Ole Sack Watch

Should we replace the manager ?

  • Yes - Its time to make a change

    Votes: 3,004 87.8%
  • No - Give him more time

    Votes: 449 13.1%

  • Total voters
    3,423
  • Poll closed .
Status
Not open for further replies.

Relevated

fixated with venom and phalluses
Joined
May 3, 2011
Messages
25,995
Location
18M1955/JU5
I don’t really understand why this would be his ceiling. It makes little sense all the talk about him being tactically inept. As a player he was known for his ability to analyze the game. Maybe he needs to look at his coaching staff and bring in someone, but I’m not really concerned about this being his ceiling.

Anyway, unless the players want him out then this is not the time to sack him. He’s been good in the games against the top sides so we might go and surprise everyone by getting a few wins in the next games.
We might surprise everyone and get a few wins? We're not Blackburn from 2010 mate.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
I don’t really understand why this would be his ceiling. It makes little sense all the talk about him being tactically inept. As a player he was known for his ability to analyze the game. Maybe he needs to look at his coaching staff and bring in someone, but I’m not really concerned about this being his ceiling.

Anyway, unless the players want him out then this is not the time to sack him. He’s been good in the games against the top sides so we might go and surprise everyone by getting a few wins in the next games.
Agree on the talk that this is definitively his ceiling, I mean he’s been here three years and he’s improved both the squad and his league position year on year.

Anybody who says this is definitely his ceiling is talking nonsense, it MAY be, but it’s not definitive in the way many claim it to be.

The problem we have is that fans want us to get a manager who can compete with Klopp and Pep, whilst I don’t think Ole will ever be that good I also don’t believe there is a manager available (right now) that guarantees that we will compete with those managers.

Changing manager is an upheaval that at this point is not worth undertaking until we’ve searched for and identified the prime replacement for Ole. It makes zero sense to change until that time.

Some will claim that’s a foolish opinion because ‘theres still a season to play for by changing now’ but I still think it’s the correct and most balanced way to deal with the situation. Knee jerking right now is a pure gamble, fact.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,321
He’s been good in the games against the top sides so we might go and surprise everyone by getting a few wins in the next games.
We won 2 from 12 against the top sides last season. We were abysmal in both games vs Leicester, vs Liverpool, vs Chelsea, vs Arsenal and the home game vs Spurs.
 

Andrew7582

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 29, 2021
Messages
606
Right, so Ole has made significant progress every year in terms of both quality of squad and performance. I was expecting not to have this current dip in form with the current squad, so this has probably been the most disappointing spell for him so far. That being said I think it’s mental that 90% of people on here want him sacked already. We’re in horrible form, but it’s not permanent. Way too early to give him the sack, he can still turn it around. He’s earned a bit of time to do that.

Sacking him means starting from scratch again. Even though we’ve got the best squad quality since Fergie we need to prepare for a new manager to take time to make the squad his own. I’m fed up with the constand chopping and changing of managers in the past 8 years. We’re not getting anywhere with this.

''What will be done eventually, must be done immediately''. We aren't winning the league or CL under Ole, not this season, not next season, not the season after that, this is abundantly clear. More time given to Ole is more time wasted. Tuchel has had a big and immediate impact at Chelsea, winning the CL and turning them into title contenders very quickly. There is no reason why that calibre of manager can't have a similar impact for us, our squad is extremely strong and doesn't need many changes at all.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Agree on the talk that this is definitively his ceiling, I mean he’s been here three years and he’s improved both the squad and his league position year on year.

Anybody who says this is definitely his ceiling is talking nonsense, it MAY be, but it’s not definitive in the way many claim it to be.

The problem we have is that fans want us to get a manager who can compete with Klopp and Pep, whilst I don’t think Ole will ever be that good I also don’t believe there is a manager available (right now) that guarantees that we will compete with those managers.

Changing manager is an upheaval that at this point is not worth undertaking until we’ve searched for and identified the prime replacement for Ole. It makes zero sense to change until that time.

Some will claim that’s a foolish opinion because ‘theres still a season to play for by changing now’ but I still think it’s the correct and most balanced way to deal with the situation. Knee jerking right now is a pure gamble, fact.
I agree that changing managers it's gambling, a gamble that may or not pay off. With Ole we are betting in to a losing horse, the argument for keeping him must be better than "well why change him if the next manager may as well be shit like him?".

