Russian invasion of Ukraine | Fewer tweets, more discussion

frostbite

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,260
Let's set aside Greece, since that would take the thread wildly off topic and let's assume that an elected official would willingly nuke his own economy:

You're saying yourself that Greece's economic hardship brought anti western idiots into the government.

Do you not see the issues of something like that happening. It could bring the pro Russian Afd into government and be the end of the EU.
What I am saying is that whatever happens to Germany in the future is irrelevant, it is just speculation.

Today the huge problem is that Germany funds the Russians, who kill the Ukrainians.



(And that's exactly what Germany was telling Greece back in 2010. And let's not forget that it was the same stupid German government that gave billions and billions to Putin. Like they did not know who Putin is. )
 

dinostar77

Full Member
Joined
Feb 6, 2014
Messages
7,265
A question that may have already been answered, though it is speculation i realise. Whats the consensus on here as to Russia's response if EU fasttrack membership for Ukraine and finland and sweden join NATO?
 

Simbo

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2010
Messages
5,228
A question that may have already been answered, though it is speculation i realise. Whats the consensus on here as to Russia's response if EU fasttrack membership for Ukraine and finland and sweden join NATO?
Lots of angry words.
 

GlastonSpur

Also disliked on an Aston Villa forum
Joined
Feb 4, 2007
Messages
17,716
Supports
Spurs
The BBC reports:

"The European Union has adopted a new raft of sanctions against Russia and entities with ties to the Kremlin. Details were published on Friday.
They include:

  • Asset freezes and travel bans for 216 individuals, including Vladimir Putin's two daughters, Ekhaterina Tikhonova, 37, and Maria Vorontsova, 37
  • Also affected are German Gref, head of Sberbank, Russia's largest bank; arms manufacturer and billionaire Oleg Deripaska; and defence ministry spokesman Igor Konashenkov
  • Sanctions on 18 more firms, including five of Russia's biggest banks
  • A ban on coal imports, the first action the EU has so far taken against Russia's energy sector
  • An import ban on others goods - including wood, vodka and chemical products - estimated to make up at least 10% of all imports from Russia
  • A ban on the export of goods including jet fuel and transportation equipment
  • An export ban on technologies including quantum computers, advanced semiconductors and high-end electronics
  • A ban on Russian ships using EU ports
  • A ban on Russian and Belarusian trucks entering the EU's territory unless they are carrying medical products, food or humanitarian assistance"
 

Beans

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
3,515
Location
Midwest, USA
Supports
Neutral
A question that may have already been answered, though it is speculation i realise. Whats the consensus on here as to Russia's response if EU fasttrack membership for Ukraine and finland and sweden join NATO?
A Russian official said that if Finland and Sweden join there will be no nuclear response, and they will build up their defense on the border.
 

stefan92

Full Member
Joined
Feb 9, 2021
Messages
6,446
Supports
Hannover 96
Okay, but now the money you give to Russia is causing deaths in Ukraine. How do you live with that? It doesn't matter to the Germans because someone else is dying?
It's a very personal question, but I personally can say that I worked actively on reducing this dependency on Russia. I did my part, and I am proud to see that the baltic states managed to break free from Russian gas now, as I also worked (a little bit) on their energy independence. I haven't voted for the governments who are responsible for this mess, actually I can say that I lost a job because of the stupid stupid energy politics of our government.

This is on the people who supported Merkel's horrible energy politics, not on me.
 

Frosty

Logical and sensible but turns women gay
Joined
Jan 11, 2007
Messages
17,243
Location
Yes I can hear you Clem Fandango!
Russia is closing the offices of 15 Western NGOs, including the two leading rights organisations, Amnesty International and Human Rights Watch.

The Russian Ministry of Justice said the decision was taken due to Russian laws being violated, without providing details.

Amnesty International's director, Agnes Callamard, said it was the latest in a long list of organisations being punished for speaking the truth to the Russian authorities.

She said Amnesty would redouble efforts to expose what she described as Russia's "egregious human rights violations at home and abroad".

“The authorities are deeply mistaken if they believe that by closing down our office in Moscow they will stop our work documenting and exposing human rights violations," she said.

Russia tightened its already restrictive media law after invading Ukraine by introducing a new law which threatens to jail anyone Russia deems to have spread "fake" news about the armed forces.
 

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,148
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Difficult to see how this will lead to anything other than a longrunning Ukrainian hatred of Russia for a long time to come after this.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,959
Difficult to see how this will lead to anything other than a longrunning Ukrainian hatred of Russia for a long time to come after this.
Ukraine vs Russia in any sport is going to be very tense for the foreseeable future. The relationship is very hateful at this point and as you say may remain for a long time.

