Not in the Race?

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,925
Location
Rehovot, Israel
We were in a title race until Sheffield United. Since that match it appears some of the players have decided they are not in a title race.
I don't think it had anything to do with a title race. We have weaknesses but our momentum carried us forward. Once that momentum is gone, though, it's hard to get it back.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,925
Location
Rehovot, Israel
He's bought two good defenders who would remain in the defence but he still needs a CDM & CB and even a GK if he wants one which he doesnt have and didn't buy. Klopp changed the whole back line. Pep has spent fortunes. Ole has only been able to change two players so far.
Solskjaer was able to bring in three defenders (Telles as well). Plus, while both keepers were in the squad when he arrived, it was his decision to give both bumper new contracts. So he had plenty of influence on the back five.

Anyhow, you can't always have a perfect team. City and Liverpool of previous years had weaknesses, lesser players, but they got over it.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
Solskjaer was able to bring in three defenders (Telles as well). Plus, while both keepers were in the squad when he arrived, it was his decision to give both bumper new contracts. So he had plenty of influence on the back five.

Anyhow, you can't always have a perfect team. City and Liverpool of previous years had weaknesses, lesser players, but they got over it.
Agreed, and they were all good signing.

It wasn't his decision what the contract was and Henderson wasn't ready and has probably been managed well.

You're right but not team gets away with it without a spine. Our GK, CBs and CDM are awful. Look how well that's worked out for Arsenal not addressing those areas.

People moaning about Maguire are basically saying you need to replace 4 players because improving just Maguire does nothing for us.

Lindelof is often targeted because he is one of the weakest CBs.
Fred is not a CDM and has the worst shot of any pro footballer.
DDG is the most passive keeper in the league and is no longer protected by an ultra defensive manager or his shot stopping.

Edit - and those two teams didn't 'get over it's they spent millions on their spine.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,925
Location
Rehovot, Israel
Edit - and those two teams didn't 'get over it's they spent millions on their spine.
Liverpool spent big on a goalkeeper and a centerhalf and improved massively even though Van Dijk was never partnered with a top class centerhalf. City made a big leap defensively by spending big on Dias.

We made the same sort of big move, but spending it on Maguire might not have been the best idea. Certainly when you compare him to the expensive CBs City and Liverpool got. We also handicapped ourselves with the De Gea contract. There are consequences to expensive errors.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
Liverpool spent big on a goalkeeper and a centerhalf and improved massively even though Van Dijk was never partnered with a top class centerhalf. City made a big leap defensively by spending big on Dias.

We made the same sort of big move, but spending it on Maguire might not have been the best idea. Certainly when you compare him to the expensive CBs City and Liverpool got. We also handicapped ourselves with the De Gea contract. There are consequences to expensive errors.
Let's ignore the fact Liverpool bought a TOP CDM too shall we?

City made a big leap by spending on everyone, they've spent a fortune on the whole back 6.

Maguire being an expensive error should have no bearing on what we do going forward. We don't recoup that money if we sell him.
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,925
Location
Rehovot, Israel
Let's ignore the fact Liverpool bought a TOP CDM too shall we?

City made a big leap by spending on everyone, they've spent a fortune on the whole back 6.

Maguire being an expensive error should have no bearing on what we do going forward. We don't recoup that money if we sell him.
I don't need to ignore anything as I just don't believe you must have great players in every position - or at least in every spine position - in order to be a terrific team. City spent a lot on the backline, but it was that one big signing that made a huge difference. We also made that one big signing, just not as good.

As of course the Maguire deal infuences future moves. It's the money that is now gone, it's the weaknesses he has we need to account for and compensate.

If you don't spend well, you'll pay for it on the field for a while. Just like when We bought Djemba Djemba, Kleberson, Miller, Bellion, etc, in a short space of time.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
I don't need to ignore anything as I just don't believe you must have great players in every position - or at least in every spine position - in order to be a terrific team. City spent a lot on the backline, but it was that one big signing that made a huge difference. We also made that one big signing, just not as good.

As of course the Maguire deal infuences future moves. It's the money that is now gone, it's the weaknesses he has we need to account for and compensate.

If you don't spend well, you'll pay for it on the field for a while. Just like when We bought Djemba Djemba, Kleberson, Miller, Bellion, etc, in a short space of time.
It wasn't that one signing it was the fact that they both already had top players to put them with :lol: why are you acting like Liverpool and City don't have a ridiculously strong spine. Then there is ours.

You put Allison, Gomez and Fabinho next to Maguire and we can win the league.

You put Ederson, Stones and Rodri next to Maguire and we can win the league.
 