We keep wasting time as if 8 years of mediocrity haven't been enough.
 

emperortan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
315
I don’t really understand why this would be his ceiling. It makes little sense all the talk about him being tactically inept. As a player he was known for his ability to analyze the game. Maybe he needs to look at his coaching staff and bring in someone, but I’m not really concerned about this being his ceiling.

Anyway, unless the players want him out then this is not the time to sack him. He’s been good in the games against the top sides so we might go and surprise everyone by getting a few wins in the next games.
Really? Last year the result against top sides of MU was 5th/top 6 clubs, if I remember correctly =))))
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,265
Location
Hollywood CA
The two biggest fears I have right now is it will happen when every decent option is off the table and also that this talented looking squad is going to completely get wasted under this management and coaching staff
Zidane and Conte are available. Either would at a minimum make be viable caretakers for the rest of the year.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
I agree that changing managers it's gambling, a gamble that may or not pay off. With Ole we are betting in to a losing horse, the argument for keeping him must be better than "well why change him if the next manager may as well be shit like him?".

We keep wasting time as if 8 years of mediocrity haven't been enough.
Yes but those 8 years have been ENTIRELY down to appointing the wrong managers.

This is the point that is lost on many who can’t see past just sacking the manager. I’m not saying that’s you, but we need to remember what brought us here and what the poor fecker has actually done to turn that around :lol:
 

FatTails

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2021
Messages
1,859
Agree on the talk that this is definitively his ceiling, I mean he’s been here three years and he’s improved both the squad and his league position year on year.

Anybody who says this is definitely his ceiling is talking nonsense, it MAY be, but it’s not definitive in the way many claim it to be.

The problem we have is that fans want us to get a manager who can compete with Klopp and Pep, whilst I don’t think Ole will ever be that good I also don’t believe there is a manager available (right now) that guarantees that we will compete with those managers.

Changing manager is an upheaval that at this point is not worth undertaking until we’ve searched for and identified the prime replacement for Ole. It makes zero sense to change until that time.

Some will claim that’s a foolish opinion because ‘theres still a season to play for by changing now’ but I still think it’s the correct and most balanced way to deal with the situation. Knee jerking right now is a pure gamble, fact.
No one will take you seriously when you think replacing a manager who’s been in the job for almost three years is “knee jerking”. Also, yes it is a gamble to change a manager at any point. There are unknowns. But keeping Ole is a known quantity now, after almost 3 years in charge, nothing new is coming. He’s not suddenly going to become a different manager or approach things differently.

So should we take a gamble by hiring a proven manager who has shown capabilities to go beyond what Ole can do or should we stick with what we have when it is blindingly obvious that it is lacking?

To me the choice is obvious, but I can see how a more pessimistic take would be, “Jesus, it might even get worse under a new manager! Let’s stick to the mediocrity we know”
 

emperortan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
315
To me the choice is obvious, but I can see how a more pessimistic take would be, “Jesus, it might even get worse under a new manager! Let’s stick to the mediocrity we know”
In stock market, that's what we call "loss cutting". You should learn to let thing goes when time comes.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
Yes but those 8 years have been ENTIRELY down to appointing the wrong managers.

This is the point that is lost on many who can’t see past just sacking the manager. I’m not saying that’s you, but we need to remember what brought us here and what the poor fecker has actually done to turn that around :lol:
So what? He stabilized a squad that had lowered their guns for the previous manager. Is that enough to keep him?

On the contrary of what you think my opinion is that we don't change managers enough, it's clear we've made pretty poor decisions at picking them. But what's poorer it's keeping them for so long. It was clear Moyes wasn't the right fit yet we let him throw the whole season, we gave LVG another season after we all saw we were heading nowhere under him. Mourinho was good for two seasons still we let him rot the squad for months when it was clear he was self sabotaging. With Ole it's been clear as water for a long time that he's not up to it yet we persist.

We have no problem replacing players but when talking about replacing managers seems people have a blind faith about them. Somehow turning against a player is ok but turning against the manager means you're a plastic fan.

We should sack and hire sack and hire until we hit gold. Persisting with Ole because we've been changing managers before and that doesn't work would be like persisting with Lingard because we've signed players before and that has takes us nowhere.
 

