Squad depth is king

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Yes I bloody do. Villarreal started the final with an 18yo of little experience because their main man was injured. Amad is one of the most promising 19yos in football and played in well in the EPL a few days ago. He's not my uncle Gav off the park, he's a professional footballer.

We are reaching peak idiocy where we're defending a player never being subbed off however bad they are, because the player that would replace them might be more junior or not quite as good as the starter in form. That's pretty much why you have starting and sub players. A lesser player is still better than a player playing badly. Otherwise no one would make subs.
18 not 19. Don’t try to suit it to your argument.t

And you are comparing an 18 years old who had 24 appearances this season as he had been slowly integrated to first team to Diallo who only joined us in January and had less time to be integrated to the squad? You are keep ignoring my post why Diallo isn’t ready.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
We were playing villarreal not real Madrid for gods sake. Daniel James would be a starter for them. They brought on Alberto moreno and he looked the best player on the park.
Let’s not kid ourself. Alcacer is more proven than Daniel James and he was on their bench.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
The same way you can sub off an Andy Cole or Dwight Yorke for an Ole Gunner Solskjaer.
Give Ole the same quality player as himself, he would bring that player on.

He has proved himself he brought on Greenwood to change the game by replacing Rashford vs spurs. Or bring on Martial when he was on the bench.
 

MU655

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
1,258
18 not 19. Don’t try to suit it to your argument.t

And you are comparing an 18 years old who had 24 appearances this season as he had been slowly integrated to first team to Diallo who only joined us in January and had less time to be integrated to the squad? You are keep ignoring my post why Diallo isn’t ready.
You have to ask why Diallo wasn't given more opportunities to integrate; there were times that were perfect to do so, but he insisted on playing the first team even when it wasn't needed. The same thing has happened with De Beek, where Solskjaer has barely given him any game time to acclimatise or reach match-fit levels. It really does hinder our depth. Substitutes still need games to be able to have an impact when they are called upon. They can't just come in after barely playing and be expected to give a good performance.

In the end, I think it was poor preparation from Solskjaer. He could have afforded Diallo and De Beek more opportunities, and we may have had more depth to call upon.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Rashford's done it a few times, but he also a) hasn't for a while b) never been as bad as he was yesterday and c) didn't do it in Extra Time after a long season carrying an injury.

Also in what world do Sancho or Grealish sit on benches? I think there's only two or three teams in the world that could boast such quality. To expect that on your bench is absolute madness, and it is not the sign of a good manager at all.

Mata came on against West Ham (who you could argue are a better team then Villareal this season) and delivered. James literally delivered one of the best crosses any of our players have put in all season a few days ago.

Fact is we didn't look even close to doing ANYTHING in extra time (our XG was 0.01 or something like that) - we were tired, thoughtless and had zero about us. It is ridiculous to suggest that anyone on our bench could have been any worse then anyone on the pitch - I even include Brandon Williams in that.

Again, if SAF was in charge, would he have managed the game in the same way? You know the answer to that question.
You don’t need to have Grealish/Sancho on the bench if he starts one of them and bench a teenager like Greenwood. Again, that’s a quality option he has proven himself that he can bring him on to change the game.

SAF had good bench options. If he doesn’t trust Pogba, what makes you think he will trust Amad in yesterday game when the score was still 1-1?
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,333
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
Yes I bloody do. Villarreal started the final with an 18yo of little experience because their main man was injured. Amad is one of the most promising 19yos in football and played in well in the EPL a few days ago. He's not my uncle Gav off the park, he's a professional footballer.

We are reaching peak idiocy where we're defending a player never being subbed off however bad they are, because the player that would replace them might be more junior or not quite as good as the starter in form. That's pretty much why you have starting and sub players. A lesser player is still better than a player playing badly. Otherwise no one would make subs.
Someone was saying something similar to me in the maguire thread a few weeks ago and lo and behind he goes and gets injured and the lads below him haven’t played together all season. Just because a good player is always semi fit you don’t have to run him to death for 180 minutes every single week. It’s criminal misuse of the second 11 in the squad especially making expensive signings and not trusting them. It also sends a poor message to the squad lads. Not enough confidence in you. Oh shit sorry actually we need you now to save our season. Basic psychology and man management. If they aren’t good enough to rotate regularly then stop signing them, sell them or loan them till they are. If I was behind Rashford this season for example I’d be wondering what the hell he needs to do to get dropped for a few games so I could have a crack at it. It’s a crazy setup.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Give Ole the same quality player as himself, he would bring that player on.

