Do we extend Ole's contract?

Bebestation

Im a doctor btw, my IQ destroys yours
Joined
Oct 9, 2019
Messages
11,862
Because we have a mediocre manager.
We have a mediocre manager that loves the club and is improving the club in so many different ways - yet isn’t winning titles.

This is why I am happy to stick with the mediocre manager until he has improved United as much as he can.

The squad, the youngsters, the lack of toxicity towards players, the new DOF and other people etc - things are improving at United; the only thing not is the trophies.
 

Jibbs

New Member
Joined
Apr 23, 2013
Messages
2,238
We have a mediocre manager that loves the club and is improving the club in so many different ways - yet isn’t winning titles.

This is why I am happy to stick with the mediocre manager until he has improved United as much as he can.

The squad, the youngsters, the lack of toxicity towards players, the new DOF and other people etc - things are improving at United; the only thing not is the trophies.
Well guess what all our League Rivals have been doing all the things you mentioned along with having some of the world's best managers.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
You extend his contract to show he has the backing of the club, and to remove any noise around that question, particularly with such a young squad.

Managers are fired on the basis of results, not on how long they have remaining on their contract.

What exactly is the downside of extending his contract by 12-24 months this season :confused:
Not winning or challenging for the above mentioned period
 

Forevergiggs1

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2019
Messages
3,451
Location
Barcelona
Supports
United
On contrary, Ole is excellent manager and I can argue with you or anyone whole day.
Klopp had Liverpool in a CL final 18 months into his tenure. The next season he won it and pushed City all the way for the PL. Within a season Pep was beating all kind of records in the PL. Within 6 months Tuchel transformed Chelsea and won the CL. This is what excellent managers do but argue away.
 

Womp

idiot
Joined
Jun 23, 2013
Messages
9,262
Location
Australia
Wait a few months, this season he really has no more excuses. Anything short of a trophy and he's failed. He's been here a considerate amount of time now and has been backed and will also be backed this window too.
 

The holy trinity 68

The disparager
Joined
Apr 10, 2016
Messages
5,815
Location
Manchester
Klopp had Liverpool in a CL final 18 months into his tenure. The next season he won it and pushed City all the way for the PL. Within a season Pep was beating all kind of records in the PL. Within 6 months Tuchel transformed Chelsea and won the CL. This is what excellent managers do but argue away.
:lol: He absolutely did not. Have you even bothered to do your research before making your argument.

Klopp joined Liverpool in October 2015. His first CL Final with Liverpool was in May 2018.

That is 31 months, almost 3 years.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,957
Give him until xmas then make a decision.
He is contracted up until the end of the season anyhow. Lets get Deadwood Woodward out of the club and then hopefully it will be a new chapter under Murtough/Fletcher. If Ole is up amongst them within 3-4 points then give him an 18 month contract. If not then start looking for a replacement on football ability and plays the right way, not just the latest big name that has been sacked.
Even if at the end of the season and he has had the new 18 month contract, we have dropped away, its not going to cost too much to get shut of Ole. Either way we start the next season with either a winning team and manager, or someone who is there for their footballing ability, not the latest big name sacking or a job for one of the old boys.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,957
:lol: He absolutely did not. Have you even bothered to do your research before making your argument.

Klopp joined Liverpool in October 2015. His first CL Final with Liverpool was in May 2018.

That is 31 months, almost 3 years.
Well if you are nit-picking its a lot nearer to 2.5 years than it is to 3.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,957
:lol: @ Eriku I was answering holy trinity saying 31 months is nearly 3 years. Where you got 18 from I dont know
For some reason it comes up with error when I tried to directly reply to you.
 

Red00012

Full Member
Joined
Jan 18, 2018
Messages
12,282
While he is improving the squad I just can’t see him challenging for a title.
 