Macern

Pee pee pants
Joined
May 11, 2014
Messages
13,538
Location
Oslo, Norway
We won 2 from 12 against the top sides last season. We were abysmal in both games vs Leicester, vs Liverpool, vs Chelsea, vs Arsenal and the home game vs Spurs.
Hm, my memory is wrong then. Must have been from previous seasons. Anyway, as someone pointed out there aren’t a lot of top managers available right now, so unless we can get our #1 or #2 choice as replacement I think it’s best to give it a bit more time.
 

Shark

@NotShark
Joined
Feb 1, 2012
Messages
26,521
Location
Ireland
Hm, my memory is wrong then. Must have been from previous seasons. Anyway, as someone pointed out there aren’t a lot of top managers available right now, so unless we can get our #1 or #2 choice as replacement I think it’s best to give it a bit more time.
It's best to give more time to what we've witnessed yesterday and getting outplayed by every Tom, Dick and Harry?

No thanks.
 

red4ever 79

New Member
Joined
Aug 27, 2015
Messages
9,530
Location
Czech Republic
Hm, my memory is wrong then. Must have been from previous seasons. Anyway, as someone pointed out there aren’t a lot of top managers available right now, so unless we can get our #1 or #2 choice as replacement I think it’s best to give it a bit more time.

There is nothing to suggest that would be best at all. 19 games without a clean sheet. In the league lost to Villa, lost to Leicester, drew with Everton. 1 point from the last 9.
Should be packing his bags today.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,933
Location
France
I don’t really understand why this would be his ceiling. It makes little sense all the talk about him being tactically inept. As a player he was known for his ability to analyze the game. Maybe he needs to look at his coaching staff and bring in someone, but I’m not really concerned about this being his ceiling.

Anyway, unless the players want him out then this is not the time to sack him. He’s been good in the games against the top sides so we might go and surprise everyone by getting a few wins in the next games.
There is a big difference between reading the game at a high level and teaching what you read at a high level. Not everyone is made for teaching/coaching it's a skill in itself and there are levels, Ole has never demonstrated that he was a high level coach. There are many players that were excellent at analyzing the game, many were considerably better players than Ole and they didn't become great coaches, the likes of Keane, Tigana, Rijkaard and many others.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
So what? He stabilized a squad that had lowered their guns for the previous manager. Is that enough to keep him?

On the contrary of what you think my opinion is that we don't change managers enough, it's clear we've made pretty poor decisions at picking them. But what's poorer it's keeping them for so long. It was clear Moyes wasn't the right fit yet we let him throw the whole season, we gave LVG another season after we all saw we were heading nowhere under him. Mourinho was good for two seasons still we let him rot the squad for months when it was clear he was self sabotaging. With Ole it's been clear as water for a long time that he's not up to it yet we persist.

We have no problem replacing players but when talking about replacing managers seems people have a blind faith about them. Somehow turning against a player is ok but turning against the manager means you're a plastic fan.

We should sack and hire sack and hire until we hit gold. Persisting with Ole because we've been changing managers before and that doesn't work would be like persisting with Lingard because we've signed players before and that has takes us nowhere.
It’s not blind faith and in fact it’s not letting them stay for too long, it’s been appointing poor fitting managers who have entirely different ethos and style from one appointment to the next.

One manager comes in and tears up the squad and we start the ‘process’ all over again, we did it with LVG, we did it with Moyes and what did all of them say when we sacked them? ‘We didn’t give them enough time.’

Im not saying let’s stick with Ole forever, what I’m saying is we are at a point where it’s vital, more so than ever, that we ensure the next guy is the right fit.

In the absence of a prime candidate I think it fairly obtuse to overlook some fans concern of repeating the tumescent cycle of the last 8 years.

We are just as likely to panic into something like Conte and miss out on somebody who may be a far better fit for us, meanwhile we will be busy giving Conte a chance only for him to fall out with everybody in no time whilst trying to sign feckin Sanchez and Lukaku.
 

The Firestarter

Full Member
Joined
Apr 8, 2010
Messages
28,232
Agreed. We seem to habitually miss out on the good ones because we are stuck with the ineffective, mediocre ones when they are available.
While this is generally true, I think when Tuchel became available we were 1st in the league? Nobody except maybe Perez or Roman would pull the trigger at such a point.
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,042
Location
England
I think this is his last week at the club. Such a shame because I feel he's been a positive influence on the team but this is as far as he can go.
 

emperortan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Mar 22, 2015
Messages
315
how the heck is the total of percentage numbers in the vote higher than 100??? =)))
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
It’s not blind faith and in fact it’s not letting them stay for too long, it’s been appointing poor fitting managers who have entirely different ethos and style from one appointment to the next.

