Gary Neville - Pundit

arnie_ni

Full Member
Joined
Apr 27, 2014
Messages
15,210
He’s just described City’s owners/what they’ve done as “awe-inspiring.”
For man City, the stadium the training pitch, houses built etc. Is he wrong?

Hes saying they are doing everything they've done for pr purposes yet this move falls in the face of it. He thinks they'll back out ahead of anyone.
 

Feed Me

I'm hungry
Joined
Apr 8, 2004
Messages
29,319
Location
Midlands, UK
Neville showing himself to be a cnut once more with the City love in. Doesn’t mind the human rights abuses?
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,602
For man City, the stadium the training pitch, houses built etc. Is he wrong?

Hes saying they are doing everything they've done for pr purposes yet this move falls in the face of it. He thinks they'll back out ahead of anyone.
Yeah I suspect if any of the clubs that will back out first, probably will be City. They don't need the extra money unlike the Glazers, Henry etc
 

always_hoping

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
7,805
Fair play to Gary Neville, showing his passion and love for the sport and giving his honest opinion.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,654
Get out of City’s arse. He’s passionate but no need to cream himself over City.
He's a hypocrite. Sky Sports and the premier League giving owners like the Glazers, Abramovich and the Mansours a free pass to do whatever the feck they want has hopefully ended his career. They brought this madness forth, well, Pandora's box is open now.
 

Lentwood

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2015
Messages
6,840
Location
West Didsbury, Manchester
This I credit Gary for saying (forget the practicalities of actually taking a stand)

Yes Gary, you ARE complicit. One of many and and only in a very small way, but complicit nonetheless.

Good to hear him finally admit this. Good to hear him air his reasons why, which are very similar to the reasons I continued to go to OT for ten years+ after the takeover. As I posted earlier, WE’RE all complicit too. If we watch it, we’re complicit. If we buy merchandise, we’re complicit. If we attend games, we’re complicit.

This isn’t after-timing. This point was made by the Green & Gold campaign in 2005. People have called for prominent voices to speak out before. They didn’t. Some fans (very few) stuck to their convictions and walked away. A similar percentage will do the same now. The rest will be angry for 15 minutes and then get over it. And that’s what the parasites in charge have always counted on.
 

Dobba

Full Member
Joined
Nov 10, 2006
Messages
28,648
Location
"You and your paper can feck off."
Pre-game: Pearl clutching about faceless owners, with no interest in fans or the history of clubs, using football clubs to make money for themselves.

Post-game: Lauding the Abu Dhabi group, with investments in 11 clubs they presumably grew up all supporting.
 

rimaldo

All about the essence
Joined
Jan 10, 2008
Messages
41,032
Supports
arse
This I credit Gary for saying (forget the practicalities of actually taking a stand)

Yes Gary, you ARE complicit. One of many and and only in a very small way, but complicit nonetheless.

Good to hear him finally admit this. Good to hear him air his reasons why, which are very similar to the reasons I continued to go to OT for ten years+ after the takeover. As I posted earlier, WE’RE all complicit too. If we watch it, we’re complicit. If we buy merchandise, we’re complicit. If we attend games, we’re complicit.

This isn’t after-timing. This point was made by the Green & Gold campaign in 2005. People have called for prominent voices to speak out before. They didn’t. Some fans (very few) stuck to their convictions and walked away. A similar percentage will do the same now. The rest will be angry for 15 minutes and then get over it. And that’s what the parasites in charge have always counted on.
spot on.
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,602
He's a hypocrite. Sky Sports and the premier League giving owners like the Glazers, Abramovich and the Mansours a free pass to do whatever the feck they want has hopefully ended his career. They brought this madness forth, well, Pandora's box is open now.
Sky Sports are pretty bad but it's really the Premier League that are the bunch of cnuts that just allowed the foreign owners come in and to never think of the consequences. This is what it comes down to.
 

Castia

Full Member
Joined
Jun 18, 2011
Messages
18,414
Absolute box office tv this, I’ve enjoyed listening to both Neville and Carragher tonight they’ve been brilliant as usual.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,423
Location
left wing
Sky need to be a bit careful. The Super League is clearly going to be sold to the streaming services and Sky are likely to be left with a significantly diminished domestic Premier League product that they are contractually locked into broadcasting (and paying for) for years - they absolutely have a vested commercial interest in preventing the Super League. I hope they succeed (for reasons entirely unrelated to Sky's financial health), but they are not neutral observers here.
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,179
Location
Cooper Station
Sky need to be a bit careful. The Super League is clearly going to be sold to the streaming services and Sky are likely to be left with a significantly diminished domestic Premier League product that they are contractually locked into broadcasting (and paying for) for years - they absolutely have a vested interest in preventing the Super League. I hope they succeed (for reasons entirely unrelated to Sky's financial health), but they are not neutral observers here.
They’ll be okay they’ve still got The Championship
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
For man City, the stadium the training pitch, houses built etc. Is he wrong?

