The comprehensive Ronaldo thread

Swoobs

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 2, 2019
Messages
761
Supports
Florentina
Yeah if you take away the stats then his all-round play doesn't stack up against the likes of Pele, Maradona and Messi (The guys who usually lead the GOAT conversation).

Ive seen much less of Cruff/ Platini and Laudrup than a lot of people here but from the little I've seen their technique and passing etc were superior too.

If you offered me peak R9 or CR7 I would go with R9 every single time but I can't say that as a reason why he's better than CR7 because statistically (longevity and achievements) CR7 dominates him.

The one area where I could confidently put Ronaldo up against some of the GOATS would be heading ability/ aerial dominance where I genuinely believe he was one of the greatest.
If you take away his stats (which longevity plays a big part of), he is not even at the level of Ronaldimho, nevermind R9 or Zidane. The reason why he is in the top 10 is mainly down to his stats and that 4 seasons of magic (around the time of his transfer to RM from United)
 

Foxbatt

New Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2013
Messages
14,297
Thought so. I read that Cryuff has the 2nd most assists in history just short of Puskas as well.
I saw him play for Ajax and Barca. He is unbelievable. He drops deep and he can pass, dribble, shoot and head. His passing is very underrated.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,926
Location
France
That's the Ronaldo I love and I don't think that this version ends up as high in all time rankings. Ronaldo greatness is tightly linked to the more cynical, number driven version, the one that expects to be fed more than feeding others or making the difference for teammates.

 
Joined
Jun 26, 2014
Messages
22,144
Location
Behind the right goal post as "Whiteside shoots!"
Funny how people just hate, of course as for United Cantona could be considered the bigger legend. But saying "just one contributor" is ridiculous. Really I think at this point United fans are becoming a joke.

Without him United did not win that 2008 UCL and would have one less ballon d'or winner in their list. Ronaldo was the cherry on top that really elevate the club to the next level. Even in the marketing side it was Ronaldo that made United famous world wide and people started to follow United.
Team was stacked and while Ronaldos goals were huge that season (including latter stages of CL), he wasn’t the sole reason we won it by a long way. Didnt score his penalty for a start… counter argument was we almost lost it because of him.

The bold bit is just ridiculous. Busby Babes, Munich, first English winners of European Cup, Best, Charlton, Law, doubles, first (only) English Treble winner, a myriad of top players known around the world… huge before him, huge after him.
 

Andre Kagawa

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Jun 24, 2013
Messages
2,517
Although a great player, he's just (and always has been) such a supremely unlikable person. To me it's baffling how he's managed to gather this enormous amount of fanbois.
 

Real Name

Full Member
Joined
Oct 21, 2020
Messages
14,270
Location
Croatia
That's the Ronaldo I love and I don't think that this version ends up as high in all time rankings. Ronaldo greatness is tightly linked to the more cynical, number driven version, the one that expects to be fed more than feeding others or making the difference for teammates.

Yup, he was a normal kid who just liked to play football back then.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,433
Peak Ronaldo was a better player than Cantona but we had to put up with 3/4 years of pointless stepovers, theatrical diving, running down blind alleys, and bleached spaghetti hairstyles before he started to be a player who could actually contribute the way the man he replaced (Becks) did. Cantona strolled in to OT and was incredible straight off the bat. That makes a difference to the perception.

The other thing is that, contrary to what his fanbois seem to believe, Ronaldo is a charisma vacuum. Cantona was possibly the most charismatic player I've ever seen. Eric was cool, Ronaldo is cringeworthy. Again, that makes a huge difference in how they are perceived.

Ultimately, Cantona gave his best years to our club and retired on top when he felt that he could no longer maintain his standards. Ronaldo claimed he was a slave to engineer a move away from our club and then rejoined us just in time for him to do the footballing equivalent of shitting his pants publicly and then blamed his manager and teammates for it. One is the among the most legendary of our legends, the other is just one contributor of many to a successful period under our greatest manager.
I agree with most of this. However it’s hardly Ronaldo’s fault that he was signed as a teenager and I would very strongly state that actually the very essence of Manchester United is developing young players rather than buying the finished article....except where it suits apparently.