Eventually it'll probably recover but the relationship will be rough for a couple of decades I reckon.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,004
Difficult to see how this will lead to anything other than a longrunning Ukrainian hatred of Russia for a long time to come after this.
Yep. The attitude is so different from when I started visiting in 2010. Completely unthinkable now to imagine Ukrainians being excited about the Sochi Olympics. Russian troops seized Crimea, then Russian insurgents arrived in Donbas soon after and changed the relationship between the two countries for ever.
 

TMDaines

Fun sponge.
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
14,004
Ukraine vs Russia in any sport is going to be very tense for the foreseeable future. The relationship is very hateful at this point and as you say may remain for a long time.
They won’t play in football for a generation unless they both get to the latter stages of an international tournament.
 

africanspur

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2010
Messages
9,148
Supports
Tottenham Hotspur
Yep. The attitude is so different from when I started visiting in 2010. Completely unthinkable now to imagine Ukrainians being excited about the Sochi Olympics. Russian troops seized Crimea, then Russian insurgents arrived in Donbas soon after and changed the relationship between the two countries for ever.
Yep. Relationships can eventually recover (Germany with rest of Europe, Germany and the Jewish people....kind of...as a whole) but these are people who culturally, at least from an outsider's perspective, seemed so close beforehand. Its almost like a civil war in a way?

Difficult to comprehend how they'll interact in a normal way afterwards.
 

RedDevilQuebecois

Full Member
Joined
May 27, 2021
Messages
8,126
They won’t play in football for a generation unless they both get to the latter stages of an international tournament.
And before that, I can see all various chapters of radical supporters from any European national team going violent against Russian away supporters wherever they will go. It's sad, but that will stay for a while when a country becomes this hated.
 
Last edited:

ThierryFabregas

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
592
Supports
Arsenal
Okay, but now the money you give to Russia is causing deaths in Ukraine. How do you live with that? It doesn't matter to the Germans because someone else is dying?
Is that actually true going forwards though? The sanctions mean Russia can't buy weapons or components for weapons from any country. This means they don't have the components to manufacture any more tanks from what I have read. So the relationship between money and military weapons may not be a 1+1 effect
 

Beans

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
3,515
Location
Midwest, USA
Supports
Neutral
Is that actually true going forwards though? The sanctions mean Russia can't buy weapons or components for weapons from any country. This means they don't have the components to manufacture any more tanks from what I have read. So the relationship between money and military weapons may not be a 1+1 effect
From any country taking part in the sanctions. I’m not sure how much of it can be replaced by China, they said a Russian tank factory was shut down for lack of parts but I’ve not read anything looking at what it will mean exactly for Russia’s military equipment.

If China don’t produce it now they’ll likely be looking to produce it. I think China see Russia as their main ally going forward, even if the money made is negligible, they’ll want a functioning Russian army…surely?

Or will China only need debt to conquer the world? For another thread.
 

ThierryFabregas

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
592
Supports
Arsenal
Ukraine vs Russia in any sport is going to be very tense for the foreseeable future. The relationship is very hateful at this point and as you say may remain for a long time.

Eventually it'll probably recover but the relationship will be rough for a couple of decades I reckon.
I can't see Russia being allowed back into international sports any time soon and maybe not team sports either.
 

frostbite

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,260
It's a very personal question, but I personally can say that I worked actively on reducing this dependency on Russia. I did my part, and I am proud to see that the baltic states managed to break free from Russian gas now, as I also worked (a little bit) on their energy independence. I haven't voted for the governments who are responsible for this mess, actually I can say that I lost a job because of the stupid stupid energy politics of our government.

This is on the people who supported Merkel's horrible energy politics, not on me.
It seems that the current German Chancellor also wants to stop getting gas from Russia "very soon".

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2...gas-imports-olaf-scholz-boris-johnson-ukraine

I have no idea what "very soon" means, but anyway, I hope Germany can achieve that surprisingly sooner than what we expect. It is weird wanting to help Ukraine and at the same time give a billion euros to Putin every day.
 

ThierryFabregas

New Member
Joined
Dec 3, 2018
Messages
592
Supports
Arsenal
From any country taking part in the sanctions. I’m not sure how much of it can be replaced by China, they said a Russian tank factory was shut down for lack of parts but I’ve not read anything looking at what it will mean exactly for Russia’s military equipment.

