Who has had the better international career? Messi or Ronaldo?

Pocho

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
1,808
A country that doesn't even belong to the continent (Mexico) reached the semis of the Copa as many times as Portugal did in the Euro (5) and reached as many finals as Portugal did as well (2).

Argentina won it the most times, 15, together with Uruguay, out of 47 editions. (28%)
Argentina reached the semi finals (or 3rd/4th place) 36 times out of 47 editions. (77%)

Since 1990 Argentina won 3 out of 13 editions. (23%)
Since 1990 Argentina reached the semi finals 8 out of 13 editions. (62%)

With Messi Argentina won 1 out of 6 editions. (17%)
With Messi Argentina reached the semi finals 5 out of 6 editions. (83%)


Portugal failed to qualify in 8 of the 16 editions of the Euro. (50%)
Portugal won 1 out of 16 editions. (6%)
Portugal reached the semi-finals 5 times out of 16. (31%)

Since 1990 Portugal failed to qualify 1 out of 8 editions. (13%)
Since 1990 Portugal won 1 out of 8 editions. (13%)
Since 1990 Portugal reached the semi finals 4 out of 8 editions. (50%)

With Ronaldo Portugal failed to qualify 0 out of 5 editions. (0%)
With Ronaldo Portugal won 1 out of 5 editions. (20%)
With Ronaldo Portugal reached the semi-finals 3 out of 5 editions. (60%)
Who cares about what happened 60 years ago, Argentina didn´t win CA since 93, 28 years. So, no, it's not easy to win it, or it hasn´t been for a while.
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,020
Supports
Real Madrid
Argentina didn´t win CA since 93, 28 years. So, no, it's not easy to win it, or it hasn´t been for a while.
Messi participated in his first final for Argentina in 2007. That was 14 years after Argentina's last win. Which means he was around for 14 of those last 28 years without a win, a full half. Maybe, just maybe, it took 28 years because he's a loser.

This stuff is so ridiculous, he plays for a nation that had been in 25 finals. This is crying about him being born in second base and not third. Unbelievable.
 
Last edited:

Daysleeper

New Member
Joined
Sep 25, 2014
Messages
4,790
Supports
Barcelona
Messi participated in his first final for Argentina in 2007. That was 14 years after Argentina's last win. Which means he was around for 14 of those last 28 years without a win, a full half. Maybe, just maybe, it took 28 years because he's a loser.

This stuff is so ridiculous, he plays for a nation that had been in 25 finals. This is crying about him being born in second base and not third. Unbelievable.
a loser that has annihilated Real Madrid his entire career. Deep down, you’re better than this
 

Pocho

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
1,808
Messi participated in his first final for Argentina in 2007. That was 14 years after Argentina's last win. Which means he was around for 14 of those last 28 years without a win, a full half. Maybe, just maybe, it took 28 years because he's a loser.

This stuff is so ridiculous, he plays for a nation that had been in 25 finals. This is crying about him being born in second base and not third. Unbelievable.
A loser that earns 300 millions a year. :lol:
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,125
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
Yeah that's great and all but their mins per goal contribution (goal/assist) in international football is exactly the same. If you remove friendlies and focus on competitive international matches it actually favours Ronaldo hugely. 98.2 mins per goal/assist for Ronaldo and 119.3 for Messi.

Please though, continue...
Messi contributes far more outside of goals and assists than Cristiano and plays deeper on average. More than makes up for it for me. I've always been saying you could half Messi's goal record and I'd still think he's better than Ronaldo. So yeah, even at international level I'd pick him over CR7. And I know this isn't about who the better player is but who had the greater career but to me this is the same. The better player had the better career, simple as that. If I was Maradona I wouldn't swap careers with Zidane.

All those things aside, you really should come off your high horse. The level of statistical comparisons you people make has everybody who has at least some clue of statistical methodology cringe. Saying that you compare apples and oranges would be an understatement.
 

Revan

Assumptionman
Joined
Dec 19, 2011
Messages
49,638
Location
London
Messi participated in his first final for Argentina in 2007. That was 14 years after Argentina's last win. Which means he was around for 14 of those last 28 years without a win, a full half. Maybe, just maybe, it took 28 years because he's a loser.