He has proved himself he brought on Greenwood to change the game by replacing Rashford vs spurs. Or bring on Martial when he was on the bench.
No he wouldn’t. Ole would be a sub with our current strikers and no way would he sub himself on to take off Rashford, Cavani or even Greenwood. He wouldn’t risk it.

No cajones.
 

Renegade

Full Member
Joined
Nov 11, 2009
Messages
5,393
Fergie once threw a unknown Macheda in the dying minutes of a must win title decider. Imagine if his thought process was “I have no quality on the bench”. Emery used his squad and bench to his advantage and now has another Europa League title to his name.
 

izec

Full Member
Joined
Sep 5, 2013
Messages
27,239
Location
Lucilinburhuc
The squad argument is nonsense when we have the best squad in the competition. For the CL or league title? Yes. For the Europa League this should have been enough. Most of our bench players would all have played for them yesterday, from the start or the bench.

We paid 30m for Van de Beek, and 40m for Amad. Hoe can they not play? Even Matic or Mata would have been useful with that slow tempo in the ET.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
No he wouldn’t. Ole would be a sub with our current strikers and no way would he sub himself on to take off Rashford, Cavani or even Greenwood. He wouldn’t risk it.

No cajones.
He subbed off Rashford for 19 years old Greenwood to change the game before so why wouldn’t he?
 

Ali Dia

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2013
Messages
14,333
Location
Souness's Super Sub/George Weahs Talented Cousin
The squad argument is nonsense when we have the best squad in the competition. For the CL or league title? Yes. For the Europa League this should have been enough. Most of our bench players would all have played for them yesterday, from the start or the bench.

We paid 30m for Van de Beek, and 40m for Amad. Hoe can they not play? Even Matic or Mata would have been useful with that slow tempo in the ET.
He choked plain and simple but he’s been laying the foundations for this particular shitshow all season with Rashford Bruno AWB and Maguire absolutely run into the ground when there was no reason for it. If we don’t have a like for like player then change the system or formation. Get creative. Involve the squad. Still raging today at how it went down. Playing for extra time and penalties against an average team is certainly a low point in my lifetime. If we went for it and they knicked the winning goal? Cool, it happens. Last night was just a hopeless culmination of all of his mistakes this season
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
You have to ask why Diallo wasn't given more opportunities to integrate; there were times that were perfect to do so, but he insisted on playing the first team even when it wasn't needed. The same thing has happened with De Beek, where Solskjaer has barely given him any game time to acclimatise or reach match-fit levels. It really does hinder our depth. Substitutes still need games to be able to have an impact when they are called upon. They can't just come in after barely playing and be expected to give a good performance.

In the end, I think it was poor preparation from Solskjaer. He could have afforded Diallo and De Beek more opportunities, and we may have had more depth to call upon.
You have to look at how Ole doesn’t rush things to integrate young players. Look at what he did to Greenwood last season. Was he being thrown away to starting XI? No, he was slowly getting his minutes only came on as sub for 2-5 minutes and slowly getting more minutes and end up as our regular player. Amad only been here for less than Greenwood had, Greenwood been training with Ole since 2018. I had my explanation about VDB’s style doesn’t suit our style at the moment.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
In a cup final?

Yeah I didn’t think so. When the pressure was on. He sunk!
He only had one cup final. Coming into conclusion based on one cup final because there is no quality on the bench doesn’t make a justification or fair assessment for what you said.
 

redpatron

Full Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2014
Messages
1,057
The squad argument is nonsense when we have the best squad in the competition. For the CL or league title? Yes. For the Europa League this should have been enough. Most of our bench players would all have played for them yesterday, from the start or the bench.

We paid 30m for Van de Beek, and 40m for Amad. Hoe can they not play? Even Matic or Mata would have been useful with that slow tempo in the ET.
i can't get over this. We could have made 6 subs in ET and won this with a near fresh squad squeezing out a goal in 30 minutes. Amad, James, Matic, Fred, Mata, VDB, Telles, you telling me we couldn't replace 6 guys running on empty with 6 fresh legs playing against EPL castoffs and La Liga has beens.
 

