City and Financial Doping | Charged by PL with numerous FFP breaches

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
I don’t think they’d investigate for four years and bring 100 charges if they don’t intend to see it through fully

whether they do or not will come down to cities legal team’s ability to fight the charge but the intent is very clear to take them down

but regardless, a fine implies guilt which was what I was getting at
Yes, it sounds alot having 100 charges but how bad are the breaches?

One of the charges is that in 09/10 the grass was more than 3cm long. So lets wait to see what the extent of the breaches are.
 

Judge Red

Don't Call Me Douglas
Joined
Feb 11, 2006
Messages
5,993
So when they are punished for cheating and ruining arguably the biggest football league in the world for more than a decade, will it be decided that their sportswashing wasn’t particularly successful?
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,666
Location
Sydney
Yes, it sounds alot having 100 charges but how bad are the breaches?

One of the charges is that in 09/10 the grass was more than 3cm long. So lets wait to see what the extent of the breaches are.
Is it? That’s ridiculous

but still, one is paying their first team manager a second salary through a third party which is extremely serious on its own
 

Oranges038

Full Member
Joined
Oct 19, 2020
Messages
12,310
So the premier League has been sitting on this for 14 years doing nothing about it.

Now that the reform is coming they had to act now so that they didn't seem like a corrupt entity allowing this rule breaking to continue before someone else caught them.

So in essence the EPL is corrupt and now have been given no choice but to do something about it before this legislation for reform comes.
Should have been following up on it since the first time it came up in 2011.

This time, I think it's more them making sure they had everything lined up before they brought a case. We've seen before with UEFA, City can get these allegations retracted on technicalities, like how the information was obtained and all that.

Why have City not cooperated with them since 2018?
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,223
Location
Hell on Earth
Well, it appears the revenue aspect is one of the problems. TV has exploded, but your revenue streams also went crazy and that hasn't been seen to such a scale with other clubs. The Eithad deal in particular looked dodgy and then got exposed in the leaks as being Mansoor paying himself. This is where the issue lies with your revenues. How much of it is real and how much of it is just essentially the owner pumping it in and pretending it is commercial revenue?

If significant, then you'll be in trouble as that was against the rules you and the other clubs signed up for.

Then there is the off the book payments. How significant are/were these? If Mancini for instance was being 2x + his declared wage and this was applied to players, then all your financial accounts are essentially fiction. The issue here is obviously proving they were for the job in question and not something seperate. If proven to be for being a Man City manager/player then your going to have HMRC to deal with as well.

Personally, I always wait and see with charges as I believe people/companies should be able to defend themselves before they are declared guilty. However, to just focus on spending in relation to the other teams you were competing with, doesn't really deal with the issues that you're being charged with.
Problem is that this case will not be done in public despite public interest. All quiet within the commission and then they publish their findings.

It's a suboptimal approach.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,223
Location
Hell on Earth
Is it? That’s ridiculous

but still, one is paying their first team manager a second salary through a third party which is extremely serious on its own
They can claim that he did legit consultation work for those entities albeit once a quarter. Can claim site visits and zoom calls?
 

Tarrou

Full Member
Joined
May 13, 2013
Messages
25,666
Location
Sydney
They can claim that he did legit consultation work for those entities albeit once a quarter. Can claim site visits and zoom calls?
Sure they can try. But he got paid a similar amount as his yearly city salary in the PL, the most lucrative league in the world, for a 4 day a year contract in a tin pot league.. Good luck arguing that in court!
 

Strelok

New Member
Joined
Jan 10, 2018
Messages
5,279
I wish I had the confidence that some do that they’ll be punished, but I think they’ll basically get off with it all.
Tbh I feel the same here.

But if that happens it'd be a big fecking slap to the so called most competitive and attractive league in the world. And probably the UK and what its people has been so proud of.
 

romufc

Full Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2019
Messages
12,559
Is it? That’s ridiculous

but still, one is paying their first team manager a second salary through a third party which is extremely serious on its own
Yep the salary one is a massive one. They need to follow the money, if the money comes from the City owners, then it also becomes a criminal case.

Imagine your place of work paying you off books, do you think you will be there without anything come towards you?
 

