Maguire | he stays!

roy'skeen

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 11, 2022
Messages
9
Maguire shouldn't get any kind of pay off. You get paid more when you trade up in sports, you should take less when you trade down. If you fail you accept the financial consequences
 

Moriarty

Full Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2008
Messages
19,191
Location
Reichenbach Falls
It might set a precedent that we don't want to set. Might be good in the short term if we pay him off, but then every Bailly, Henderson, and VdB (at the least) will also start overplaying their hand.

Best to take a hard line on this I reckon.
All right, this is a bit black and white but the club has a contractual obligation to Maguire. If they want to unilaterally terminate that contract, then Maguire is within his rights to demand payment. The difference between his wage at West Ham and his wage at United equals the amount of his damages and he should be made whole. Having said that, I'm sure there will be a compromise and Maguire will go.
 

whitbyviking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Messages
2,463
f he sees out his contract you'd think he's at risk of only getting an offer from the Championship, should mean his England career done too.
 

DavelinaJolie

Full Member
Joined
May 8, 2013
Messages
3,627
There is no point lashing out at Maguire. He is entitled to receive whatever is mentioned in the contract. Clubs happily sign contracts and then try to shove players away when they’re not good enough.

The new West Ham contract, if he signs it, will be final one before he retires. He is being forced to play for West Ham where he has no chance of winning anything and has been asked to take a paycut on top of that. All that for the increased chance of playing in the Euros! Doesn't sound interesting. Pay him the 7m and get done with it.
I agree tbh. I wouldn't leave that amount of money on the table.
 

whitbyviking

Full Member
Joined
Aug 15, 2022
Messages
2,463
All right, this is a bit black and white but the club has a contractual obligation to Maguire. If they want to unilaterally terminate that contract, then Maguire is within his rights to demand payment. The difference between his wage at West Ham and his wage at United equals the amount of his damages and he should be made whole. Having said that, I'm sure there will be a compromise and Maguire will go.
The contract is awarded based on him providing a service, usually in a normal contract there are performance requirements regarding level of service alongside the requirement to provide the service. This doesn't appear to be the same in football related contracts, and is obviously very subjective of course. In the real world there are mechanisms to terminate a normal contract for not providing the service to the level required, if we look at it that way is he providing the service that should be expected from a record signing, and very well remunerated, player? Arguably not.

So whereas you are right in that he can ask to be "made whole", it is very easy to argue that he doesn't deserve to be "made whole", since he ins't performing to a level that should be expected. He is lucky that contracts don't appear to have penalties for general performance related issues. So are the club though in reality, since if a player blows up the club could get multiple seasons at a cheaper rate than normal.
 

Wilt

Full Member
Joined
May 22, 2017
Messages
7,054
Wouldn’t blame him if sees out his contract. Contracts are set up to protect both player and club.
If anything blame OGS and Woodward ….they signed him.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,253
Location
Hell on Earth
There is no point lashing out at Maguire. He is entitled to receive whatever is mentioned in the contract. Clubs happily sign contracts and then try to shove players away when they’re not good enough.

The new West Ham contract, if he signs it, will be final one before he retires. He is being forced to play for West Ham where he has no chance of winning anything and has been asked to take a paycut on top of that. All that for the increased chance of playing in the Euros! Doesn't sound interesting. Pay him the 7m and get done with it.
He is playing chicken with United. He has to be pretty stupid to think that sitting on the bench at this critical juncture of his career is a good move.

If he runs out his contract, he will land up being like Lingard, training at some former club in the summer and looking for a new contract.
 

sglowrider

Thinks the caf is 'wokeish'.
Joined
Dec 27, 2009
Messages
25,253
Location
Hell on Earth
Wouldn’t blame him if sees out his contract. Contracts are set up to protect both player and club.
If anything blame OGS and Woodward ….they signed him.
His contract runs out in 2026.

He will be too old to be of value to a PL club by then if he does a Borgade.
 

Nickelodeon

Full Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Messages
2,351
He’s an employee given a contract by the club for extremely high wages. He’s about to sign one last contract which promises him lower wages. Why shouldn’t he seek a payout from the club? If your current employers wants to get rid of you, would any of the forum members happily leave their jobs without negotiating a decent severance?

Before raining the abuses, we should see him as a human being who’s asking for what he’s genuinely due. If as a professional, he decides to earn his bucks here than play at West Ham and strengthen his England case, the only reason he’s able to do that is because of our own incompetence.

Ultimately, I’m quite sure that a compromise will be reached and he’ll be off to West Ham. They can bluff all they want but they aren’t moving on to anyone else.
 

Van Piorsing

Lost his light sabre
Joined
Feb 10, 2006
Messages
22,581
Location
Polska
Fear not, lads. Special board meeting in upcoming days.

When you have that many arguments of volume and percentage, compromise is reachable.

 

windycityfan

New Member
Newbie
Joined
May 23, 2016
Messages
331
Location
Chicago, the USofA
This is the worst news I could get yet today. With the shit midfield showcased last night, I’m now even more convinced this bloke should never leave the bench again- imagine how many circles the Wolves would’ve ran around this statue of a footballer.