MU655

Full Member
Joined
Dec 11, 2020
Messages
1,258
You have to look at how Ole doesn’t rush things to integrate young players. Look at what he did to Greenwood last season. Was he being thrown away to starting XI? No, he was slowly getting his minutes only came on as sub for 2-5 minutes and slowly getting more minutes and end up as our regular player. Amad only been here for less than Greenwood had, Greenwood been training with Ole since 2018. I had my explanation about VDB’s style doesn’t suit our style at the moment.
But Amad didn't even get that. He didn't play in the Premier League until second was secured, and I think it is because Solskjaer was a bit scared to give other players opportunities. I think that cost us in the end as he didn't trust any of the bench players for the Europa League final. Why would he? He didn't even trust them enough to play them in games when the first team (or the full first team) wasn't needed.

It took a month to give Greenwood his first start in the Premier League from his first appearance in the league. First appearance in the Premier League was 8th November 2019; first start was the 4th December 2019.

What was Amad's reward for scoring against AC Milan? Nothing. He proceeded to see 6 minutes against Leicester where we were losing 3:1 and were crashing out of the FA Cup, and he got 8 minutes against Granada. That is all the game time he saw until second was secured. That for me backs up that Solskjaer was afraid to change things, and didn't give our subs enough chances to show what they are capable of.
 

Lebowski

Full Member
Joined
Jan 2, 2010
Messages
707
Location
Collyhurst
I agree with that.

For as good of a manager Klopp is, let us not forget he has a grand total of one league in 6 (six) years.

For the life of me I don't understand when the basics of football like first 11 quality and squad depth have been forgotten and their place taken by patterns of play and pressing. It's like the modern football journalist is some FM obsessed kid that hasn't fallowed a club or football in general in his life. Calling managers that are yet to win a league WC calling others super promising before they even managed an under 18. It's just bizarro World for the last 3 or 4 years :lol:
Yeah I reckon Football Manager and Fifa definitely have played a role in 'gamifying' the experience of football and making your average fan or journo see the sport in a more surgical and tactical way.

Then there's the media's love of buying in to the cult of personality of a particular manager as attributing success to individual genius makes a better story than 'team A win another league because they have the best players'.

I think it's also of particular appeal to United fans because it's far easier (and therefore comforting) to imagine all of our problems being solved by replacing the manager rather than them being the result of the type of systemic and structural failure that is difficult if not impossible to rectify, at least whilst the Glazers are in charge.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,612
Location
London
Our XI is being well coached thus why we see huge improvement in them
No it's not. There's no huge improvement, there's a marginal one. 8 points more than last year.

We have no pattern of play, just pass to Bruno/Pogba and hope for something. We haven't got the tiniest clue on what to do with low blocks. We can't stop conceding from set pieces. We are not using our full squad well enough and our manager never makes subs so much we've started taking the piss with threads like "Make a fecking sub Ole". All pretty obvious problems from where I'm standing that we're not well coached.

I’m referring the fact that Shaqiri was a better player because he is more proven in PL and had done more than James in PL
None of that means jack shit. Sorry. Age and experience don't play football. By your reasoning Shaqiri must be better than Mbappe.

and yet Klopp doesn’t use him so how is people expecting Ole to use James? 2019/2020 is when Shaqiri at 27 years old, that was supposed to be a prime age of an attacker.
When Mane was playing like Rashford was yesterday he was getting subbed. For Shaqiri or Origi or Ings or for anyone. The criterion isn't the age of the sub, it's how good he is and how well the main player is playing. When Mane was playing shit he was getting subbed. In 19/20 Mane was on fire so he didn't need to get subbed too much. Not the case for Rashford.

Imagine comparing a team that has 19 years old with a team that has 28 years old and expecting both will have the same development. :houllier:
We have one 19yo in the line up. You're acting like it's something crazy. Liverpool had a 20yo TAA in the CL final, no big deal. And I never compared Greenwood to Mane, you're the one doing that. Like you're the one comparing Dan James to Shaqiri and claiming Shaqiri is better against reason just cause he's older. I just pointed out how nonsensical your comparison is and not backed up by anything.

Your arguments are not making any sense. Know when to stop.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
But Amad didn't even get that. He didn't play in the Premier League until second was secured, and I think it is because Solskjaer was a bit scared to give other players opportunities. I think that cost us in the end as he didn't trust any of the bench players for the Europa League final. Why would he? He didn't even trust them enough to play them in games when the first team (or the full first team) wasn't needed.

It took a month to give Greenwood his first start in the Premier League from his first appearance in the league. First appearance in the Premier League was 8th November 2019; first start was the 4th December 2019.