This stuff is so ridiculous, he plays for a nation that had been in 25 finals. This is crying about him being born in second base and not third. Unbelievable.
Messi a loser? FFS, this thread is becoming worse and worse.
 

SportingCP96

emotional range of a teaspoon
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
9,873
Supports
Sporting Clube de Portugal
‘Supports Sporting Club de Portugal’

It must be hard for you bro. To have one of yours that’s come along who is by common consensus only the SECOND best of a generation. Never mind. Maybe the next great player you have will be better :lol:
Hard for me?

The guy accomplished everything in the sport and holds records that won’t be broken until after we are all dead. Along with being the best player of his generation and coming from one of the top 3 youth academies in football.
 

SportingCP96

emotional range of a teaspoon
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
9,873
Supports
Sporting Clube de Portugal
I haven’t checked the odds so I can’t comment, but my broader point was that going into every Copa, Brazil and Argentina are the overwhelming favourites for each tournament.
Everyone knows this. That’s why while being happy for him because of his greatness it’s like…dam bro it took you this long? Playing for Argentina in a 2 horse race competition
 

RedRonaldo

Wishes to be oppressed.
Joined
Aug 17, 2003
Messages
18,996
I get what you are saying and I’ve stated that neither can be said to have done as well as they have at club level. But what you’ve highlighted just shows why Messi has been better. When he doesn’t score, he contributes more to the overall game. That’s why his performances are better. I dissected Ronaldo’s goal record not to show that Messi’s is much better (it clearly isn’t) but rather because Ronaldo advocates generally don’t have any other arguments beside his goals. And yet he has 3 out of 109 in the KO rounds of major tournaments.
Well the thing is, its never easy for Portugal to progress further in knock stage in major tournament against other football giants (France, Spain, Germany etc during their world domination), when he did score he also won the Euro with Portugal, and in fact he currently holds the record of scoring most goals in WC+Euro, while Messi scoring record in knockout stage (WC) has been equally poor, I don't think you can really criticise Ronaldo over that.

True in recent years (past 5-6 years), ever since Ronaldo has turned into poacher, his strength has always been more about his goals. But over the course of his long career (especially during early, mid, late 20s), he has far much more than that for sure. Here's his skill show for Portugal, absolutely breathtaking and enjoyable to watch. I know many people forgot how wonderful player he was in the past, as they often let this 30-36 years old poacher version of Ronaldo overwhelmingly overtakes their overall impression of the player.

 
Last edited:

KeanoMagicHat

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
4,047
Ronaldo was already a legend for us in 2006 for his first two tournaments alone... that’s 15 years ago.

Then he scored 100 goals more, lifted the only two trophies we’ve ever won and elevated Portugal’s status in the sport to one of the main European countries instead of a below average one that had one good tournament every 25 years. All while spending his peak years with a poor generation and having managers that have failed at pretty much every other job they had.

His international career will be more appreciated in time when eventually our status as a footballing country reverts to normality as it’s impossible to keep consistently competing like we’ve been doing for forever as shown by the results of similarly sized European countries.
Portugal were very good in the 10 years before Ronaldo with Figo and Rui Costa and have a great system for producing players, they've done well in recent youth tournaments and have another great generation to come. I don't think Portugal are going away any time soon.
 

youmeletsfly

New Member
Joined
Sep 29, 2018
Messages
2,528
A country that doesn't even belong to the continent (Mexico) reached the semis of the Copa as many times as Portugal did in the Euro (5) and reached as many finals as Portugal did as well (2).

Argentina won it the most times, 15, together with Uruguay, out of 47 editions. (28%)
Argentina reached the semi finals (or 3rd/4th place) 36 times out of 47 editions. (77%)

Since 1990 Argentina won 3 out of 13 editions. (23%)
Since 1990 Argentina reached the semi finals 8 out of 13 editions. (62%)

With Messi Argentina won 1 out of 6 editions. (17%)
With Messi Argentina reached the semi finals 5 out of 6 editions. (83%)


Portugal failed to qualify in 8 of the 16 editions of the Euro. (50%)
Portugal won 1 out of 16 editions. (6%)
Portugal reached the semi-finals 5 times out of 16. (31%)

Since 1990 Portugal failed to qualify 1 out of 8 editions. (13%)
Since 1990 Portugal won 1 out of 8 editions. (13%)
Since 1990 Portugal reached the semi finals 4 out of 8 editions. (50%)

With Ronaldo Portugal failed to qualify 0 out of 5 editions. (0%)
With Ronaldo Portugal won 1 out of 5 editions. (20%)
With Ronaldo Portugal reached the semi-finals 3 out of 5 editions. (60%)
Doesn't really matter, the level of the Copa is far below the Euros.