Hughie77

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,156
There's no doubt that City are overwhelming favourites now. In my mind they've won it, but there is that small chance that complacency steps in.

This was hard to read but a reminder of what could go wrong: https://www.bbc.com/sport/football/17853469

Payback time? You never know...
That season was mental and well ingrained, the 4-4 At home to Everton strangely enough, I thought lost it for us, Evra hit the post with a header to make it 5-2 , then we conceded 2.
We just need to try and keep winning that's all we can do. It's going to be tough.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,423
Location
left wing
City are on pace for late 80's early 90's.
They are on pace for 86 points at the ppg (2.27) they have achieved so far this season.

The last three Premier League winners have achieved 99, 98 and 100 points. You have to go back to 2015/16 for the last time any team failed to break the 90 point barrier - Leicester won the league that year.

There was a chance this year, with City and Liverpool well off their usual pace, for a different side to step up and grab the title. Doesn't look like it is going to happen, sadly. Might be a while before anyone gets the chance again.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Not hard to argue that they have better than Lindelof, Fred and DDG. Also, obviously you ignore the attacking comment.
You cant see a defense as a whole and they point out a single player. I asked as a unit would you swap? Is ridiculous to think anyone would. We clearly have better players than them, we are just underperforming.

So you say because we are a more attack driven team than them then is justifiable that we conceed more goals? that doesnt make sense to me. The top teams always have a better attacking and defensive record than the rest. Or do you see that pattern repeated amongst other top teams in other leagues? does Bayern, Juve, Madrid, PSG, etc have an average defensive record because they play more offensive football than the rest of the league?

If anything a better attack helps your defense, the other team is more focused on defending than attacking.
 

Nou_Camp99

what would Souness do?
Joined
Apr 1, 2013
Messages
10,274
They are on pace for 86 points at the ppg (2.27) they have achieved so far this season.

The last three Premier League winners have achieved 99, 98 and 100 points. You have to go back to 2015/16 for the last time any team failed to break the 90 point barrier - Leicester won the league that year.

There was a chance this year, with City and Liverpool well off their usual pace, for a different side to step up and grab the title. Doesn't look like it is going to happen, sadly. Might be a while before anyone gets the chance again.
There was a chance for a team that is good enough to get 86pts plus. We got 66 last season.

We arent there yet but the signs are positive and we are improving.
 

Teja

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2014
Messages
5,842
They are on pace for 86 points at the ppg (2.27) they have achieved so far this season.

The last three Premier League winners have achieved 99, 98 and 100 points. You have to go back to 2015/16 for the last time any team failed to break the 90 point barrier - Leicester won the league that year.

There was a chance this year, with City and Liverpool well off their usual pace, for a different side to step up and grab the title. Doesn't look like it is going to happen, sadly. Might be a while before anyone gets the chance again.
I think points deltas are more indicative than trying to find some meaning from absolute points totals this year. IMO just because teams won't hit the PPG they hit last season doesn't mean this year was easier in any way. Okay maybe a bit of an added advantage for teams not in Europe like Everton and WHU but they are kind of irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

Couple of opinions that might be controversial. I think City's points totals are a good benchmark for us because they've been consistently up there for the past decade or so. So if we do as well as City points totals wise, I think we'll be alright.

Currently, we're sitting 8 points below City - assuming they win their game in hand. At the end of the past few seasons we were:

2014-16: 9 points off.
2015-16: 0 points off. (The Leicester year)
2016-17: 9 points off (Pep's first year in charge)
2017-18: 19 points off.
2018-19: 32 points off.
2019-20: 15 points off.

They've clearly been transformed and have been way better than us since Pep came in. I think 2018-19 maybe is a one off because Jose got sacked, bad start etc. so I won't read too much into that.

This season anything >10 points off of City's pace is grounds for sacking Ole and replacing him with someone better. Ideally we should be within touching distance (<6 pts) come end of the season to prove that we've made progress under Ole.
 

bsCallout

New Member
Joined
Dec 21, 2017
Messages
4,278
You cant see a defense as a whole and they point out a single player. I asked as a unit would you swap? Is ridiculous to think anyone would. We clearly have better players than them, we are just underperforming.

So you say because we are a more attack driven team than them then is justifiable that we conceed more goals? that doesnt make sense to me. The top teams always have a better attacking and defensive record than the rest. Or do you see that pattern repeated amongst other top teams in other leagues? does Bayern, Juve, Madrid, PSG, etc have an average defensive record because they play more offensive football than the rest of the league?