Really bad taste in my mouth. We need dynamic players with strong mentality. Maguire is the perfect opposite.
 

Devil You Know

New Member
Joined
Mar 21, 2023
Messages
1,225
Location
bed
So he gets rewarded for not being good enough?
He's being rewarded for not leaving Manchester United within a period of 6 years from the day on which he signed his contract. The fact that that stipulation is no longer one that United want to enforce is cost of doing business.
 

van Nistelrooy

Full Member
Joined
Jul 1, 2017
Messages
1,093
Maguire should be banished to the reserves, at least until the end of the window. No appearances on the bench. Don't give him hope. We need to show him the consequences more harshly.

You just know he'll still go to the Euros under Southgate if he's making the odd appearance off the bench. We need to remove that potential appearance, then see what Maguire thinks.

Let him disappear in the darkness until January, then just watch him cry for a move. Less money for us no doubt, but I just can't stand to have this deluded person as part of our squad any more!
 

united_99

Takes pleasure in other people's pain
Joined
Jul 4, 2012
Messages
9,580
It will get done. And we need to pay him the difference in wages.
Standard. No different to us loaning our players and still covering half their salary or if the the other club covers the entire salary then we get no or a very small loan fee. Or does anyone believe Martial played for free for Sevilla?
 

reddev3

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Sep 9, 2018
Messages
465
Future earnings are promised and the club now want to break the agreed contract to sell him on elsewhere. Therefore he is perfectly within his rights to negotiate terms to that contract being broken so he can go to another club. He has every right to expect Man Utd to pay him for it.
They don't want to break the agreed contract at all, They want to sell him which is well within their rights and if he is sold he isn't owed any payoff from Utd because he will be getting a new contract making ours void (like a new contract for higher wages a player might get mid contract for playing well, being sold for being crap to a lesser team on lower wages is basically the opposite and is what is going on here).

He is well within his rights to give up on his career and sit out his contract here for the rest of the money but don't make out he deserves the rest or even most of the remaining contract AND gets to move on to enjoy a new contract and challenge. You can't eat your cake and have it to.
 

IRN-BRUno

Full Member
Joined
May 26, 2021
Messages
1,207
Could we tear up his contract for gross misconduct? Was he ever prosecuted for what happened?
His retrial is in February.

That's another reason why we need to sell now, he doesn't have to attend but it's going to be an extra distraction for him and the club.
 

AndySmith1990

Full Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
6,469
How can anyone rationalise paying him the remainder of his contract? You get paid the entirity of a contract when you see out the entire contract by being an employee and doing your job for the full length of it. If we sell him then he's no longer an employee and he'll have already have been paid what he's owed by United up until that point of leaving. Paying him off means he'll get paid wages he's not earned here on top of additional wages he'll be earning at his new club. It's pure fecking greed. If he wants to stay and be a backup player fine. If he wants to leave then he should accept a wage decrease befitting of his status and value to his new employer. He'll still be richer than 99% of the population ffs
 

swissgenius

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2013
Messages
552
He's getting the remuneration that we deemed good enough. We signed him at 180k per week on a long term deal - that's on us. Not him.
Exactly, not so hard to grasp.

If a company hires me for 2 million a year and I somehow negotiate a 5-year length, I surely want to see those 10m in my pocket, even if they find a better one for the job after two years.
Yes there are some legends in the game who play on half wages for their hometown team, but you can't expect that from anyone.
As a club, you have to set very strict standards for your wage structure. You can't leave those standards just because you need a guy desperately or it's late into the transfer window. If they don't want to play within those structures, just move on.
 

Cantonagotmehere

Full Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2015
Messages
3,399
Location
Charm City, MD
Euros are gone for Harry. No way he plays for England if he stays here. I think that is the only thing that might get him to move. I really don't get it.
 

lsd

The Oracle
Joined
Jun 5, 2016
Messages
10,956
I was sure we would certainly get rid of Henderson, Maguire and McTominay this window.

Amazing it looks like they will all stay now. Wonder will the media keep talking about how professional Maguire is by deciding to sit this out over his money rather than go to a club where he can play every week
 

The Dane

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Oct 2, 2021
Messages
457
Location
Aarhus Denmark
Player power. If you are underperforming and not worth your wages you just sit your contract out. If you are over performing you demand a rise midway through your contract to prolong or hand in a transfer request and refuse to play if you are not sold.
 

Mainoldo

New Member
Joined
Sep 17, 2004
Messages
22,965
Clubs fault. If this was Bhoely this would have been dealt with. As crazy as he is.
 

100

binary bot
Joined
Jul 14, 2010
Messages
11,050
Location
HELLO
Wouldn’t blame him if sees out his contract. Contracts are set up to protect both player and club.
If anything blame OGS and Woodward ….they signed him.
Scarier thing is we’re doing the same thing under the current leadership. Just won’t realise it for a few years