In regards to the OP, I think both of them had quite average international careers with maybe Ronaldo edging it a bit.
In terms of World cups, both Ronaldo and Messi had quite the bad luck of playing against Spain, Germany and France, at that time, teams far superior to Portugal and Argentina.
In terms of Euros, Ronaldo had the same bad luck of playing against the same good teams.
In terms of Copas, I'd say that, other than the numbers, Messi under performed when it mattered, that's why Ronaldo might edge it, but Ronaldo didn't shine on the international stage as well.

If we take a step back and step outside our usual dumb feck fanboyism, we can easily say they were both quite average in their international careers but, at the same time, quite unlucky of not having the proper team and playing against 2-3 of the greatest generations of all time.
Also football has changed a lot. We're not in the 80's anymore where one brilliant player could carry a team to a trophy. The level of international football is getting closer and closer to the club one and having a good balanced team is very important.
 

antohan

gets aroused by tagline boobs
Joined
Apr 24, 2002
Messages
42,185
Location
Montevideo
My fault. I put it yesterday (when I listed all the matches), but forgot to put it today. Other than Argentina in 2014 (3 wins and 1 defeat) and Uruguay last time (1 win and 1 defeat), all other KO matches in the last 4 WCs have been won by European teams.
At any one point the strongest European teams are better outfits. South American teams rely far more on individual talent/contribution, while European teams are always better drilled tactically. The moment any of those European sides also adds individual brilliance to the mix, it neuters us.

That's the bottomline that the knockout stat reflect. Probabilities are always on Europe's side to produce the best side around or one hitting peak form. I disagree with the notion that by extension "South American teams are not competitive" though.

WC2010: 13 Euro NTs, 5 SAM NTs. QF: 3 Euro, 4 SAM (all 5 made 2nd round but Brazil knocked out Chile).

WC2014: 13 Euro NTs, 6 SAM NTs. QF: 4 Euro, 3 SAM (again, 5 made 2nd round but Brazil knocked out Chile and Colombia knocked out Uruguay).

WC2018: 14 Euro NTs, 5 SAM NTs. QF: 6 Euro, 2 SAM. Clearly dominant here, although it didin't help our numbers that the champions' path was Peru (Group), Argentina (R8), Uruguay (QF).

It pisses me off running through that. Our best generation in my lifetime and only one Copa to show for it. Miffed at how we never got knocked out at full strength. Against the Dutch in 2010 we lost three players to injury in normal time against Ghana (inc. captain Lugano) and played out ET with Fucile concussed after a spear tackle of sorts and Lodeiro almost standing still for 50 mins with a broken foot. Add Suarez's handball red after phantom free kick and two players offside. Could have been a different story. 2014 Suarez chomping on Chiellini and suspended for two years. 2018 Cavani injured after his brace against Portugal... Sort of brings me back to reliance on individuals I guess?

Actually it does, I'm sure many Argentinians are miffed they had the world's top player for more than a decade and also only have one Copa to show for it.
 

kc7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 17, 2021
Messages
83
You're just not getting it. If a team is routinely getting to the final of the competition over a prolonged period of time...like Argentina have in the Copa, what does that tell you about their relative strength and / or the strength of the opposition? Answer me that.



So FIFA rankings aren't important when it comes to Argentina, but are important when it comes to Portugal and the opposition they faced in the Euros? Makes total (non)sense and is a double standard (par for the course with your posts to be honest).



Again, you're missing the point. If 80% of the teams in the group stage qualify, then it's obviously an easy competition to progress to the next round. The fact that they did it now or 100 years ago really isn't the point I'm making.




No, this is called an analogy. It's used to compare one thing to another for the purpose of explanation and clarification.

In this analogy, we're saying that Brazil and Argentina in the Copa are the equivalent of Real & Barca in La Liga. In that, they're the strong favourites, and expected to win it. Does that make sense?