If anything a better attack helps your defense, the other team is more focused on defending than attacking.
Any attacking team without a top defence or more importantly; spine, will leak goals.

I didn't single out a player, I gave you our spine.

See Argentina for a team with a WC attack and a poor defense, didn't help them much did it? So your last point is nonsense.

We are second because of our attack, not our defence(or spine).
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,701
Does anybody else hope the pressure being off might help this team. They look a year short of a challenge and are soon 8pts behind a city that most have given the title to while also having a bit of breathing space to 4th.

We have 45 pts to play for but would unfortunately need 38 to even be in contention. Can't see it happening but we finished last season with a decent run
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Any attacking team without a top defence or more importantly; spine, will leak goals.

I didn't single out a player, I gave you our spine.

See Argentina for a team with a WC attack and a poor defense, didn't help them much did it? So your last point is nonsense.

We are second because of our attack, not our defence(or spine).
So you are taking one example with Argentina and taking as if its a given rule? I think its clear the better players you have the best all the units can play. A better defense helps you have a better attack, a better midfield helps you have a better defense and attack, and a better attack helps you have a better defense. I don't see how any unit would be affected by having best players in other units.

I still think we have more talent that what we are currently playing at our defense. Most of those players would walk on any team. Still we are below the average defense in the league. At least we should be around the top 6 defenses in the league.

So let me ask another question, do you think with the talent we have in defense are we on par on where we should be? you think its on balance to allow 30 goals in 23 games with the talent we have on our defense? or are we underperforming and should be doing better?
 

Striker10

"Ronaldo and trophies > Manchester United football
Joined
Sep 21, 2004
Messages
18,857
Oles jobs to manage situations. If the target imagined at the start of the season was top four? At any stage would we be 'in the race'? No. But Ole don't have to hold everyones hand nor explain everything to everyone because you need to keep secrets. Sometimes you need to obfuscate. So people always picking up on this or that....no one thought we'd challenge for the league this season. No one. What people said after a point in time is we could - based on how we were going. Unless City stumble majorly we're not challenging. We had an opportunity to challenge but will learn from these things. HOPEFULLY. If the players have any sense, they will. We've lost so many points - too many in the final seconds of games. We've achieved a great away record but went behind in the majority.

Not getting Sancho was a blow. Offensively, we've not reached our potential this season. Bruno and Cavani have covered the cracks but Martial and Greenwood can produce so much more and we know that. Hopefully we can win a trophy this season because we have improved and if Bailly had been fit all season, who knows where we'd be. We've given City the confidence they needed to win the league. Let's focus on securing champions league place and trying to win a trophy. But you need luck all the same. People dismiss the market often but it can really buy momentum, and optimism going in the season. We've dropped some bad bad points but this is an improving squad. The defenders NEED to solidify at key times. When we got the second against Everton, what happens? They almost scored before half time.

We should remain solid for as long as possible because the games is won but we conceded 2 in quick succession at home and that's not a team challenging for the league but a team that still needs to learn from it's mistakes. We're capable but we should just focus on ourselves and look to go on a run. Let's see how high we can finish. We've not earnt the right yet...to say we can challenge. Our home form fools no one. What Ole tells the players and what he tells the media etc are two different things. We heard him yell as Rashford in the arsenal game to run at his man......he can't defend. But we would blame Ole for more dropped points. People even blamed Ole last game for making a sub.....that yeah led to a goal but that's absurd. People need to lay off the drink and here's a suggestion.

Try to remember how BAD and awful we've been at times in the last 7-8 years and the improvement is there. No question. At home via Everton, we were more aggressive and made more runs and created opportunities and this is something we've not done for much of the season at home. The players will learn. When you play for the league, once you've got the points.....put them in a box marked fragile and post them to yourself...carefully. We gave two points away very cheaply in search of winning a game we'd already won.
 
Last edited:

caid

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2014
Messages
8,321
Location
Dublin
I have much the same attitude as i did a month ago to be honest. Were in a title race but it would probably be our weakest title winning team ever and would require both City and Liverpool to feck up fairly severely.
 

RashfordisRed

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 10, 2019
Messages
59
Whilst it seems we are out of it, the seasons swings some roundabouts - in the last 2 weeks, we have had some things just not go right, the refs at Sheff Utd, some basic finishing at Arsenal and unbelievable scenes at Everton (that picture of DDG fk at past 94mins still haunts me). In that same time, City had a lucky call vs Aston Villa, snuck over the line vs Brighton and were gifted 2 goals by one of the best keepers going. Yes, it is too idealistic to say everything goes your way, but if a couple of those went right i.e. we got a point vs Sheff Utd and held on vs Everton whilst City dropped points in one of those three we would be talking about 3 points rather than 8 with an easier next couple of games than them.