As for it being a popularity contest. Exactly my point. Cantona strutted in, absolutely adored him but he wrecked one season for us and underperformed on the biggest stage. But if you have the ‘charisma’ it’s fine. But this is life.
 

KeanoMagicHat

Full Member
Joined
Mar 31, 2019
Messages
4,032
Yeah don't get me wrong I'm not saying he wasn't good (in fact he was great), just that for him to be In contention for the best ever label his in game performances have to be "subsidised" (not the right word really but just continuing on from.the statistical conversation) with his statistical achievements because on a technical level I don't believe hes in a top 10 (personally).
That’s the problem that people keep pushing him as GOAT, it puts that part of his game under more scrutiny, Ronaldo was obviously much better at a lot of these skills than the average player but when you’re talking about the best that’s played football in 100 years you have to point out where he’s got 7/10s in parts of the game others have 9 or 10s.
 

Gehrman

Phallic connoisseur, unlike shamans
Joined
Feb 20, 2019
Messages
11,166
Yeah the idea that Cruyff’s reputation has gone up as he got older is laughable in fact I believe at one point before Maradona he was in regular conversations as the best player ever with Pele, and my dad’s generation, one of the first players he would have told me about was Cruyff.

Won the European Cup three times and to boil down his games for Barcelona to just goals is wrong, I watched him play a game for Barcelona and what a game it was to behold, he kept picking the ball up at the back and deep midfield and driving at the opposition with brilliant dribbling on a shite pitch, he was pretty much running the whole game, like Modric now with peak Messi direct dribbling. Everything went through him and he was a class above. Ronaldo could never do that, for example.
I know its all people point too. Games/goals and they forget or dont know that Barca hadnt won the league for 14 years when they bought him.
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,469
I am genuinely gobsmacked that anyone tried for the hot take that Cruyff, who had the joint most Balon D'ors before Messi/CR7 arrived, was "not in the discussion for top 5" of all time.
or a poor mans Michael Laudrup. @Regulus Arcturus Black - why make such statements when you are clearly out of your depth on football history?
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,433
Yeah we're done here. You keep moving the goalposts so there's really no point in continuing. It's pretty clear from the majority of responses here from actual United fans who they think the more iconic player was, and that's what your initial argument was before you serpentined into whatever this is. Like Ronaldo you can't stand to be wrong so you do you buddy.
WTF is this moronic post? It’s got to be one of the most ridiculously poor responses I’ve read. And there’s been plenty of crybabies in plenty of threads that couldn’t handle facts presented and as a result decided to throw toys out of the peak when they had nothing to come back with....

On the bolded:-

1.I haven’t moved the goalposts once, even when others have tried to take me down a different agenda.

2.That was never my argument...at any point.

3.You’re full of shit.
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,926
Location
France
WTF is this moronic post? It’s got to be one of the most ridiculously poor responses I’ve read. And there’s been plenty of crybabies in plenty of threads that couldn’t handle facts presented and as a result decided to throw toys out of the peak when they had nothing to come back with....

On the bolded:-

1.I haven’t moved the goalposts once, even when others have tried to take me down a different agenda.

2.That was never my argument...at any point.

3.You’re full of shit.
For your own sake calm down and maybe ignore this thread.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,433
You know ball. You're putting up a clinic.
Thank you. Christ this is hard work. Some cry babies on these boards that just want to believe that because they like a player more that makes them better. In no objective appraisal can Eric Cantona be considered more successful or influential than Ronaldo in terms of their entire career at United. Subjectively yes but that’s not my problem.
 

DevilRed

Full Member
Joined
Mar 2, 2011
Messages
13,002
Location
Stretford End
The real question is whether he will start against morocco.

portugal have what is now looking like the easiest path to the semi finals.

A real shot at winning the whole thing.
 

