Darkhorsez
Full Member
Please make this happen!
At least we’d only be paying half the wages. We’re currently paying him to be unavailable or turn up doing his invisible man impression. Not sure it makes much difference to us whether he’s wearing a Porto shirt or a United one whilst doing it.I know its a bit of a running joke on here to say transfers would cost more if we offer our shite player in exchange
but in this case I think it would be true
we'd have to pay at least half of Martial's wages for him to go there
Yeah, I’d want the 2I'd be incredibly happy if we went for Hojlund and Taremi.
The source is Porto based, not sure about their reliability.How reliable is this source?
Not that it matters, but no. On pretty good terms.Aren't Iran and Qatar enemies?
No, Iran & Iraq do on political terms.Aren't Iran and Qatar enemies?
How reliable is that source for Porto?Would be a fun transfer for you guys. Has some similarities to Harry Kane, as previously mentioned.
Won’t beat many people in a foot race but has good athleticism and great link up play.
His confidence goes up and down, and can really get in his head if there’s a scoring drought. Also developed quite a reputation for being a diver.
Talent for talent, I don’t see him being worse than Goncalo Ramos. That 100 million price tag for GR was one of the biggest jokes I’ve ever come across.
Well established source. I don’t think they’d make something up, so there is at least some smoke.How reliable is that source for Porto?
No, they both enemy of Saudi, and UAE is Saudi close ally.Aren't Iran and Qatar enemies?
They are BFFs. Qatar has paid for their international training camps and friendlies in past and even hosted them at the Aspire Academy.Aren't Iran and Qatar enemies?
I think most would be happy only if we are getting an extremely promising young no.9 in at the same time, like the Atalanta forward. Which is fair, I think.What kind of nonsense is going on in here eh? “Get him in”, “please let this happen” etc. I know Weghorst was a short term fix, but surely our standards haven’t fallen this much?
I don't think many (any?) want him as the only striker, but he does seem the right profile to come in alongside one of the young promising strikers we're linked with. If that's the route we're going it is a good idea to bring in a fairly cheap experienced striker that can alternate with him for a couple of years. Whether this guy is the right one or not is another question though.What kind of nonsense is going on in here eh? “Get him in”, “please let this happen” etc. I know Weghorst was a short term fix, but surely our standards haven’t fallen this much?
Goes right along with what I've maintained this summer that United are putting a team together not building one. That's Ighalo, Cavani, Ronaldo and Weghorst. I can't think of any other top teams in world football who's scouting infrastructure would bear such fruit in one area of the field to show such a lack of direction and strategy. It's comical. The last legitimate striker with the right age and profile though it didn't work was Lukaku. This is a terrible choice, it's also not one where United sign two strikers due to FFP, no sales and a new goalkeeper which impacts the budget.Wow... another "never heard of him" 30+ player found out of the blue. Do wejust put a few names in a hat and draw out one or two every pre-season?
Yeah great insight except how much do you think Mitrovic might cost vs Taremi?Please just stop if this is what we are shopping in Mitrovic would be mile and miles better. Also I'm not championing we should buy Mitrovic but if this is the market then he is proven.
What about the outcome that both of them have a crap season, because one is a very young unproven forward coming from a league where retirees like Dzeko, Giroud and Ibra dominated for years, and the other is a journeyman in the Portuguese league?I'll be the hundredth person to say if we're planning to get this guy and Hojlund (or similar), then I'm really starting to warm up to our transfer strategy this summer.
His goalscoring record looks rock solid, his style of play absolutely suited to the system, and his age/profile perfect to be the foil/insurance policy against the risk of relying too much on the relatively unproven Hojlund.
If we got both, you've got three outcomes all of which would be fine:
Hope there's some truth to this!
- Hojlund isn't ready, takes a while to settle, or just plain struggles. Taremi shoulders the goalscoring burden alongside more 'high-end' forwards like Rashford, Bruno, Antony/Sancho.
- Hojlund starts well, but isn't ready to be clear-cut first choice. They split games evenly.
- Hojlund is a smash hit, and scores reliably from the start. Taremi serves as rotation/back-up and at his stage in his career is happy to do so at United, and experienced enough to be ready when called upon, but still young enough to also be fit when called upon.
Mitrovic would be around €60m compared to Taremi at probably €20m. Not exactly in the same financial bracket.Yeah great insight except how much do you think Mitrovic might cost vs Taremi?