Alexis Mac Allister | Moves to Liverpool for 35m according to Romano

Status
Not open for further replies.

Josh 76

Full Member
Joined
Mar 14, 2018
Messages
5,605
The interesting thing is that until Liverpool paid the clause, which is 35 million, not a few teams were interested in Mаc Allister and there was talk of a price of around 65-70 million euros. There was no mention of a buyout clause at all.

How come no one knew about the clause until now.
You mean the journalists, reporting this crap, never knew about the release clause.

Maybe the player had agreed to sign for Liverpool weeks ago, so other teams didn’t bother.
 

InfiniteBoredom

Full Member
Joined
Jun 10, 2013
Messages
13,679
Location
Melbourne
Can we pull a John Obi Mikel on this one? I’d rather slap an extra £10m on wage to get him at that price rather than £50m for Mount.

Incredible deal for the Scousers.
 

Robertd0803

Full Member
Joined
Sep 1, 2014
Messages
6,649
Hes going to be a great signing for them. And if his release clause is that low why werent the usual suspects in for him?
 

Rolaholic

Full Member
Joined
Aug 1, 2016
Messages
11,171
He has a great agent for agreeing to that release clause pre-world cup.

Now he got a direct route out of the club to a bigger club despite having signed a new deal recently.

The likes of Kane and Rafael Leao should take notes...
 

saivet

Full Member
Joined
Feb 22, 2013
Messages
25,466
£35m is great value, if true, though the BBC reported that the fee is around £55m a couple days ago. We'll find out soon, which is closer to the truth soon.
 

The-Mezzala

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 13, 2018
Messages
493
So according to the cafe he’s either a midtable level player or he’s the next Modric? I suspect the truth is somewhere in the middle and he’ll be a good signing for them.
It is middle. Tbh at 35 million the scousers have done well to sign him. We are reportedly paying 70
For Mount who has a year left on his contract. Proof we are still terrible at transfer negotiations
 

MegadrivePerson

Full Member
Joined
Aug 17, 2022
Messages
1,595
I think he was out of contract in 2024 so presumably that's why he managed to negotiate a low release clause.
 

aeh1991

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 13, 2022
Messages
925
I really worry that everyone will make fun of us at the end of the season for overpaying for Mount while other teams made very clever MF signings. If we hijack Rice and buy him for 100m it's gonna be even worse.
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,352
Release clause, allegedly. He renewed only earlier this season till 2026.
I really don't believe this nonsense honestly. He signed a new deal before the WC. In December/January you had their CEO say they don't do release clauses. When we were linked to him last month he was valued at 60m, and now that Liverpool sign him it first comes down to 45m and now 35m? Pretty sure Liverpool media will finally say he was signed for 20m.
 

Crimson King

Full Member
Joined
May 11, 2013
Messages
3,109
I really worry that everyone will make fun of us at the end of the season for overpaying for Mount while other teams made very clever MF signings. If we hijack Rice and buy him for 100m it's gonna be even worse.
Seriously, who gives a shit?! Imagine worrying about people making fun of the football team you support...find something else to occupy your brain!

A ball hasn't even been kicked next season yet and this is the kind of thing you're worrying about? If we finish 20 points ahead of Liverpool it won't matter how much Mac Allister cost.

And quite honestly, who cares? He's a good player and didn't cost the earth, but he really isn't as good as the bed wetters on here are making out.
 

Raees

Pythagoras in Boots
Joined
May 16, 2009
Messages
29,471
£35m makes this a much more reasonable signing and one with very little downside. Even if he can’t make it as a starter long term - plenty of resale value and will be a good squad option.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,437
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
Don’t believe everything Fabrizio tweets, this is the Athletic

Liverpool were able to trigger a clause in the new contract he signed last October. The fee is likely to be undisclosed but is understood to be in excess of £45million.
Still cheap though.
 

MadMike

Full Member
Joined
Sep 16, 2015
Messages
11,690
Location
London
(Sick rhymes!)

What's the problem, is it the money?
If we had more, would Mac be our honey?
I feel dejected, what can cure this dread?
Let's all head over to the Mount thread.

EDIT: Didn't expect rhymes from someone who hates music. Maybe you love poetry?
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,352
Don’t believe everything Fabrizio tweets, this is the Athletic



Still cheap though.
They've definitely gotten a good deal but given Brighton's stance over transfers, is it really believable that a club tell them has a release clause as low as 35m when they're out there selling the likes of Cucurella for 60m? Romano can tweet all sorts of crap and people lap it up.
 

L1nk

Full Member
Joined
Dec 31, 2017
Messages
5,116
35 million?! We should have been all over it for that price.

Edit: Okay seems it may be higher. Good.
And it seems like we were but got an indication from him that he wanted Liverpool, so didn't pursue. Similar to how Mount has indicated he wants United and not Liverpool so they aint pursuing it
 

roonster09

Hercule Poirot of the scouting world
Scout
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
36,831
Scouse media, innit. We've obviously paid £100m for him like Nunez. :wenger:
Ofcourse you believed you paid Slaah 80k per week when you signed him.
"OMG we pay only 80k for Salah", isn't it.
 

The Boy

Full Member
Joined
Mar 25, 2014
Messages
4,437
Supports
Brighton and Hove Albion
And this from Andy Naylor, by far the most reliable Brighton journalist.

 

Shinjch

Full Member
Joined
May 18, 2012
Messages
1,386
The fees should have to be declared to an independent body of some sort, the PR nonsense around transfer fees is wild when certain clubs are involved.
 

Pexbo

Winner of the 'I'm not reading that' medal.
Joined
Jun 2, 2009
Messages
68,839
Location
Brizzle
Supports
Big Days
Honestly not fussed about this one. Think he’s actually quite limited.
 

strandty

Full Member
Joined
Apr 13, 2007
Messages
1,627
Romano also stated in his Here We Go tweet that Postecoglou was signing a 2+1 deal at Tottenham when it was actually a 4 year deal. Doesn't always get the full details correct.
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,352
The fees should have to be declared to an independent body of some sort, the PR nonsense around transfer fees is wild when certain clubs are involved.
That's the advantage with listed clubs who declare facts and I often see other foreign clubs also not go with undiclosed nonsense. Liverpool's wages and fees are honestly a joke in the media. They try to downplay it as much as possible.
 

wr8_utd

:'(
Joined
Apr 22, 2008
Messages
38,352
Romano also stated in his Here We Go tweet that Postecoglou was signing a 2+1 deal at Tottenham when it was actually a 4 year deal. Doesn't always get the full details correct.
He gets way too much information wrong but he's unfortunately got a **** following. And its been proven very often he just copies information from other sources and will tweet it as his own within 3-4 mins of them tweeting.
 

RuudTom83

Full Member
Joined
Sep 30, 2013
Messages
5,659
Location
Manc
The so called experts on twitter know next to nothing...the only details you can trust are that MacAllister is moving to Liverpool.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.