Jeppers7

Pogfamily Mafia
Joined
Feb 25, 2014
Messages
7,433
With all due respect, can you please not compare Ronaldo with Eric. He had everything in his personality that Ronaldo doesn't have, was beyond just a football player. The world legend doesn't do him justice and there is not a stat in this world that can explain how great he was. The shit he did was biblical.

Thanks.
He was great. Great charisma. Unbelievable player. You just need to differentiate between objective and subjective. But yes. What a player he was.
 

moses

Can't We Just Be Nice?
Staff
Joined
Jul 28, 2006
Messages
43,304
Location
I have no idea either, yet.
WTF is this moronic post? It’s got to be one of the most ridiculously poor responses I’ve read. And there’s been plenty of crybabies in plenty of threads that couldn’t handle facts presented and as a result decided to throw toys out of the peak when they had nothing to come back with....

On the bolded:-

1.I haven’t moved the goalposts once, even when others have tried to take me down a different agenda.

2.That was never my argument...at any point.

3.You’re full of shit.
Play nice people. I know religion is a touchy subject but we have to respect all the different versions of insanity in the thread.
 

city-puma

Full Member
Joined
Dec 10, 2020
Messages
3,279
Location
NYC
Thank you. Christ this is hard work. Some cry babies on these boards that just want to believe that because they like a player more that makes them better. In no objective appraisal can Eric Cantona be considered more successful or influential than Ronaldo in terms of their entire career at United. Subjectively yes but that’s not my problem.
Aha, you are the one to lecture people Ronaldo is more influential than Cantona for United! I saw this thread’s posts growing exponentially, found people are debating such a ridiculous topic, and felt pretty frustrated really. Eric stimulated and pushed us over the line that we had not been able to overcome for so so many years. The rest is the consequence and the continuation of it. Get it?!
You need to understand what’s leadership and why it’s important to team sports. Ronaldo has zero leadership really. You can only say he had been a great player, one of many bests. Influential? No, not at all.
 

Gavinb33

Full Member
Joined
Apr 6, 2014
Messages
2,738
Location
Watching the TV or is it watching me
I think Ronaldo at his peak had very good set of attributes. Like a good passer and crosser, just he didnt pass like best ever at it, was a good(some seasons great) dribbler just not as good as the best ever at it etc. Was great at freekicks which for some reason declined massively at some point, but he was a incredibly well rounded forward who delivered all the goals he promised. If you watch all his assists for Man Utd and Real Madrid they were pretty good too. Not the best of the best, but defintely good.
People might get upset but the only thing he was truly elite at is scoring.

If you make his scoring that of an average elite striker players like Zidane, Ronaldinho, Iniesta, R9 and maybe one or 2 others in the modern game are above him for me no question, his scoring marks him above these players 100%
 

Jim Beam

Gets aroused by men in low socks
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
13,081
Location
All over the place
He was great. Great charisma. Unbelievable player. You just need to differentiate between objective and subjective. But yes. What a player he was.
Was a bit harsh. But, he really was more than a player or just stats. Just a perfect player (or better to say person) at the right time.

People do go in extreme now. Ronaldo was brilliant for us 2006 - 2009. His peak is probably matched only by Best. But, the way he acted all together just leaves a sour taste atm. Mind you, history in 5 or 10 years will be kinder to him. But, he was no Cantona, especially because of his actions. One said his greatest United moment is an assist to a teammate, the other probably thinks every teammate should thank God they played with him.
 

Forevergiggs1

Full Member
Joined
Sep 22, 2019
Messages
3,451
Location
Barcelona
Supports
United
Thank you. Christ this is hard work. Some cry babies on these boards that just want to believe that because they like a player more that makes them better. In no objective appraisal can Eric Cantona be considered more successful or influential than Ronaldo in terms of their entire career at United. Subjectively yes but that’s not my problem.
I think it's less who was better but who had more influence on the club as a whole. When Cantona came to the club the whole dynamic changed and I think it's hard to argue against he was the catalyst that put us on the road to decades of success. When Ronaldo came to the club we were already a juggernaut and although he definitely improved us as a team the chances are quite high that if he didn't join we still would of had the same levels of success.