The margins in football are so tight and if it swings the other way, before you know it we could be in touching distance.

Regarding our defence, I agree it was atrocious against Everton, that was a game to close out from the start of the second half, but I feel sometimes as sports fans we forget that other teams have also come to play and are professionals. They came out with some intensity at the start of the second half and yes we buckled, but that first goal was again such slight margins - in the build up if the ref lets Fred keep the ball (when he was fouled) rather than the other way it never happens, then De Gea actually shows conviction on the cross and it dwindles away. I watched City vs Villa and I can tell you Villa made a lot more clear chances than Everton got near to doing, but they didn't make it count, Everton did. A positive take on the Everton game was that after we buckled to 2-2, we did all of the running and a combination of howlers in the final minute cost us.

The defence conceded a lot less last year and even this year there have been some good signs. There is a chance the lack of consistency means we fall into the midst of a top 4 battle, but I would say there is as much chance that we go in a mini run, and come the game against City be in a position that a win puts us right on their tails.

Whilst we are no doubt frustrated, the Everton game was really depressing, and I hate the idea that we played so well, scored some nice goals, controlled the game but could not get 3 points part of me thinks that we as fans are falling to the media's attempts to discredit Ole and continue to make us look weak and a failure. For those that want to see progress, we played Liverpool twice, all the talk after the first one was we should have won, then we went away and beat them in the second.

I for one will be cheering for Spurs this weekend, and hope that City drop points and we turn it on against WBA to maybe, just maybe start a shift in the momentum.

Having watched Utd game in game out all throughout the last few years, dreading games but watching them as you never know - to now be at a place where it looks like there is some team spirit, the manager does not stink the place out and ultimately look forward to Utd games can only be a good sign.
 

croadyman

Full Member
Joined
Mar 9, 2018
Messages
34,768
Was good while it lasted but best to now just switch our focus to beating Leicester for second place
 

The Cat

Will drink milk from your hands
Joined
May 18, 2017
Messages
12,345
Location
Feet up at home.
I wouldn't give up just yet. I accept we are underdogs and also not ready but these are strange times with a lot of different variables than usual.
 

Ayoba

Poster of Noncense.
Joined
Feb 2, 2021
Messages
8,527
Was good while it lasted but best to now just switch our focus to beating Leicester for second place
I would agree with this. Nobody is stopping city's juggernaut.

Our race right now is for 2nd place!
 

sullydnl

Ross Kemp's caf ID
Joined
Sep 13, 2012
Messages
34,063
City are going to breeze their way to the title. Aguero and KDB just coming back too.

Still, second place would be progress and as much or more than I expected from this season so whatever.
 

Sandikan

aka sex on the beach
Joined
Mar 14, 2011
Messages
53,219
It's a process.
Would have been miraculous to go from last year's performance to champions bearing in mind we didn't strengthen the team in the summer.

The squad, maybe, you can argue, but definitely not the team.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,519
Location
Ireland
It's over. Not a hope we're pulling back 8 points on City. I'm fine with 2nd this season but we'd want to be mounting a serious challenge next season of it's time for a change.
 

GoldTrafford99

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Dec 28, 2020
Messages
296
I think points deltas are more indicative than trying to find some meaning from absolute points totals this year. IMO just because teams won't hit the PPG they hit last season doesn't mean this year was easier in any way. Okay maybe a bit of an added advantage for teams not in Europe like Everton and WHU but they are kind of irrelevant in the grand scheme of things.

Couple of opinions that might be controversial. I think City's points totals are a good benchmark for us because they've been consistently up there for the past decade or so. So if we do as well as City points totals wise, I think we'll be alright.

Currently, we're sitting 8 points below City - assuming they win their game in hand. At the end of the past few seasons we were:

2014-16: 9 points off.
2015-16: 0 points off. (The Leicester year)
2016-17: 9 points off (Pep's first year in charge)
2017-18: 19 points off.
2018-19: 32 points off.
2019-20: 15 points off.

They've clearly been transformed and have been way better than us since Pep came in. I think 2018-19 maybe is a one off because Jose got sacked, bad start etc. so I won't read too much into that.

This season anything >10 points off of City's pace is grounds for sacking Ole and replacing him with someone better. Ideally we should be within touching distance (<6 pts) come end of the season to prove that we've made progress under Ole.

