- Joined
- Aug 26, 2022
- Messages
- 733
Just pay him and get rid.
Yes?Yeah, that's the bit that's confusing me over all this.
I've seen comparisons to the De Jong situation, but that was over deferred wages when Barcelona restructured the deal mid-contract. That's an unusual scenario. This is the run of the mill situation where a player is just being sold before the end of the contract but has received all wages up until then.
If compensation of millions is due to Maguire based on the wages for the rest of his contract, does that mean in situations where the player is the one pushing for the move then they have to compensate the club for millions of the transfer fee for 'breaking' the contract mid way through?
If I would earn that amount of money I would not give a shit no. If the decision is to either sit on the bench for 90% of the games and earn more or play regular football and earn less the choice would be easy. But it seems he is a money grabbing cnut.Ah ok, in that case I've spoke with your boss. Apparently they don't like you. But not to worry, I've found you a new job, I'm sure you'll like it more but you'll take home 50% less money and you need to move 200 miles away. I'm sure you'll jump at the chance to move though, right?
Totally agree, the club, Woodward, due to the Glazers rewarding failure, caused this mess. The money should come from their dividends.Just pay him up and be rid of him, rather than carry on paying him 190k every week for two years and leave on a free after. Club made the first mistake of paying 80m for him, then giving him 190k a week, now we have to pay for our mistakes.
Football agents do the negotiating, it's their job to get the best deal.What a greedy cnut.
We have been paying him huge wages for years, while 50% of the time he operated like a mid table player and costs us games.
We made him captain when large chunks of the team didnt respect or rate him.
Now instead of saying thank you and walking away for a great new start in London, he wants one last big pay cheque.
I didnt agree with all the abuse he got at stadiums, but if he does stay i hope he gets booed every second he touches the ball. See if the lump sum he wants is worth it then.
It's not really simply the cost, clubs pay players as part of leaving the club all the time, it just rarely gets reported on. And it's very rare players go to a club that will only pay them half of what they're currently on. That's on our football club giving him the big money in the first place, not him.And I really don't get why people don't understand that this is generally the cost of moving from a big club to a smaller club, which you as a player sometimes need to do because it's better for your career than sitting on the bench at a big club with "failure" virtually branded into your forehead. The player is perfectly entitled to prioritise the money and stay, but then there's a career and reputation cost to be paid. If he can persuade the selling club to take some of the sting out of it by making up some of the difference then he's fortunate, but it's not like this is something that can be expected. It is something that happens only exceptionally.
Of course you would. This idea that it's perfectly reasonable to walk away from half your expected earnings across the next two years to leave a club you don't even want to leave, to live somewhere you probably don't even want to live, is completely fecking insane.If I would earn that amount of money I would not give a shit no. If the decision is to either sit on the bench for 90% of the games and earn more or play regular football and earn less the choice would be easy. But it seems he is a money grabbing cnut.
players get sold all the time without getting the final year or two of their contractual obligation....why should 'arry be any different? why does he need to get paid out. This is just him and his agent being utter cnutsFootball agents do the negotiating, it's their job to get the best deal.
If I had been given a 5 year contract with £190k per year by some idiot, why would I walk away from it without getting the money I was promised?
I agree he is shite and doesn't deserve it though.
Guess he doesn't want to play football anymore.players get sold all the time without getting the final year or two of their contractual obligation....why should 'arry be any different? why does he need to get paid out. This is just him and his agent being utter cnuts
Yes?
If we pay 100M for Maguire to sign him to a 5 year contract, and a year later Real Madrid (stop laughing) express interest in him, and he pushes for a leave, we are well within our rights to tell him to
A. feck off and respect the contract
B. Ask Real to pay us 100M plus some, as we'll be needing the funds to replace Maguire
C. Pay a hefty fee out of pocket to walk away
Exactly, just do a city pay him under the table and get it over with.Just pay him and get rid.
To be quite fair, United fans are not used anymore at club players attracting that sort of interest or leaving without major financial loss.Yes?
If we pay 100M for Maguire to sign him to a 5 year contract, and a year later Real Madrid (stop laughing) express interest in him, and he pushes for a leave, we are well within our rights to tell him to
A. feck off and respect the contract
B. Ask Real to pay us 100M plus some, as we'll be needing the funds to replace Maguire
C. Pay a hefty fee out of pocket to walk away
may or may not be true if we pay out his contract....however this is just a true reflection of what a shit person he is by sticking it to EtH b/c he dropped him and took his captaincy awayGuess he doesn't want to play football anymore.
The costs to his career are overstated; he will find a place in a PL squad after his United days are over. Whether it's now or in 2 years. Plus, he's on the plane to the Euros next year.And I really don't get why people don't understand that this is generally the cost of moving from a big club to a smaller club, which you as a player sometimes need to do because it's better for your career than sitting on the bench at a big club with "failure" virtually branded into your forehead. The player is perfectly entitled to prioritise the money and stay, but then there's a career and reputation cost to be paid. If he can persuade the selling club to take some of the sting out of it by making up some of the difference then he's fortunate, but it's not like this is something that can be expected. It is something that happens only exceptionally.
