Member
Joined
Jun 17, 2010
Messages
28,381
Location
Dublin
We should be consistent, right now that's our biggest issue.

Yeah we have to build on what we have achieved to mount title challenge, we should have been aggressive this window.
He fecked up against Chelsea imo so hopefully today we bounce back from that. They were clearly there for the taking. We should be approaching this game with real confidence given our fantastic result midweek.

I think it was a difficult window for most clubs. We made some solid signings and signed some exciting young talents. I'm not too disappointed how the Sancho saga ended as I wasn't invested in it. For me, it was ludicrous money to pay for a player still with a-lot to prove. Add to that Greenwoods emergence and I don't think it was as massive a blow as was made out. We still improved our depth but not necessarily our starting eleven. Next summer would be the time to make some additions that will improve our starting eleven.
 

lolok

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 1, 2018
Messages
92
Lets get the win against Arsenal, then keep the momentum moving forward. Anything less than a win today will be a major disappointment.
 

dwd

Saturday Night Spies
Joined
Jan 16, 2012
Messages
16,352
Location
Under soil heating.
Utter shite again after a good game. He needs to sort this out pronto if we are to do something of note this season. I worry we’ve been found out in the league but hopefully it’s just a bad 45 mins.
 

PoTMS

Full Member
Joined
Dec 15, 2016
Messages
16,450
Our home form is deeply concerning. We've been awful in all of those games too. Our last six games:

Southampton D
West Ham D
Palace L
Spurs L
Chelsea D
Arsenal D?
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,553
Location
Ireland
Our home form is deeply concerning. We've been awful in all of those games too. Our last six games:

Southampton D
West Ham D
Palace L
Spurs L
Chelsea D
Arsenal D?
That's bloody shocking if we don't get the win today.
 

Matriac

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2020
Messages
1,502
I just sat down and skimmed through this entire thread, more or less. There's a lot of sober minds who were treated like garbage along the way and are owed an apology, by people who are still posting on almost every page. Also I just love how the narrative have gone from people hating on Ole and lashing out at anyone either supporting him or merely reserving their judgement, to now claiming "he's improved a lot" and using that to justify their initial bias. As if he used to be the worst there is and now suddenly he's good. That makes no sense to me, it's just making up excuses for oneself by fitting the narrative.

I'd much rather suggest he was never that bad to begin with, that perhaps he even had a long-term plan just like he claimed and that he was right in saying there's no quick-fix to the situation he inherited. That maybe, just maybe, you were simply wrong back then and way premature (not to mention exaggerated) in your objections.

I remember during his initial run thinking "this can't last". The drive was back (I'd even call it overdrive especially that match against PSG) and the positivity, but for the most part the quality still wasn't there and many of these players were the same ones that had downed tools many times before so I kind of expected them to do it again at some point. A lot of people, even in this thread, knew his initial season could end badly, and that we'd definitely struggle the next unless some serious improvements were made. I believe Ole himself made a transfer wish in that regard, highlighting the need to strengthen all across the field before backing down on his demand the moment he knew these wouldn't be met. Which makes sense, to say you're happy with your squad even if you're not, as you can't go to war against your employers nor risk your players feeling unappreciated or inadequate if you want to maintain a healthy working environment.

Positivity breeds success, even when it's not really warranted it will still improve your chances more so than defeatism. It's why it's called "defeatism", because it leads to defeat.

So no, Solskjær hasn't suddenly improved, he's done a good job making the right calls all along (well as much as you can expect from any manager at least / nobody's perfect). He's taken the necessary steps needed for making the most of a very difficult situation. It's the quality of our squad, alongside the mentality and togetherness (the "culture" if you may) also needed for success, that are finally up to standards and that's why we're seeing improvement in results. To judge someone's management before these fundamental requirements are in place, like so many have done in this thread, that's just silly and I hope we as supporters have learnt from this.

Criticism where criticism's due, sure, but also credit where credit's due. And if it isn't due, if circumstances dictate it's too soon to tell, then focus on supporting your team. Negativity is a destructive force, it shouldn't come easy to you.
Really great post. Clearly took a lot of time to "research" and type out.
Well founded opinions. Glad that it finally received the Like it deserves today. :wenger:
 
Status
Not open for further replies.