To put it another way. If I was given the choice that only one of Cantona or Ronaldo could join the club I'd be picking Cantona every single time with absolutely no doubts. United made Ronaldo not the other way around as some seem to think.
 

Zehner

Football Statistics Dork
Joined
Mar 29, 2018
Messages
8,112
Location
Germany
Supports
Bayer 04 Leverkusen
People might get upset but the only thing he was truly elite at is scoring.

If you make his scoring that of an average elite striker players like Zidane, Ronaldinho, Iniesta, R9 and maybe one or 2 others in the modern game are above him for me no question, his scoring marks him above these players 100%
If you go by longevity absolutely. I'd take Ronaldo 1996-1999 over peak Cristiano though.
 

Mr Pigeon

Illiterate Flying Rat
Scout
Joined
Mar 27, 2014
Messages
26,326
Location
bin
2.That was never my argument...at any point.
(Good luck finding any player with a list of more standout moments and crucial goals that gave United fans successful moments to enjoy than Ronaldo, I’ll keep waiting for you to invalidate my point)
Sure it wasn't, unless we're misreading one another's interpretations of what makes talismanic/standout moments and iconic similar. Anyway it's kind of a mute point now anyway because the conversation has run its course.
 

troylocker

Full Member
Joined
May 2, 2019
Messages
2,560
That's the Ronaldo I love and I don't think that this version ends up as high in all time rankings. Ronaldo greatness is tightly linked to the more cynical, number driven version, the one that expects to be fed more than feeding others or making the difference for teammates.

Fun to watch, but I don't think anyone would take the "6 goals and 8 assists a season Ronaldo with stepovers" over the "50+ goals/15+ assists Ronaldo without the stepovers" he became at Real Madrid.

For me he's definitely a top 5 of all times player. His 07-19 seasons were simply phenomenal, and (for me) I don't think you need to be a complete footballer to be considered among the best of the best. If you're dominant enough as a specialist you deserve to be there.

That said. He's become impossible to like or root for, and he'll make any eventual top team he signs for worse. He doesn't have the workrate, pace or intensity needed for the top level anymore and needs to be carried by his teammates to put up numbers, while being a whiny, needy and narcissistic, super ego. A horrible combination.
 

Eckers99

Michael Corleone says hello
Joined
Aug 9, 2014
Messages
6,117
Yeah if you take away the stats then his all-round play doesn't stack up against the likes of Pele, Maradona and Messi (The guys who usually lead the GOAT conversation).

Ive seen much less of Cruff/ Platini and Laudrup than a lot of people here but from the little I've seen their technique and passing etc were superior too.

If you offered me peak R9 or CR7 I would go with R9 every single time but I can't say that as a reason why he's better than CR7 because statistically (longevity and achievements) CR7 dominates him.

The one area where I could confidently put Ronaldo up against some of the GOATS would be heading ability/ aerial dominance where I genuinely believe he was one of the greatest.
I think he had an elite mindset (which has predictably tripped over into narcissism with age) and elite physicality. He was very good at a lot of things but elite in those areas. Like you said, he was incredible in the air and could outleap anyone. Often in the biggest games.
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
Yeah if you take away the stats then his all-round play doesn't stack up against the likes of Pele, Maradona and Messi (The guys who usually lead the GOAT conversation).

Ive seen much less of Cruff/ Platini and Laudrup than a lot of people here but from the little I've seen their technique and passing etc were superior too.

If you offered me peak R9 or CR7 I would go with R9 every single time but I can't say that as a reason why he's better than CR7 because statistically (longevity and achievements) CR7 dominates him.