What was Amad's reward for scoring against AC Milan? Nothing. He proceeded to see 6 minutes against Leicester where we were losing 3:1 and were crashing out of the FA Cup, and he got 8 minutes against Granada. That is all the game time he saw until second was secured. That for me backs up that Solskjaer was afraid to change things, and didn't give our subs enough chances to show what they are capable of.
Greenwood has trained with Ole since 2018 and only been used in 2019. Amad has only trained with us since January 2020. Train with the first team first, get used to play with the men and understand his team mate, and etc. Ole has his process to integrate the kid.

He did it with Greenwood, and remember people used to moan about Ole not giving Greenwood a chance last season despite of him scoring goals for us and look at him now.

Amad played around 260 minutes for us so far. That’s already way more minutes than what Atalanta gave him.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,612
Location
London
18 not 19. Don’t try to suit it to your argument.t

And you are comparing an 18 years old who had 24 appearances this season as he had been slowly integrated to first team to Diallo who only joined us in January and had less time to be integrated to the squad? You are keep ignoring my post why Diallo isn’t ready.
I'm not trying to suit my argument. I though he was 19, my bad.

Plenty of times 18 year olds have been thrown into the thrust of things. And if Diallo wasn't ready and not integrated in the team enough to play, then why is he on the bench? What's the point of having a player on the bench of a final if you can't bring him on for 20 mins when the starter is having a shocker?

If not Amad, why not James who's been with the team for a couple of seasons? Why not veteran Mata? The pace of the game was static anyway and there was no space, so a good game for him. Why not VDB in the middle and Pogba left?

You can try to provide a string of excuses for all that, but it's just that. Excuses. He had a handful of options and chose to keep playing a half-injured player that was having a shocker and not make any subs for 100 mins. Thus surrendering the impetus to Villarreal after 75'. He played for pens against Villarreal, with DDG in goal. Pure genius.
 
Last edited:

Leftback99

Might have a bedwetting fetish.
Joined
Jan 11, 2015
Messages
14,427
Barcelona striker Messi cost Nothing
Exactly so what does price paid for our bench have to do with anything?

If you want to bring money into in half of these players get paid more than Ole. Why do they get a free pass of it all being the managers fault? They weren't good enough.
 

Bobcat

Full Member
Joined
Feb 2, 2014
Messages
6,388
Location
Behind the curtains, leering at the neighbors
We had as good of a season fitness wise as we can hope for. Minimal injuries over a grueling season like that, and its unlikely to be repeated to that level. It's not about one player not doing great in limited game time, it's getting more out of squad players or trusting them to at least do something. We all complained about a lack of depth last summer after Ole couldn't rotate his starting 11. We signed Van de Beek, Cavani, Telles, spent 40m on an 18 year old Amad, bought Pellistri... and yet we are right back here and saying the squad depth isn't good enough, even though 3 of those players were on the bench all for the full 120 and another was loaned out? We played for 120 minutes. It's mind bogglingly stupid to not use subs normally. We saw at the start of the season how big of a difference a fit and fresh team makes even if they are lower quality. Van de Beek had a poor season, sure. Put him in the final and I'm sure he'll play with a point to prove.

My point in 2008 was during an injury crisis, Sir Alex didn't just sit with the proven first team professionals on the pitch. He threw the kids in during a must win game for the likes of Tevez and Nani who were having poor games, and it came off. You need to have that bravery to still use your bench even if its sparse, at least you are trying to change something, you tell your bench players you believe in them, you roll the dice, and you get fresh legs on there which is invaluable. We wasted the last 20 minutes of the regular 90 and pretty much the entirely of extra time by not making subs until really late. That was our problem. Ole just froze like a deer in headlights last night.
Telles despite having played very little have served his purpose. Cavani was brought as back up to Martial, but considering the latter have had a diabolical season he ended up being the main man up front instead. VdB either needs more time to settle or we simply wasted 40 million on a player whos not good enough. Mata and Matic have also gotten a year older so in terms of depth, we did not add a whole lot last summer.

Also, OP did not say we lost yesterday because of lacking depth, he simply said depth is incredibly important and we currently lack it, which i agree with

Not going to blame lack of depth for our loss yesterday, it was a poor game from top to bottom, but if we had more dependable backups then the likes of Rashford and Bruno would not have been completely gassed by this point, and that might have made an impact
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,612
Location
London
Exactly so what does price paid for our bench have to do with anything?

If you want to bring money into in half of these players get paid more than Ole. Why do they get a free pass of it all being the managers fault? They weren't good enough.
Who's giving them a free pass? Have your read the performance threads?

