Donald Trump - GUILTY!

UncleBob

New Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
6,330
Go on, then, tell me the consequences of Biden's quite factual statement. I'll give you a hint, the answer is there are none.

On the other hand, we have seen the consequences of Trump's months long operation to convince people that the democrats, Dominion's algorithm and other actors actively rigged the election so Joe Biden would win.
It wasn't much of a factual statement at the time, was it? If I drive to the city centre 10 times under the influence of narcotics and I only have an accident once, it doesn't mean it was ok the 9 other times.

Not sure why people are boiling this down to tweets and blowing them out of proportion, like suddenly pretending that "fight" is only meant in the literally sense of arming yourself etc. The key question is if Trump had reasons to believe that his speech that day would incite people and result in catastrophic violence.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,979
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
It wasn't much of a factual statement at the time, was it? If I drive to the city centre 10 times under the influence of narcotics and I only have an accident once, it doesn't mean it was ok the 9 other times.

Not sure why people are boiling this down to tweets and blowing them out of proportion, like suddenly pretending that "fight" is only meant in the literally sense of arming yourself etc. The key question is if Trump had reasons to believe that his speech that day would incite people and result in catastrophic violence.
Whether it was factual or not is irrelevant. You are avoiding the question. What were the consequences of Biden's statement?
 

UncleBob

New Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
6,330
And what is the point of this answer, in relation to, you know, things that people are actually talking about in this thread.

Does it mean it's acceptable in some way? Or that Trump didn't do the things he did?
I certainly don't think so. But there's a lot of things happening in the states that I don't find acceptable.
 

Dr. Dwayne

Self proclaimed tagline king.
Joined
May 9, 2006
Messages
97,979
Location
Nearer my Cas, to thee
None yet?
Yes, I'd told you that already.

Now, let's look at the consequences of Trump's repeated, relentless claims that the election was going to be and was stolen.


And if you need it, the following shows a clear timeline of how Trump laid the foundations for the insurrection by legitimizing groups that would later try to stop the certification of the Electoral College vote.

https://www.justsecurity.org/74138/...actions-leading-to-the-attack-on-the-capitol/
 

unchanged_lineup

Tarheel Tech Wizard
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
16,948
Location
Leaving A Breakfast On All Of Your Doorsteps
Supports
Janet jazz jazz jam
Yes, I'd told you that already.

Now, let's look at the consequences of Trump's repeated, relentless claims that the election was going to be and was stolen.


And if you need it, the following shows a clear timeline of how Trump laid the foundations for the insurrection by legitimizing groups that would later try to stop the certification of the Electoral College vote.

https://www.justsecurity.org/74138/...actions-leading-to-the-attack-on-the-capitol/
I'd forgotten about the Trump Army. Feck sake :lol:
 

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
28,539
It's like the argument clinic sketch , but instead of John Cleese you argue with Tommy Wiseau.
 

Ramshock

CAF Pilib De Brún Translator
Joined
Nov 20, 2007
Messages
45,425
Location
Swimming against a tide of idiots and spoofers
It wasn't much of a factual statement at the time, was it? If I drive to the city centre 10 times under the influence of narcotics and I only have an accident once, it doesn't mean it was ok the 9 other times.

Not sure why people are boiling this down to tweets and blowing them out of proportion, like suddenly pretending that "fight" is only meant in the literally sense of arming yourself etc. The key question is if Trump had reasons to believe that his speech that day would incite people and result in catastrophic violence.
Jesus Christ lad.....yep Donald J Trump is well known for his subtle use of subtext in his meticulously planned public speeches. Give your fecking head a wobble mate
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,970
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Jesus Christ lad.....yep Donald J Trump is well known for his subtle use of subtext in his meticulously planned public speeches. Give your fecking head a wobble mate
:lol:
 

Rado_N

Yaaas Broncos!
Joined
Apr 6, 2009
Messages
111,394
Location
Manchester
I think basically they are in a position where they are trying to whitewash what just happened.
They dont want to be known as supporters of fascists and traitors and are trying to downplay the whole thing.
Or they’re just a fecking moron. Who really knows.
 

