Maguire | he stays!

theatreofdreams777

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Apr 30, 2022
Messages
303
Send him to the reserves and let him rot there. If PSG can do that with Mbappe, Neymar, Verratti etc. we should be able to do that with the feckin fridge too.
 

Abraxas

Full Member
Joined
Mar 6, 2021
Messages
6,107
It is not a matter of moral principles or being cheeky. Harry is doing what is best for him.
No shit. I'm looking at it from the clubs perspective and why the decision was made not to proceed with the pay off.
 

TheLord

Full Member
Joined
Nov 25, 2018
Messages
1,718
I'm not sure it's very productive to linger too much on it now. Maybe another offer comes this summer (doubt it but heh who knows). He'll be easier to move next year -at a reduced fee-.
I'd rather he was out and replaced this year but what can you do. From the little we really know about all this, I'm not sure I understand the stance of the club.
If the entire idea is to move him on next year, then won't we be better off letting him leave this season with a severance package, thus eliminating his weekly wages from our books, getting an immediate replacement, and grooming the new incoming player? That saves money; that improves our future. Why wait till next year?
 

Plastic Evra

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2023
Messages
1,865
Send him to the reserves and let him rot there. If PSG can do that with Mbappe, Neymar, Verratti etc. we should be able to do that with the feckin fridge too.
Mbappé is back on the squad, Neymar was transferred within 10 days of being told he was no longer part of the plan, and Verratti was allegedly told the same but that he'll train with the first team and be played as necessary if he can't find a buyer.
The "dropped to reserves" has been done but it's not that common.
 
Last edited:

Eddy_JukeZ

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2012
Messages
17,198
He doesn't care about playing week in and week out evidently.

Terrible transfer all-around though. I have no idea what we were thinking giving him this much money.
 

Borussia Teeth

Full Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
566
I really don't understand what the fuss is about for the payout. Pierre-Emerick Aubameyang, Mesut Ozil, Shkodran Mustafi and Sead Kolasinac have all been paid to leave the Emirates in the past three years. Pepe will be next.
You have better owners than we do. We probably can't afford to pay him off AND get a replacement. Personally, I would just go with Evans as 4th/5th choice and buy a new cb next summer.
 

Waynne

Full Member
Joined
Aug 21, 2014
Messages
1,956
He's like a turd the club just can't flush.

Got nothing against him as a person. He's probably an alright bloke to hang out with but his footballing abilities are not anywhere up to the standards for any top team and he needs to leave.
 

ThierryHenry14

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
4,341
Supports
Arsenal
You have better owners than we do. We probably can't afford to pay him off AND get a replacement. Personally, I would just go with Evans as 4th/5th choice and by a new cb next summer.
I am not familiar with the accounting side of both Arsenal and Man Utd. I only saw 50m or 43m (30m transfer fee + 13m wage saving) vs 7m. I am not familiar with the FFP calculation either. According to Redcafe Maguire will rot to reserve and never play so cost for replacement is irrelevant.
 

Someone

Something
Joined
Oct 21, 2007
Messages
7,984
Location
Somewhere
He's a liability. Him staying stops us from signing someone who can can actually contribute and add quality to our squad. It'll be almost impossible selling him next summer after another year of not playing, so that's him staying for another two years. We should've made it clear that he isn't gonna play, and if ETH did actually tell him that he's happy for him to stay and fight for his place then it's a massive mistake. He needs to be out of the squad.
 

Plastic Evra

Full Member
Joined
Jul 16, 2023
Messages
1,865
If the entire idea is to move him on next year, then won't we be better off letting him leave this season with a severance package, thus eliminating his weekly wages from our books, getting an immediate replacement, and grooming the new incoming player? That saves money; that improves our future. Why wait till next year?
I entirely agree but we're not privy to all the financial ins and outs, maybe when all factored it's too much of a bad deal to transfer him for that bid.
Next year his remaining amortization value should be 13m£ at most and only one year of wages to haggle over, even if he doesn't play a lot I could see a couple of teams possibly trying a punt at that price.
 

IamBurnsey

New Member
Newbie
Joined
Aug 14, 2023
Messages
104
The thought of him being relied upon in anyway at all just disturbs me, most times you see him play he just seems capable of doing something utterly daft, this club just seems so amateurish at times!
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,981
Nah with 20k after 2 years the math doesn’t add up.

WHU most likely will have offered him 4 years contract. If he played well and got a one year extension then he’s ahead. 4 years contract equals his United pay. He will be 34 at the time and considering nutrition and fitness levels, preserving his value he could get 1-2 years at least at lower level probably at around 50-60k.

if he’s marginalised at United, he’d be 32, zero form, zero credentials anymore, most likely forgotten and getting pay as you play, don’t see any PL team touching him apart from recently promoted and Luton for example are paying their star players 10k per week?

if he was banking on him and keeping shape and prolonging his career then getting playing time should be his goal. If he’s unsure of his qualities but still want to get the bag - then yeah getting the promised bag sitting in a corner seems the safe option.
Your calculus doesn't make sense. You think he will earn more as a 34 year old than as a 32 year old? That is highly doubtful. Even then, he will have earned as much by 32 if he remains on his current contract as he would do on West Ham's offer by 34 years old, so under no circumstance should he walk away from his contract unless United make up the difference. That is objectively the correct financial decision.
 