One manager comes in and tears up the squad and we start the ‘process’ all over again, we did it with LVG, we did it with Moyes and what did all of them say when we sacked them? ‘We didn’t give them enough time.’

Im not saying let’s stick with Ole forever, what I’m saying is we are at a point where it’s vital, more so than ever, that we ensure the next guy is the right fit.

In the absence of a prime candidate I think it fairly obtuse to overlook some fans concern of repeating the tumescent cycle of the last 8 years.

We are just as likely to panic into something like Conte and miss out on somebody who may be a far better fit for us, meanwhile we will be busy giving Conte a chance only for him to fall out with everybody in no time whilst trying to sign feckin Sanchez and Lukaku.
One thing has nothing to do with the other. Ole has to go, and we need to find a proper replacement.

Will the replacement mean we'll be competing instantly, well we won't know until we try it. If he doesn't work then sack the new manager and appoint another one. As I said before hire and sack endlessly until we strike gold.

I for one don't want Conte, I agree he's not a long term manager. I think we should aim for one of the "modern" German/dutch managers.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,321
Hm, my memory is wrong then. Must have been from previous seasons. Anyway, as someone pointed out there aren’t a lot of top managers available right now, so unless we can get our #1 or #2 choice as replacement I think it’s best to give it a bit more time.
I don't see the point in sacking him before the next international break, but this should be the time we start seriously looking at who could take over, either as an interim or permanent option.

I think we'll be lucky to take a point from our next 3 league games, but even Ole should be able to get 4 points vs Atalanta.

Though if we fail to beat Atalanta and then get dominated by Liverpool I think waiting for the international break won't even be possible. The indignation at how badly we're currently being managed is on an exponential growth curve.
 

largelyworried

Full Member
Joined
Feb 10, 2021
Messages
2,101
I don’t really understand why this would be his ceiling. It makes little sense all the talk about him being tactically inept. As a player he was known for his ability to analyze the game. Maybe he needs to look at his coaching staff and bring in someone, but I’m not really concerned about this being his ceiling.

Anyway, unless the players want him out then this is not the time to sack him. He’s been good in the games against the top sides so we might go and surprise everyone by getting a few wins in the next games.
All the problems we've seen with Ole are long term at this point. Directionless possession, lack of team shape, ineffective or missing high press, susceptibility to opposition press, poor basic defending. Ole has shown no ability to really crack these issues. Every time we have a poor spell of form - which has happened at least twice a season in the last two seasons and is happening again now - it's the same issues at the root of it. You would at least expect progress at this point if there were any chance of this changing, but he's struggling as much as ever. They won't disappear of their own accord and the manager seems to have no answers himself.
 

Handsome Devil

Full Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2016
Messages
1,481
Location
No, not Lisbon..Lisburn!
We could always appoint Teddy Sheringham.
He knows the club.
DNA etc.
Legend from '99, scoring in the final and laying on an assist for another bloke.
Has managed mighty Stevenage and ATK of India.
Has never got anyone relegated.
What could possibly go wrong?
 

lex talionis

Full Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2017
Messages
14,041
I was 100% behind Ole going into the season, even believing we were capable of putting in proper title challenge. That was then. Hope of any kind of trophy this season us now lost. However, whether we go with an interim manager or not, we need to get the next appointment right. No more sentimental journeys.
 

Ixion

Full Member
Joined
Apr 11, 2003
Messages
15,275
We could always appoint Teddy Sheringham.
He knows the club.
DNA etc.
Legend from '99, scoring in the final and laying on an assist for another bloke.
Has managed mighty Stevenage and ATK of India.
Has never got anyone relegated.
What could possibly go wrong?
Andy Cole assistant manager
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
No one will take you seriously when you think replacing a manager who’s been in the job for almost three years is “knee jerking”. Also, yes it is a gamble to change a manager at any point. There are unknowns. But keeping Ole is a known quantity now, after almost 3 years in charge, nothing new is coming. He’s not suddenly going to become a different manager or approach things differently.