Eriku

Full Member
Joined
Jul 18, 2007
Messages
16,211
Location
Oslo, Norway
:lol: @ Eriku I was answering holy trinity saying 31 months is nearly 3 years. Where you got 18 from I dont know
For some reason it comes up with error when I tried to directly reply to you.
I removed the post because I spotted the ambiguity. Where I got 18 months from? The post he was responding to. I initially thought you were making the point that 18 months was closer to the mark than 3 years.

Well that is still 13 months longer than the post I quoted had suggested.
See? Not just me you confused.
 

Jonno

Full Member
Joined
Mar 5, 2010
Messages
8,375
Location
Preston, Lancashire
I don’t believe he is an elite manager in world football. I think he has been excellent for us in his time here, he has improved our squad, our expectations, he has got rid of so much deadwood.

I think he has to take us forward to get a new contract. If we are part of a title race, if we win a major trophy, then there is evidence of more progression.

If we have reached our ceiling under Ole, it will be quite evident next season and he can be clapped out of the front door having done a decent job.
 

Forevergiggs1

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2019
Messages
3,451
Location
Barcelona
Supports
United
:lol: He absolutely did not. Have you even bothered to do your research before making your argument.

Klopp joined Liverpool in October 2015. His first CL Final with Liverpool was in May 2018.

That is 31 months, almost 3 years.
Ok my bad. I'll put it another way. In the same time frame that Ole has been here Klopp took Liverpool to a CL final. The following season (this one coming up for Ole) he won it and pushed City all the way for the title with 97 points. Do you think we have shown signs that this season we'll win the CL or lose out on the PL by 1 point while playing great football? Ole may be a good manager but excellent he definitely is not.
 

KD6-3.7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 24, 2020
Messages
514
I’d rather us just let his contract run down and start looking for a replacement. I like Ole but I just don’t think we will ever mount a proper title challenge or anything under him. Whenever his under pressure you can really see how tactically limited he is but also our coaching staff who are half the problem.
 

wolvored

Full Member
Joined
Jul 6, 2016
Messages
9,957
I removed the post because I spotted the ambiguity. Where I got 18 months from? The post he was responding to. I initially thought you were making the point that 18 months was closer to the mark than 3 years.



See? Not just me you confused.
Oh. Well all I saw was the 31 month quote and that was al I answered.
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,365
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
The contract is not going to run away. Ole is not going to run away. So not now. Why should we?
 

padzilla

Hipster
Joined
Oct 31, 2005
Messages
3,420
In his two full seasons he has brought us to a third and second place finish. This season coming he has to at least match those positions while the team also has to show it is becoming more competitive on the pitch when it comes to actually challenging for the league, rather than being the best of the rest.
 

El Zoido

Full Member
Joined
Jun 7, 2013
Messages
12,371
Location
UK
I really don’t think there’s anyone better for us right now, I think he’s doing a fantastic job. I don’t know how far he can take us, but we can definitely get even better under him.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
What is the point in sacking him now? Give him a rolling contact or sack him and pay him off if he doesn't perform the next season.
It would be bad management if his contract is not extended because the players would know that the club has no faith in him.
It's better to extend it and then pay him off if he doesn't perform.
Personally I don't think he is going to challenge for the PL or the CL. Because I don't think his coaching staff is good enough but the buck stops with him.
 

Wednesday at Stoke

Full Member
Joined
Feb 11, 2014
Messages
21,699
Location
Copenhagen
Supports
Time Travel
The contract is not going to run away. Ole is not going to run away. So not now. Why should we?
I don't understand this fecking ass backwards logic. His salary is around 10M a season. Its not coming from your pocket and its definitely a minuscule compared to the dividends Daddy Glazer takes out of the club every season. Why act all high and mighty about pinching pennies here? If you let him coach on the last year of his deal, he'd be a lame duck all season in terms of his authority over the players and the dressing room. That's when players begin to act up, knowing they can overrule him and be fine as their deals run longer than his. Why risk all that dysfunction over 10M per season? This is the very definition of penny wise, pound foolish.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,725
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
I don’t believe he is an elite manager in world football. I think he has been excellent for us in his time here, he has improved our squad, our expectations, he has got rid of so much deadwood.

