GOAT Player and Manager combined

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
As the title says, who is the greatest of all time if you combine their abilities as a player plus their abilities as a manager, with each role weighted equally.

Maybe, score each out of 10 where 10 is the Greatest of all time in your opinion in each case, giving a maximum theoretical score of 20.
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,689
I'm going with Cruyff.

Just throwing some other names out there not mentiond yet. Don't necessarily think they'd be winners but they're notable and at least solid in both:

Trapattoni, Capello, Simeone, Happel, Dalglish

Good names mentioned so far.
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
Cruyff
10/10 player
9/10 coach

Beckenbauer
10/10 player
8.5/10 coach

Zidane
9/10 player
8/10 coach
 

P-Nut

fan of well-known French footballer Fabinho
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Messages
21,671
Location
Oldham, Greater Manchester
Cruyff, Pep and Zidane with Cruyff probably edging it and the other 2 being about level. Pep the better manager and Zidane the better player.
 

R77

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2017
Messages
530
Yeah, Cruyff is the outstanding choice.

Just because he hasn't been mentioned, and the most obvious ones have, I'll throw in Brian Clough. 0.916 goals per game. He was a very good striker, but it's been lost in the mists of time. No idea how to rate/score him, but he'd be great at an underdog club.
 

Okey

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2017
Messages
2,436
Johan Cryuff wins this rather easily I think. Lots behind him but he's the outstanding choice.
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,263
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
From the ones who haven't been mentioned, I would nominate Mário Zagallo. As a player, he was a key presence for Brazil when they were making deep forays in the World Cup and Copa América (you could even argue that his balancing act was one of the foremost factors behind the success of a free-flowing Garrincha on the opposite flank). As a manager, he won a World Cup (a feat equaled by only Beckenbauer and Deschamps) while coaching what is arguably the greatest team in tournament history when most others would fail to galvanize the talents of Pelé-Gérson-Jairzinho-Rivelino-Tostão, won a Copa América, and took other teams to the World Cup and Copa América finals — on top of assisting Carlos Alberto Parreira for the 1994 World Cup winning team...

Though yeah, all things considered it has to be Cruyff — especially when you factor in his colossal ideological imprint on future eras of football (that characteristic eluded Beckenbaer in a managerial capacity even though he guided a Matthäus led Germany to the World Cup title and Marseille to a European Cup final). All-Time great player + All-Time great manager + All-Time great influencer, lovely jubbly!

Honorable mentions for others who haven't been mentioned: Rijkaard (All-Time great player and Champions League winning manager), Muñoz (3 European Cups as a player and 2 European Cups as a manager), Stábile (top scorer of the first ever World Cup and 6 time winner of the South American Championship as manager).
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
Cruyff.

Between what he did as a player, what he did as a manager and the subsequent influence he had on later Barcelona teams (and in turn the influence they had on world football), there are few more influential figures in the history of football.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
Fergie and Ronaldo.
Pep and Messi.
Sacchi and Baresi?
Busby and Best.
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,815
Location
Manchester
I would choose Zidane over Cruyff.

Their career honours are quite similar but Zidane edges it overall due to being the main reason France won the 98 WC and Euro 2000 back to back.

Zidane also won 3 CL trophies as a manager and Cruyff won 1.
WC for Zidane as a player edges Cruyff’s Cl
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,038
Location
Moscow
No charlton?
Which one? Jack was a decent player, but I wouldn't call him one of the all-time greats; his success with Ireland was quite impressive, but, again, it's not something that's comparable to the big guys like Sacchi, Trapattoni, Fergie etc.

Did Sir Bobby actually do anything of note with Preston?

If you're talking about player-managers who combined the roles at some point then fair enough.
 

Precaution

Full Member
Joined
Nov 18, 2003
Messages
3,839
Location
'Murican South
Fergies record as a striker was pretty damn good though, 171 in 300 odd games albeit in the Scottish leagues but back when it was decent.
 

harms

Shining Star of Paektu Mountain
Staff
Joined
Apr 8, 2014
Messages
28,038
Location
Moscow
Cruyff has to be somewhere on 18,5 or 19 points out of 20. True visionary in both roles.

Zidane & Beckenbauer had achieved a lot as managers, but I wouldn't call their managerial careers revolutionary – just very successful.
Pep was a world-class/top player, but obviously not comparable to the above-mentioned; his managerial career is outstanding though, arguably even better than Cruyff?
Ancelotti is a carbon copy of Pep in that regard – not quite as influential as a manager and a comparable player. A solid 8/10 in both categories, I'd say.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Theonas

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,082
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Which one? Jack was a decent player, but I wouldn't call him one of the all-time greats; his success with Ireland was quite impressive, but, again, it's not something that's comparable to the big guys like Sacchi, Trapattoni, Fergie etc.