I watched the Copas, and remembered quite distinctly Messi's lacklustre performance in the final, missing a crucial spot kick and then promptly retiring (and then subsequently coming out of retirement) because things weren't going his way.




You can only beat what's in front of you. Luck plays a massive role in these competitions. I also find it amusing you have such a low opinion on FIFA rankings. I wonder is it because it doesn't fit your bullshit narrative? I think so.

Let's take a close look at Argentina's run though...
Chile - 19th
Uruguay - 9th
Paraguay - 35th
Bolivia - 81st
Ecuador - 53rd
Colombia - 15th
Brazil - 3rd

Average position is 31 (I rounded up from 30.71).

Let's take a close look at Portugal's run (using Aug 2016 figures - it's even more in my favour if I use May 2016)...

Hungary - 19th
Iceland - 23rd
Austria - 22nd
Croatia - 15th
Poland - 16th
Wales - 11th
France - 7th

Average position is 16 (I rounded down from 16.41).

So, according to FIFA rankings which I think has more science behind it than your 'I use my eyes to watch football bro', Portugal's run on average was more difficult. The Copa teams may have a few standout players, but it's clear that the level of competition is a step above in the Euros. Only an idiot would argue otherwise (this is where you come in though).


See above.


Cool.
Since you seem to love quoting FIFA rankings, please have a look at the below FIFA rankings comparison, I am sure you will find them interesting.

====

May 2018 WC:
Portugal 4th – Argentina 5th

May 2014 WC: Portugal 3rd – Argentina 7th

May 2010 WC: Portugal 3rd – Argentina 7th

Portugal in WC 2010, 2014, and 2018 is higher ranked than Argentina, a consistently top 4 side prior to the tournament. Since FIFA rankings reflect the relative strengths of teams as you stated, Portugal terribly underperformed with Ronaldo, no final, no SF, not even a QF with a top-4 team losing out to teams like Uruguay and USA…They should have easily played a final with Ronaldo and massively underachieved… whereas Argentina overachieved as their best rank is the 5th.

Again, since FIFA rankings reflect the difference between team strengths objectively as you confirmed, Ronaldo fans should cut this BS argument that Argentina has a superior team than Portugal in all these WCs.

===

May 2016 EC:
Portugal 8th in FIFA rankings only behind Germany and Spain in Europe and it did not meet any of these teams. Portugal was one of the top 3 sides in Europe based on the FIFA rankings and thus a top side. Furthermore, they did not even play against Germany and Spain, better ranked teams. In fact that, they did not even play against a top-10 team as France was ranked 21st unlike Argentina who met 2 top-10 FIFA ranked teams in the last Copa (Uruguay no.9 and Brazil no.3) and actually beat them.

So, Ronaldo fans again should cut this BS argument that Portugal won the tournament as a weak side, an underdog. How can you be an underdog when all the teams you play against are lower ranked than your team? And what exactly makes this win spectacular when France was ranked 21st (vs Portugal's 8th) and Ronaldo is a non-factor in the final? If anything, despite their superiority based on FIFA rankings, they struggled throughout the tournament against every single opponent that is lower ranked than them.

====

What about Portugal’s performance in WCs?


In 2018 WC, Portugal (4th in FIFA rankings) lost to Uruguay (17th in FIFA rankings)

In 2014, Portugal (3rd in FIFA rankings) could not even pass the group stage, left behind USA (14th in FIFA rankings)

Overall, it seems, looking at the FIFA rankings, Portugal performed in an embarrassing fashion with a great team in the WCs, and much worse than an inferior Argentina side. And was probably the first side winning a EC without meeting any top 10 European side))
 
Last edited:

The Corinthian

I will not take Mad Winger's name in vain
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
11,877
Supports
A Free Palestine
Since you seem to love quoting FIFA rankings, please have a look at the below FIFA rankings comparison, I am sure you will find them interesting.

====

May 2018 WC:
Portugal 4th – Argentina 5th

May 2014 WC: Portugal 3rd – Argentina 7th

May 2010 WC: Portugal 3rd – Argentina 7th

Portugal in WC 2010, 2014, and 2018 is higher ranked than Argentina, a consistently top 4 side prior to the tournament. Since FIFA rankings reflect the relative strengths of teams as you stated, Portugal terribly underperformed with Ronaldo, no final, no SF, not even a QF with a top-4 team losing out to teams like Uruguay and USA…They should have easily played a final with Ronaldo and massively underachieved… whereas Argentina overachieved as their best rank is the 5th.