Hes saying they are doing everything they've done for pr purposes yet this move falls in the face of it. He thinks they'll back out ahead of anyone.
Morally, Citys owners are a lot worse than wanting a super league. He has done himself over with his City ass licking
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,294
Their investment in the local area has been pretty impressive to be fair.
For man City, the stadium the training pitch, houses built etc. Is he wrong?

Hes saying they are doing everything they've done for pr purposes yet this move falls in the face of it. He thinks they'll back out ahead of anyone.
Sure but that’s the extent of his assessment. No indication he understands how the oil takeovers have played a role in leading to this moment. Banging on about the anti-competitiveness of this new league with not a word about how the oil clubs have distorted competition across the continent.

On another note, himself and Carragher are living in a different era in their heads. When they talk about “the fans”, they’re clearly not thinking of anyone living outside the country. This aspect of the globalization of football doesn’t seem to register with them, yet the Abu Dhabi owners are “awe-inspiring.”
 

SER19

Full Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2008
Messages
12,733
We are all complicit. Every single one of us. If you ever bought a shirt or ticket since 2006 or watched a game on sky you've played your part. This absurd purity test laid out to everybody who hates this awful idea is such a waste of time. Certainly there are people and states instrumental in this that are hypocrites now but there is a spectrum. Neville has articulated well why this is different
 

FlawlessThaw

most 'know it all' poster
Joined
Oct 26, 2005
Messages
29,602
Sure but that’s the extent of his assessment. No indication he understands how the oil takeovers have played a role in leading to this moment. Banging on about the anti-competitiveness of this new league with not a word about how the oil clubs have distorted competition across the continent.
Well that's his view that he isn't against foreign takeovers and investment in clubs and enhancing the local area. Which makes sense given he is doing the exact same thing with Salford.
 

chromepaxos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
192
That’s not my point at all. My point is that the organisation Neville represents and who keep shoving him in-front of cameras to rant about “greed” and his “disgust” are the same organisation who helped create this mess in the first place.

I find their sanctimonious, desperate blathering to be an absolute insult to our intelligence. Irregardless of what I think of the proposed ESL.

Let’s have it right. This is rich people fighting with rich people about who gets to rip us off. That is exactly why I gave up my ST and haven’t bought a single piece of merchandise in must be ten years plus now. Neither do I pay for Sky or BT. Not that any of it matters because I am replaceable and irrelevant to them.
So you're so busy being sanctimonious yourself that you won't actually say that this is wrong?

And your super-intelligent opinion is that there's no difference between Gary Neville and Roy Keane (genuine Man Utd icons), and the Glazers because they are all rich?

Have you considered the possibility that being smug about how principled you are isn't the same as being smart? Or actually principled?
 

Berbaclass

Fallen Muppet. Lest we never forget
Joined
Jan 23, 2010
Messages
39,179
Location
Cooper Station
Sure but that’s the extent of his assessment. No indication he understands how the oil takeovers have played a role in leading to this moment. Banging on about the anti-competitiveness of this new league with not a word about how the oil clubs have distorted competition across the continent.

On another note, himself and Carragher are living in a different era in their heads. When they talk about “the fans”, they’re clearly not thinking of anyone living outside the country. This aspect of the globalization of football doesn’t seem to register with them, yet the Abu Dhabi owners are “awe-inspiring.”
Not to mention that blatant sportswashing. Mad considering he went to the Middle East himself and spoke to people out there for that Sky documentary
 

Roboc7

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2014
Messages
6,678
This I credit Gary for saying (forget the practicalities of actually taking a stand)

Yes Gary, you ARE complicit. One of many and and only in a very small way, but complicit nonetheless.

Good to hear him finally admit this. Good to hear him air his reasons why, which are very similar to the reasons I continued to go to OT for ten years+ after the takeover. As I posted earlier, WE’RE all complicit too. If we watch it, we’re complicit. If we buy merchandise, we’re complicit. If we attend games, we’re complicit.

This isn’t after-timing. This point was made by the Green & Gold campaign in 2005. People have called for prominent voices to speak out before. They didn’t. Some fans (very few) stuck to their convictions and walked away. A similar percentage will do the same now. The rest will be angry for 15 minutes and then get over it. And that’s what the parasites in charge have always counted on.
That’s why it’s so attractive to own these Premier League teams, Arsenal have become a joke, have extortionate ticket prices but fans keep turning up. Glazers have heaped debt on Utd, allowed stadium to rot but fans keep coming back for more.