If China don’t produce it now they’ll likely be looking to produce it. I think China see Russia as their main ally going forward, even if the money made is negligible, they’ll want a functioning Russian army…surely?

Or will China only need debt to conquer the world? For another thread.
You are probably correct that China will likely supply Russia military equipment and components to make equipment long term. You'd imagine in terms of logistics, they'll struggle to do so short term to a large degree.

As for China's strategic position, I think their trade relationship with western nations is far more important to them. Russia has a GDP below South Korea, Italy and Canada so economically they are no super power. Can Russia even afford a long term war? NATO can effectively out produce Russia very easily in terms of military production. Russia are likely banking on the Gas and Oil reserves in Eastern Ukraine and the Black Sea, which they plan on annexing. They will then need to do a pipeline deal with China.
 

ShoePolish

Full Member
Joined
Jan 23, 2013
Messages
1,129
From any country taking part in the sanctions. I’m not sure how much of it can be replaced by China, they said a Russian tank factory was shut down for lack of parts but I’ve not read anything looking at what it will mean exactly for Russia’s military equipment.

If China don’t produce it now they’ll likely be looking to produce it. I think China see Russia as their main ally going forward, even if the money made is negligible, they’ll want a functioning Russian army…surely?

Or will China only need debt to conquer the world? For another thread.
Well, they're treading the neutrality line right now, leaning more towards Russia, of course. One could argue they could benefit from chaos in Russia, fall of government and use it to take part of Siberia and claim it was theirs historically to begin with.
If reports are true, then russian forces on their eastern flank are greatly diminished to support war in Ukraine, and lack of government in place would leave their nuclear deterrent questionable if there is no chain of command in place, plus, who the hell right now would side with Russia, if they would be invaded?
Far-fetched, though.
 

frostbite

Full Member
Joined
Jun 28, 2021
Messages
3,260
Here is an interesting article from NYT about Germany and gas. My opinion is that the rest of Europe should demand from Germany to stop paying anything to Putin. Right now, not months and years in the future.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/07/opinion/germany-russia-ukraine-energy.html

What strikes me — a parallel that for some reason I haven’t seen many people drawing — is the contrast between Germany’s current reluctance to make moderate sacrifices, even in the face of horrific war crimes, and the immense sacrifices Germany demanded of other countries during the European debt crisis a decade ago.

As some readers may remember, early last decade much of southern Europe faced a crisis as lending dried up, sending interest rates on government debt soaring. German officials were quick to blame these countries for their own plight, insisting, with much moralizing, that they were in trouble because they had been fiscally irresponsible and now needed to pay the price.

As it turns out, this diagnosis was mostly wrong. Much of the surge in southern European interest rates reflected a market panic rather than fundamentals; borrowing costs plunged, even for Greece, after the president of the European Central Bank said three words — “whatever it takes” — suggesting that the bank would, if necessary, step in to buy the debt of troubled economies.

Yet Germany took the lead in demanding that debtor nations impose extreme austerity measures, especially spending cuts, no matter how large the economic costs. And those costs were immense: Between 2009 and 2013 the Greek economy shrank by 21 percent while the unemployment rate rose to 27 percent.

But while Germany was willing to impose economic and social catastrophe on countries it claimed had been irresponsible in their borrowing, it has been unwilling to impose far smaller costs on itself despite the undeniable irresponsibility of its past energy policies.

I’m not sure how to quantify this, but my sense is that Germany received far more and clearer warning about its feckless reliance on Russian gas than Greece ever did about its pre-crisis borrowing. Yet it seems as if Germany’s famous eagerness to treat economic policy as a morality play applies only to other countries.

To be fair, Germany has moved on from its initial unwillingness to help Ukraine at all; Ukraine’s ambassador to Germany claims, although the Germans deny it, that he was told there was no point in sending weapons because his government would collapse in hours. And maybe, maybe, the realization that refusing to shut off the flow of Russian gas makes Germany de facto complicit in mass murder will finally be enough to induce real action.

But until or unless this happens, Germany will continue, shamefully, to be the weakest link in the democratic world’s response to Russian aggression.
 

Sarni

nice guy, unassuming, objective United fan.
Joined
Jan 21, 2004
Messages
57,724
Location
Krakow
Ukraine vs Russia in any sport is going to be very tense for the foreseeable future. The relationship is very hateful at this point and as you say may remain for a long time.

Eventually it'll probably recover but the relationship will be rough for a couple of decades I reckon.
I would imagine you’d have provisions made in all sports ensuring they can’t compete with each other (especially in team sports), like there are for other conflicted nations.
 