Again, since FIFA rankings reflect the difference between team strengths objectively as you confirmed, Ronaldo fans should cut this BS argument that Argentina has a superior team than Portugal in all these WCs.

===

May 2016 EC:
Portugal 8th in FIFA rankings only behind Germany and Spain in Europe and it did not meet any of these teams. Portugal was one of the top 3 sides in Europe based on the FIFA rankings and thus a top side. Furthermore, they did not even play against Germany and Spain, better ranked teams. In fact that, they did not even play against a top-10 team as France was ranked 21st unlike Argentina who met 2 top-10 FIFA ranked teams in the last Copa (Uruguay no.9 and Brazil no.3) and actually beat them.

So, Ronaldo fans again should cut this BS argument that Portugal won the tournament as a weak side, an underdog. How can you be an underdog when all the teams you play against are lower ranked than your team? And what exactly makes this win spectacular when France was ranked 21st (vs Portugal's 8th) and Ronaldo is a non-factor in the final? If anything, despite their superiority based on FIFA rankings, they struggled throughout the tournament against every single opponent that is lower ranked than them.

====

What about Portugal’s performance in WCs?


In 2018 WC, Portugal (4th in FIFA rankings) lost to Uruguay (17th in FIFA rankings)

In 2014, Portugal (3rd in FIFA rankings) could not even pass the group stage, left behind USA (14th in FIFA rankings)

Overall, it seems, looking at the FIFA rankings, Portugal performed in an embarrassing fashion with a great team in the WCs, and much worse than an inferior Argentina side. And was probably the first side winning a EC without meeting any top 10 European side))
You're missing the point somewhat.

Are Argentina one of the two strongest / best / favourites teams in the Copa year in year out?

Would you say Portugal is one of the two strongest / best / favourites teams in the Euros?
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,020
Supports
Real Madrid
If Messi were a Mexican you would have people arguing that him winning the Gold Cup once is a huge achievement.
 

giorno

boob novice
Joined
Jul 20, 2016
Messages
26,668
Supports
Real Madrid
I'd say individually it's pretty even. Relative to expectations, Cristiano, by far
 

kc7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 17, 2021
Messages
83
Those European teams were a bit shit in that competition. Europe still managed to have 3 out of 4 semi-finalists, and a European team won the competition. 4 years prior, Europe managed to send 3 semi-finalists, and both finalists. 4 years later, all four semi-finalists were from Europe. Oh, the same happened in 2006.

The last time some American team won any of the three medals, it was in 2002. I posted yesterday all the matches between European and American teams, in KO it was not even close. It was a total domination of European teams, essentially they destroyed American teams.

Does Europe have shit teams? Of course they do, I come from one country who has a shit team. Are there shit European teams in Euros and World Cups? Of course there are. But the best European teams (in the period of time where Messi and Ronaldo play) have happened to be significantly better than American ones, to the point that American teams (with the exception of Argentina in 2014) have been a total non-entity. Their campaign always ended the first time they faced a European team in KO. I guess I have to repeat it, no South American team, except Argentina in 2014 (where they defeated Switzerland 1-0 with a goal in 118th minute, Belgium 1-0 and Netherlands in penalties) has won a KO tie vs an European team, in the time where Messi and Ronaldo play in WCs.

If that does not prove that European teams are miles better, I do not know what proves it. Maybe you will get convinced when you see again four semi-finalists from Europe and Brazil/Argentina getting out of the competition when they face a European team next year.
1) says SA teams are shit and irrelevant. When shown how top European teams (Spain, Italy, England, Holland, Belgium, Portugal) were dominated in WC 2014 by not only SA teams but all other American teams, this time starts calling these top European teams shitty..BS argument..

2) says every decent side passes the group stage. When shown top sides such as England, EC 2012 finalists Spain, Italy and, 2016 EC finalist, Portugal failed to do that in WC 2014, calls these European teams shitty, again.. another BS..

3) implies Copa is a shitty tournament, but can not explain how mighty EC 2016 winning Portugal side lost against "shitty and irrelevant" American sides such as USA in WC 2014, Chile 2017, and Uruguay in WC 2018..