On what planet would anybody with any reasonable intellect accept that 'equation' (most of which is out of the hands of the actual club itself) as the metric in which to measure progress... We can all see the progress.... it's in plain sight and very obvious.
 

Red Daz

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 19, 2019
Messages
248
Second place would be an improvement on last year and that’s good in my book , it’s been horrible since Fergie retired, improvement has been non existent until Ole took charge, we are still far off, way too inconsistent but I see hope for the future for the first time in what feels like an age
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
They have keepers throwing them in for them now, we need to ride it out and beat them at the Etihad to stand a chance, keep the pressure up when the games pile up on them.
Well know in about 2 weeks
 

Lee565

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2019
Messages
5,072
If we finish 20+points behind city come the end of the season will we have actually made any progress under ole and closed the gap as was the target this season?
 

Steve 007

Full Member
Joined
Aug 26, 2019
Messages
645
Location
London
We’ve clawed back bigger deficits but our team isn’t quite ready. I think we should remember this City team are exceptional and our aim should just be to win as many games as we can. I think we all know they won’t capitulate but if we run them close and get a quality centre back in the summer then we might just do it again next season.,
 

Amir

Full Member
Joined
Aug 6, 2000
Messages
24,925
Location
Rehovot, Israel
It's over. Not a hope we're pulling back 8 points on City. I'm fine with 2nd this season but we'd want to be mounting a serious challenge next season of it's time for a change.
If City is once again returning to the heights of 100 points a season, it would require something special to get to that level.
 

Poborsky's hair

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
1,722
Supports
Bohemians 1905
If we finish 20+points behind city come the end of the season will we have actually made any progress under ole and closed the gap as was the target this season?
Exactly. Just because some teams can't maintain their form we shouldn't be complacent and be happy with second. Next year there can be some more good managers in the more talented teams, can think of Hassenhuttl or Rose moving to Spurs and Tuchel might get his things together next season too while Rodgers could be backed in the transfer market and it can be tough fight for top 4 again.

Man City are well drilled team with a proper system, which can lose some points but thanks to consistency such system brings it will generate the most points more often than not. We are, on the other hand, far behind (from the very top) because simply put our "system" is very much dependable on individuals which have more days off than perform. Ole is a great manager and in a style way closer to Fergie but the best football addresses off the ball play much more than we do and we have to address the weakness by our management as soon as possible or we just never catch up with the best.

In general there is three ways to do it:

- either address this issue by hiring a specialist for this or simply the team to focus on this the most
- or buy world class players, manage their ego well, hope their form stays by world-class I mean players who are consistently on top of their game which can bring results, similarly to what happened in Zidane's Real
- or hire a more progressive manager who knows how to play progressive football
- extra option is to wait for Guardiola to leave Mancity but then with the money they have they might go for some talented manager again and dominate football for coming years + the influx of progressive manager in the EPL generally makes it more and more challenging every year, compared to the days when Big sams, Arrys, Bruceys, Pardiolas managed the majority of the teams in the league, so we should think about it.

This is not an anti-Ole post but kind of a reality check post from my view.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Now you understand why it was never missed opportunity. You thought Man City’s form is like 15/16 Leicester, not even closed. You are forgetting the quality they have brought in into their squad with tons of money.
 

Longshanks

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2020
Messages
1,783
It's over. Not a hope we're pulling back 8 points on City. I'm fine with 2nd this season but we'd want to be mounting a serious challenge next season of it's time for a change.

Somewhat deafitist of you, lots of football to be played yet, bear in mind citys next four are everton away, arsenal away west ham home and then the derby.

Let's see where we are after the derby before we start conceding the title.
 

Poborsky's hair

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
1,722
Supports
Bohemians 1905
We’ve clawed back bigger deficits but our team isn’t quite ready. I think we should remember this City team are exceptional and our aim should just be to win as many games as we can. I think we all know they won’t capitulate but if we run them close and get a quality centre back in the summer then we might just do it again next season.,
Like you said, we are not ready, CB next to Harry is a big problem, certainly, but that alone wouldn't guarantee results, we would need a goalscorer of the level of Kane, Haaland too. Preferably Sancho-like RW, or Grealish type of creator ( when Pogba leaves) to play through the middle or from the LW when Rashford is out of form.
I think we need two of these, with CB being absolute priority, then we can challenge depends still on form of other teams though.
 

Hughie77

Full Member
Joined
Oct 22, 2017
Messages
4,156
All we can do is try to keep winning , 3 pts 3pts no matter how just get them, it's going to be tough because we've dropped silly points this season, we all know where. Consolidate 2nd at least would be my agenda. Then just see how it pans out in April and May.