I think he has to take us forward to get a new contract. If we are part of a title race, if we win a major trophy, then there is evidence of more progression.

If we have reached our ceiling under Ole, it will be quite evident next season and he can be clapped out of the front door having done a decent job.
We were in a title race last season and was a decent GK away from winning a major trophy. They are some incredibly fine lines you're judging there
 

Eli Zee

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
1,061
I mean, if the squad is improving and that continues then at some point the squad will challenge for the title, no?
Improving the squad and continuing to improve the squad with no plateau or steps back are completely different.

I really think Ole is awesome, but that he may not be too strong tactically compared to other managers.
 

crossy1686

career ending
Joined
Jun 5, 2010
Messages
31,725
Location
Manchester/Stockholm
Improving the squad and continuing to improve the squad with no plateau or steps back are completely different.

I really think Ole is awesome, but that he may not be too strong tactically compared to other managers.
The part in bold is nonsense.

Improving a squad is hard. It depends on who's available to buy and all the current players getting better and not doing a Martial. A plateau or a step back are natural, look at Liverpool. City have also fell into the same traps. Saying Ole isn't allowed that luxury is just bizarre
 

Catt

Ole's at the wheel!
Joined
Mar 10, 2013
Messages
27,898
Location
Norway
Solskjær is like next door to me today, watching his son. Might try to catch up later :D
 

tenpoless

No 6-pack, just 2Pac
Joined
Oct 20, 2014
Messages
16,365
Location
Ole's ipad
Supports
4-4-2 classic
I don't understand this fecking ass backwards logic. His salary is around 10M a season. Its not coming from your pocket and its definitely a minuscule compared to the dividends Daddy Glazer takes out of the club every season. Why act all high and mighty about pinching pennies here? If you let him coach on the last year of his deal, he'd be a lame duck all season in terms of his authority over the players and the dressing room. That's when players begin to act up, knowing they can overrule him and be fine as their deals run longer than his. Why risk all that dysfunction over 10M per season? This is the very definition of penny wise, pound foolish.
The backwards logic could have actually helped us from tying ourselves to years of contract of underperforming players that we struggled to let go of. I dont think players give a shit if their manager is on his last year of contract or not. Respect is earned not written in contracts. Also as i said Ole is happy to be here, there is no rush. Hopefully he will have more players to work with next season that fit his criteria and we can asses the team performance then. It's much more fair that way instead of being this trigger happy team that rushes on giving out contracts like Santa handing out gifts on Xmas. It's called learning from the past, not acting high and mighty. Who gives a shit about the Glazers, its the club that is in trouble when we make non calculated decisions, not them.
 
Last edited:

Eli Zee

Full Member
Joined
Feb 20, 2017
Messages
1,061
The part in bold is nonsense.

Improving a squad is hard. It depends on who's available to buy and all the current players getting better and not doing a Martial. A plateau or a step back are natural, look at Liverpool. City have also fell into the same traps. Saying Ole isn't allowed that luxury is just bizarre
I'm not saying he is a terrible manager. I just think there are others out there who would be more tactically astute.

of course there are up and downs. This is more of an opportunity-cost situation. The cost of keeping Ole is the opportunity for another manager to come in and be better
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
What is the point in sacking him now? Give him a rolling contact or sack him and pay him off if he doesn't perform the next season.
It would be bad management if his contract is not extended because the players would know that the club has no faith in him.
It's better to extend it and then pay him off if he doesn't perform.
Personally I don't think he is going to challenge for the PL or the CL. Because I don't think his coaching staff is good enough but the buck stops with him.
It doesn't hurt anyone to wait till Jan before taking a decision. He's not going anywhere and neither do the players believe that. Waiting is best for everyone.

And if it's an absolute must for him to gets a new contract, then extend it for one more year and nothing more.

Giving him 3 years contract now will just another terrible decision by United.
 