Well yes of course I would. I even did it last year as i quit my job where I earned 50% more than now. But now I work much less hours. It's also stupid to compare footballers to normal people. He earns in a week (even at west ham) what the avarage person earns a year.It's not really simply the cost, clubs pay players as part of leaving the club all the time, it just rarely gets reported on. And it's very rare players go to a club that will only pay them half of what they're currently on. That's on our football club giving him the big money in the first place, not him.
Of course you would. This idea that it's perfectly reasonable to walk away from half your expected earnings across the next two years to leave a club you don't even want to leave, to live somewhere you probably don't even want to live, is completely fecking insane.
7 is from the Guardian, 15 from The sun (Custis)Is it 7M or 15M that he wants? The first one is kinda ok. It is our fault that we gave him a big contract.
The second one means he gets almost all the money we owe him, which means he is ok to stay, if he doesn't get his money and he doesn't care if he gets selected for English NT or not.
You really think someone's going to give him a big contract at age 32 and after 3 seasons of largely warming the bench? And that's he's necessarily on the plane to the Euros next summer if he hardly plays for United?The costs to his career are overstated; he will find a place in a PL squad after his United days are over. Whether it's now or in 2 years. Plus, he's on the plane to the Euros next year.
He's not the one in a bind. We are.
I understand the business and legal decisions being made by Maguire re: his contract, but it doesn’t make him less of a c***.He has to significantly drop his salary to leave and also drop down in size of club. What would you do in his situation?
The only person to blame is Woodward giving average players way above average salaries. None of them want to leave for that reason.
Place at the Euros I don't know. Being signed by a PL team ? Yes absolutely though maybe for less than what West Ham offers currently.You really think someone's going to give him a big contract at age 32 and after 3 seasons of largely warming the bench? And that's he's necessarily on the plane to the Euros next summer if he hardly plays for United?
The De Jong comparisons are wrong but it’s not far off.Yeah, that's the bit that's confusing me over all this.
I've seen comparisons to the De Jong situation, but that was over deferred wages when Barcelona restructured the deal mid-contract. That's an unusual scenario. This is the run of the mill situation where a player is just being sold before the end of the contract but has received all wages up until then.
If compensation of millions is due to Maguire based on the wages for the rest of his contract, does that mean in situations where the player is the one pushing for the move then they have to compensate the club for millions of the transfer fee for 'breaking' the contract mid way through?
So you didn't take a huge pay cut if you now work considerably less hoursWell yes of course I would. I even did it last year as i quit my job where I earned 50% more than now. But now I work much less hours. It's also stupid to compare footballers to normal people. He earns in a week (even at west ham) what the avarage person earns a year.
And he would trade Manchester for London, hardly a downgrade..
Presumably he does want to leave, otherwise there's nothing to even consider. He can just stay, no one can force him to go. And he'd be moving to London, so....It's not really simply the cost, clubs pay players as part of leaving the club all the time, it just rarely gets reported on. And it's very rare players go to a club that will only pay them half of what they're currently on. That's on our football club giving him the big money in the first place, not him.
Of course you would. This idea that it's perfectly reasonable to walk away from half your expected earnings across the next two years to leave a club you don't even want to leave, to live somewhere you probably don't even want to live, is completely fecking insane.
I don't think there's a "maybe" there, with another two years on the biological clock and 3 years out of being a regular. And I said "big contract".Place at the Euros I don't know. Being signed by a PL team ? Yes absolutely though maybe for less than what West Ham offers currently.
Well I wouldn't move to London either because I'm not rich. If you have that kind of money you have a perfectly comfortable life everywhere.So you didn't take a huge pay cut if you now work considerably less hours
And for a northerner, with a young family, settled not too far from their own families, moving to London probably is a huge downgrade in terms of his life comfortability. I'm a normal person and nobody could pay me enough to live near London.
Absolutely spitting feathersHaha knew it when those ETH quotes came out, bizarre thing to say just as he was "leaving". Shouldn't have even been on the bench last night either.
"And he'd be moving to London, so...." So what exactly?Presumably he does want to leave, otherwise there's nothing to even consider. He can just stay, no one can force him to go. And he'd be moving to London, so....
If anything is fecking insane, it's this seeming total belief that no one walks away from money out of other and broader concerns, ever. People do that all the time, for many and good reasons. Including people who can much less well afford it than Harry Maguire.
Meanwhile we are hamstrung with moneyIf he doesn't want to leave to go to West Ham then just say it. He is wasting West Ham and United's time...just say you are not interested in a move to West Ham. The End.
He wants to go and wants United to pay for it.If he doesn't want to leave to go to West Ham then just say it. He is wasting West Ham and United's time...just say you are not interested in a move to West Ham. The End.
I would expect he would be asking for the difference in pay between the West Ham and United contracts over the duration he has left of his United contract.Is it 7M or 15M that he wants? The first one is kinda ok. It is our fault that we gave him a big contract.
The second one means he gets almost all the money we owe him, which means he is ok to stay, if he doesn't get his money and he doesn't care if he gets selected for English NT or not.
Don't usually agree with booing but for not leaving I hope he gets some stick on SaturdayHe wants to go and wants United to pay for it.
Sounds like Trump saying he will build a wall and Mexico will pay for it.