Messi has never had great work rate, it's more noticeable now cause he has no legs to past 4-5 players like he used to.
Nordic Ghost Yeti (Scandi Carroll) | Haaland at City
- Thread starter Samid
- Start date
-
In the latest episode of the United Hour Podcast, Nik (@Rood) was joined by comedian Ali Woods to look back at the best and worst moments of a rollercoaster season with the annual United Hour Awards.
Has Ten Hag been sacked yet? We're not sure and we hope not, but it's looking more likely as the days pass.
Who should replace him and why is it taking so long to make a decision?
Four seasons and counting now since the last time he did anything of note in CL. So yeah, at, this point, "usual" is very much factual
So we agree, Messi is most likely going to win the balon d'or thanks entirely to the world cup and Haaland would need to complete the treble while playing a decisive role in at least the 2 finals to have a shot at it
Also, careful you don't get spunk all over that picture of Messi you're holding mate
He is most likely to win due to the world cup, just as other all time greats won it when they shined during world cup.So we agree, Messi is most likely going to win the balon d'or thanks entirely to the world cup and Haaland would need to complete the treble while playing a decisive role in at least the 2 finals to have a shot at it
Also, careful you don't get spunk all over that picture of Messi you're holding mate
Weird last comment. Maybe Andrade is onto something. You sound unhinged.
He's also has a chance to hit 50 non penalty goals in all competitions. Nobody besides Messi in 2012 and in 2013 has done it in the modern era, as far as I know.
Incidentally, it's amazing to see that Van Nistelrooy wasn't on the list of non penalty goals in a league season. A lot of his goals were inflated by spot kicks but I still would have thought he'd have a better record.
As I said, grain of salt.Four seasons and counting now since the last time he did anything of note in CL. So yeah, at, this point, "usual" is very much factual
So we agree, Messi is most likely going to win the balon d'or thanks entirely to the world cup and Haaland would need to complete the treble while playing a decisive role in at least the 2 finals to have a shot at it
Also, careful you don't get spunk all over that picture of Messi you're holding mate
And that's ok
Clearly
read your previous post again mate come on 
Ah, it's you. Should have known. I'd ask you to prove me wrong, but there's no point to that
Grain of saltAnd that's ok
Clearly
Ah, it's you. Should have known. I'd ask you to prove me wrong, but there's no point to that
My opinions have nothing to do with the club Messi plays for nor his nationality as I've never been a Barcelona fan nor am I Argentine. It has absolutely to do with the fact that in my unbiased opinion, he is easily the best I've ever seen so much so that when anyone claims someone else is better I find it very surprising. It has everything to do with football.
And in those 2 finals, I totally supported United.
The thing is, that's a totally valid opinion, but thinking he's the best player ever shouldn't totally bias your opinions when it comes to him. It shouldn't suddenly make you think that the world cup should be more important than a treble while breaking multiple records set pre-war if you wouldn't think this with another player. Moroccco reached the semi finals of the world cup, how many of their players should be making the ballon d'or shortlist? After all if the world cup is so much more important that a player winning it but having a fairly average club season can beat a player who wins a treble and breaks goalscoring records, then surely minnows reaching the semi finals should be shortlisted?
Can't wait till City don't win the treble so we can put an end to this nonsense.
Well obviously that would be great but the league looks done, and tbh I think a league title and a champions league should still be enough really to win it. I mean if the WC is so important, then how high should haaland come in the ballon d'or according to you? Can't be ahead of Di Maria, he was great in the final, can't be ahead of modric, he helped Croatia to the semi final, and Madrid to a champions league semi final. Or is it only if you win the world cup that you should get the ballon d'or regardless of how strong a club season someone has?
Some silliness in this post bro. You're better than that.
Ok I'm exaggerating a little, but I mean if France win the penalty shootout, has haaland suddenly played better than Messi even if Messi scored his penalty and it was his teammates that let him down? Clearly a good world cup should have some weighting in the ballon d'or, but it is still just 7 games, the first 3 of which are almost always against weaker opposition.
Even let's take this to an extreme, Messi in 10-11 with the 2010 world cup had it happened in winter, vs Messi in 22-23 with the 2022 world cup. Is the 35 year old Messi better? Did he play better or have a better season? He's likely to win a league and a world cup while 2010 Messi was out fairly early in that world cup without contributing much, which of those seasons was better?
The world cup is definitely something that should hold weight, but not to the point of overriding a last 16 champions league exit against another player who's doing extremely well in a much tougher domestic league and the champions league
I'm sure you'd want City to win the champions league just so that Haaland can win the ballon d'or. That's the extent of your fanboyism.
No I wouldn't, it's just looking inevitable at this point. But obviously I'd take us winning the fa Cup and City winning the champions league over them beating us but really stopping them, thats the big match for me, its inevitable for City to eventually win the champions league, even though its been really funny watching them somehow feck it up every single year.
I'm sure given your fanboyism you'd prefer real to stop the treble than us to stop it, because the champions league might give haaland the edge over messi
You're hilarious. Football is a teamsport and I've never supported City against any team other than Liverpool.
Are the 2 possibilities mutually exclusive?
No they aren't but if you can make up imaginary scenarios in your head, so can I
Please care to elaborate the imaginary scenario I created in my head? Total nonsense.
That I want City to win the champions league. You made that up in your head, I don't, I just assume they will given the quality gap between them and the other sides
Haaland has really good passing skills? Are we living in an alternate Universe? Next you'll be saying he has really good dribbling skills.
Kdb has good passing skills. Haaland just passes the ball decent enough.
Nope. That’s where you are wrong. Haaland is an excellent playmaker. Have an extra look at his passing skills in tonights game and you will be amazed.
If City get the treble he gets the Balon d'Or
Most goals scored in a season ever? Really?
I'm thinking even if they lose the fa cup, but win the other two he would still get it
He really isn't.
Going to read this thread's first pages. There must be some gems buried there.
Edit: Found one who adamantly claimed he wasn't better than 2022 Cronaldo .
Edit: Found one who adamantly claimed he wasn't better than 2022 Cronaldo
.I find him likeable aswell, which makes me hate him even more.
He's an average passer and an average creator. His linkup play is average as well, but does the job. He leads the line, gets fed as the main goal scorer, and scores an obscene amount of goals due to the quality service and his elite goal scoring prowess within the box.
If Harry Kane is the excellent playmaker as a CF, who by the way has 25 league goals, then what does that make Haaland in terms of playmaking ability from the CF position...100% not an excellent playmaker, not even close.
any team is lucky to have him
Scored 35 premier league goals in one season. Same as what Martial has scored in the last 5 years.
Playmaker.
Tweet
— Twitter API (@user) date
Most goals in a 38-game PL season.
His assist and advanced numbers suggest he is a good playmaker actually, for a striker. Which tracks. Most great strikers playing on great teams tend to be
And a 42 game season. Record was 34.
Haaland is a lot of things, but play making isn’t one of them. Far from it. There was a good reason he was getting so little touches every game recently and not involved in build up. Just being able to pass the ball consistently and successfully doesn’t make one a playmaker.
Oh, you're right!