Did Sir Bobby actually do anything of note with Preston?

If you're talking about player-managers who combined the roles at some point then fair enough.
oh dear, I'm getting old :(

I always thought Charlton was the manager of 66 WC win :(
 

Schmeichel's Cartwheel

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Dec 21, 2014
Messages
11,420
Location
Manchester
Cruyff, Pep and Zidane with Cruyff probably edging it and the other 2 being about level. Pep the better manager and Zidane the better player.
Pep is a great manager but as a player he was nothing special, he just did his job. The Barcelona Darren Fletcher.
 

Invictus

Poster of the Year 2015 & 2018
Staff
Joined
Mar 22, 2014
Messages
15,263
Supports
Piracy on the High Seas.
I would choose Zidane over Cruyff.

Their career honours are quite similar but Zidane edges it overall due to being the main reason France won the 98 WC and Euro 2000 back to back.

Zidane also won 3 CL trophies as a manager and Cruyff won 1.
WC for Zidane as a player edges Cruyff’s Cl
The latter inspired an entire branch of football with his far-reaching influence, though — that influence, while intangible, exceeds even the likes of Ferguson or Messi — and must be worth something extra? For example, without Cruyff the player, Ajax wouldn't become the club it became and Michels probably wouldn't be as successful as he was, and that would have a domino effect on Gullit, van Basten, Neeskens as well. Without Cruyff the manager, Barcelona might not have lost their little-brother mentality that plagued the club through the early '80s, La Masia wouldn't be as distinguished (which would affect Messi, Xavi, Iniesta, et cetera), and probably no Guardiola in his current guise — which would considerably alter the landscape of modern football as totaalvoetbal and concepts of positiespel have permeated every sector of the game.

Would also disagree with the assertion that Zidane was the main reason France won the 1998 World Cup, as the key to the team was the impregnable defensive unit: conceded only 2 goals in the entire tournament including a long streak without conceding a single goal between the Round 1 match vs. Denmark and the Semi-final match vs. Croatia — definitely one of the absolute greatest defenses in football history. That being said, fair enough if you reckon Zidane has an edge over Cruyff as a player and manager — not trying to step on your toes! :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Theonas

sun_tzu

The Art of Bore
Joined
Aug 23, 2010
Messages
19,536
Location
Still waiting for the Youthquake
Yeah, Cruyff is the outstanding choice.

Just because he hasn't been mentioned, and the most obvious ones have, I'll throw in Brian Clough. 0.916 goals per game. He was a very good striker, but it's been lost in the mists of time. No idea how to rate/score him, but he'd be great at an underdog club.
A very impressive stat... though somewhat tempered by the fact that all except one of his goals were not in top flight games (he only ever played 3 games in the top league division scoring one goal and two international caps with no goals...
Essentially 99.6% of his goals were outside the top level and whilst his strike rate is impressive at that level I'm not quite sure it puts him at the Zidane Beckenbauer and cryuff levels as a player
 

2mufc0

Everything is fair game in capitalism!
Joined
Jan 8, 2014
Messages
17,018
Supports
Dragon of Dojima
Cruyff, his style as manager and player heavily influenced football and carries on to this day.
 

Nani Nana

Full Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2009
Messages
5,658
Supports
Whoever won the game
The latter inspired an entire branch of football with his far-reaching influence, though — that influence, while intangible, exceeds even the likes of Ferguson or Messi — and must be worth something extra? For example, without Cruyff the player, Ajax wouldn't become the club it became and Michels probably wouldn't be as successful as he was, and that would have a domino effect on Gullit, van Basten, Neeskens as well. Without Cruyff the manager, Barcelona might not have lost their little-brother mentality that plagued the club through the early '80s, La Masia wouldn't be as distinguished (which would affect Messi, Xavi, Iniesta, et cetera), and probably no Guardiola in his current guise — which would considerably alter the landscape of modern football as totaalvoetbal and concepts of positiespel have permeated every sector of the game.