If this all falls apart fans will quickly forget and start worrying about who going to buy in the summer.

Good point made about City, I think they might buckle, feels like they signed up as didn’t want to be left out and aren’t really committed. They don’t need the cash and don’t want stricter FFP, also might like the PR of being ones to drop out.
 

Infra-red

Full Member
Joined
May 4, 2010
Messages
13,423
Location
left wing
Pre-game: Pearl clutching about faceless owners, with no interest in fans or the history of clubs, using football clubs to make money for themselves.

Post-game: Lauding the Abu Dhabi group, with investments in 11 clubs they presumably grew up all supporting.
City and Chelsea have been reported as the final clubs to sign on (ie the most reluctant joiners) to the Super League. A good strategy for Sky, UEFA and anyone else who wants to prevent this going forward, would be persuading City to pull out.
 

2cents

Historiographer, and obtainer of rare antiquities
Scout
Joined
Mar 19, 2008
Messages
16,294
Klopp just called him out for working for Sky.
 

Bilbo

TeaBaggins
Joined
Sep 27, 2004
Messages
14,303
This I credit Gary for saying (forget the practicalities of actually taking a stand)

Yes Gary, you ARE complicit. One of many and and only in a very small way, but complicit nonetheless.

Good to hear him finally admit this. Good to hear him air his reasons why, which are very similar to the reasons I continued to go to OT for ten years+ after the takeover. As I posted earlier, WE’RE all complicit too. If we watch it, we’re complicit. If we buy merchandise, we’re complicit. If we attend games, we’re complicit.

This isn’t after-timing. This point was made by the Green & Gold campaign in 2005. People have called for prominent voices to speak out before. They didn’t. Some fans (very few) stuck to their convictions and walked away. A similar percentage will do the same now. The rest will be angry for 15 minutes and then get over it. And that’s what the parasites in charge have always counted on.
Good post. It'll be fascinating to see whether this movement will grow or burn itself out. Monday night football is fascinating tonight. There's an air of panic with Neville and Carragher here, and I don't think it's anything to do with losing some sky income. They're being careful to address the hypocritical element of their own involvement, and im sure that was planned and its smart to do that.

Its clear that this is much bigger than endorsing a new premier league, or sitting idly by while oligarchs and states buy our clubs though. The panic is palpable.
 

chromepaxos

Full Member
Joined
Jul 29, 2015
Messages
192
We are all complicit. Every single one of us. If you ever bought a shirt or ticket since 2006 or watched a game on sky you've played your part. This absurd purity test laid out to everybody who hates this awful idea is such a waste of time. Certainly there are people and states instrumental in this that are hypocrites now but there is a spectrum. Neville has articulated well why this is different
This is exactly right. The idea that every former player who ever got a job in media is disqualified from having an opinion on something like this is childish and self-defeating.

If you're spending your time criticizing Roy Keane and Gary Neville rather than Joel Glazer, you are the equivalent of what the Soviets used to call a "useful idiot." It's exactly what the Glazers want: turn some fans against former players who are making waves and distract from the actual crooks making off into the distance with our club.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,654
We are all complicit. Every single one of us. If you ever bought a shirt or ticket since 2006 or watched a game on sky you've played your part. This absurd purity test laid out to everybody who hates this awful idea is such a waste of time. Certainly there are people and states instrumental in this that are hypocrites now but there is a spectrum. Neville has articulated well why this is different
They let Man City cheat willingly. Neville complaining about things being anti competitive in a world where we watched Man City and PSG flaunt the """rules""" - and then praising them on the regular seems hypocritical in the extreme . And the current Champions League semi finalists all involve those very same clubs. It's drivel from him. Real Madrid have regularly been 'helped' by UEFA and the Spanish Government. AC Milan were owned by the Italian President, and many Italian clubs bribed and cheated their way through the 90's and beyond, as we saw in Calciopoli). The 'fabric of sport' is thin at best.
They don't care about us fans, but then they never did. £30 a month for Sky Sports these days.
 

edcunited1878

Full Member
Joined
Sep 3, 2014
Messages
8,935
Location
San Diego, CA
UEFA, The FA, and Premier League didn't regulate all those years ago and do not act with transparency. And this is what you get. Everybody attached to the game as being 'complicit' and being a hypocrite, trying to 'place' blame on everyone else instead of holding people and parties accountable in specific, tangible ways.