Borussia Teeth

Full Member
Joined
Oct 18, 2019
Messages
566
I am not familiar with the accounting side of both Arsenal and Man Utd. I only saw 50m or 43m (30m transfer fee + 13m wage saving) vs 7m. I am not familiar with the FFP calculation either. According to Redcafe Maguire will rot to reserve and never play so cost for replacement is irrelevant.
I'm also not sure about the accounting side of things. To me, it seems that Josh Kronke has backed Arteta in getting rid of his unwanted players at all costs. This is not something the Glazers will do.

I don't think Maguire will (nor should) 'rot in the reserves' if he stays. It's a long season, 5th choice will get some minutes here and there.
 

RedDevil@84

Full Member
Joined
Jun 5, 2014
Messages
21,787
Location
USA
No shit. I'm looking at it from the clubs perspective and why the decision was made not to proceed with the pay off.
He couldn't agree personal terms with West Ham. So the payoff doesn't even come into the picture. Unless we are talking about terminating his contract and paying him salary for next 2 years.
 

Todd

Full Member
Joined
Mar 7, 2011
Messages
3,510
Location
Indiana, USA
Just watched a highlight reel on YouTube of many of Slabhead's greatest blunders in a United shirt. Absolutely shocking this guy has been allowed to stay on as long as he has.

The day he stood and waited on the ball to come to him against Leicester and thus allowed them to pounce on it and score was the day I was done with Maguire.

Failing to unload him this summer will be the greatest failure we could have made in this window.
 

Enigma_87

You know who
Joined
Aug 7, 2008
Messages
27,664
Your calculus doesn't make sense. You think he will earn more as a 34 year old than as a 32 year old? That is highly doubtful. Even then, he will have earned as much by 32 if he remains on his current contract as he would do on West Ham's offer by 34 years old, so under no circumstance should he walk away from his contract unless United make up the difference. That is objectively the correct financial decision.
At 34 with regular playing time compared to 32 with no playing time for 2 years? Yes I think the former option would be better for the buying club. Besides if he’s good at WH he might get an extension to very similar terms to the 100k he’d be on.
If he warmed the bench for 2 years who will objectively take 32 years old Maguire on their roster?
The difference is that Maguire has to put up the work during those three - four years to keep the level he is at. If he has doubts - yes just banking it up and retire at 32 is the safer bet.
 

JagUTD

Full Member
Joined
Sep 20, 2022
Messages
3,225
Will provide competition for Jonny Evans while also being useful as a threat to the likes of Varane and Onana if they drop below the required level.

"Play like that again and I'm getting the Harry out"
 

ThierryHenry14

Full Member
Joined
Dec 30, 2015
Messages
4,341
Supports
Arsenal
At 34 with regular playing time compared to 32 with no playing time for 2 years? Yes I think the former option would be better for the buying club. Besides if he’s good at WH he might get an extension to very similar terms to the 100k he’d be on.
If he warmed the bench for 2 years who will objectively take 32 years old Maguire on their roster?
The difference is that Maguire has to put up the work during those three - four years to keep the level he is at. If he has doubts - yes just banking it up and retire at 32 is the safer bet.
I would say that would be the safer bet. Why give up something he has on his hand for the money he may earn in the future? It makes no sense unless he is a young player looking for game time to develop.

The deal is off for now. There is still 2 weeks left in the window and anything can happen.
 

ayushreddevil9

Foootball hinders the adrenaline of transfers.
Joined
Jul 11, 2015
Messages
10,346
Will provide competition for Jonny Evans while also being useful as a threat to the likes of Varane and Onana if they drop below the required level.

"Play like that again and I'm getting the Harry out"
Which is followed by a burst in laughter from all involved in the discussion
 

Fridge chutney

Full Member
Joined
Sep 11, 2016
Messages
8,981
At 34 with regular playing time compared to 32 with no playing time for 2 years? Yes I think the former option would be better for the buying club. Besides if he’s good at WH he might get an extension to very similar terms to the 100k he’d be on.
If he warmed the bench for 2 years who will objectively take 32 years old Maguire on their roster?
The difference is that Maguire has to put up the work during those three - four years to keep the level he is at. If he has doubts - yes just banking it up and retire at 32 is the safer bet.
He's not going to have no playing time though, is he? He played 800 premier league minutes last year and featured in 16 games, starting 8. He featured in 31 games for us across all comps and started in 15 or 16. If he is available, then ETH will use him. If not, he can reassess next year and negotiate an exit.

It makes no sense for him to leave money on the table.
 

Eugenius

Full Member
Joined
May 10, 2009
Messages
3,938
Location
Behind You
People just want to slag him off. But the guy has realistically 5 years left of his career. Beyond that he has no idea on what he can earn. He is being asked to give up £7m over the course of 2 of those 5 years. Makes no sense unless he really thinks his career will be over at 32.
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
9,096
If it's true that Ten Hag is happy to have him as a squad player fighting for his place, then he's probably the one to be annoyed at. Hard to blame a player for staying at a bigger club that are in 4 comps and making more money.
 

RedSky

Shepherd’s Delight
Scout
Joined
Jul 27, 2006
Messages
74,404
Location
Hereford FC (Soccermanager)
Hope he's included in the match day squad so the fans can tell him what we think of this greedy feck. Should be brought on in the final few minutes so he gets the message.

Twat of a man.

Honestly been a long time since I've hated a United player, probably Di Maria.
 

Dec9003

Correctly predicted Portugal to win Euro 2016
Joined
Jul 31, 2015
Messages
9,096
Hope he's included in the match day squad so the fans can tell him what we think of this greedy feck. Should be brought on in the final few minutes so he gets the message.

Twat of a man.
Why is he greedy?