StiffTackle

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2021
Messages
108
I can’t see them being expelled from the league because as bad as this is, there are worse crimes in football and you leave yourself very little room for manoeuvre if you start with expulsion. Juventus went down for match fixing but only got a points deduction for their financial maladministration.

For me if the FFP rules are judged over a 3 season period and carries a penalty of a 15 point deduction, they’ve been breaking the rules for 10 years so it stands to reason they should expect a fine and a 45 point deduction as a minimum.

This would mean Pep would probably leave, they’d probably get relegated (which would be a de facto ban from Europe) and the reduction in revenue wouldn’t quite be a transfer ban, but it would be a transfer limitation.
 

Drainy

Full Member
Joined
May 5, 2009
Messages
14,861
Location
Dissin' Your Flygirl

Baxter

Full Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2010
Messages
11,738
Yes, it sounds alot having 100 charges but how bad are the breaches?

One of the charges is that in 09/10 the grass was more than 3cm long. So lets wait to see what the extent of the breaches are.
This isn't true :lol:
 

UnitedSofa

You'll Never Walk Away
Joined
Jul 12, 2013
Messages
6,797
I can’t see them being expelled from the league because as bad as this is, there are worse crimes in football and you leave yourself very little room for manoeuvre if you start with expulsion. Juventus went down for match fixing but only got a points deduction for their financial maladministration.

For me if the FFP rules are judged over a 3 season period and carries a penalty of a 15 point deduction, they’ve been breaking the rules for 10 years so it stands to reason they should expect a fine and a 45 point deduction as a minimum.
What?

They have cheated for over a decade, their cheating has lead to teams not getting into Europe, relegation and preventing titles going to the rightful teams.

This is monumental, relegation is arguably the right punishment.
 

Murder on Zidane's Floor

You'd better not kill Giroud
Joined
Jun 11, 2015
Messages
28,856
So when they are punished for cheating and ruining arguably the biggest football league in the world for more than a decade, will it be decided that their sportswashing wasn’t particularly successful?
Remember there are people on here who don't believe sport washing exists...
 

StiffTackle

Full Member
Joined
Dec 2, 2021
Messages
108
What?

They have cheated for over a decade, their cheating has lead to teams not getting into Europe, relegation and preventing titles going to the rightful teams.

This is monumental, relegation is arguably the right punishment.
In my mind it would be worse if they were bribing referees for wins, match fixing with opponents, engaging in squad wide doping, covering up sexual abuse of children in the academy. Much worse crimes than what they are accused of.

They’ve definitely cheated and its been systematic over 10 years. But we’ve always known thats what they were up to. If we knew they were doing any of the things mentioned above they would have been stopped immediately. So in my opinion, there is worse they could have done.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,223
Location
Hell on Earth
Sure they can try. But he got paid a similar amount as his yearly city salary in the PL, the most lucrative league in the world, for a 4 day a year contract in a tin pot league.. Good luck arguing that in court!
We did overpaid £84million for Macquire.... ;)
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,223
Location
Hell on Earth
They’ve definitely cheated and its been systematic over 10 years. But we’ve always known thats what they were up to. If we knew they were doing any of the things mentioned above they would have been stopped immediately. So in my opinion, there is worse they could have done.
Human rights issue in Abu Dhabi?
 

cyberman

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2010
Messages
37,331
In my mind it would be worse if they were bribing referees for wins, match fixing with opponents, engaging in squad wide doping, covering up sexual abuse of children in the academy. Much worse crimes than what they are accused of.

They’ve definitely cheated and its been systematic over 10 years. But we’ve always known thats what they were up to. If we knew they were doing any of the things mentioned above they would have been stopped immediately. So in my opinion, there is worse they could have done.
They’ve been trying to stop them. We just didn’t know about it because City were successful with court injunctions
 

redcucumber

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2022
Messages
3,258
They should be stripped of their titles, owners forced to sell and sent to whichever league will take them. They have made a mockery of the sport since the takeover.
 

grahamo

Full Member
Joined
May 20, 2004
Messages
1,449
Location
Its a funny old game
Everyone saying city have great lawyers and will negotiate their way out of the mess. I'm sure the premier league's lawyers are no slouches.
 