Sparky Rhiwabon

New Member
Joined
Jul 10, 2013
Messages
16,946
From any country taking part in the sanctions. I’m not sure how much of it can be replaced by China, they said a Russian tank factory was shut down for lack of parts but I’ve not read anything looking at what it will mean exactly for Russia’s military equipment.

If China don’t produce it now they’ll likely be looking to produce it. I think China see Russia as their main ally going forward, even if the money made is negligible, they’ll want a functioning Russian army…surely?

Or will China only need debt to conquer the world? For another thread.
Should we stop buying stuff from China as well then, if that’s also helping Russia by proxy?
 

FireballXL5

Full Member
Joined
May 9, 2015
Messages
10,095
Probably asking when are they going to start taking back those pesky refugees.
 
Last edited:

Beans

Full Member
Joined
Aug 9, 2019
Messages
3,515
Location
Midwest, USA
Supports
Neutral
Should we stop buying stuff from China as well then, if that’s also helping Russia by proxy?
I think the West is mad to let China control the world's supply of vital medicines, many things need to be manufactured in the US or Western Europe to ensure the world won't get cut off in the future.
 

Rajma

Full Member
Joined
Sep 8, 2012
Messages
8,580
Location
Lithuania
Here is an interesting article from NYT about Germany and gas. My opinion is that the rest of Europe should demand from Germany to stop paying anything to Putin. Right now, not months and years in the future.

https://www.nytimes.com/2022/04/07/opinion/germany-russia-ukraine-energy.html

What strikes me — a parallel that for some reason I haven’t seen many people drawing — is the contrast between Germany’s current reluctance to make moderate sacrifices, even in the face of horrific war crimes, and the immense sacrifices Germany demanded of other countries during the European debt crisis a decade ago.

As some readers may remember, early last decade much of southern Europe faced a crisis as lending dried up, sending interest rates on government debt soaring. German officials were quick to blame these countries for their own plight, insisting, with much moralizing, that they were in trouble because they had been fiscally irresponsible and now needed to pay the price.

As it turns out, this diagnosis was mostly wrong. Much of the surge in southern European interest rates reflected a market panic rather than fundamentals; borrowing costs plunged, even for Greece, after the president of the European Central Bank said three words — “whatever it takes” — suggesting that the bank would, if necessary, step in to buy the debt of troubled economies.

Yet Germany took the lead in demanding that debtor nations impose extreme austerity measures, especially spending cuts, no matter how large the economic costs. And those costs were immense: Between 2009 and 2013 the Greek economy shrank by 21 percent while the unemployment rate rose to 27 percent.

But while Germany was willing to impose economic and social catastrophe on countries it claimed had been irresponsible in their borrowing, it has been unwilling to impose far smaller costs on itself despite the undeniable irresponsibility of its past energy policies.

I’m not sure how to quantify this, but my sense is that Germany received far more and clearer warning about its feckless reliance on Russian gas than Greece ever did about its pre-crisis borrowing. Yet it seems as if Germany’s famous eagerness to treat economic policy as a morality play applies only to other countries.

To be fair, Germany has moved on from its initial unwillingness to help Ukraine at all; Ukraine’s ambassador to Germany claims, although the Germans deny it, that he was told there was no point in sending weapons because his government would collapse in hours. And maybe, maybe, the realization that refusing to shut off the flow of Russian gas makes Germany de facto complicit in mass murder will finally be enough to induce real action.

But until or unless this happens, Germany will continue, shamefully, to be the weakest link in the democratic world’s response to Russian aggression.
Completely agree. If until 2014 occupation you could have somehow forgiven the reckless dependency on Russia but they literally had a decade to sort this out and instead they actually doubled down by going ahead with NS2 project, which quite frankly was totally irresponsible (it was basically a gamble). I supported the idea that Southern EU states had to adhere to more reasonable fiscal policies to an extent back then but this totally the same, and EU needs to demand from Germany to take a hit for the greater good.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,959
From the NYT:

  • The most colorful example of Russia's disregard for safety is a soldier who picked up a nuclear waste container of Cobalt-60, a highly radioactive isotope only found in nuclear reactors, with his bare hands. He was emitting so much radiation shortly afterwards that it pegged a geiger counter to it's maximum.
 

VorZakone

What would Kenny G do?
Joined
May 9, 2013
Messages
32,959
Co-60 is like a death ray device, but it has a short half life, this is unlikely to be from Chernobil, maybe the other active plant they captured ? Or, there is still some active reactors in the Chernobil complex?
The NYT article specifically focus on Chernobyl, so it probably did happen there.