TheMagicFoolBus
Full Member
Kepa had literally the worst season ever recorded by a goalkeeper in the PL. De Gea was more or less bang average - there's a big difference between the two in terms of the extent to which they were liabilities.Don't agree with that at all. You can say Kepa cost Chelsea a few goals, but on that same logic De Gea cost us quite a few goals as well.
Chelsea are too inconsistent at the moment and don't seem to have any attacking edge to them despite having a talent squad. Top 4 is realistic for them at the moment, not saying we'll challenge for the title but I still think we'll end up above Chelsea.
Also, Kepa cost us far more than a few goals - last season we had a lower xGA than Liverpool but conceded 17 more goals, thanks to Kepa being historically bad. His save percentage was like 54% - that is comical.