But if a player. who is coming from a series of poor games recently. is having a shocker and the manager is not utilising the depth he has then we will criticize him. This is a thread about the depth.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
I'm not trying to suit my argument. I though he was 19, my bad.

Plenty of times 18 year olds have been thrown into the thrust of things. And if Diallo wasn't ready and not integrated in the team enough to play, then why is he on the bench? What's the point of that if you can't bring him on for 20 mins?

Why not James who's been with the team for a couple of seasons? Why not veteran Mata? The pace of the game was static anyway and there was no space, good game for him. Why not VDB in the middle and Pogba left?

You can try to provide a string of excuses for all that, but it's just that. Excuses.
These reactions about Amad. Honestly, I‘m seeing the same reaction to how people used to moan about Ole not using Greenwood enough back then.

I also still remember how Klopp brought on Shaqiri vs 0-0 Newcastle this season in 1 min remaining of the game. The guy is supposed to be better than what we have on the bench as he was more proven in top level than James and in better age than Mata. And Klopp has different level of trust when someone as quality as Jota on the bench. That should answer your questions that quality matters.
 

Annihilate Now!

...or later, I'm not fussy
Scout
Joined
Nov 4, 2010
Messages
49,949
Location
W.Yorks
You don’t need to have Grealish/Sancho on the bench if he starts one of them and bench a teenager like Greenwood. Again, that’s a quality option he has proven himself that he can bring him on to change the game.

SAF had good bench options. If he doesn’t trust Pogba, what makes you think he will trust Amad in yesterday game when the score was still 1-1?
Fergie has trusted a whole host of random teenagers, he's also trusted established squad players and senior members of his side.

SAF has had benches with a variety of quality - hell he brought on Quinton Fortune in an FA Cup final vs. Arsenal (in a game we were dominating no less). It is nonsensical to even argue that he wouldn't have made several changes before the 100th minute last night.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,612
Location
London
These reactions about Amad. Honestly, I‘m seeing the same reaction to how people used to moan about Ole not using Greenwood enough back then.

I also still remember how Klopp brought on Shaqiri vs 0-0 Newcastle this season in 1 min remaining of the game. The guy is supposed to be better than what we have on the bench as he was more proven in top level than James and in better age than Mata. And Klopp has different level of trust when someone as quality as Jota on the bench. That should answer your questions that quality matters.
He isn't. And he has nothing to do with the argument.
 

UNITED ACADEMY

New Member
Joined
Aug 14, 2018
Messages
13,127
Supports
Erik ten Hag
Fergie has trusted a whole host of random teenagers, he's also trusted established squad players and senior members of his side.

SAF has had benches with a variety of quality - hell he brought on Quinton Fortune in an FA Cup final vs. Arsenal (in a game we were dominating no less). It is nonsensical to even argue that he wouldn't have made several changes before the 100th minute last night.
I’m not disrespecting O’Shea here but he subbed off O’Shea not Keane, Scholes or young Ronaldo or young Rooney or Ruud. It’s big difference of comparison with Mata/James/Amad to what we had in our XI.
 

Jibbs

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
2,238
Liverpool's squad depth is not any better than ours over the past 4 or 5 years and yet they have won a European cup and premier league in that time and that is because they have a world class coach
This.
 

Sky1981

Fending off the urge
Joined
Apr 12, 2006
Messages
30,063
Location
Under the bright neon lights of sincity
Exactly so what does price paid for our bench have to do with anything?

If you want to bring money into in half of these players get paid more than Ole. Why do they get a free pass of it all being the managers fault? They weren't good enough.
What an absurd analogy.

If Messi cost 0, he's still Leonel Messi, he plays like a 300M striker, not like an 0 striker.
 

bosskeano

Full Member
Joined
Dec 8, 2020
Messages
5,131
What a novel idea, squad depth! That isn't on Ole, that is on Jose, VanGaal and Moyes. They've spent a small fortune on shit players who aren't good enough to play at United and Ole has been stuck with the task of either trying to move them on or getting the best out of them.

Like he said we are two to three players short from improving the starting XI and making the squad depth greater. Unfortunately we don't have the backing of a small oil rich country or a russian criminal so it'll take a bit more time to revamp the squad. Liverpool will be in the same spot a year or two from now.

Liverpool's squad depth is not any better than ours over the past 4 or 5 years and yet they have won a European cup and premier league in that time and that is because they have a world class coach
Liverpools squad depth may not be better than ours and you're probably right however their starting XI is better than ours especially in the front 3 who do most of their scoring. That is why they won the CL not the depth of their squad.