So should we take a gamble by hiring a proven manager who has shown capabilities to go beyond what Ole can do or should we stick with what we have when it is blindingly obvious that it is lacking?

To me the choice is obvious, but I can see how a more pessimistic take would be, “Jesus, it might even get worse under a new manager! Let’s stick to the mediocrity we know”
Yes but the three years you mention have at least brought continued improvement in the squad and slow progress in league position.

It’s not like he’s started well and gone completely backwards.

On your last paragraph, that’s the fear some of us have. If we were to bin Ole now and hire Conte I would be very concerned the net result of that could be a huge overall negative from the footing we are on now.

We’ve almost completely rebuilt the squad, if somebody like that tore that up and we went in a totally different direction and then he leaves we would be set back years. That’s the concern and it’s a valid one.
 

sewey89

Incorrectly predicted the de Jong transfer 2022
Joined
Jun 15, 2011
Messages
10,682
Location
Chesterfield
It feels inevitable to me at this point that Ole will be gone and Conte will come in before Christmas. I’m not sure that Conte is what we need, but a change certainly is
 

Raoul

Admin
Staff
Joined
Aug 14, 1999
Messages
130,265
Location
Hollywood CA
We could always appoint Teddy Sheringham.
He knows the club.
DNA etc.
Legend from '99, scoring in the final and laying on an assist for another bloke.
Has managed mighty Stevenage and ATK of India.
Has never got anyone relegated.
What could possibly go wrong?
Knows how to tackle Gordon Ramsay as well.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,652
While this is generally true, I think when Tuchel became available we were 1st in the league? Nobody except maybe Perez or Roman would pull the trigger at such a point.
Bayern were 2nd in the league on match day 10 when they fired Kovac, who also was champion with them last year.

They fired him, hired Flick and won the treble same year.
 

RUCK4444

New Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
9,553
Location
$¥$¥$¥$¥$
One thing has nothing to do with the other. Ole has to go, and we need to find a proper replacement.

Will the replacement mean we'll be competing instantly, well we won't know until we try it. If he doesn't work then sack the new manager and appoint another one. As I said before hire and sack endlessly until we strike gold.

I for one don't want Conte, I agree he's not a long term manager. I think we should aim for one of the "modern" German/dutch managers.
On the bolded though, how much time should we give them?

Because I like the idea more of one of the German/Dutch up and comers but they aren’t going to hit the ground running.
 

hobbers

Full Member
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
28,321
Yes but the three years you mention have at least brought continued improvement in the squad and slow progress in league position.

It’s not like he’s started well and gone completely backwards.

On your last paragraph, that’s the fear some of us have. If we were to bin Ole now and hire Conte I would be very concerned the net result of that could be a huge overall negative from the footing we are on now.

We’ve almost completely rebuilt the squad, if somebody like that tore that up and we went in a totally different direction and then he leaves we would be set back years. That’s the concern and it’s a valid one.
Improvement in the squad solely on paper. Nothing that has translated into performances or the quality of our football. As evidenced by every game so far this season.

And this is just a fantasy some people have about "tearing up rebuilds", "being set back years". It's a nonsense argument. It doesn't happen. And we don't have a playing system to tear up anyway.

What we have are a collection of excellent players who are currently playing in a team that has no underlying philosophy and no tactical system, at least not one worth talking about.
 

SAFMUTD

New Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
11,787
On the bolded though, how much time should we give them?

Because I like the idea more of one of the German/Dutch up and comers but they aren’t going to hit the ground running.
It depends on the progress, there's not an specific answer to that. Sometimes 15 games can be enough to see if the manager has it or not. It all depends on the famous "eye test".

There's teams that don't get points but their style and upward direction is so obvious that it would be foolish to sack the manager. Like Liverpool's Klopp before exploding.
 

Delano

Full Member
Joined
Jul 7, 2016
Messages
1,513
The club has to start putting in place the groundwork to get a new manager. Ole's taken us as far as he can, but we shouldn't fire him without someone properly lined up.

Forget about going blindly for big names or "United through and throughers". The club needs to identify how we want to play, where we want to be, and who can take this team forward.

The problem is, who has any faith that our board and the people in key footballing positions will be proactive enough to do that? I think they love the coziness at the club, but this team is far too talented to be wasted like it is.

Unfortunately, I think Oles position will become untenable very soon, and we'll go for whoever is out a job. We never learn.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.