Cheimoon

Made of cheese
Scout
Joined
Jun 22, 2020
Messages
14,382
Location
Canada
Supports
no-one in particular
None yet?
Would you say you're discussing honestly here? Cause I don't see how you can think there is an equivalence between Biden saying that Trump might try to steal the elections, without any calls to violence (metaphorical or not) and without tarring the GOP or GOP/Trump voters along the way; and Trump, who continuously said that Biden and the Democrats will try to steal the election, and constantly calling upon his supporters to fight this.

While I'm add it, I will add that Trump did actually try to steal the election (by suppressing votes in all kinds of ways) and openly spoke about the need to do so (saying that Republicans most suppress votes if they ever want to be voted into office again), while there is nothing similar from Biden's side. This further speaks to the lack of moral equivalency.

And finally, while you can say that Trump only ever spoke of violence metaphorically ('fight to stop the steal' in a non-physical way), using that language repeatedly and with insistence has the distinct possibility that people will take it literally. You can't shy away from that. And yes, that can be prosecuted. If someone would tweet 'we should kill Biden', they can be put on trial for inciting violence; and an excuse like 'I meant kill politically, by voting against him' won't fly. So why would it for Trump?
 

Odin

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2019
Messages
296
Location
Midgard
Whether it was factual or not is irrelevant. You are avoiding the question. What were the consequences of Biden's statement?
Actually, it is relevant. Everybody with a brain could foresee the attempted political theft and the needy grifting from Trump. It is part of the playbook he's followed all the time - accuse your adversaries of what you are planning to do yourself! He's executed it (nearly) to perfection. If GOP let him get away with it, he's salvaged his indebted fat ass while shitting on the institutions held dear by those who oppose his opportunistic, ultraegotistical worldview.

Reasoning with the uncle? I am not going there. But I applaud your and everybody elses effort. Hopefully somewhere out there there is a candidate for falling down the rabbit hole who just didn't lose his/her bearings after reading some of your responses. Hopefully...
 
Last edited:

unchanged_lineup

Tarheel Tech Wizard
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
16,948
Location
Leaving A Breakfast On All Of Your Doorsteps
Supports
Janet jazz jazz jam
Actually, it is relevant. Everybody with a brain could foresee the attempted political theft and the needy grifting from Trump. It is part of the playbook he's followed all the time - accuse your adversaries of what you are planning to do yourself! He's executed it (nearly) to perfection.
I think it might have been in this thread, but someone shared lately a Time article about the informal network (composed of left and right) who came together and stopped him from executing that plan fully. It was a close-run thing and would have been much more likely without their incredible effort to fight disinformation and help people vote.

Edit: found it
https://time.com/5936036/secret-2020-election-campaign/
 

Vitro

Full Member
Joined
Jan 25, 2010
Messages
3,217
Location
Surrey
Didn't Joe Biden state, several times, that one of his biggest concerns was that Trump would try to steal the election?
Biden stated that there was a threat a fascist would try to steal the election, primarily because Trump said he would, and to the surprise of no one he then did try to steal the election. No future prediction can be a fact as by definition it has not yet occurred. Trump said Biden tried to steal the election as a means for himself to steal an election.There’s no equivalence. One was a prediction (or a future certainty for any non idiot) while the other was a lie so as to perform the deed in which he was accusing his adversary of.
 

unchanged_lineup

Tarheel Tech Wizard
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
16,948
Location
Leaving A Breakfast On All Of Your Doorsteps
Supports
Janet jazz jazz jam
Aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaanyway...

Just for the heck of it, for argument's sake, what could anyone in the world say or do to make enough GOP senators drop Trump and vote to convict him?

I'm going with, "provide incontrovertible proof he's a paedophile". And even then it'd probably be a close run thing.
 

mav_9me

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2009
Messages
12,530
So close...


Here’s a non paywall...

I call BS. Now I didn't see him in the hospital but he never appeared that sick. I think this is sensationalism.

I have seen 100s of Covid patients in ICU. They are not standing on their own.