Would also disagree with the assertion that Zidane was the main reason France won the 1998 World Cup, as the key to the team was the impregnable defensive unit: conceded only 2 goals in the entire tournament including a long streak without conceding a single goal between the Round 1 match vs. Denmark and the Semi-final match vs. Croatia — definitely one of the absolute greatest defenses in football history. That being said, fair enough if you reckon Zidane has an edge over Cruyff as a player and manager — not trying to step on your toes! :)
What about 2006 WC where he literally dragged France past Spain and Brazil into the final?

Zidane and Cruyff are joint leaders to me.
 

FootballHQ

Full Member
Joined
Nov 17, 2017
Messages
18,288
Supports
Aston Villa
Wasn't Fergie a pretty good striker?

Daniel Passarella, one of Argentina's greatest ever players and won stuff as manager in South America although didn't win anything when in charge of his country.

I agree for ability, honours and the whole legacy he created Johan Cruyff is very hard to beat in this category.
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,815
Location
Manchester
The latter inspired an entire branch of football with his far-reaching influence, though — that influence, while intangible, exceeds even the likes of Ferguson or Messi — and must be worth something extra? For example, without Cruyff the player, Ajax wouldn't become the club it became and Michels probably wouldn't be as successful as he was, and that would have a domino effect on Gullit, van Basten, Neeskens as well. Without Cruyff the manager, Barcelona might not have lost their little-brother mentality that plagued the club through the early '80s, La Masia wouldn't be as distinguished (which would affect Messi, Xavi, Iniesta, et cetera), and probably no Guardiola in his current guise — which would considerably alter the landscape of modern football as totaalvoetbal and concepts of positiespel have permeated every sector of the game.

Would also disagree with the assertion that Zidane was the main reason France won the 1998 World Cup, as the key to the team was the impregnable defensive unit: conceded only 2 goals in the entire tournament including a long streak without conceding a single goal between the Round 1 match vs. Denmark and the Semi-final match vs. Croatia — definitely one of the absolute greatest defenses in football history. That being said, fair enough if you reckon Zidane has an edge over Cruyff as a player and manager — not trying to step on your toes! :)

That is fair enough and if you want to look at footballing philosophy as a whole then he far exceeds Zidane, I am not going to argue about that. Cruyff definitely impacted the game possibly more than any other person.


But what Zidane has achieved as a manager seems to get understated for some reason (in general, not you). Just because he had a great team of players at his disposal at Madrid seems to mean people dismiss him as being a great manager, yet the likes of Pep who has spent over £1bn in his career and won less CL trophies in far more time, gets hailed as far superior.
 

Flanders Devil

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 23, 2018
Messages
450
Controversial- but I think both Zidane (less so) and Pep have been overrated as players.
Pep was in his own works (something like) a 3rd division player with a first division mentality.
Zidane has some great moments sure, but I feel often overrated as a player from a careers perspective. Again, I recognise this is controversial.
 

TwoSheds

More sheds (and tiles) than you, probably
Joined
Feb 12, 2014
Messages
12,998
Controversial- but I think both Zidane (less so) and Pep have been overrated as players.
Pep was in his own works (something like) a 3rd division player with a first division mentality.
Zidane has some great moments sure, but I feel often overrated as a player from a careers perspective. Again, I recognise this is controversial.
Are you old enough to have watched much of Zidane? The guy was unbelievable, effortless talent and a great leader.
 

Pow

New Member
Joined
Feb 1, 2015
Messages
3,516
Location
Somewhere
Supports
Chelsea
What about 2006 WC where he literally dragged France past Spain and Brazil into the final?

Zidane and Cruyff are joint leaders to me.
The highlights of zizou vs brazil in that game is just art. No other word for it. On a pitch full of stars he looked a level above.
 

Chipper

Adulterer.
Joined
Oct 25, 2017
Messages
5,689
Controversial- but I think both Zidane (less so) and Pep have been overrated as players.
Pep was in his own works (something like) a 3rd division player with a first division mentality.
Zidane has some great moments sure, but I feel often overrated as a player from a careers perspective. Again, I recognise this is controversial.
I get what you're saying about Guardiola and one or two others have said similar. He was never regarded as one of the very best players in the world or in contention for Balon D'or or anything like that. However he was a very solid player, won trophies, won a good number of caps for his country and if any other big club had have bought him you wouldn't exactly have had people being shocked or fans protesting the signing.

As we're considering 2 categories here there's going be very few were absolute elite as both managers and players anyway and compromises in one or the other are going to start having to be made here and there or very few names are going to be mentioned at all. When it comes down to it Guardiola still had a playing career that the vast majority of players (well over 99% of them) would envy. My pick of Cruyff was obviosuly ahead of him playing-wise though.