4) writes paragraphs about how ECs are on average stronger than Copas as if people are saying the opposite conveniently ignoring the fact that people are talking specifically about EC 2016 in which Portugal has an atypical path, the easiest path ever, and weaker than Copa..

5) continues to wrongly assume that by discounting EC 2016 win of Portugal, people are discounting the achievements of all other EC winners..

6) talks over and over about how strong European teams are and how they dominated those SA teams in KO rounds in WCs, conveniently ignoring the fact Portugal did not play against any of these dominating European sides other than France in EC (in which Ronaldo was a non-factor)..
 
Last edited:

kc7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 17, 2021
Messages
83
You're missing the point somewhat.

Are Argentina one of the two strongest / best / favourites teams in the Copa year in year out?

Would you say Portugal is one of the two strongest / best / favourites teams in the Euros?
Yes to both based on FIFA rankings.. see below.

2021 May EC Portugal ranked 5th
2016 May EC Portugal ranked 8th
2012 May EC Portugal ranked 5th

You seemed to be very confident in the accuracy of FIFA rankings when comparing the strength of Portugal’s rivals vs Argentine rivals in your previous posts, adding the rankings and averaging out etc. What happened? Did you start having some doubts?
 
Last edited:

SportingCP96

emotional range of a teaspoon
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
9,873
Supports
Sporting Clube de Portugal
Saying Argentina aren’t favorites every single year along with Brazil to make the final of the Copa is like saying México and USA don’t make the gold cup final basically every year.
 

SportingCP96

emotional range of a teaspoon
Joined
Feb 17, 2014
Messages
9,873
Supports
Sporting Clube de Portugal
1) says SA teams are shit and irrelevant. When shown how top European teams (Spain, Italy, England, Holland, Belgium, Portugal) were dominated in WC 2014 by not only SA teams but all other American teams, this time starts calling these top European teams shitty..BS argument..

2) says every decent side passes the group stage. When shown top sides such as England, EC 2012 finalists Spain, Italy and, 2016 EC finalist, Portugal failed to do that in WC 2014, calls these European teams shitty, again.. another BS..

3) implies Copa is a shitty tournament, but can not explain how mighty EC 2016 winning Portugal side lost against "shitty and irrelevant" American sides such as USA in WC 2014, Chile 2017, and Uruguay in WC 2018..

4) writes paragraphs about how ECs are on average stronger than Copas as if people are saying the opposite conveniently ignoring the fact that people are talking specifically about EC 2016 in which Portugal has an atypical path, the easiest path ever, and weaker than Copa..

5) continues to wrongly assume that by discounting EC 2016 win of Portugal, people are discounting the achievements of all other EC winners..

6) talks over and over about how strong European teams are and how they dominated those SA teams in KO rounds in WCs, conveniently ignoring the fact Portugal did not play against any of these dominating European sides other than France in EC (in which Ronaldo was a non-factor)..
You say Portugal had an easier path yet they barely made it out the group and barely won each game except for Wales.

So does that mean Portugal are much worse then Argentina consistently (yes) or does that mean the euro is the most competitive international competition after the World Cup (also Yes)

So Portugal had the “weakest competition in years” yet they still struggled the whole way through. Geez imagine if the euro was even more competitive….
 

Iker Quesadillas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 12, 2021
Messages
4,020
Supports
Real Madrid
Portugal are shit when the argument requires them to be shit and the cream of the crop when the argument requires them to be the cream of the crop. Cristiano Schroedinaldo plays for them.
 

MrEleson

Full Member
Joined
Oct 25, 2014
Messages
2,530
Yes to both based on FIFA rankings.. see below.

2021 May EC Portugal ranked 5th
2016 May EC Portugal ranked 8th
2012 May EC Portugal ranked 5th

You seemed to be very confident in the accuracy of FIFA rankings when comparing the strength of Portugal’s rivals vs Argentine rivals in your previous posts, adding the rankings and averaging out etc. What happened? Did you start having some doubts?
Now you’re just being intellectually dishonest.
 

Green_Red

New Member
Joined
May 29, 2013
Messages
10,296
You'd have to say that even with his injuries being top goalscorer for WC and also winning the world Cup means Ronaldo has had the better international career. I think only Klose matches Ronaldo on the international stage with regard to strikwrs.
 