The one area where I could confidently put Ronaldo up against some of the GOATS would be heading ability/ aerial dominance where I genuinely believe he was one of the greatest.
Fun fact, Ronaldos 17 assists in La Liga is only 3 off KDB and Henry best ever return
 

RacingClub

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
2,048
Supports
Racing Club
I think he had an elite mindset (which has predictably tripped over into narcissism with age) and elite physicality. He was very good at a lot of things but elite in those areas. Like you said, he was incredible in the air and could outleap anyone. Often in the biggest games.
Yup all fair, if you gave Ronaldinho his mindset and R9 his physicality(injury resistance etc) they would both have far stronger claims to be in upper echelons of top players.
 

17Larsson

Not a malefactor just a lagomorph
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
6,609
Location
30,000 feet above ground

She basically wants him to do the Piers meme :lol: :lol:

"We've suffered enough".
Jesus christ. What about all the subs he has been looking at sitting on the bench all down the years? Was he advising them to go home as well?

Him and his family are completely deluded
 

Mockney

Not the only poster to be named Poster of the Year
Joined
Jan 27, 2009
Messages
40,957
Location
Editing my own posts.
Or the obvious fact that Ronaldo used Manchester Uniteds world wide fame (as well as his outrageous talent) as a platform to catapult himself to superstardom.

In the early part of his career United contributed far more to Ronaldo's fame than Ronaldo did to Uniteds.
Plus the whole “CR7” thing only exists ‘cos we gave him our most famous shirt (he wanted 28) previously vacated by that notoriously unmarketable shrinking wallflower…. David Beckham

If it was such an unimportant part of his global brand, he could’ve easily kept the No9 he was initially given at Madrid?

Naturally he used that platform to amazing effect, but it’s daft to pretend that didn’t immediately catapult him to much greater level of fame… even to the point he insisted on the No17 for Portugal when Figo still occupied the 7..
 

Tincanalley

Turns player names into a crappy conversation
Joined
Apr 12, 2011
Messages
10,135
Location
Ireland
He's actually that type of person who was hoping they would lose just because they bench him so he could go on and say oh look, you did not play me now you deserve losing.

He was fuming when they were 4-1 up. He looked like he wanted to kill someone.

He couldn't stand it.
Giflord?
 

RacingClub

Full Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2021
Messages
2,048
Supports
Racing Club
Fun fact, Ronaldos 17 assists in La Liga is only 3 off KDB and Henry best ever return
Well yeah that kind of backs up the whole "Ronaldo fans also use statistics to justify his position with the GOATS" point that I was agreeing with initially.

As you said yourself he's 3 off KDB and Henrys stats record and nobody (as far as I can tell) makes a case for them being in the top 15 of all time? Maybe Henry?
 

JPRouve

can't stop thinking about balls - NOT deflategate
Scout
Joined
Jan 31, 2014
Messages
65,926
Location
France
Fun to watch, but I don't think anyone would take the "6 goals and 8 assists a season Ronaldo with stepovers" over the "50+ goals/15+ assists Ronaldo without the stepovers" he became at Real Madrid.

For me he's definitely a top 5 of all times player. His 07-19 seasons were simply phenomenal, and (for me) I don't think you need to be a complete footballer to be considered among the best of the best. If you're dominant enough as a specialist you deserve to be there.

That said. He's become impossible to like or root for, and he'll make any eventual top team he signs for worse. He doesn't have the workrate, pace or intensity needed for the top level anymore and needs to be carried by his teammates to put up numbers, while being a whiny, needy and narcissistic, super ego. A horrible combination.
That's exactly my point. The better version is not the most enjoyable nor is it the one that used all the skills that the player actually had. The better version is the one that piled up statistical records, was self centered and generally cynical.
 

Jim Beam

Gets aroused by men in low socks
Joined
Feb 10, 2017
Messages
13,081
Location
All over the place
Impressed with Santos decision though. Although, I wonder if Portugal get to the final would he still bench him. Not just because he would have a biggest meltdown known to the world if he doesn't play. Imagine Argentina - Portugal final with Cristiano on the bench. No way he doesn't go absolutely nuts if he is not in first 11.

He still is the winner and out all historic players the one you would pick for a deciding penalty, header or a deciding goal in a one off game.

Saying all that, hope he gets benched in that scenario. Yes, am being petty. :wenger: