Could've got a bus between those lines!Well off, good call
Could've got a bus between those lines!Well off, good call
2 mins is too generous. If it takes longer than 30 seconds it isn’t clear and obviousCan there not just be a rule that if it takes more than 2 mins you stick with the original decision
Exactly.That's as "offside" as Cavani "wasn't in the box".
Imagine getting annoyed by a completely hypothetical situation.Only we could lose after being 4 up at half time, against a team with 10 men . Shitehawks
It wasnt a peno.Not offside at all, but balances out considering we were robbed a penalty. VAR has been absolutely shocking though.
And like 600fps too instead of this skip frame and the player moves a metre nonsense.Why do they not have a whole row of fecking cameras either side so they can actually make the decision? Surely able to do that with the money in football
Then bring a player who’ll actually try on.To rest, we have a packed shedule.
HAHAHA twat
It says if the foul continues into the box:Law 12 states if a foul continues into the box then a penalty kick is given, I'm sure.
I guess the difference is holding is a deliberate elongated offence, and the tackle was at the point of time outside of the box and the momentum took Cavani into the box/lineIf a defender starts holding an attacker outside the penalty area and continues holding inside the penalty area, the referee must award a penalty kick.
That is a lot of abbreviationsVAR omg wtf
Keep him for the bantz?Fire that idiot in the VAR room. Fecking hell! Even I am upset that goal wasn't given
Mike Dean