Pocho

Full Member
Joined
Jun 13, 2006
Messages
1,808
You'd have to say that even with his injuries being top goalscorer for WC and also winning the world Cup means Ronaldo has had the better international career. I think only Klose matches Ronaldo on the international stage with regard to strikwrs.
You are talking about fat Ronaldo I guess
 

kc7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 17, 2021
Messages
83
You're just not getting it. If a team is routinely getting to the final of the competition over a prolonged period of time...like Argentina have in the Copa, what does that tell you about their relative strength and / or the strength of the opposition? Answer me that.



So FIFA rankings aren't important when it comes to Argentina, but are important when it comes to Portugal and the opposition they faced in the Euros? Makes total (non)sense and is a double standard (par for the course with your posts to be honest).



Again, you're missing the point. If 80% of the teams in the group stage qualify, then it's obviously an easy competition to progress to the next round. The fact that they did it now or 100 years ago really isn't the point I'm making.




No, this is called an analogy. It's used to compare one thing to another for the purpose of explanation and clarification.

In this analogy, we're saying that Brazil and Argentina in the Copa are the equivalent of Real & Barca in La Liga. In that, they're the strong favourites, and expected to win it. Does that make sense?





I watched the Copas, and remembered quite distinctly Messi's lacklustre performance in the final, missing a crucial spot kick and then promptly retiring (and then subsequently coming out of retirement) because things weren't going his way.




You can only beat what's in front of you. Luck plays a massive role in these competitions. I also find it amusing you have such a low opinion on FIFA rankings. I wonder is it because it doesn't fit your bullshit narrative? I think so.

Let's take a close look at Argentina's run though...
Chile - 19th
Uruguay - 9th
Paraguay - 35th
Bolivia - 81st
Ecuador - 53rd
Colombia - 15th
Brazil - 3rd

Average position is 31 (I rounded up from 30.71).

Let's take a close look at Portugal's run (using Aug 2016 figures - it's even more in my favour if I use May 2016)...

Hungary - 19th
Iceland - 23rd
Austria - 22nd
Croatia - 15th
Poland - 16th
Wales - 11th
France - 7th

Average position is 16 (I rounded down from 16.41).

So, according to FIFA rankings which I think has more science behind it than your 'I use my eyes to watch football bro', Portugal's run on average was more difficult. The Copa teams may have a few standout players, but it's clear that the level of competition is a step above in the Euros. Only an idiot would argue otherwise (this is where you come in though).


See above.


Cool.
Says the guy who provides false information (in his response to another forumer above) in a football forum to strengthen his point, really embarrassing.. see point 1 below..

1) When comparing Argentina’s Copa rivals to Portugal’s EC rivals in your previous post using FIFA rankings, you said

“Let's take a close look at Portugal's run (using Aug 2016 figures - it's even more in my favour if I use May 2016)...”

which is a blatant lie.

So, all of a sudden you decided to help Messi fans and use Aug 2016 (post-tournament) figures instead of May 2016 (pre-tournament) figures though May 2016 figures are even more in your favor, really interesting and let’s say a little suspicious))

Then, you list the August FIFA rankings of Portugal’s rivals in the same post as below:

August 2016 rankings (the one that you used in your post)

Hungary 19th -- Iceland 23rd -- Austria 22nd – Croatia 15th -- Poland 16th -- Wales 11th – France - 7th

Then you find the average position as 16

Well, tell you what, I made a little analysis as I found your behavior a little suspicious and pulled out the below data from the FIFA website and to be honest, not surprisingly saw my suspicions being confirmed))

May 2016 rankings (the one you avoided using though it was supposed to be “even more in your favor” in your own words)).

Hungary 18th -- Iceland 35th -- Austria 11th -- Croatia 23rd -- Poland 27th – Wales 24th -- France 21st

Here, I find the average as 22.7, more than 6 points worse than that you found using August 2016 rankings))

Why might he have done that? Well, probably because, other than improving the average position of Portugal’s rivals by more than 6 points, it also elevates France’s position from 21st to 7th ensuring there’s another top 10-side along with Portugal in the Portuguese path in EC 2016..

The level of dishonesty and extent of embarrassing things people can do to support in a simple football forum, mind-blown...