Rooney in Paris

Gerrard shirt..Anfield? You'll Never Live it Down
Scout
Joined
Mar 11, 2010
Messages
36,012
Location
In an elephant sanctuary
In my mind it would be worse if they were bribing referees for wins, match fixing with opponents, engaging in squad wide doping, covering up sexual abuse of children in the academy. Much worse crimes than what they are accused of.

They’ve definitely cheated and its been systematic over 10 years. But we’ve always known thats what they were up to. If we knew they were doing any of the things mentioned above they would have been stopped immediately. So in my opinion, there is worse they could have done.
No one really cares about this arbitrary hierarchy you've decided in your head. There are rules to competitions they enter in, rules they are presumed to have violated for years and years, and which enabled them to create a position of dominance to the detriment of their competitors, a position they most likely should not be in had they followed the rules. So yeah, if they are found guilty, there is no reason why the book shouldn't be thrown at them.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,223
Location
Hell on Earth
Yep the salary one is a massive one. They need to follow the money, if the money comes from the City owners, then it also becomes a criminal case.

Imagine your place of work paying you off books, do you think you will be there without anything come towards you?
I think the salary part is the smaller issue esp with regards to Mancini's salary. Its small potatoes. The bigger issue is how the concocted their revenues.

City currently have the highest (top-line) revenues in the world. Bigger than Real Madrid, the 14 time European Champion. Made the league a laughing stock when United, Liverpool and even Chelsea all have a larger global fan base.

That was probably the triggering point -- it too bullshitty that there was no way they could get away with that.
 

GazTheLegend

Full Member
Joined
Jul 22, 2014
Messages
3,658
@Relfy my thinking is more cynical than yours: that those same states (and perhaps those wishing to buy Manchester United?) are putting pressure on the governing bodies as a "if they got away with it why aren't we allowed!" sort of deal - that they only want to invest in Chelsea/Man Utd if they were allowed to breach the same rules City have done (on hundreds of occasions). They've got a point too, why AREN'T the PIF allowed to get away with what City did? Perhaps the Newcastle ownership stand to benefit here since they're on the verge of CL football and if City are docked points/relegated then that frees up a slot for the Saudi's....
 

Lay

Correctly predicted Italy to win Euro 2020
Joined
Jan 29, 2013
Messages
20,135
Location
England
Everyone saying city have great lawyers and will negotiate their way out of the mess. I'm sure the premier league's lawyers are no slouches.
Surely even Lionel Hutz can win this case
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,223
Location
Hell on Earth
@Relfy my thinking is more cynical than yours: that those same states (and perhaps those wishing to buy Manchester United?) are putting pressure on the governing bodies as a "if they got away with it why aren't we allowed!" sort of deal - that they only want to invest in Chelsea/Man Utd if they were allowed to breach the same rules City have done (on hundreds of occasions). They've got a point too, why AREN'T the PIF allowed to get away with what City did? Perhaps the Newcastle ownership stand to benefit here since they're on the verge of CL football and if City are docked points/relegated then that frees up a slot for the Saudi's....
Or maybe it's the PL's shot across the bow of PIF/Newcastle? If they can't control or stop the poorer Abu Dhabi now, then there is no way they can allow the PIF to fester in a few years time.
 

tomaldinho1

Full Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2015
Messages
18,001
One thing I keep seeing which I don’t like and needs to stop is the idea that a ‘small’ club is irrelevant to the PL. The issue here isn’t that City are a small club or that they have bought their success, every club buys their success to varying degrees, it’s that they cheated.
 

sincher

"I will cry if Rooney leaves"
Joined
Sep 20, 2004
Messages
25,595
Location
YSC
It is certainly true that financial doping is just as if not more effective in enhancing performance than the kind of doping cycling teams did, but it is much more debatable ethically. I mean big clubs with big revenue bases have a massive and perpetual advantage unless you allow some level of owner-led investment in smaller clubs, especially if time-limited, so at what point do you say the latter is 'too much'? I am not really clued up on the detail of the FFP rules but I do think the Premier League is a little bit realistic that it likes the fact that it is the one with all the richest clubs, and isn't necessarily that bothered about where the money comes from. It will be interesting to see how this plays out.