Anustart89

Full Member
Joined
Jun 6, 2013
Messages
15,955
The part in bold is nonsense.

Improving a squad is hard. It depends on who's available to buy and all the current players getting better and not doing a Martial. A plateau or a step back are natural, look at Liverpool. City have also fell into the same traps. Saying Ole isn't allowed that luxury is just bizarre
You think these two things happen independently of the manager?
 

Lelouch geass

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 25, 2018
Messages
179
Location
Ktm nepal
Klopp had Liverpool in a CL final 18 months into his tenure. The next season he won it and pushed City all the way for the PL. Within a season Pep was beating all kind of records in the PL. Within 6 months Tuchel transformed Chelsea and won the CL. This is what excellent managers do but argue away.
Avram Grant also took Chelsea to final does this mean he is a top manager? Tuchel is sacked from PSG for not winning UCL, and oh wait, where is Pep's UCL trophy for a squad worth billion. SAF won only 2 UCL.Klopp UCL Ole has good record vs Klopp and excellent vs Pep. Pep has more luxurious squad and Klopp's team is now being exposed and having a third season syndrome and messing in same way like he did in Dortmund. Without Van Djik he is struggling to win a game, same way Ole had to face many games without Pogba. Give City's squad to Biesla or Ancelloti, they will still end up winning league, perhaps even win a UCL. Give some credit for finishing 2nd in top league of world and stop moaning or name one manager who can do better job than Ole. He has actually done a far better job than Mou and Van Gaal, who were also top managers. Talking about transformation and available fund, I guess Ole did fairly well given the squad of Phil Jones, Mctominay, Lindelof, half of the squad with epitome of mediocrity. I guess he is getting rid of deadwoods even now right given the transfer of United being pathetic. Chill out and just wait for trophy.
 
Last edited:

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
Avram Grant also took Chelsea to final does this mean he is a top manager? Tuchel is sacked from PSG for not winning UCL, and oh wait, where is Pep's UCL trophy for a squad worth billion. SAF won only 2 UCL.Klopp UCL Ole has good record vs Klopp and excellent vs Pep. Pep has more luxurious squad and Klopp's team is now being exposed and having a third season syndrome and messing in same way like he did in Dortmund. Without Van Djik he is struggling to win a game, same way Ole had to face many games without Pogba. Give City's squad to Biesla or Ancelloti, they will still end up winning league, perhaps even win a UCL. Give some credit for finishing 2nd in top league of world and stop moaning or name one manager who can do better job than Ole. He has actually done a far better job than Mou and Van Gaal, who were also top managers. Talking about transformation and available fund, I guess Ole did fairly well given the squad of Phil Jones, Mctominay, Lindelof, half of the squad with epitome of mediocrity. I guess he is getting rid of deadwoods even now right given the transfer of United being pathetic. Chill out and just wait for trophy.
I have seen a lot of posts with terrible logic here but I guess this takes the cake. You realize the difference between the squad Grant inherited in comparison to the one Klopp or Tuchel did, right ?
 

Lelouch geass

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 25, 2018
Messages
179
Location
Ktm nepal
I have seen a lot of posts with terrible logic here but I guess this takes the cake. You realize the difference between the squad Grant inherited in comparison to the one Klopp or Tuchel did, right ?
This takes a cake? I guess this is a typical logic Ole out squad? I guess you also did not realize Klopp did get money to buy 80 m plus center back , Mane and other handpicked players right? Tuchel had a world class squad at PSG and won nothing so half a season and by chance winning UCL does not mean he is world class manager. Chelsea spent millions (most in Premier league I think) last season hoarding out Harvetz, Mounts etcs and we can expect to win with that kind of money spent so his feat is similar to interim manager Grant as both inherit great squad. How about Pep, you did not mention he had best squad and money. Amount of money given to Ole and squad he inherited, I think he has done better job. Give your Peps, Tuchels and Klopps Mctominay, Lindelofs VDB and Daniel James instead of Sancho and Grealish then imagine if they can even finish top four.
 