2) uses FIFA rankings to support his case and when somebody else does the same using the same objective/quantitative data against his narrative, goes completely silent on FIFA rankings))

3) says to another forumer things like “I also find it amusing you have such a low opinion on FIFA rankings. I wonder is it because it doesn't fit your bullshi tnarrative?))

Again, what happened? Why so silent about FIFA rankings after my posts? I wonder is it because it now doesn't fit your bullshit narrative?
 
Last edited:

kc7

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jul 17, 2021
Messages
83
Overall, the level of hypocrisy & dishonesty in a simple "football forum" is unreal….
 
Last edited:

NasirTimothy

New Member
Joined
Jan 4, 2021
Messages
2,388
Supports
Enyimba F.C.
Says the guy who provides false information (in his response to another forumer above) in a football forum to strengthen his point, really embarrassing.. see point 1 below..

1) When comparing Argentina’s Copa rivals to Portugal’s EC rivals in your previous post using FIFA rankings, you said

“Let's take a close look at Portugal's run (using Aug 2016 figures - it's even more in my favour if I use May 2016)...”

which is a blatant lie.

So, all of a sudden you decided to help Messi fans and use Aug 2016 (post-tournament) figures instead of May 2016 (pre-tournament) figures though May 2016 figures are even more in your favor, really interesting and let’s say a little suspicious))

Then, you list the August FIFA rankings of Portugal’s rivals in the same post as below:

August 2016 rankings (the one that you used in your post)

Hungary 19th -- Iceland 23rd -- Austria 22nd – Croatia 15th -- Poland 16th -- Wales 11th – France - 7th

Then you find the average position as 16

Well, tell you what, I made a little analysis as I found your behavior a little suspicious and pulled out the below data from the FIFA website and to be honest, not surprisingly saw my suspicions being confirmed))

May 2016 rankings (the one you avoided using though it was supposed to be “even more in your favor” in your own words)).

Hungary 18th -- Iceland 35th -- Austria 11th -- Croatia 23rd -- Poland 27th – Wales 24th -- France 21st

Here, I find the average as 22.7, more than 6 points worse than that you found using August 2016 rankings))

Why might he have done that? Well, probably because, other than improving the average position of Portugal’s rivals by more than 6 points, it also elevates France’s position from 21st to 7th ensuring there’s another top 10-side along with Portugal in the Portuguese path in EC 2016..

The level of dishonesty and extent of embarrassing things people can do to support in a simple football forum, mind-blown...

2) uses FIFA rankings to support his case and when somebody else does the same using the same objective/quantitative data against his narrative, goes completely silent on FIFA rankings))

3) says to another forumer things like “I also find it amusing you have such a low opinion on FIFA rankings. I wonder is it because it doesn't fit your bullshi tnarrative?))

Again, what happened? Why so silent about FIFA rankings after my posts? I wonder is it because it now doesn't fit your bullshit narrative?
Promote this poster :)
 

Red Company

Full Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2019
Messages
1,072
Location
Toronto
Supports
The Peaky Blinders
I’m really curious to see where Ronaldo ends up next summer.. I genuinely thought PSG would go for him but don’t see that happening with Messi there..

A part of me wants him to come back to us before going to MLS or wherever he decides to end his career..

But first priority is Haaland. And if Haaland does end up coming then I don’t see where Ronaldo would fit in..
 

tentan

Poor man's poster.
Joined
Oct 5, 2013
Messages
4,564
I’m really curious to see where Ronaldo ends up next summer.. I genuinely thought PSG would go for him but don’t see that happening with Messi there..

A part of me wants him to come back to us before going to MLS or wherever he decides to end his career..

But first priority is Haaland. And if Haaland does end up coming then I don’t see where Ronaldo would fit in..
 

MUW4Eva

New Member
Joined
Mar 23, 2022
Messages
1,526
I can't see Ronaldo moving to the MLS....off field issues might prevent this....
 

Reapersoul20

Can Anderson score? No.
Joined
Aug 13, 2006
Messages
12,153
Location
Jog on
kill this thread with fire, feck me why has this steaming turd been bumped....is it because of the amber heard case?
 

Joel Miller

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Nov 30, 2021
Messages
590
Guessing most would give it to Ronaldo on the basis of getting to batter amateur sides like the faroes, andorra and Luxembourg again and again