el3mel

Full Member
Joined
Oct 23, 2016
Messages
43,735
Location
Egypt
This takes a cake? I guess this is a typical logic Ole out squad? I guess you also did not realize Klopp did get money to buy 80 m plus center back , Mane and other handpicked players right? Tuchel had a world class squad at PSG and won nothing so half a season and by chance winning UCL does not mean he is world class manager. Chelsea spent millions (most in Premier league I think) last season hoarding out Harvetz, Mounts etcs and we can expect to win with that kind of money spent so his feat is similar to interim manager Grant as both inherit great squad. How about Pep, you did not mention he had best squad and money. Amount of money given to Ole and squad he inherited, I think he has done better job. Give your Peps, Tuchels and Klopps Mctominay, Lindelofs VDB and Daniel James instead of Sancho and Grealish then imagine if they can even finish top four.
No it's a stupid logic. Gram inherited a team that was dominating England for the previous 3 years, won 2 league titles out of those 3 and even the year they didn't win it in, they won the 2 domestic cups. Klopp inherited a shit team who finished 6th the previous season and transformed them into a CL finalist 2.5 years in. Tuchel got a team who last progressed past CL 16th round in 2014 and were 9th in the table when he got and made them CL champions in 6 months (and also got PSG into their first even CL final). To compare them to Grant who inherited one of the best English teams of the decade at this point is a terrible logic. Neither Tuchel nor Klopp were expected to win CL when they inherited their teams while this Chelsea side back then was screaming to reach a CL final and couldn't just take the final step in the semis the previous few years.

Meanwhile we're 2.5 years into Ole's reign and we're still giving excuses for why we can't beat Villareal in an EL final.

As for the money argument, you realize Klopp had to sell before he can buy right ? You realize that he sold Coutinho for 140m to be able to pay that much for VVD, Alisson and Keita, and once the money dried out they didn't spend shit last summer. Klopp first two summers at Liverpool had positive net spend :

https://www.transfermarkt.com/liver.../31/plus/?saison_id=2016&pos=&detailpos=&w_s=

https://www.transfermarkt.com/liver.../31/plus/?saison_id=2017&pos=&detailpos=&w_s=

It's after these 2 markets he was able to spend a lot in the next one on Alisson and Keita because of the incoming money from Coutinho business, then their next 2 summers are back to shit and barely spending.

https://www.transfermarkt.com/liver.../31/plus/?saison_id=2019&pos=&detailpos=&w_s=

https://www.transfermarkt.com/liver.../31/plus/?saison_id=2020&pos=&detailpos=&w_s=

Klopp knew their budget and what to do and what to not. He spent his first 2 years buying decent players like Mane and Salah for less than 45m, built up their attack quite well so that they don't need Coutinho anymore, then sold him to Barca for 140m to fund enough money for the biggest problems in the squad : defense and GK. He wasn't getting money from the board's pockets and he didn't get a free chequebook. He just organized his budget and the money available for him.

Finally weird as usual to keep on signaling Daniel James as a problem when he's, guess what, one of Ole's signings. Similarly VDB.

Anyway, the board is giving Ole his 90m Sancho this summer so I hope the excuses finally stop next year.
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
This takes a cake? I guess this is a typical logic Ole out squad? I guess you also did not realize Klopp did get money to buy 80 m plus center back , Mane and other handpicked players right? Tuchel had a world class squad at PSG and won nothing so half a season and by chance winning UCL does not mean he is world class manager. Chelsea spent millions (most in Premier league I think) last season hoarding out Harvetz, Mounts etcs and we can expect to win with that kind of money spent so his feat is similar to interim manager Grant as both inherit great squad. How about Pep, you did not mention he had best squad and money. Amount of money given to Ole and squad he inherited, I think he has done better job. Give your Peps, Tuchels and Klopps Mctominay, Lindelofs VDB and Daniel James instead of Sancho and Grealish then imagine if they can even finish top four.
This is being silly. Who bought DVB and Daniel James?